panel and contract practice

1
971 PANEL AND CONTRACT PRACTICE stated that no Order had been made, and on March 24th he repeated this statement explicitly : "The circular letter is by way of recommendation to local authorities ; it is not an order." He further stated that the local authorities had powers enabling them to take the action recommended in the circular, but he was silent when questioned for the statutory reference to such powers. The possession of such powers is widely questioned, and it has been stated in the daily press that the Local Government Officials’ Association-a body representative of the officers of local authorities-has obtained opinion of senior counsel that no such power resides in the local authorities. The council of the Irish Free State Medical Union has advised its members who might be adversely affected if the recommendations of the circular were carried out to take no step toward resigning at present. MR. HENRY S. MEADE The French Government has conferred on Mr. Henry S. Meade the rank of Chevalier de la Legion d’Honneur. Mr. Meade, who is one of the surgeons to St. Vincent’s Hospital, Dublin, worked as a surgeon for a con- siderable time in French hospitals during the late war. FOTHERGILL TESTIMONIAL FUND THE following is the fifth list of subscribers to the testimonial to Dr. E. Rowland Fothergill received in response to the letter published in the British Medical Journal and The Lancet of Jan. 18th:- Amount previously acknowledged, P1361 12s. R. L. Newell (Manchester), 2 2s.; Carnarvonshire Panel Committee, .85 5 5s. ; E. R. Sweeney (London), 10s. 6d. ; J. P. Davie (Chesterfield) and H. Downer (Hove), each .81 Is. ; Bed- fordshire Local Medical and Panel Committee, 21 ; Car- marthenshire Panel Committee, .&bgr;5 5 5s. ; ; Portsmouth Panel Committee, B13 8s. ; Northampton Panel Committee, .82 2 2s. ; ; Glamorgan Panel Committee, 10 10s. ; C. J. Marsh (Yeovil) and A. T. Jones (Mountain Ash), each 91 Is.; J. Macfayden (Newcastle-on-Tyne), .81 ; F. A. L’E. Burges (Birmingham), .82 2 2s. ; Sir Thomas Dunhill (London), k3 3 3s. ; F. H. Alexander (Littlehampton), H. Child (Brighton), -. Marshall, F. Hinds (Worthing), N. E. Chadwick (Hove), D. D. Macintosh (Worth- ing), W. N. Maple (Hove), Nora Crow (Brighton), A. Barnes, Sir Hubert Bond (Brighton), A. E. Cawston (Lewes), J. V. Banner (Brighton), W. A. Wood (Brighton), and Roderick Clapham (Hove), 927 9s. 6d. ; W. P. S. Branson (Frimley Green), k2 2 2s. ; B. R. Rygate (London), 10s. ; C. F. T. Scott .and W. Paterson (Willesden), each .81 Is. ; Adam Fulton (Harrogate), k2 10s. Total 1466 17s. It has been decided that the fund will be closed at the end of May and it is hoped, therefore, that any intending subscribers will forward before that date their contribution to the treasurer, Fothergill Testimonial Fund, British Medical Association, B.M.A. House, Tavistock-square, London, W.C.I. PANEL AND CONTRACT PRACTICE Test Prescriptions A PRACTITIONER in the Home Counties was asked to write a test prescription and did so, under protest, in such a way as to make it clear to any chemist to whom it might be presented that it was a test prescription. Approached in turn by the insurance and the panel committee he relented to the extent of saying he would be prepared to issue an amended prescription, but he was adamant in his intention to inform the local chemists that he was issuing it. His attitude is accordingly being investigated by the medical service subcommittee. During the discussion a medical member of the committee imputed to the sponsor of the Act the statement that the dispensing of medicines by chemists was designed to secure that doctors should not give their patients " bad drugs," but it now appeared that an elaborate intelligence system was necessary to ensure this. If there had to be a system of tests it should, he thought, be an efficient one. He seems to have been unaware that the schemes for testing drugs and appliances supplied to insured persons are designed simply to check the accuracy with which they are dispensed. Under their terms of service the drugs and appliances which chemists supply must be of a grade or quality not lower than that specified in the Drug Tariff, which is almost invariably that of the B.P. or its codex. If not included in it they must be of a grade or quality not lower than that ordinarily used for medical purposes. Inspectors under the Food and Drugs Acts see that drugs are of a proper degree of purity. In the early days of the testing scheme, before the issue of test prescriptions was made part of the practitioner’s terms of service, the protestant would prescribe for Mr. B. Ware, Mr. 0. B. Careful, or Mr. A. Test. Secrecy of Records There has been some concern about the possible leakage of information on forms of medical record. The instructions to insurance committees lay it down that the obligation laid on them to maintain strict secrecy as to the information in their possession extends generally to all information, of any kind whatever (including names and addresses), about all classes of insured persons and their dependants, which may come into the possession of the com- mittee, its members, and officials in their official capacity. Even when application is made by the police for information as to the addresses of insured persons, the foregoing instructions are sufficiently explicit to warrant the refusal of information. In cases where the entries on a record card are likely to be of assistance to the investigation of a question by the medical service subcommittee, it is the practice to secure the consent of the insured person to the production of the medical record before it is even examined by the subcommittee. Grubby Envelopes An insurance doctor had employed a surgery attendant who for many years had been in the habit of taking the medical records from the file as patients arrived so that each patient on passing into the consulting-room could himself hand the F.M.R. to the doctor or his assistant. After surgery hours the attendant would restore the records to the cabinet, but naturally over a period of years some of the envelopes became dirty. Recently the doctor appointed a new surgery attendant who developed pulmonary tuberculosis. The doctor pointed out to the insurance committee that it was difficult effectively to disinfect and clean the envelope records and asked for duplicate envelope records to which he might transfer the notes. The committee consulted the Department, who took the view that, in the special circumstances, if in the case of such records as the doctor considered should be renewed he would enter on the back of a new envelope a brief summary of the essential facts of the medical history, as indicated by the clinical notes on the ’old envelope, the latter might then be destroyed. No notes other than this summary should be made on the fresh envelope ; particulars of further illnesses, for instance, should be recorded on continuation cards. Medical records have now been in existence since January, 1921, and the condition of some of them, especially where handled by the insured persons themselves, is certainly not hygienic. Other practitioners will be considering the desirability of substituting a clean new record where the condition of the existing record is unsatisfactory.

Upload: edwin-g

Post on 27-Dec-2016

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

971PANEL AND CONTRACT PRACTICE

stated that no Order had been made, and on

March 24th he repeated this statement explicitly :"The circular letter is by way of recommendationto local authorities ; it is not an order." He furtherstated that the local authorities had powers enablingthem to take the action recommended in the circular,but he was silent when questioned for the statutoryreference to such powers. The possession of suchpowers is widely questioned, and it has been stated inthe daily press that the Local Government Officials’Association-a body representative of the officersof local authorities-has obtained opinion of seniorcounsel that no such power resides in the localauthorities. The council of the Irish Free StateMedical Union has advised its members who mightbe adversely affected if the recommendations of thecircular were carried out to take no step towardresigning at present.

MR. HENRY S. MEADE

The French Government has conferred on Mr. HenryS. Meade the rank of Chevalier de la Legion d’Honneur.Mr. Meade, who is one of the surgeons to St. Vincent’sHospital, Dublin, worked as a surgeon for a con-

siderable time in French hospitals during the late war.

FOTHERGILL TESTIMONIAL FUND

THE following is the fifth list of subscribers to thetestimonial to Dr. E. Rowland Fothergill received in

response to the letter published in the British MedicalJournal and The Lancet of Jan. 18th:-Amount previously acknowledged, P1361 12s.R. L. Newell (Manchester), 2 2s.; Carnarvonshire Panel

Committee, .85 5 5s. ; E. R. Sweeney (London), 10s. 6d. ; J. P.Davie (Chesterfield) and H. Downer (Hove), each .81 Is. ; Bed-fordshire Local Medical and Panel Committee, 21 ; Car-marthenshire Panel Committee, .&bgr;5 5 5s. ; ; Portsmouth PanelCommittee, B13 8s. ; Northampton Panel Committee, .82 2 2s. ; ;Glamorgan Panel Committee, 10 10s. ; C. J. Marsh (Yeovil)and A. T. Jones (Mountain Ash), each 91 Is.; J. Macfayden(Newcastle-on-Tyne), .81 ; F. A. L’E. Burges (Birmingham),.82 2 2s. ; Sir Thomas Dunhill (London), k3 3 3s. ; F. H. Alexander(Littlehampton), H. Child (Brighton), -. Marshall, F. Hinds(Worthing), N. E. Chadwick (Hove), D. D. Macintosh (Worth-ing), W. N. Maple (Hove), Nora Crow (Brighton), A. Barnes,Sir Hubert Bond (Brighton), A. E. Cawston (Lewes), J. V.Banner (Brighton), W. A. Wood (Brighton), and RoderickClapham (Hove), 927 9s. 6d. ; W. P. S. Branson (FrimleyGreen), k2 2 2s. ; B. R. Rygate (London), 10s. ; C. F. T. Scott.and W. Paterson (Willesden), each .81 Is. ; Adam Fulton(Harrogate), k2 10s. Total 1466 17s.

It has been decided that the fund will be closed at theend of May and it is hoped, therefore, that any intendingsubscribers will forward before that date their contributionto the treasurer, Fothergill Testimonial Fund, BritishMedical Association, B.M.A. House, Tavistock-square,London, W.C.I.

PANEL AND CONTRACT PRACTICETest Prescriptions

A PRACTITIONER in the Home Counties was askedto write a test prescription and did so, under protest,in such a way as to make it clear to any chemistto whom it might be presented that it was a test

prescription. Approached in turn by the insuranceand the panel committee he relented to the extent ofsaying he would be prepared to issue an amendedprescription, but he was adamant in his intentionto inform the local chemists that he was issuing it.His attitude is accordingly being investigated by themedical service subcommittee. During the discussiona medical member of the committee imputed to thesponsor of the Act the statement that the dispensingof medicines by chemists was designed to secure thatdoctors should not give their patients " bad drugs,"but it now appeared that an elaborate intelligencesystem was necessary to ensure this. If there hadto be a system of tests it should, he thought, be anefficient one. He seems to have been unaware

that the schemes for testing drugs and appliancessupplied to insured persons are designed simply tocheck the accuracy with which they are dispensed.Under their terms of service the drugs and applianceswhich chemists supply must be of a grade or qualitynot lower than that specified in the Drug Tariff,which is almost invariably that of the B.P. or itscodex. If not included in it they must be of a gradeor quality not lower than that ordinarily used formedical purposes. Inspectors under the Food andDrugs Acts see that drugs are of a proper degree ofpurity. In the early days of the testing scheme,before the issue of test prescriptions was made partof the practitioner’s terms of service, the protestantwould prescribe for Mr. B. Ware, Mr. 0. B. Careful,or Mr. A. Test.

Secrecy of RecordsThere has been some concern about the possible

leakage of information on forms of medical record.The instructions to insurance committees lay it downthat the obligation laid on them to maintain strictsecrecy as to the information in their possessionextends generally to all information, of any kindwhatever (including names and addresses), about allclasses of insured persons and their dependants,

which may come into the possession of the com-mittee, its members, and officials in their officialcapacity. Even when application is made by thepolice for information as to the addresses of insuredpersons, the foregoing instructions are sufficientlyexplicit to warrant the refusal of information. Incases where the entries on a record card are likelyto be of assistance to the investigation of a questionby the medical service subcommittee, it is the practiceto secure the consent of the insured person to the

production of the medical record before it is evenexamined by the subcommittee.

Grubby EnvelopesAn insurance doctor had employed a surgery

attendant who for many years had been in the habitof taking the medical records from the file as patientsarrived so that each patient on passing into the

consulting-room could himself hand the F.M.R.to the doctor or his assistant. After surgery hoursthe attendant would restore the records to the cabinet,but naturally over a period of years some of the

envelopes became dirty. Recently the doctorappointed a new surgery attendant who developedpulmonary tuberculosis. The doctor pointed outto the insurance committee that it was difficulteffectively to disinfect and clean the envelope recordsand asked for duplicate envelope records to whichhe might transfer the notes. The committee consultedthe Department, who took the view that, in the

special circumstances, if in the case of such recordsas the doctor considered should be renewed he wouldenter on the back of a new envelope a brief summaryof the essential facts of the medical history, as

indicated by the clinical notes on the ’old envelope,the latter might then be destroyed. No notes otherthan this summary should be made on the fresh

envelope ; particulars of further illnesses, for instance,should be recorded on continuation cards. Medicalrecords have now been in existence since January,1921, and the condition of some of them, especiallywhere handled by the insured persons themselves,is certainly not hygienic. Other practitioners willbe considering the desirability of substituting a cleannew record where the condition of the existing recordis unsatisfactory.