paper 395
TRANSCRIPT
7/23/2019 Paper 395
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/paper-395 1/4
APJEM
ArthPrabhand: A Journal of Economics and Management
Vol. 4 Issue 3 March 2015, ISSN 2278-0629, pp. 134-150
J
h t t p : / / w w w . p
r j . c o . i n
Engineering Design Requirements Ranking in Qfd by Fuzzy Data
Envelopment Analysis
Mohammad Molani Aghdam*,Mostafa Jafarian Jelodar**, Iraj Mahdavi***
*Department of Industrial Engineering, Ayatollah Amoli Branch, Islamic Azad University, Amol, Iran
** Department of Industrial Engineering, Ayatollah Amoli Branch, Islamic Azad University, Amol, Iran
***Department of Industrial Engineering, Mazandaran University of Science and Technology,Babol, Iran
Abstract
Quality function deployment (QFD) is a product development technique thattranslates customer requirements into activities for the development of products and
services. From the viewpoint of QFDs designers, product design processes are performed in uncertain environments, and usually more than one goal must be taken
into account. Therefore, when dealing with the fuzzy nature in QFD processes, fuzzy
approaches are applied to formulate the relationships between customer
requirements (CRs) and engineering design requirements (DRs). However littleacademic work exists on methodologies for deriving the relative importance of DRs
When several additional factors (cost and environmental impact) are considered.
DEA provides a general framework facilitating QFD computations when more
factors need to be considered. In this paper, the fuzzy data envelopment analysis
aims to rank DRs to maximize the customer satisfaction. Finally, the applicability ofthe proposed models in practice is demonstrated with a numerical example.
Keywords: Quality function deployment, Customer Requirements, Design
Requirements, Fuzzy Data Envelopment Analysis.
___________________________________________________________________
7. References
Aguwa, C., C, Monplaisir, L &Turgut, O., (2012), Voice of the customer: Customer satisfactionratio based analysis, Expert Systems with Applications, 39 , 10112 – 10119.
Akao, Y., (1990), Quality function deployment: Integrating customer requirements into product
design, Cambridge, MA: Productivity Press.
7/23/2019 Paper 395
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/paper-395 2/4
APJEM
ArthPrabhand: A Journal of Economics and Management
Vol. 4 Issue 3 March 2015, ISSN 2278-0629, pp. 134-150
J
h t t p : / / w w w . p
r j . c o . i n
Azadi, M &Saen, R., F., (2013), A combination of QFD and imprecise DEA with enhanced
Russell graph measure: A case study in healthcare, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 47, 281-
291.
Bas, E., (2014), An integrated quality function deployment and capital budgeting methodology
for occupational safety and health as a systems thinking approach: The case of the construction
industry, Accident Analysis and Prevention, 68, 42 – 56.
Bhattacharya, A., Sarkar, B & Mukherjee, S.K., (2005), Integrating AHP with QFD for robot
selection under requirement perspective, International Journal of Production Research, 43: (17),3671-3685.
Chan, L., K & Wu, M., L., (2002), Quality function deployment: a literature review, European
Journal of Operational Research, 143, 463 – 497.
Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W & Rhodes, E., (1978), Measuring the efficiency of decision making
units, European Journal of Operation Research, 2, 429-444.
Cooper, W.W., Seiford, L.M & Tone, K., (2006), Introduction to data envelopment analysis and
its uses with DEA-solver software and references, New York: Springer.
Delice, E.K &Gungor, Z., (2009), A new mixed integer linear programming model for product
development using quality function deployment, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 57, 906 – 912.
Despotis, D.K &Smirlis, Y.G., (2002), Data envelopment analysis with imprecise data, European
Journal of Operation Research, 140, 24-36.
Geum, Y., Kwak, R & Park, Y., (2012), Modularizing services: A modified HoQ approach,
Computers & Industrial Engineering, 62, 579–590.
Golany, B & Roll, Y., (1989), An application procedure for DEA, Omega, 17: (3), 237 – 50.
Hwang, C &Masud, A., (1979), Multiple objective decision making-methods and applications: a
state-of-the-art survey, Springer, Berlin.
Kao, C & Liu, S.T., (2000), Fuzzy efficiency measures in data envelopment analysis, Fuzzy Sets
System, 113, 427-437.
Kim, D., (2010), An integrated framework of HoQ and AHP for the QOE improvement of
network-based ASP services, Ann. Telecommun, 65:19 – 29.
7/23/2019 Paper 395
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/paper-395 3/4
APJEM
ArthPrabhand: A Journal of Economics and Management
Vol. 4 Issue 3 March 2015, ISSN 2278-0629, pp. 134-150
J
h t t p : / / w w w . p
r j . c o . i n
Lertworasirikul, S., Fang, S-C., Joines, J.A &Nuttle, H.L.W., (2003), Fuzzy data envelopment
analysis (DEA): A possibility approach, Fuzzy Sets System, 139, 379-394.
Liu, H.T., (2009), The extension of fuzzy QFD: From product planning to part deployment,
Expert Systems with Applications, 36: (8), 11131–11144.
Marbini, A.H., Emrouznejad, A &Tavana, M., (2011), A taxonomy and review of the fuzzy dataenvelopment analysis literature: two decades in the making, European Journal of Operation
Research, 214: (3), 457 – 472.
Mirhedayatian, M., Jelodar, M.J., Adnani, A, M &Saen, R.F., (2013), A new approach for prioritization in fuzzy AHP with an application for selecting the best tunnel ventilation system,
International Journal Advance Manufacturing Technology, 68, 2589 – 2599.
Partovi, F.Y &Corredoira, R.A., (2002), Quality function deployment for the good of soccer,
European Journal of Operation Research, 137, 642–656.
Prasad, B., (1998), Review of QFD and related deployment techniques, Journal of
Manufacturing Systems, 17: (3), 221 – 234.
Ramanathan R., (2003), An introduction to data envelopment analysis: a tool for performance
measurement. New Delhi: Sage.
Ramanathan, R., (2006), Data envelopment analysis for weight derivation and aggregation in the
analytic hierarchy process, Computer and Operation Research, 33: (5), 1289 – 1307.
Ramanathan, R &Yunfeng, J., (2009), Incorporating cost and environmental factors in quality
function deployment using data envelopment analysis, Omega, 37: (3), 711-23.
Ramik, J &Korviny, P., (2010), Inconsistency of pair-wise comparison matrix with fuzzyelements based on geometric mean, Fuzzy Sets and systems, 161: (11),1604 – 1613.
Revelle, J., Moran, J & Cox, C.A., (1998), The QFD handbook, Wiley Press.
Su, C.T & Lin, C.S., (2008), A case study on the application of fuzzy QFD in TRIZ for service
quality improvement, Quality Quant, 42: (5), 563 – 578.
Tang, J., Fung, F.Y.K., Xu, B & Wang, D., (2002), A new approach to quality function
deployment planning with financial consideration, Computers & Operations Research, 29: (2),
1447 – 63.
Tone, K., (2001), A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis, European
Journal of Operation Research,130: (3), 498 – 509.
7/23/2019 Paper 395
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/paper-395 4/4
APJEM
ArthPrabhand: A Journal of Economics and Management
Vol. 4 Issue 3 March 2015, ISSN 2278-0629, pp. 134-150
J
h t t p : / / w w w . p
r j . c o . i n
Wang, Y.M., Luo, Y & Liang, L., (2009), Fuzzy data envelopment analysis based upon fuzzy
arithmetic with an application to performance assessment of manufacturing enterprises, Expert
Systems with Applications, 36, 5205–5211.
Wang, Y.M & Chin, K.S., (2011), Technical importance ratings in fuzzy QFD by integrating
fuzzy normalization and fuzzy weighted average, Computers and Mathematics with
Applications, 62, 4207 – 4221.
Wen, M & Li, H., (2009), Fuzzy data envelopment analysis (DEA): Model and ranking method,
Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 223, 872 – 878.
Yang, Y.Q., Wang, S.Q., Dulaimi, M & Low, S.P., (2003), A fuzzy quality function deployment
system for buildable design decision-makings, Automation in Construction, 12: (4), 381 – 393.
Zadeh, L.A., (1975), The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximatereasoning, Part 1, Information Science 8, 199-249, Part 2, Information Science 8, 301-353, Part
3, Information Science 9, 43-80.
Zadeh, L.A., (1978), Fuzzy set as the basis for the theory of possibility, Fuzzy Sets and Systems
1, 3-28.
Zaim, S., Sevkli, M &Hatice, C-A., Demirel, O.F., Yayla, A.Y., &Delen, D., (2014), Use ofANP weighted crisp and fuzzy QFD for product development, Expert Systems with
Applications, 41, 2014, 4464 – 4474.
Zimmermann, H.J., (1996), Fuzzy set theory and its application, 3rd edition, Kluwer AcademicPublishers.