page 1 | confidential and proprietary information iaesb strategy session june 2012 ifac headquarters...

| Confidential and Proprietary Information

IAESB Strategy SessionJune 2012

IFAC Headquarters

New York, USA


Welcome & Introduction - Peter

Purpose of the session• Enable a frank discussion on purpose and focus of the

Board• Prepare for Public Consultation (more on that shortly)• This is not decision making forum• We are here to gather ideas and formulate a focus to be

tested through public consultation


Critical Questions

• How relevant are we?• What impact do we have?


Context - David

Series of steps• Output of this session will be input to a Consultation tool

(e.g., survey) • Q3 Consultation of key IAESB stakeholders & public• Consultation with IAESB CAG• October Board session – Board operations and resourcing• Exposure Draft of Strategy & Work Plan• 12-16 months time will decision making point


Necessary Output from this Session

Input to the Public Consultation • 5-10 high level environmental trends• 5-10 high level statements of strategic focus

– Clear and linked to projects and activities – Public will be able to comment on these

• Projects and Activities– Statements of what they are and who they will be focused on– Public comment on whether the list of Projects and Activities are

appropriate and what the priorities should be


Our Agenda - Bill

Section Timing

Welcome & Set up 8:00 – 8:20

Environmental Scan 8:20 – 9:45

BREAK 9:45 – 10:15

Strategic Focus 10:15 – 12:30

LUNCH 12:30 – 13:30

Proposed Projects & Activities 13:30 – 15:30

ADJOURN 15:30


Courtesies

• Begin and end on time and together• One conversation at a time• 80% rule


Breakout Groups- Session 1

Group A – Board room

Group B – Annex Group C – Green Room (6th floor)

Group D – Orange (6th Floor)

Edward Kieswetter Chris Austin Kazuo Hiramatsu Kai Uwe Marten

Jayne Freeman Jose Echenique Mandi Olivier Kim Langfield-Smith

Marcelo Canetti Ann Kilbride Robert Taylor Koichi Inoue

Peter Wolnize Saleem Kharwa Denny Reigle Jean-Francois Belorgey

Andrew Barry Thomas Orth Susan Flis Eileen Walsh

Anette Hedbern Aileen Pierce Clare Minchington Brigitte Rothkege

Vijay Kapur Gary Previts Kristrun Ingolfsdotti

Laine Katzin

Subodh Kumar Agrawal

Mubita Anakoka Nambayo Kalaluka Anne Loft

Adrian Pulham Clare Morley Greg Owens Gareth Wellings



Group A Group B Group C Group D

Kai Uwe Marten Edward Kieswetter Chris Austin Kazuo Hiramatsu

Jose Echenique Mandi Olivier Kim Langfield-Smith

Jayne Freeman

Robert Taylor Koichi Inoue Marcelo Canetti Ann Kilbride

Peter Wolnizer Jean-Francois Belorgey

Denny Reigle Saleem Kharwa

Thomas Orth Susan Flis Eileen Walsh Andrew Barry

Clare Minchington Brigitte Rothkege Anette Hedbern Aileen Pierce

Laine Katzin Vijay Kapur Gary Previts Kristrun Ingolfsdotti

Subodh Kumar Agrawal

Anne Loft Nambayo Kalaluka Mubita Anakoka



Group A Group B Group C Group D

Kazuo Hiramatsu Kai Uwe Marten Edward Kieswetter Chris Austin

Kim Langfield Jayne Freeman Jose Echenique Mandi Olivier

Koichi Inoue Marcelo Canetti Ann Kilbride Robert Taylor

Peter Wolnizer Saleem Kharwa Denny Reigle Jean-Francois Belorgey

Susan Flis Thomas Orth Andrew Barry Eileen Walsh

Clare Minchington Aileen Pierce Anette Hedbern Brigitte Rothkege

Gary Previts Kristrun Ingolfsdotti

Laine Katzin Vijay Kapur

Mubita Anakoka Nambayo Kalaluka Anne Loft Subodh Kumar Agrawal


Breakout Process

• Set up and clarification• Individual accumulation of ideas onto Post-its

– One idea per post-it

• Posting of Post-its– Identify themes

• Prioritization of themes• Restate themes for report back


Breakout 1 – Environmental Scan

• What are the critical trends and issues that should inform the Strategy & Work Plan?

• What are the implications of these trends and factors for the Strategy & Work Plan?


Breakout 2 – Strategic Focus

• Set up comments from Peter• Discussion on the draft Value Proposition – Does the

Value Proposition provide sufficient clarity and guidance to enable dialogue on strategic focus?

• Breakouts – – Given the discussion on the Environmental Scan and the Value

Proposition, what should be the objectives of the next Strategy & Work Plan?

– Given that the IAESB is a standard setting board, what proportion of our time/resources should be devoted to setting new standards versus engaging in outreach activities to promote the implementation of the IESs?


Breakout 2 – Projects & Activities

• What projects and activities should be in the IAESB’s proposed SWP?

• Definitions• IAESB Projects are defined as projects that require a

project proposal and approval by the Education Board• IAESB Activities are defined as activities that do not need

the Education Board’s approval, but are performed with the aim to improve the Board’s stature, or increase awareness IAESB pronouncements (e.g., Conference presentations, meetings with government agencies)

page 1 | confidential and proprietary information iaesb strategy session june 2012 ifac headquarters...

Documents