page 2 of 13 - ijhpd · 2018-12-07 · 136 pain, jaundice and fever due to biliary stone disease,...
TRANSCRIPT
Manuscript Accepted Peer Reviewed | Early View Article
Page 1 of 13
Early View Article: Online published version of an accepted article before publication in the final form.
Journal Name: International Journal of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases (IJHPD)
Type of Article: Case Series
Title: Low Convergence of Hepatic Ducts: A Rare Extrahepatic Biliary Tree Anatomical Variation
Authors: Awang Dahlan Dayang Azzyati, Nik Abdullah Nik Azim, Julaihi Rokayah
doi: To be assigned
Early view version published: July 17, 2015
How to cite the article: Azzyati A.D.D, Azim N.A.N, Rokayah J. Low Convergence of
Hepatic Ducts: A Rare Extrahepatic Biliary Tree Anatomical Variation. International
Journal of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases (IJHPD). Forthcoming 2015.
Disclaimer: This manuscript has been accepted for publication. This is a pdf file of the Early View Article. The Early View Article is an online published version of an accepted article before publication in the final form. The proof of this manuscript will be sent to the authors for corrections after which this manuscript will undergo content check, copyediting/proofreading and content formatting to conform to journal’s requirements. Please note that during the above publication processes errors in content or presentation may be discovered which will be rectified during manuscript processing. These errors may affect the contents of this manuscript and final published version of this manuscript may be extensively different in content and layout than this Early View Article.
Manuscript Accepted Peer Reviewed | Early View Article
Page 2 of 13
TYPE OF ARTICLE: Case Series 1
2
TITLE: Low Convergence of Hepatic Ducts: A Rare Extrahepatic Biliary Tree 3
Anatomical Variation 4
5
AUTHORS: 6
Awang Dahlan, Dayang Azzyati1, MBBS 7
Nik Abdullah, Nik Azim2, MD 8
Julaihi, Rokayah3, MBBS 9
10
AFFILIATIONS: 11
1Surgical Registrar, Department of Surgery, Sarawak General Hospital, Kuching, 12
Sarawak, Malaysia, [email protected] 13
2Consultant Hepatobiliary Surgeon and Head of Department, Department of Surgery, 14
Sarawak General Hospital, Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia, [email protected] 15
3General Surgeon, Department of Surgery, Sarawak General Hospital, Kuching, 16
Sarawak, Malaysia, [email protected] 17
18
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR DETAILS: 19
Dayang Azzyati Awang Dahlan 20
Complete Mailing Address: Lot 9265, Lorong Kenanga 5, Jalan Kenanga, Gita, Petra 21
Jaya, Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia - 93050 22
Phone number: +060168788094 23
Email: [email protected] 24
Fax number: +06082419495 25
26
SHORT RUNNING TITLE: Rare Low Convergence of Hepatic Ducts 27
28
GUARANTOR OF SUBMISSION : The corresponding author is the guarantor of 29
submission 30
31
Manuscript Accepted Peer Reviewed | Early View Article
Page 3 of 13
TITLE: Low Convergence of Hepatic Ducts: A Rare Extrahepatic Biliary Tree 32
Anatomical Variation 33
34
ABSTRACT 35
Introduction: 36
Low convergence of hepatic ducts is extremely rare. Here, the right and the left 37
hepatic ducts course down toward the second part of the duodenum separately and 38
converge just proximal to the ampulla of Vater, forming a short common bile duct. 39
Case Series: 40
We describe 2 cases of a 43-year-old gentleman and a 53-year-old lady with this 41
anatomical anomaly who presented with obstructive jaundice. Endoscopic retrograde 42
cholangiopancreaticography (ERCP) demonstrated low convergence of the hepatic 43
ducts. Both cases were associated with biliary ectasia and complicated with primary 44
ductal stones. Excision of the anomalous extrahepatic bile ducts with 45
hepaticoenterostomy was performed for one of the cases, however the other was 46
lost to follow-up. 47
Conclusion: 48
Definitive operative intervention seems prudent despite the lack of consensus in the 49
management of such anomaly, especially when there are concomitant biliary ectasia 50
and ductal stones. 51
52
Keywords: Hepatic ducts, extrahepatic biliary tract, low convergence, distal 53
bifurcation, biliary stone disease 54
55
56
57
58
59
60
Manuscript Accepted Peer Reviewed | Early View Article
Page 4 of 13
TITLE: Low Convergence of Hepatic Ducts: A Rare Extrahepatic Biliary Tree 61
Anatomical Variation 62
INTRODUCTION 63
Anatomical variations of the biliary tree are not uncommon and numerous anomalies 64
have been described in the literature. The right and the left hepatic ducts converge to 65
form the common hepatic duct just after exiting the liver hilum in 60%-70% of the 66
cases[1]. However, low convergence of the hepatic ducts is extremely rare and the 67
exact incidence is unknown with review of the literature resulted in only a few case 68
reports [2,3]. Here, the right and the left hepatic ducts course down toward the 69
second part of the duodenum separately and converge just proximal to the ampulla 70
of Vater, forming a short common bile duct. This may become significant during 71
operative intervention as failure to recognize such anomaly may lead to iatrogenic 72
biliary injury. 73
74
CASE SERIES 75
Case 1 76
A 43-year-old gentleman presented with epigastric pain and obstructive jaundice. 77
Ultrasonography (USG) showed a normal liver and gallbladder with dilated CBD and 78
intrahepatic ducts (IHD) secondary to choledocholithiasis. ERCP confirmed these 79
findings (Figure 1). ERCP with attempted stone extraction was challenging, made 80
difficult by the presence of a huge pre-pyloric gastric ulcer. Thus a biliary stent was 81
inserted to temporarily relieve the obstruction. He underwent open cholecystectomy 82
and CBD exploration. Intra-operatively, the CBD was dilated with multiple soft stones 83
within. Cholangioscopy confirmed no residual stones. Intra-operative biliary stenting 84
was done. He recovered uneventfully and the biliary stents were removed 2 months 85
later. ERCP revealed the presence of low convergence of the hepatic ducts (Figure 86
2). Patient was counselled for operative intervention but was not keen and 87
subsequently was lost to follow-up. 88
89
90
91
Manuscript Accepted Peer Reviewed | Early View Article
Page 5 of 13
Case 2 92
A 53-year-old lady who had previous open cholecystectomy for empyema of the 93
gallbladder 16 years ago presented with epigastric pain and obstructive jaundice. 94
ERCP revealed low convergence of the hepatic ducts with a large stone in the left 95
hepatic duct (Figure 3). Both the hepatic ducts and the CBD were grossly dilated and 96
ectatic necessitating biliary stenting. Computed tomography (CT) showed normal 97
liver, mild dilatation of the IHD with marked dilatation of the left and right hepatic 98
ducts and CBD. Cholangiojejunostomy was performed and intra-operatively, both the 99
hepatic ducts and CBD were dilated with 1 large stone in the left hepatic duct, 100
measuring 2.5 cm x 1.5 cm and 2 smaller stones in the right hepatic duct, measuring 101
1.0 cm x 1.0 cm. Both hepatic ducts were transected as proximal as possible close 102
to the lower liver edge. The medial edges of the ducts were sutured with interrupted 103
polyglyconate sutures MaxonTM 4/0 to fashion a single duct and a retrocolic 104
cholangiojejunostomy was created (Figure 4 and Figure 5). Histopathological 105
examination of the hepatic ducts and CBD showed chronic inflammation. 106
Subsequent follow-ups found she was well with no stone recurrence. 107
108
DISCUSSION 109
Anatomical variations of the biliary tree are not uncommon and numerous anomalies 110
have been described in the literature, based on observation from imaging studies, 111
operative reports and autopsy discoveries, in as high as 47% of the cases [4]. These 112
anomalies may be minor or major with variable clinical significance. 113
The numerous anatomical variations and anomalies are attributable to the underlying 114
complexity of the embryological development of the liver and biliary tree. By the 5th 115
week of intrauterine life, the liver, biliary tract, gallbladder and pancreas are 116
recognizable structures. During this period, lengthening of the common duct occurs. 117
However, the lumen is occluded by the rapidly proliferating epithelial cells. By the 118
end of the 5th week, recanalization occurs and this start from the proximal portion 119
progressing toward the distal portion of the lumen. By the 8th week, the common duct 120
becomes patent and by the 12th week, bile starts to flow from the liver to the second 121
part of the duodenum [5]. 122
Manuscript Accepted Peer Reviewed | Early View Article
Page 6 of 13
The right and the left hepatic ducts converge to form the common hepatic duct just 123
after exiting the liver hilum in 60%-70% of the cases [1]. Low convergence of the 124
hepatic ducts is extremely rare and resulted in longer than usual right and left 125
hepatic ducts with resultant shorter than usual common bile duct. The common 126
hepatic duct may or may not be present, depending on the site of insertion of the 127
cystic duct. Frequently, the site of insertion of the cystic duct is anomalous too. 128
Similar to one of our case, the cystic duct may insert to the right hepatic duct. 129
Insertion to the left hepatic duct or low insertion to the more distal portion of the 130
common bile ductal has been reported too [2,3]. 131
Such anomalies are postulated to be the result of embryological malformations, 132
either due to incomplete recanalization or maldivision of the extrahepatic ductal 133
portion of the embryonic hepatic diverticulum [5,6]. 134
Clinical presentation of such biliary tree anomalies includes recurrent abdominal 135
pain, jaundice and fever due to biliary stone disease, cholangitis or pancreatitis. 136
Frequently, these anomalies are discovered during the investigations and 137
management of the presenting symptoms. The importance of recognizing such 138
anomalies during surgical procedures such as laparoscopic cholecystectomy, is 139
emphasized as failure to do so may result in iatrogenic biliary tract injury with 140
resultant bile leak and ductal stricture [7,8]. 141
Both of our cases underwent open cholecystectomy under emergency setting as part 142
of the management of their presenting symptoms. However, intra-operatively the 143
anomaly was missed. This may be due to the presence of inflammatory and 144
oedematous tissues or fibrous adhesions surrounding the extrahepatic bile ducts 145
making the anomaly less obvious. For the first case, the initial ERCP did not reveal 146
obvious low convergence due to the orientation of the film. This was subsequently 147
detected in the later ERCP. 148
Biliary tree anomalies may predispose to formation of biliary stones [9]. Both of our 149
patients presented with complications of primary ductal stone. In our cases, we 150
believe such anomalous arrangement may cause abnormal bile flow or bile stasis. 151
We postulated that the long hepatic ducts lie in the edge of the lesser omentum 152
unsupported by solid liver parenchyma and an increase in the intraluminal pressure 153
(ie secondary to stone obstruction) will easily stretches the ductal wall and causes 154
Manuscript Accepted Peer Reviewed | Early View Article
Page 7 of 13
ductal dilatation. This perpetuates the vicious cycle of biliary stasis, infection, further 155
stones formation and obstruction. 156
The presence of recurrent and chronic biliary stones is associated with carcinoma of 157
the biliary tract in the long term [10-11]. Biliary stones may initiate the hyperplasia-158
carcinoma sequence. As mentioned, it causes bile obstruction and stasis 159
predisposing to infection. These conditions induce chronic inflammation via 160
prolonged exposure of the epithelial cells to bile acids and pancreatic enzymes in the 161
bile. These cause increased cellular proliferation, initiating the multistep progression 162
from epithelial hyperplasia to metaplasia, then dysplasia and finally carcinoma of the 163
biliary tract [10,12]. 164
Hence, a definitive operative intervention seems prudent despite the lack of 165
consensus in the management of such anomalies, especially in cases with 166
concomitant biliary ectasia and ductal stones. We felt that the decision for definitive 167
management was challenging due to the scarcity of similar cases in literature. We 168
decided to extrapolate the management from the management of adult choledochal 169
cyst. Total excision of the extrahepatic bile duct and gallbladder followed by 170
hepaticoenterostomy is the treatment of choice. 171
172
CONCLUSION 173
Low convergence of hepatic ducts is extremely rare. Such anomaly may be 174
associated with biliary ectasia and ductal stones. Not only it predisposes the patients 175
to recurrent obstruction, infection and pancreatitis, in the long term it may also lead 176
to carcinoma of the biliary tract. Definitive operative intervention seems prudent, 177
especially in our cases where there are concomitant biliary ectasia and ductal 178
stones. 179
180
CONFLICT OF INTEREST 181
The authors declare no conflict of interest. 182
183
AUTHOR’S CONTRIBUTIONS 184
Dayang Azzyati Awang Dahlan 185
Manuscript Accepted Peer Reviewed | Early View Article
Page 8 of 13
Main contributions to conception and design, acquisition of data, analysis and 186
interpretation of data, drafting the article, critical revision of the article, and final 187
approval of the version to be published 188
189
Nik Azim Nik Abdullah 190
Substantial contributions to conception and design, acquisition of data, analysis and 191
interpretation of data, drafting the article, critical revision of the article, final approval 192
of the version to be published 193
Rokayah Julaihi 194
Substantial contributions to conception and design, acquisition of data, analysis and 195
interpretation of data, drafting the article, critical revision of the article, final approval 196
of the version to be published 197
198
REFERENCES 199
200 1. Crawford JM. Development of the intrahepatic biliary tree. Semin Liver Dis 201
2002;22(3):213-226. 202
2. Koruk I, Aydin U, Koruk S, Aydinli M. A newly defined biliary anatomic variation. 203
Turk J Gastroenterol 2011;22(2):232-233. 204
3. Hafner M, Schofl R, Gangl A. A rare anomaly of the biliary tree: The interhepatic 205
duct. Gastrointest Endosc 1997;45(6):523-525. 206
4. Lamah M, Dickson GH. Congenital anatomical abnormalities of the extrahepatic 207
biliary duct: A personal audit. Surg Radiol Anat 1999;21(5):325-327. 208
5. Ando H. Embryology of the biliary tract. Dig Surg 2010; 27:87-89. 209
6. Roskams T, Desmet V. Embryology of extra- and intrahepatic bile ducts, the 210
ductal plate. Anat Rec (Hoboken) 2008;291(6):628-635. 211
7. Talpur KA, Laghari AA, Yousfani SA, Malik AM, Memon AI, Khan SA. Anatomical 212
variations and congenital anomalies of extra hepatic biliary system encountered 213
during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Pak Med Assoc 2010;60(2):89-93. 214
8. Hasan MM, Reza E, Khan MR, Laila SZ, Rahman F, Mamun MH. Anatomical and 215
congenital anomalies of extra hepatic biliary system encountered during 216
cholecystectomy. Mymensingh Med J 2013;22(1):20-26. 217
Manuscript Accepted Peer Reviewed | Early View Article
Page 9 of 13
9. Kubota Y, Yamaguchi T, Tani K, Takaoka M, Fujimura K, Ogura M, et al. 218
Anatomical variation of pancreaticobiliary ducts in biliary stone diseases. Abdom 219
Imaging 1993;18(2):145-149. 220
10. Holzinger F, Z’graggen K, Buchler MW. Mechanisms of biliary carcinogenesis: A 221
pathogenetic multi-stage cascade towards cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Oncol 222
1999;10 Suppl 4:122-126. 223
11. Donato F, Gelatti U, Tagger A, Favret M, Ribero ML, Callea F, et al. Intrahepatic 224
cholangiocarcinoma and hepatitis C and B virus infection, alcohol intake, and 225
hepatolithiasis: A case-control study in Italy. Cancer Causes Control 226
2001;12(10):959-964. 227
12. Ohta T, Nakagawa T, Ueda N, Nakamura T, Akiyama T, Ueno K, Miyazaki I. 228
Mucosal dysplasia of the liver and the intraductal variant of peripheral 229
cholangiocarcinoma in hepatolithiasis. Cancer 1991;68(10):2217-2223. 230
231
ABBREVIATIONS 232
ERCP - Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography 233
CBD - Common bile duct 234
IHD - Intrahepatic ducts 235
CT - Computed tomography 236
237
FIGURE LEGENDS 238
Figure 1: Cholangiogram demonstrating the insertion of the cystic duct into the right 239
hepatic duct. 240
Figure 2: Cholangiogram demonstrating the long right and left hepatic duct 241
converging to form the short common bile duct; note that the intrahepatic ducts are 242
no longer dilated. 243
Figure 3: Cholangiogram demonstrating the grossly dilated right and left hepatic 244
ducts. 245
Figure 4: Intraoperative image showing the grossly dilated right and left hepatic 246
ducts. 247
Figure 5: Medial edges of the ducts sutured to fashion a single duct before creation 248
of the retrocolic cholangiojejunostomy. 249
Manuscript Accepted Peer Reviewed | Early View Article
Page 10 of 13
250
251
252
253
Figure 1: Cholangiogram demonstrating the insertion of the cystic duct into the right 254
hepatic duct. 255
256
257
Manuscript Accepted Peer Reviewed | Early View Article
Page 11 of 13
258
Figure 2: Cholangiogram demonstrating the long right and left hepatic duct 259
converging to form the short common bile duct; note that the intrahepatic ducts are 260
no longer dilated. 261
262
Manuscript Accepted Peer Reviewed | Early View Article
Page 12 of 13
263
Figure 3: Cholangiogram demonstrating the grossly dilated right and left hepatic 264
ducts. 265
266
Manuscript Accepted Peer Reviewed | Early View Article
Page 13 of 13
267
Figure 4: Intraoperative image showing the grossly dilated right and left hepatic 268
ducts. 269
270
271
Figure 5: Medial edges of the ducts sutured to fashion a single duct before creation 272
of the retrocolic cholangiojejunostomy. 273
274
275
276
277
278