palrap update growth and reader response during the first year october 22, 2013 tom reinsfelder john...

30
PaLRaP Update Growth and Reader Response During the First Year October 22, 2013 Tom Reinsfelder John Barnett

Upload: nathan-dixon

Post on 11-Jan-2016

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: PaLRaP Update Growth and Reader Response During the First Year October 22, 2013 Tom Reinsfelder John Barnett

PaLRaP UpdateGrowth and Reader Response

During the First Year

October 22, 2013

Tom Reinsfelder

John Barnett

Page 2: PaLRaP Update Growth and Reader Response During the First Year October 22, 2013 Tom Reinsfelder John Barnett

The Past

• Background work began in January 2012• Work began on 1st issue in fall 2012• Vol. 1, No. 1 published April 2013• See the Editor’s Welcome in the first issue

for more details

Page 3: PaLRaP Update Growth and Reader Response During the First Year October 22, 2013 Tom Reinsfelder John Barnett

PaLRaP published content

• Vol 1, No 1 – Spring 2013– Research 2– Practice 3– News 4– Commentary 1– Editorial 1

• Total articles published 11

Page 4: PaLRaP Update Growth and Reader Response During the First Year October 22, 2013 Tom Reinsfelder John Barnett

Promotion• Conference presentations• Email lists• Print media/press release/rack card• Social media– Twitter– Linked In

• Alerts– Google– Talkwalker

Page 5: PaLRaP Update Growth and Reader Response During the First Year October 22, 2013 Tom Reinsfelder John Barnett

Abstract views

• Provided by PKP OJS• Viewable by authors/journal staff

Issue 1 (Spring 2013) # Total Average per Article

– Research (2) 1,267 633– Practice (3) 1,613 537– News (4) 1,468 367– Commentary (1) 605– Editor’s welcome (1) 416

Page 6: PaLRaP Update Growth and Reader Response During the First Year October 22, 2013 Tom Reinsfelder John Barnett

Abstract views – All items

24%

30%

27%

11%

8%

Vol 1 No 1 - Spring 2013

ResearchPracticeNewsCommentaryEditorial

Page 7: PaLRaP Update Growth and Reader Response During the First Year October 22, 2013 Tom Reinsfelder John Barnett

Google Analytics

• May 1 – October 15, 2013

– Visits = 1,494– Unique visitors = 1,004– Page views = 10,924– Unique page views = 6,696– Average visit duration = 00:05:29

Page 8: PaLRaP Update Growth and Reader Response During the First Year October 22, 2013 Tom Reinsfelder John Barnett

Google Analytics• Audience– United States 1,309– Egypt 18– United Kingdom 14– Palestine 13– Israel 10– India 10– Australia 9

Page 9: PaLRaP Update Growth and Reader Response During the First Year October 22, 2013 Tom Reinsfelder John Barnett

The Present• Vol. 1, No. 2 (Fall 2013) • More guidance needed for:– Authors– Copyeditors

• New sections added– Features– “Noteworthy” – personnel briefs from PA

libraries

Page 10: PaLRaP Update Growth and Reader Response During the First Year October 22, 2013 Tom Reinsfelder John Barnett

PaLRaP published content

• Vol 1, No 2 – Fall 2013– Research 0– Practice 5– News 9– Features 1– Commentary 2– Editorial 1

• Total articles to be published 18

Page 11: PaLRaP Update Growth and Reader Response During the First Year October 22, 2013 Tom Reinsfelder John Barnett

PaLRaP published content %

28%

45%

3%

10%

7%

Spring 2013 & Fall 2013

ResearchPracticeNewsFeatureCommentaryEditorial

7%

Page 12: PaLRaP Update Growth and Reader Response During the First Year October 22, 2013 Tom Reinsfelder John Barnett

Observations

• APA Style challenges– Frequent citation & formatting errors

• Copyediting challenges– Most articles need some editing to improve

readability

• Template challenges• Time investment

Page 13: PaLRaP Update Growth and Reader Response During the First Year October 22, 2013 Tom Reinsfelder John Barnett

Life cycle of an article• Author submits article ongoing• Editors read/evaluate submission <2-3 days• Peer review 3-4 weeks• Communicate decision to author & author revisions 1-4 weeks• Copyedit 2 weeks• Editors review copyediting <1 week• Authors review copyediting 1 week• Layout 1 week• Editors review layout 2-3 days• Authors review layout & proofread 1 week• Corrections 1 week• Editors proofread 1 week• Publish 1 week• Total 15 to 22 weeks

Page 14: PaLRaP Update Growth and Reader Response During the First Year October 22, 2013 Tom Reinsfelder John Barnett

• Creative Commons: CC-BY

• Readers may: – Share: Copy, Distribute, and Transmit the Work– Remix: Adapt the Work

• Readers must:– Provide attribution when redistributing or

remixing the work

Copyright Policy

Page 15: PaLRaP Update Growth and Reader Response During the First Year October 22, 2013 Tom Reinsfelder John Barnett

The Future• Next issue: Vol. 2, No. 1 – Spring 2014• Adding other types of content– Reviews? What parameters?– Other ideas?

• Further clarify workflows for all roles• Recruit editorial team volunteers• Recruit authors and reviewers - ongoing

Page 16: PaLRaP Update Growth and Reader Response During the First Year October 22, 2013 Tom Reinsfelder John Barnett

Recruiting editorial team

• Board members (ideally) serve 2-year terms

• Term began Fall 2012 • Co-Editors, News Editors, Publicity

Coordinator due to change in Fall 2014• Pressing need for copyeditors, layout

editors

Page 17: PaLRaP Update Growth and Reader Response During the First Year October 22, 2013 Tom Reinsfelder John Barnett

Recruiting reviewers and authors

• Reviewers always welcome– Specializations appreciated– Who can serve as a reviewer?

• Research and practice authors welcome– Contact presenters at conferences– Solicit content from colleagues– Open call for articles to PA lists

• Brief news items– New submission system– Balanced content

Page 18: PaLRaP Update Growth and Reader Response During the First Year October 22, 2013 Tom Reinsfelder John Barnett

Increasing readership and profile

• More conference presentations• Encourage more articles from PA public,

school, and special libraries• Messages to PA and US library lists• Traditional and social media• Increased indexing/harvesting

Page 19: PaLRaP Update Growth and Reader Response During the First Year October 22, 2013 Tom Reinsfelder John Barnett

Indexing/registration• Google Scholar• MediaFinder– Database of U.S./Canadian media/publications

• Public Knowledge Project Open Journal Systems journal list

• Directory of Open Access Journals (pending)– Suggested to DOAJ; has not yet been accepted

• EBSCO (pending)– Contractual agreement– Indexing & harvesting of full-text content

Page 20: PaLRaP Update Growth and Reader Response During the First Year October 22, 2013 Tom Reinsfelder John Barnett

Indexing/registration - future

• With 10 peer-reviewed articles or 2 published issues, opportunities increase– Open Archives Registry– UIUC OIA Registry– OAIster– Ulrich’s– NewJour– Electronic Journals Library

Page 21: PaLRaP Update Growth and Reader Response During the First Year October 22, 2013 Tom Reinsfelder John Barnett

Rolling vs. discrete issues

• Articles in OA journals can be published – On a rolling basis, as they become ready– Or in complete, discrete issues – Or in rolling volumes with an occasional special

issue

• What should PaLRaP do?

Page 22: PaLRaP Update Growth and Reader Response During the First Year October 22, 2013 Tom Reinsfelder John Barnett

The survey says…

• Cirasella, J., and Bowdoin, S. (2013). Just Roll with It? Rolling Volumes vs. Discrete Issues in Open Access Library and Information Science Journals.

Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication 1(4):eP1086. doi:10.7710/2162-3309.1086

Page 23: PaLRaP Update Growth and Reader Response During the First Year October 22, 2013 Tom Reinsfelder John Barnett

Results

• Survey was distributed to journal editors, asking them about their publication model and their reasons for and satisfaction with that model

• 21 responses– 12 publish in discrete issues– 8 in rolling volumes– 1 in rolling volumes with occasional special

issue

Page 24: PaLRaP Update Growth and Reader Response During the First Year October 22, 2013 Tom Reinsfelder John Barnett

Satisfaction

• Regardless of model, almost all editors cited ease of workflow as justification for chosen model

• All rolling-volume editors reported being satisfied with their model

• Satisfaction was less universal among discrete-issue editors

Page 25: PaLRaP Update Growth and Reader Response During the First Year October 22, 2013 Tom Reinsfelder John Barnett

Benefits of Discrete Issues(as reported by editors of OA journals)

• Easier production workflow• Deadlines are more meaningful• Easier to promote new issues• Look & feel like a traditional journal• Easier to solicit manuscripts• Work well for themed issues

Page 26: PaLRaP Update Growth and Reader Response During the First Year October 22, 2013 Tom Reinsfelder John Barnett

Benefits of Rolling Issues (as reported by editors of OA journals)

• Improved production workflows• Less emphasis on deadlines• Faster dissemination of information • Prevents a backlog of articles• Easier to solicit manuscripts

Page 27: PaLRaP Update Growth and Reader Response During the First Year October 22, 2013 Tom Reinsfelder John Barnett

Discussion

• Readers and authors appreciate quick publication times

• Journal staffing needs to be consistent—or does it?

• What are other possible “issues” with a different model?

• Which model should PaLRaP follow?

Page 28: PaLRaP Update Growth and Reader Response During the First Year October 22, 2013 Tom Reinsfelder John Barnett

Paying the bills - expenses

Open Access means free to read, and volunteers provide the labor, but….…someone still has to pay the bills.

• University of Pittsburgh E-Journal Publishing

• Domain name• Publicity

Page 29: PaLRaP Update Growth and Reader Response During the First Year October 22, 2013 Tom Reinsfelder John Barnett

Paying the bills - income• Donate button

and join PaLA link

• Article processing fees• Advertising• Sponsorships• Partnerships• Value-added fee-based services• Something else?

Page 30: PaLRaP Update Growth and Reader Response During the First Year October 22, 2013 Tom Reinsfelder John Barnett

Questions? Comments?

• Website: http://www.palrap.org• Journal email: [email protected]

• John Barnett, Co-Editor, [email protected]• Tom Reinsfelder, Co-Editor, [email protected]