parallel and perpendicular flows driven by stochastic ...d. craig wheaton college. goal: identify...

12
TTF Workshop 25-28 March, 2008 Boulder, CO Parallel and Perpendicular Flows driven by Stochastic Magnetic Fields in MST D.L. Brower W.X. Ding, T. Yates University of California at Los Angeles G. Fiksel, J.S. Sarff, S.C. Prager and the MST Group University of Wisconsin-Madison D. Craig Wheaton College

Upload: others

Post on 29-Jan-2021

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • TTF Workshop

    25-28 March, 2008

    Boulder, CO

    Parallel and Perpendicular Flowsdriven by Stochastic Magnetic Fields in MST

    D.L. Brower

    W.X. Ding, T. YatesUniversity of California at Los Angeles

    G. Fiksel, J.S. Sarff, S.C. Prager and the MST GroupUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison

    D. CraigWheaton College

  • GOAL: Identify the role of stochastic magnetic fields in momentumtransport and flow generation during reconnection

    Results:

    (1) transport of parallel momentum from stochastic fields is measuredand found to be significant in the plasma core……matching parallel velocity relaxation

    (2) Stochastic field driven charge transport produces localized perpendicular flow and radial electric field (shear)

    …….to be presented at poster

  • MST Reversed-Field Pinch (RFP) is toroidal configuration with relatively weak toroidal magnetic field BT ( i.e., BT ~ Bp)

    Madison Symmetric Torus - MST

    R0 = 1.5 m, a = 0.51 m, Ip < 600 kA BT ~ 3-4 kG, ne ~ 1019 m-3, Te0 < 1.3 keV τE ~ 10 ms, β =

    /B2(a)=15%

  • Field Line Puncture Plot

    Toro

    idal

    Ang

    le / π

    r/a

    Puncture Plot of B Field in MST

    magnetic field in MST is typically stochastic andshould contribute to momentum transport

    • J. Finn (1991?) suggests momentum diffusion with D ~ Dm cs• Plugging in MST parameters: τm ~ 1 ms in ambient case

    τm ~ 100 µs during relaxation event

  • • Momentum density in z direction being transferred in xdirection is

    • Assuming a strong B field with small fluctuations and taking zalong B, we can write the contribution from parallel streamingparticles using vz ≅ v|| and vx ≅ v|| (bx/B) as

    • Averaging over flux surface (z and y directions) we get theaverage momentum flux.

    momentum transport by stochastic B field

    vdvvmf xz3

    ! v)(x,

    !

    f (x,v)" m v||2bx

    Bd3v =

    p||bx

    B

    B

    bp x >< ||

  • • If = 0, then we are left with

    • In order for the momentum at x to change, need more fluxcoming in from –x than that leaving toward +x.

    • above relation provides a direct measure of the transport of momentum along the mean magnetic field direction due to stochastic magnetic field.

    • Substituting , we get two terms

    !

    Flux : "rmom

    =< ˜ p

    ||˜ b x >

    B

    !!

    "

    #

    $$

    %

    & ><'(

    )

    >

    B

    &

    ' (

    )

    * + $ n%

    < ˜ T ||

    ˜ b x

    >

    B

    &

    ' (

    )

    * +

    !

    ˜ p //

    = T//

    ˜ n + n ˜ T //

  • Momentum transported from core to the edgeduring reconnection

    During reconnection, parallel momentum redistributes within ~100 µs,much faster than classical collision time.

    25

    20

    15

    10

    km

    /s

    -2 -1 0 1 2time [ms]

    Toroidal flow r/a=0

  • Stochastic field-driven transport is directly measured(first term only)

    • Measure T//,ion with Rutherford Scattering (or CHERS)• Measure br and B with FIR laser Faraday Rotation• Measure with differential FIR interferometer

    • Measurement details provided at poster….!

    ˜ n and " ˜ n

    !

    "< #v||

    >

    "t~ $T

    ||%

    < ˜ n ˜ b r

    >

    B

    &

    ' (

    )

    * + $ n%

    < ˜ T ||

    ˜ b r

    >

    B

    &

    ' (

    )

    * +

    Convection

  • FIR Polarimeter-Interferometer System

    MST!

    " ~ ndl# + ˜ n dl#

    Interferometer

    11 chords, Δx~ 8 cm, Δφ~ 0.05o , Δt~ 1µs

    !

    " ˜ #

    "x"x ~ 1mm

    !

    " ~ nr B • d

    r l + n ˜

    r

    b • dr l + ˜ n

    r B • d

    r l ###

    Differential Interferometer

    Faraday rotation

    !

    ˜ n

    !

    " ˜ n

    !

    ˜ b and ˜ j

    !

    ˜

    r

    b • dr l

    L

    " = µ0 ˜ I # $˜ %

    1& ˜ %

    2

    cF n 0' ˜ j #

  • At x=-2 cm

    Momentum flux and parallel momentum change

    !

    "mom

    = T//,i

    < ˜ n ̃ b r

    >

    B

    Magnetic fluctuation-induced (convective) flux drives parallel momentum drop!

    r / a = 0.04 -T//,i"< ˜ n ̃ b

    r>

    B

    # < $V// >

    #t-8

    -6

    -4

    -2

    0

    2

    4

    N/m

    3

    1.51.00.50.0-0.5-1.0Time [ms]

    !

    " < #V// >

    "t+ T//,i$

    < ˜ n ̃ b r

    >

    B% 0

    m=1, n=6,7,8,9

    800

    600

    400

    200

    0

    Ti [e

    V]

    1.51.00.50.0-0.5-1.0Time [ms]

  • Momentum flux changes direction away from magnetic axis

    !

    r /a = 0.04 " < #V

    //>

    "t

    -$ •%mom

    !

    r /a = 0.45

    -8

    -6

    -4

    -2

    0

    2

    4

    N/m

    3

    1.51.00.50.0-0.5-1.0Time [ms]

    4

    2

    0

    -2

    -4

    N/m

    3

    1.51.00.50.0-0.5-1.0time [ms]

    Direction change consistent with momentum transport(not total momentum loss)

    30

    20

    10

    0

    -10

    [km

    /s]

    1.51.00.50.0-0.5-1.0Time [ms]

    40

    30

    20

    10

    0

    -10

    V// [

    km

    /s]

    1.51.00.50.0-0.5-1.0Time [ms]

    !

    < "V//

    >

    # $ •%mom& dt

  • Summary: Stochastic magnetic fields drive parallel and perpendicular flows

    Measurements indicate :

    Momentum transport(convective)

    !

    "rmom

    =< ˜ p //

    ˜ b r >stochastic magnetic field

    tearing mode coupling

    Parallel Velocity Relaxation

    Charge Transport

    Perpendicular Zonal Flow

    Radial Electric Field !

    Er

    = "Te#n

    e

    nee

    Increasing Density Gradient

    !

    "q = "ri#"r

    e

    !

    V"i

    = #Er

    B