parallel operation of one-cycle controlled three …medinid/energy-gordon/smedley/pocc...parallel...
TRANSCRIPT
U C IP E L
UCI Power Electronics Lab
Parallel Operation of One-Cycle Controlled
Three-Phase Inverters
Yang Chen and Keyue Smedley
Power Electronics LaboratoryUniversity of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA
E-mail: [email protected]
U C IP E L
UCI Power Electronics Lab
Outline
• Introduction;
• Review of three-phase OCC gird-connected inverters;
• Concept for OCC inverters in parallel;
• Implementation circuit of the controller;
• Experimental verification;
• Conclusions.
1
U C IP E L
UCI Power Electronics Lab
Introduction
Three-phase grid-connected inverters:
• Converting photovoltaic or fuel cell DC to AC;
• to the present utility power grids;
• with high power quality, high efficiency, and low switchinglosses.
Advantages of paralleled inverters over a single one with a large power rating:
• Higher expandability due to modular configuration;
• Higher reliability due to redundancy design;
• Cost-effectiveness.
2
U C IP E L
UCI Power Electronics Lab
Reported methods
• Current Sharing: Droop method; Average current sharing method; Master-Slave (MS) method )
Dedicative MSAutomatic MS (Democratic)
• Circulating Current limiting Inductors or current-balancers; Instantaneous current deviation cancellation; Control the duty ratios of zero vectors in discontinuous SVM.
Two major concerns related to parallel inverters in a three-phase system:
3
U C IP E L
UCI Power Electronics Lab
Proposed method
• Good current balance capability;
• Limited circulating current;
• Low switching losses;
• Minimized communication burden;
• Simple circuitry;
• Modular design and flexible installation.
4
U C IP E L
UCI Power Electronics Lab
OCC Grid-Connected Inverter
Six-switch bridge topology
Switching-cycle average model 5
Six regions in each line cycle
U C IP E L
UCI Power Electronics Lab
€
23 − 1
3 − 13
− 13
23 − 1
3
− 13 − 1
323
⋅
dapdbpdcp
=1E⋅
vavbvc
Input - output relationship:
Since the matrix is singular, non-unique solutions exist.
€
dap = K1+vaE
dbp = K1+vbE
dcp = K1+vcE
€
2 /3 −1/3−1/3 2 /3
⋅dapdcp
=
1Evavc
Two possible solutions:
U C IP E L
UCI Power Electronics Lab
OCC with Bipolar Operation Mode
OCC controller with bipolar mode
• All three-phase currents are used togenerate duty ratios ;
• It doesn’t require the condition ofia+ib+ic=0;
• All the switches are operated inswitching frequency, the switchinglosses are high.
Control equations :
−=⋅−
−=⋅−
−=⋅−
)1(
)1(
)1(
1
1
1
K
dViRKv
K
dViRKv
K
dViRKv
cpmcsc
bpmbsb
apmasa
7
U C IP E L
UCI Power Electronics Lab
• Only two phase currents areused for generating twoindependent duty ratios in eachregion ;
• ia+ib+ic=0 is always satisfied inan individual inverter;
• The phase current with themaximum absolute value is notswitched at high frequency. Theswitching losses are lower.
OCC with Vector Operation Mode
⋅−⋅
⋅−⋅=
⋅
⋅
cpmcb
apmab
c
as dVvK
dVvK
i
iR
21
12
Control equation in Region I:
OCC controller (vector mode)6
U C IP E L
UCI Power Electronics Lab
OCC Inverters in Parallel Operation
Parallel operation of two inverters
• Current Sharing and Power Distribution
8
js
m
j vREV
Ki
−=
23 rmss
m
total VRE
VK
P−
=
Phase current( j = a, b, c )
Output power
• ij is only affected by Rs, provided that Vm, E and vj are equal for each module;
• Output power could be unevenly distributed to each module which has a different Rs.
U C IP E L
UCI Power Electronics Lab
• Current crosslink is unavoidable;
• Circulating currents always go through the phases which are not switched at switching frequency.
Equivalent circuit of circulating current loop
• Circulating current loop behaves as a first-order system;
• The circulating iz has an initial value anddecays during that region with a very largetime constant.
• Circulating Current Control
Equivalent circuit of two paralleled inverters in Region I
9
U C IP E L
UCI Power Electronics Lab
• Theoretical analysis of iz:
2
12
2 cz R
EEi
−=
satisfied by current sharing
• DC bus voltage control can hardly detect iz,
• Sharing Vm can’t limit the circulating current.
τ/tzoz eIi −=
42
21
cc
bb
RRLL
++
=τ
•Time constant is very large due to a small value of Rc2;• If Izo is reduced at starting points, iz will be decaying in that region. Thus the circulating current is limited;• The idea is: to use bipolar mode to limit iz; and use vector mode to reduce switching losses.
From equivalent circulating loop:
2121
2121
,
,
cpcpapap
ccaa
dddd
iiii
==
>>=<<>>=<<
10
U C IP E L
UCI Power Electronics Lab
Proposed OCC Controller For Parallel Operation
• Three current sensors are used for detecting circulating currents;
• When iz is over pre-set limit, controller switches to bipolar mode; otherwise, it remains in vector mode operation;
• Only simple add-on is required to the original control core. It remains simple.
Diagram of OCC controller
11
U C IP E L
UCI Power Electronics Lab
Experimental Results
12
va
ia1
ia2
va
ia1,ia2(overlapped)
iz1
iz2
iz1
iz2
Without proposed control method With proposed control method
Circulating currentswith a gain of 5
(5A/div)
Phase A voltage(140V/div)
Input currents(5A/div)
Two OCCinverters witheven powerdistribution.
The circulating current is reducedto 25%.
U C IP E L
UCI Power Electronics Lab
Alternation between vector and bipolar operation
• The controller switches to bipolar mode when iz is greater than the pre-set limit;
• When iz decays to below this limit, the system will be switched back to the vector operation;
• Pre-set limits are chosen so that the controller is in vector mode for most of the time; bipolar mode only happens for limiting circulating currents.
Vector
Bipolar Sap (2V/div)
ia1 (5A/div)
13
U C IP E L
UCI Power Electronics Lab
va
ia1
ia2
Phase A voltage(140V/div)
Input currents(5A/div)
• 2 sets of OCC inverters with uneven power distribution;
• By letting Rs2=1.5Rs1 , the output power is 1.5kW for Inverter1 and 1kW for Inverter2
14
U C IP E L
UCI Power Electronics Lab
Conclusions
A new control method is proposed for parallel operation of OCC grid-connected inverters;
Current sharing is achieved by sharing a DC signal among paralleled modules, which is very flexible for installation;
The circulating current is limited and the system preserves the advantages of low switching losses;
There are only a small add-on to the original OCC controller; so the circuit remains simple and low-cost.
15