parcc results: spring 2016 and ... - summit public schools · spring 2016 and spring 2017 cohort...
TRANSCRIPT
Measuring College and Career Readiness
PARCC RESULTS:SPRING 2016 AND SPRING 2017
ADMINISTRATIONS
SUMMIT PUBLIC SCHOOLSSeptember 14, 2017
1
◼2017 marks the 3rd administration of the Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) and the second year for similar assessments to be given.
◼The following slides will compare year two and three results.
◼Assessments Administered:▪PARCC English Language Arts and Literacy Assessments (ELA/L) in grades 3 – 11.▪PARCC Mathematics Assessments in grades 3 – 8 and End of Course Assessments in Algebra I, Geometry, and Algebra II.
NEW JERSEY’S STATEWIDE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM
2
◼Level 1: Not yet meeting grade-level expectations
◼Level 2: Partially meeting grade-level expectations
◼Level 3: Approaching grade-level expectations
◼Level 4: Meeting grade-level expectations
◼Level 5: Exceeding grade-level expectations
PARCC PERFORMANCE LEVELS
3
Students Tested out of Total EnrollmentGrade Level Year to Year
Change2016 2017
Grade3 327/333=98% 312/321=97% -1%Grade4 311/324=96% 326/332=98% +2%Grade5 273/294=89% 317/323=98% +9%Grade6 296/306=97% 272/290=94% -3%Grade7 289/314=92% 295/315=94% +2%Grade8 293/321=91% 291/322=90% -1%Grade9 295/315=94% 283/290=98% +4%Grade10 253/311=81% 223/311=72% -9%Grade11* 197/342=58% 121/307=39% -19%
STUDENTS TESTED ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY
Note: “Students Tested” represents individual valid test scores for English Language Arts/Literacy. 4
Students Tested out of Total Enrollment Grade Level Year to Year
Change2016 2017
Grade 3 329/333=99% 312/321= 97% -2%Grade 4 318/324=98% 331/332=99% +1%Grade 5 276/294=94% 320/323=99% +5%Grade 6 300/305=98% 274/290=94% -4%Grade 7 295/317=93% 296/315=94% +1%Grade 8* 156/170=92% 167/188= 89% -3%Algebra I (Gr. 8)* 138/143=97% 127/134=95% -2%Algebra I (HS) 159/215=80% 157/186= 84% +4%Geometry 205/325=63% 215/298= 72% +9%Algebra II 160/336=48% 152/294=52% +4%
STUDENTS TESTEDMATHEMATICS
*Some students in grade 8 participated in the PARCC Algebra I assessment in place of the 8th grade Math assessment. Thus, PARCC Math 8 outcomes are not representative of grade 8 performance as a whole.
Notes: “Students Tested” represents individual valid test scores for Mathematics.
5
6
STUDENT REFUSALS
2016-2017RefusalsGrade3 8Grade4 4Grade5 2
ELA MATHGrade6 12 Grade6 13Grade7 14 Grade7 12Grade8 21 Grade8 16Grade9 1 Grade8Alg1 6Grade10 84 Algebra1 7Grade11 184 Algebra2 135
Geometry 51
SPRING 2017 PARCC ADMINISTRATIONENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY
7
40% 43% 43% 50%
56% 59%
81% 87% 86%
GRADE 3 GRADE 4 GRADE 5
Cross State State District
8
SPRING 2017 PARCC ADMINISTRATIONENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY
36% 43% 56% 54% 55% 54% 65%
52% 4%
7%
25% 12%
34% 27% 21%
34%
Grade 3
Met Expectations Exceeded Expectations
9
SPRING 2017 PARCC ADMINISTRATIONENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY
34% 41% 39% 62%
31% 32% 28% 37%
9% 15%
48% 26%
62% 37%
63% 49%
Grade 4
Met Expectations Exceeded Expectations
SPRING 2017 PARCC ADMINISTRATIONENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY
10
38% 48% 50% 36%
63% 58% 36%
55% 5%
11% 36%
34%
31% 24% 59% 32%
Grade 5
Met Expectations Exceeded Expectations
11
SPRING 2017 PARCC ADMINISTRATIONENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY
40% 45% 43%
53% 59% 59%
80% 81% 77%
GRADE 6 GRADE 7 GRADE 8Cross State State District
SPRING 2017 PARCC ADMINISTRATIONENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY
12
34% 41% 45% 31% 35% 39% 33% 40% 48%
6% 12%
35%
14% 24%
42%
10%
19%
29%
CROSS STATE
STATE DISTRICT CROSS STATE
STATE DISTRICT CROSS STATE
STATE DISTRICT
GRADE 6 GRADE 7 GRADE 8Met Expectations Exceeded Expectations
SPRING 2017 PARCC ADMINISTRATIONENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY
13
43% 45% 37%
51% 45%
37%
79%
59% 49%
GRADE 9 GRADE 10 GRADE 11
Cross State State District
SPRING 2017 PARCC ADMINISTRATIONENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY
14
33% 37% 48%
31% 31% 34% 29% 29% 21%
10% 14%
31%
14% 14% 25%
8% 8% 28%
CROSS STATE
STATE DISTRICT CROSS STATE
STATE DISTRICT CROSS STATE
STATE DISTRICT
GRADE 9 GRADE 10 GRADE 11Met Expectations Exceeded Expectations
SPRING 2016 AND SPRING 2017 COHORT ANALYSISENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY
Note: “Students Tested” represents individual valid test scores for English Language Arts/Literacy. 15
Cohort Analysis of Proficiency
2015-2016 2016-2017Grade Level Year to Year
ChangeGrade3 81% 81% =
Grade4 84% 87% +3%
Grade5 83% 86% +3%
Grade6 76% 81% +5%
Grade7 82% 81% -1%
Grade8 80% 77% -3%
Grade9 79% 79% 0
Grade10 69% 59% -10%
Grade11 60% 49% -11%
16
SPRING 2017 PARCC ADMINISTRATIONMATHEMATICS
43% 36% 35%
53% 48% 46%
81% 80% 73%
GRADE 3 GRADE 4 GRADE 5Cross State State District
SPRING 2017 PARCC ADMINISTRATIONMATHEMATICS
17
33% 39% 52% 53% 44% 53% 56% 52%
10% 14%
29% 23% 34% 25% 33% 30%
Grade 3
Met Expectations Exceeded Expectations
18
SPRING 2017 PARCC ADMINISTRATIONMATHEMATICS
32% 41% 64% 68% 75%
48% 57% 64% 4% 7%
16% 13% 20%
10% 21% 17%
Grade 4
Met Expectations Exceeded Expectations
19
SPRING 2017 PARCC ADMINISTRATIONMATHEMATICS
29% 37% 50%
34% 54% 54% 54% 52% 6%
9%
23% 25%
26% 16% 32%
17%
Grade 5
Met Expectations Exceeded Expectations
SPRING 2017 PARCC ADMINISTRATIONMATHEMATICS
20
32% 28% 26% 36%
44% 40% 28%
42%
69% 60%
49%
97%
GRADE 6 GRADE 7 GRADE 8* ALGEBRA I (GR. 8)
Cross State State District
SPRING 2017 PARCC ADMINISTRATIONMATHEMATICS
21
27% 35% 49%
25% 34%
45%
23% 27% 48%
33% 37%
69% 78%
5% 9%
20%
3% 6%
15%
3% 1%
1%
3% 5%
8%
19%
CROSS STATE
STATE DISTRICT CROSS STATE
STATE DISTRICT CROSS STATE
STATE DISTRICT CROSS STATE
STATE DISTRICT SCHOOL
GRADE 6 GRADE 7 GRADE 8 GRADE 8 ALG. I
Met Expectations Exceeded Expectations
SPRING 2017 PARCC ADMINISTRATIONMATHEMATICS
22
36% 32% 27%
42%
30% 27%
62% 70%
78%
ALGEBRA I (HS) GEOMETRY ALGEBRA II
Cross State State District
SPRING 2017 PARCC ADMINISTRATIONMATHEMATICS
23
33% 37%
69% 62%
28% 26%
52%
24% 24%
58% 3%
5%
8%
0%
4% 4%
18%
3% 3%
20%
CROSS STATE
STATE DISTRICT SHS CROSS STATE
STATE DISTRICT CROSS STATE
STATE DISTRICT
ALGEBRA I GEOMETRY ALGEBRA IIMet Expectations Exceeded Expectations
SPRING 2016 AND SPRING 2017 COHORT ANALYSIS MATHEMATICS
*Some students in grade 8 participated in the PARCC Algebra I assessment in place of the 8th grade Math assessment. Thus, PARCC Math 8 outcomes are not representative of grade 8 performance as a whole.
24
Cohort Analysis of Proficiency
2015-2016 2016-2017 YeartoYearChange
Grade3 82% 81% -1%
Grade4 73% 80% +7%
Grade5 75% 73% -2%
Grade6 67% 70% +3%
Grade7 64% 60% -4%
Grade8* 44% 49% +5%
AlgebraI.(Gr.8)* 99% 97% -2%
AlgebraI(HS) 53% 62% +9%
Geometry 69% 70% +1%
AlgebraII 60% 79% +19%
COMPARISON OF SPRING 2016 AND SPRING 2017ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY
PERFORMANCE LEVELS
25
2% 5% 12%
54%
27% 2% 4% 14%
56%
25%
LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4 LEVEL 5
Grade 3
2016 2017
2% 3% 12%
46% 38%
1% 4% 8% 39% 48%
LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4 LEVEL 5
Grade 4
2016 2017
1% 3% 13%
49% 34%
0% 3% 10% 50%
36%
LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4 LEVEL 5
Grade 5
2016 2017
COMPARISON OF SPRING 2016 AND SPRING 2017ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY
PERFORMANCE LEVELS
26
2% 5% 17%
52%
24% 2% 4% 13% 46% 35%
LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4 LEVEL 5
Grade 6
2016 2017
4% 3% 11%
40% 42%
2% 2% 15% 39% 42%
LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4 LEVEL 5
Grade 7
2016 2017
4% 2% 14%
48% 32%
4% 6% 13% 48%
29%
LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4 LEVEL 5
Grade 8
2016 2017
COMPARISON OF SPRING 2016 AND SPRING 2017ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY
PERFORMANCE LEVELS
27
3% 5% 12%
46% 33%
6% 2% 13% 48%
31%
LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4 LEVEL 5
Grade 9
2016 2017
7% 8% 16%
31% 38%
14% 9% 17% 34%
25%
LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4 LEVEL 5
Grade 10
2016 2017
9% 12% 18%
41%
19% 15% 11% 25% 21% 28%
LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4 LEVEL 5
Grade 11
2016 2017
COMPARISON OF SPRING 2016 AND SPRING 2017MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVELS
28
2% 4% 12%
50%
32% 1% 4% 15%
52% 29%
LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4 LEVEL 5
Grade 3
2016 2017
2% 7% 18%
60%
13% 2% 5% 12%
64%
16%
LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4 LEVEL 5
Grade 4
2016 2017
3% 8% 14%
50%
25% 3% 7% 17%
50% 23%
LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4 LEVEL 5
Grade 5
2016 2017
COMPARISON OF SPRING 2016 AND SPRING 2017MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVELS
29
3% 9% 21%
53%
14% 5% 8% 17% 50%
20%
LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4 LEVEL 5
Grade 6
2016 2017
2% 8% 26%
51%
13% 2% 9% 28% 45%
15%
LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4 LEVEL 5
Grade 7
2016 2017
13% 16% 27%
44%
0% 8% 19% 24% 48%
1%
LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4 LEVEL 5
Grade 8
2016 2017
0% 0% 1%
76%
23% 0% 1% 2%
78%
19%
LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4 LEVEL 5
Grade 8 Algebra I
2016 2017
COMPARISON OF SPRING 2016 AND SPRING 2017MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVELS
30
6% 11% 30%
52%
1% 4% 10% 24%
62%
0%
LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4 LEVEL 5
Algebra I
2016 2017
3% 12% 16%
49%
20% 1% 8% 21%
52%
18%
LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4 LEVEL 5
Geometry
2016 2017
9% 11% 18%
54%
8% 5% 7% 11%
59%
20%
LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4 LEVEL 5
Algebra II
2016 2017
RESOURCES FOR PARENTS
◼PARCC Resources for Parentshttp://www.state.nj.us/education/assessment/parents/
◼Understanding the student score reports (with translations): understandthescore.org/
Sample report31