pacific telecommunications council · ixps are run by carrier-neutral data center operators local...

14
© EdgeConneX Confidential and Proprietary Pacific Telecommunications Council

Upload: others

Post on 25-May-2020

4 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Pacific Telecommunications Council · IXPs are run by carrier-neutral data center operators Local data centers are run by specialized edge operators Peering Point 0.02 6 148 1,471

© EdgeConneX Conf ident ial and Propr ietary

Pacific Telecommunications Council

September 2014

Page 2: Pacific Telecommunications Council · IXPs are run by carrier-neutral data center operators Local data centers are run by specialized edge operators Peering Point 0.02 6 148 1,471

© EdgeConneX Conf ident ial and Propr ietary

Network and Wireless Trends – Edge Data Centers

Data Moving to the Edge

Page 3: Pacific Telecommunications Council · IXPs are run by carrier-neutral data center operators Local data centers are run by specialized edge operators Peering Point 0.02 6 148 1,471

© EdgeConneX Conf ident ial and Propr ietary

What’s Driving Our Business

3  

Data Consumption Exploding Across Fixed and Wireless Networks

Streaming Video Increasing 10x

* Source: Cisco VNI 2014 and Alcatel Lucent 2012

Fiber | Ethernet Video | Apps Cloud Mobility

0  

200,000  

400,000  

600,000  

800,000  

1,000,000  

1,200,000  

2012   2013   2014   2015   2016   2017   2018   2019   2020  

Video Comm Cloud Video OTT Video Storage

0  

50  

100  

150  

2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Thou

sand

s  

Fixed Internet Managed IP Mobile data

Fixed and Wireless Data Traffic Growth (PB per Month)

Market Overview and Demand Discussion | Data Moving to the Edge

Page 4: Pacific Telecommunications Council · IXPs are run by carrier-neutral data center operators Local data centers are run by specialized edge operators Peering Point 0.02 6 148 1,471

© EdgeConneX Conf ident ial and Propr ietary

Traffic Growth Drives the Internet Exchange Infrastructure

4  

Phases in the Evolution of the Internet

Phase 2 Mid-1990s – Today

Phase 3 Future

70+ Regional Peering Facilities Traffic is brought to nearest point for exchange 1,000s of Local Edge Data Centers

Phase 1 1980s – Mid-1990s

Few Key Exchange Facilities All traffic is brought to one of these points

MASSACHUSETTS

Exchange facilities are legacy NSFNET exchange points

IXPs are run by carrier-neutral data center operators

Local data centers are run by specialized edge operators

Peering Point

0.02 6 148 1,4716,998

19,796

43,855

0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

1994 1998 2002 2006 2010 2014 2018

US  IP

 Traffic  (PB)

IP Traffic in the US (Petabytes per Month)

Shifting from Centralized to Regional to Local Edge Data Centers

Market Overview and Demand Discussion | Data Moving to the Edge

Page 5: Pacific Telecommunications Council · IXPs are run by carrier-neutral data center operators Local data centers are run by specialized edge operators Peering Point 0.02 6 148 1,471

© EdgeConneX Conf ident ial and Propr ietary

Targeting Smaller Tier 1 and Tier 2 Markets

5  

46 45  53

88  

0102030405060708090

100

Washington,  DC Nashville Orlando Pittsburgh

2008-­‐09 2012-­‐13

Traf

fic in

Pet

a B

ytes

Washington DC had an average speed of 5.4 Mpbs in 2008-09 compared to an average speed of 12.5 Mpbs in 2012-13

Average US speed has grown to over 6.4 Mpbs in 2012-13 from 3.4 Mbps in 2008-09, indicating that several smaller markets that had low single digit speeds 4-5 years ago are now rapidly catching up to larger markets

This growth will need the establishment of increased peering infrastructure in several tier II markets

* BW Utilization is a per traffic utilization measure and is equal to [Actual Data Usage / Speed (Mpbs) X Total Time (s)] Sources: Akamai State of Internet Report Q1 2009, US Census Bureau, National Broadband Plan, Cisco VNI Study 2008 and 2012 and CMA Research

HH Passed

Average Speed (Mpbs)

BW Utilization* 0.30% 0.18%

9.9 9.0 11.9 5.4

615,374 798,445 1,001,627 1,991,552

Monthly Traffic Generated by Market (in Peta Bytes) Observations

Several such as Nashville, Orlando and Pittsburgh Lack the Public Peering Infrastructure

Market Overview and Demand Discussion | Edge Data Center

Page 6: Pacific Telecommunications Council · IXPs are run by carrier-neutral data center operators Local data centers are run by specialized edge operators Peering Point 0.02 6 148 1,471

© EdgeConneX Conf ident ial and Propr ietary

Purpose Built Edge Data Centers

CONSUMER | exponential bandwidth consumption

NETWORK PROVIDER | increasing backbone costs

CONTENT PROVIDER | inconsistent user experience

EDGECONNEX PROVIDES

§  Purpose-built for network, content and cloud requirements §  Building at optimal, customer driven locations §  Average of 10+ kW per rack §  Typical implementation of 1,600 kW §  Rapid deployment for targeted locations §  Power, space, connectivity and operations §  Consortium of content customers §  EdgeOS: Proprietary distributed data center operating system

CHALLENGES ADDRESSED EDGECONNEX | Edge Data Center

§  Right  LOCATION

§  Right  SIZE

§  Right  BUSINESS MODEL

§  Economic  benefit,  Ecosystem  wide  

Provide Content Providers & Caching Networks with Local Connectivity & Local Distribution Where the Eyeballs are Aggregated

Edge Data Center Overview

6  

Page 7: Pacific Telecommunications Council · IXPs are run by carrier-neutral data center operators Local data centers are run by specialized edge operators Peering Point 0.02 6 148 1,471

© EdgeConneX Conf ident ial and Propr ietary

20 Edge Data Center Markets…so far National Roadmap of EdgeConneX Facilities

Q1 2015 Delivered EDC Locations

Detroit Pittsburgh

Norfolk

Jacksonville

Salt Lake City

Seattle

Portland

Las Vegas

Houston

Operational EDC Locations

Phoenix

Denver

Boston

Richmond

Tallahassee

Atlanta

Memphis San Diego

Nashville

Miami

Sacramento

Page 8: Pacific Telecommunications Council · IXPs are run by carrier-neutral data center operators Local data centers are run by specialized edge operators Peering Point 0.02 6 148 1,471

© EdgeConneX Conf ident ial and Propr ietary

Network and Wireless Trends – Small Cells

Data Moving to the Edge

Page 9: Pacific Telecommunications Council · IXPs are run by carrier-neutral data center operators Local data centers are run by specialized edge operators Peering Point 0.02 6 148 1,471

9  

Data Growth Drives the need to maximize spectrum

9  

Phases in the Evolution of the Wireless Facilities

Phase 2 Mid-1990s – Today

Phase 3 Future

1000’s of cell sites are built Cell Sites are split to accommodate traffic Hundreds of thousands of small cells

Phase 1 1980s – Mid-1990s

Few High and Wide Cell Sites All traffic broadcasts to one of these points

MASSACHUSETTS

Shifting from High and Wide to Macro to Local Small Cells

Market Overview and Demand Discussion | Data Moving to the Edge

Source  of  “#of  Small  Cells”  data  from:  Informa  Telecoms  &  Media  Source  of  “#  of  Towers”  data  from:  CTIA,  Wireless  Industry  Summary  Report,  Year  End  Results,  2014  

0  

500,000  

1,000,000  

1998   2003   2006   2010   2011   2012   2013   2014   2015   2016  

#  of  Towers  vs  #  of  Small  Cells  by  Year  Number  of  Cell  Towers   #  of  Small  Cells  (in  Hundreds)  

Page 10: Pacific Telecommunications Council · IXPs are run by carrier-neutral data center operators Local data centers are run by specialized edge operators Peering Point 0.02 6 148 1,471

© EdgeConneX Conf ident ial and Propr ietary

Small Cell Network Deployment Not Always a Small Effort Wireless | Small Cell and Services

10  

BUILDING REQUIREMENTS

NETWORK | BACKHAUL RESOURCES

§  Fiber §  Wireless (LOS / NLOS) §  HFC §  Coax | Copper

§  Indoor / Outdoor Access §  Aesthetics §  Vertical and horizontal rights §  Inside plant design and

implementation

STREET  VIEW  

Page 11: Pacific Telecommunications Council · IXPs are run by carrier-neutral data center operators Local data centers are run by specialized edge operators Peering Point 0.02 6 148 1,471

© EdgeConneX Conf ident ial and Propr ietary

What is holding up Small Cell Network Deployment? Challenges

11  

•  Cultural  PredisposiVon  

•  Necessary  shiW  in  real  estate  negoVaVons  

•  Lack  of  experience  

•  Cost  of  small  cell  equipment  

•  Cost  of  backhaul  

Page 12: Pacific Telecommunications Council · IXPs are run by carrier-neutral data center operators Local data centers are run by specialized edge operators Peering Point 0.02 6 148 1,471

© EdgeConneX Conf ident ial and Propr ietary

Leveraging Differentiation to Drive Business Model Approach to Market Enables Monthly Recurring Revenue Opportunity

12  

Locations Infrastructure Connectivity Maintenance

Rapid access to 10,000s of sites

Integrated streamlined process to address

zoning and approvals

Rapid time-to-on-air via standardized designs

Flexible installation options (buildings, poles,

street furniture)

NLOS/LOS capability where fiber not

available

Rapid access to fiber backhaul through MSO and fiber partnerships

24 x 7 NOC

Repair / replace capability

Edge Small Cells enable operators to reach scale on timeline and cost required to meet traffic demands

Page 13: Pacific Telecommunications Council · IXPs are run by carrier-neutral data center operators Local data centers are run by specialized edge operators Peering Point 0.02 6 148 1,471

© EdgeConneX Conf ident ial and Propr ietary

•  Site  Selec;on  •  Fiber  Sourcing  &  Design  •  Network  Design  

•  Program  Management  •  Work  Flow  •  Custom  Repor;ng  and  Dashboards  

All tools are web-based and fully integrated

Proprietary Suite of Design and Management Systems Integrated Edge Infrastructure Software Solutions

13  

Page 14: Pacific Telecommunications Council · IXPs are run by carrier-neutral data center operators Local data centers are run by specialized edge operators Peering Point 0.02 6 148 1,471

© EdgeConneX Conf ident ial and Propr ietary

Wireless Network Data Growth Accelerating Network and Handset Improvements Driving Wireless Video Adoption

14  

Global Mobile Data Traffic Exploding

15.9 Exabytes per Month of Mobile Data Traffic by 2018

Shift to Higher Bit Rate Mobile Video

Mobile Video Will Generate Over 69 Percent of Mobile Data Traffic by 2018

4G - 15%Connections | 51% of Traffic

4G connection generates 15 times more traffic than a non-4G connection

The  Mobile  Network  in  2013:    Signs  of  a  increasingly  wireless  world  •  Global  mobile  data  traffic  grew  81  percent  in  2013  reaching  1.5  exabytes  per  month  •  Last  year's  mobile  data  traffic  was  nearly  eighteen  Vmes  the  size  of  the  enVre  global  Internet  in  2000.    •  Mobile  video  traffic  exceeded  50  percent  of  all  traffic  for  the  first  ;me  in  2012.    53%  by  the  end  of  2013  •  Mobile  network  connecVon  speeds  more  than  doubled  in  2013  •  In  2013,  a  fourth-­‐generaVon  (4G)  connecVon  generated  14.5x  more  than  a  non-­‐4G  connecVon  •  4G  represents  only  2.9%  of  mobile  connecVons  and  accounts  for  30%  of  mobile  data  traffic  •  Average  smartphone  usage  grew  50  percent  in  2013.  (529  MB  per  month,  up  from  353MB  in  2012)    

The  Mobile  Network  in  2018:    Access  &  Core  Network  improvements  drive  video  adopVon