pacific fisheries research center (tinro), vladivostok, russia · pacific fisheries research center...
TRANSCRIPT
Yury ZUENKO, Elena Ustinova, Alexander Vdovin, Vladimir Nuzhdin, and Natalia Dolganova
Pacific Fisheries Research Center (TINRO), Vladivostok, Russia
Impacts of climate shifts in the late 20th centuryon zooplankton and fishery resources in the Japan Sea
Goals:
- to find significant correlations between changes of environments and biotic components of the Japan Sea ecosystem
- to reveal mechanisms of these relations (mainly by analyzing of temporal lags)
- to trace the ecosystem response on climate regime shift in the late 1980s
- to elaborate a conceptual model of the climate changes influence on the Japan Sea ecosystem
Materials:
Climatic indices:
- Siberian High Index: mean atmospheric pressure in the area 40-65 N 80-120 E averaged for December- February (Panagiotopoulos et al., 2005);
- Pressure gradient between the centers of Siberian High and Aleutian Low, by months (Vasilevskaya et al., 2003);
- Aleutian Low Pressure Index (ALPI), - North Pacific Index (NPI), - West Pacific Index (WP), - Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO),- Victoria winter Pattern (afterBond et al, 2003),- Arctic Oscillation Index (AO),- El Nino – South Oscillation Index (ENSO)
(from http://www.cdc.noaa.gov/ClimateIndices/,http://www.beringclimate.noaa.gov/data/index.php,http://www.cgd.ucar.edu/cas/catalog/climind/,http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/, http://jisao.washington.edu/, http://www.pac.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/sci/sa-mfpd/climate/clm_index.htm)
Materials:
Water temperature data:
- Monthly SST anomalies data provided by the Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA) averaged seasonally for the zones 35-38 N (southern part of the Japan Sea) and 41-45 N (northern part of the Japan Sea) (since 1950)
- Seasonal anomalies of the mean temperatures of the surface and subsurface layers at the standard section 41o30-42o30 N 132o00 E (since 1926 -authors data)
- Seasonal anomalies of the mean temperature at 200 m depth at the standard section L-107 (38o N 128o26-129o25 E) calculated from the data provided by Korean OceanographicData Center (KODC) (since 1955)
Note: the Intermediate Water mass occupies the subsurface layer in the northwestern Japan Sea
Materials:
Zooplankton data:
- Mean seasonal anomalies of the total biomass of zooplanktonat 6 stations of the standard PM-line section, annually averaged (for 1973-1995 - from Minami, 1999; Iguchi, 2004)
- Annual data on the mean total biomass of zooplankton in the EEZ of South Korea (since 1962 - after S. Kang et al., 2000, with additions of Y.-S. Kang and the latest additions from KODC site)
- Mean total biomass of zooplankton in 41-42 N 131-133 E averaged for May-June of each year (since 1989 -authors data)
Materials:
Fish and squids data:
- Annual catch of sardine by Japan, S. Korea and Russia
- Annual catch of japanese common squid by Japan and S. Korea
- Annual catch of chub mackerel by Japan, S. Korea and Russia
- Annual catch of saury by S. Korea
- Walleye pollock generations abundance in the northwestern Japan Sea
- Arabesque greenling biomass in the northwestern Japan Sea
- Annual catch of saffron cod in the northwestern Japan Sea
-3
-2
-1
0
1
1950
1955
1960
1965
1970
1975
1980
1985
1990
1995
2000
2005
SS
T a
no
ma
ly, оС
1020
1025
1030
1035
SH
I, h
Pa
winter SST in the southern Japan Sea (35-38 N)Siberian High Index
Sea Surface Temperature:
Winter SST has the best correlations with:
- in the northern Japan Sea – with the pressure gradient between Siberian High and Aleutian Low in December (positive, quasi-synchronous)
- in the southern Japan Sea – with the Siberian High Index(negative, synchronous; R = -0.54, after 3-years smoothingR = -0.74)
Mechanism of relation: sea surface cooling by cold and dry winter monsoon winds.
The Siberian High weakening in 1986-1989 caused (directly or through the weak gradient) SST rise in 1986-1989, with further partial relaxation
1960 1964 1968 1972 1976 1980 1984 1988 1992 1996 2000 2004-2.0
-1.5
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
Ano
mal
ies
Summer SST in the north PDO summer
Summer SST in the Japan Sea have the best correlations with the summer PDO (negative, synchronous). However, PDO is the index describing SST fluctuations in the North Pacific. Stable significant correlations (R > 0.5) with any atmospheric indices were not found.
The climate regime shift of 1986-1989 is not obvious for summer SST.
-4.5
-4.0
-3.5
-3.0
-2.5
-2.0
-1.5
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
19
60
19
65
19
70
19
75
19
80
19
85
19
90
19
95
20
00
20
05
wa
ter
tem
pe
ratu
re a
no
ma
ly a
t 20
0 m
de
pth
, o C
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
SS
T a
no
ma
ly, o C
temperature at 200 m depth in the Korean EEZ (winter, trend removed)SST in the southern Japan Sea (winter, trend removed)
-1.5
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
196
0
196
5
197
0
197
5
198
0
198
5
199
0
199
5
200
0
200
5
tem
pera
ture
ano
mal
y in
the
rmo
clin
e-2
00
m, o C
-2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
SS
T a
nom
aly
, o C
temperature thermocline-200 m in the Russian EEZ (summer, trend removed)
SST in the southern Japan Sea (winter, trend removed)
Subsurface temperature:
Temperature in the subsurface layer has the best correlation with the winter SST in the southern part of the Japan Sea.
In the Russian EEZ the correlation is positive, with 3 years lag (R = 0.42, after smoothingR = 0.62).In the Korean EEZ the correlation is positive, with 1 year lag (R = 0.48, after smoothingR = 0.58).
Thus, the mechanism of the Intermediate Water formation in the process of subduction at the south periphery of the Subarctic Front prevails in the Japan Sea.
If that, the lags 1 year for the Korean zone and 3 years for the Russian zone are determined by the time of transfer new portions of the Intermediate Water from the main area of formation to these areas. This succession of renovation shows an anti-cyclonic circulation of the Intermediate Water mass in the Japan Sea.
SST increasing in 1986-1989 caused the subsurface temperature increasing in the Korean zone in 1988-1990, and in the Russian zone – in 1990-1993.
Zooplankton:
Negative dependence on spring-summer SST is well-known. It is based on the primary production negative
dependence on thermal stratification.
Dolganova, Zuenko, 2004, with additions Minami, 1999; modified by Iguchi, 2004
However, this correlation could be found for year-to-year scale only, but positive relation typical for decadal scale was not described yet.
-300
0
300
198
5
198
8
198
9
199
0
199
1
199
2
199
3
199
4
199
5
199
6
199
8
200
2
200
3
200
4
200
5
200
6
200
7
zoop
lank
ton
biom
ass
anom
aly,
mg/
m3
-2
-1
0
1
2
SS
T an
omal
y, о
C
zooplankton biomass
sea surface temperature-3.00
-2.00
-1.00
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
197
31
974
197
51
976
197
71
978
197
91
980
198
11
982
198
31
984
198
51
986
198
71
988
198
91
990
199
11
992
199
31
994
199
5
wat
er te
mpe
ratu
re a
nom
aly
(оС
)
-30.0
-20.0
-10.0
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
zoop
lank
ton
biom
ass
anom
aly
(mg/
m3 )
water temperaturezooplankton biomass
-100
0
100
200
300
400
196
0
196
5
197
0
197
5
198
0
198
5
199
0
199
5
200
0
200
5
tota
l zoo
plan
kton
bio
mas
s, m
g/m
3
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
tem
pera
ture
ano
mal
y, o C
zooplankton biomass in the Korean EEZ (trend removed)
temperature at 200 m depth in the Korean EEZ (winter, trend removed)
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
19
80
19
85
19
90
19
95
20
00
20
05
tota
l zoo
plan
kton
bio
mas
s, m
g/m
3
-2.00
-1.50
-1.00
-0.50
0.00
0.50
1.00
tem
pera
ture
ano
mal
y, o C
zooplankton biomass in the Russian EEZ (May-June)
temperature thermocline-200 m in the Russian EEZ (summer)
Zooplankton:
The highest correlations (positive) were found between total biomass of zooplankton and subsurface temperature.
In the Russian zone R = 0.70, after smoothingR = 0,84, with lag 3 years.In the Korean zone R = 0.32, after smoothingR = 0,50, with lag 3 years.In the Japanese zone we have no data on subsurface temperature, but the total biomass of zooplankton correlated well with the subsurfacetemperature in the Korean and Russian zones.
Zooplankton biomasses in all 3 zones are well correlated, with small shifts in the succession: Japan-Korea-Russia (that corresponds to the anti-cyclonic circulation of the Intermediate Water mass).
-150
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
196
0
196
5
197
0
197
5
198
0
198
5
199
0
199
5
200
0
200
5
tota
l zoo
pla
nkto
n b
iom
ass
, mg/
m3
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
zoop
lank
ton
bio
ma
ss a
nom
aly
, mg/
m3
total zooplankton biomass in the Korean EEZ (trend removed)total zooplankton biomass in the Russian EEZanomaly of total zooplankton biomass in the Japanese EEZ
smoothed by 3-years running smoothing
100
200
300
400
500
Depth, m
Proposed mechanism of water temperature in the subsurface layer influence on zooplankton species with 2-years life cycle(as Neocalanus copepods) +1 year +2 years +3 years
period of the sub- this influence is not success of reproduction the effect on biomass willsurface temperature essential for the and number of recruits appear when the recruitsinfluence on current (parental) depend on this influence, will grew to the stage C5,copepods maturing generation although their biomass is i.e. in the 3th years after
insignificant the impact
C5 C5
C4C4
tem
pera
ture
cha
nges
Scheme of climate change influence on zooplanktonabundance in the Japan Sea
Atmospheric conditions influence on winter SST by means of air-sea heat exchange dependent on the rate of winter monsoon winds.
Winter SST influence on the subsurface temperature because the Intermediate Water forms in winter in by the process of surface water subduction. New formed portions of this water mass are transported from the formation area by anti-cyclonic circulation (not observed directly yet).
Subsurface temperature influence on the process of mass Copepoda species maturation during their dormancy at the depth, that is important for the next generation and appears in the recruits biomass with the time lag 3 years.
Intermediate Water transport
Intermediate Water formation
Subsurface temperature (no data)Subsurface temperature
Subsurface temperature
Zooplankton biomassZooplankton biomass
Zooplankton biomass
Siberian High
Winter SST in the south
0 years
0 years
0 years1 year
3 years3 years
3 years
3 years
0 years
Japanese common squid:
Annual catch of the squid correlates well with zooplanktonbiomass in the Japanese zone(positive, synchronous)
Rise of zooplankton abundance in 1991-1993 (after SST rising in 1986-1989) became the reason for the squid stock and catch increase in 1991-1993, with the possible mechanism of its paralarvae better survival. Rrecently the squid is the main object of commercial fishery in the Japan Sea
The regime shift of the late 1990s has no visible consequences for the squid
R = 0.77 without lagR = 0.94 for smoothed
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
1960
1965
1970
1975
1980
1985
1990
1995
2000
2005
catc
h, 1
000
t
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
zoop
lank
ton
biom
ass
anom
aly,
mg/
m3
squid catch zooplankton Japanese
Chub mackerel:
The mackerel catch correlates withzooplankton biomass in the Japanese zone, as well (positive, temporal lag 0-1 years).
The lag is too short for this long-living species, but it is reasoned by the considerable Japanese fishery of the young (1+) mackerel in the southern Japan Sea.
Rise of zooplankton abundance in 1991-1993 (after SST rising in 1986-1989) became the reason for the mackerel stock and catch increase, with possible mechanism of its larvae better survival.
The regime shift of the late 1990s has no visible consequences for the mackerel.
R = 0.78 with 1 year lagR = 0.93 for smoothed
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
1960
1965
1970
1975
1980
1985
1990
1995
2000
2005
catc
h, 1
000
t-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
zoop
lank
ton
biom
ass,
mg/
m3
jack mackerel catch zooplankton Japanese
Pacific saury:
Annual catch correlates wellwith zooplankton biomass in theJapanese zone (positive, lag 2 years)and in the Russian zone (positive,lag 1 year).
Both lags are caused by the age of spawning and mass fishery for saury (+2). The lag for the Russian zone is shorter obviously because of elder (+1) fish on feeding grounds in the Russian zone.
Rise of zooplankton abundance in the Japanese zone in 1991-1993 and in the Russian zone in 1993-1996 (after SST rising in 1986-1989) became the reason for the saury stock and catch increase in 1994-1997.
The regime shift of the late 1990s has no visible consequences for the saury.
for Japanese zooplankton:R = 0.69 with 3 years lagR = 0.70 for smoothed
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
1960
1965
1970
1975
1980
1985
1990
1995
2000
2005
catc
h, 1
000
t; R
ussi
an z
oopl
ankt
on b
iom
ass,
mg/
m3
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
Japa
nese
zoo
plan
kton
bio
mas
s an
omal
y, m
g/m3
saury catch zooplankton Russian zooplankton Japanese
Japanese sardine:
The sardine annual catch has no strong positive correlations with any environmental parameter, separately. In opposite, zooplankton biomass correlated negatively with the sardine catch, with temporal lag corresponding to the age of mass sardine fishery.
It means that the sardine influence negatively on zooplankton (grazing?) or both components depend on a common reason.
Both components (sardine and zooplankton) had sharp decreasing in the early 1990s.
R = - 0.86 with 3 years lagR = - 0.91 for smoothed
0
500
1000
1500
1960
1965
1970
1975
1980
1985
1990
1995
2000
2005
catc
h, 1
000
t
-20
-10
0
10
20
zoop
lank
ton
biom
ass,
mg/
m3
sardine catch zooplankton Japanese
Sardine annual catch correlations with...
-1
-0,5
0
0,5
1
-10
-9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2
temporal lag, yearspreceding follow ing
R
w inter SST in the south
w inter SST in the north
summer SST in the south
summer SST in the north
w inter subsurfacetemperature
summer subsurfacetemperature
Russian zooplankton
Korean zooplankton
Japanese zooplankton
Japanese sardine:
Cushing match/mismatch mechanism can be used for understanding of sardine fluctuations. We suppose that the timing of sardine larvae hatching is determined by winter SST anomaly in the southern Japan Sea, and the timing of spring plankton bloom – by spring SST anomaly. In the second half of XX Century, the sardine reproduction was successful in the years when both winter and spring SST anomalies were negative. Their ratio changed to mismatch in the late 1980s and continued to be unfavorable for sardine reproduction after the regime shift of the late 1990s.
Thus factor of winter and spring anomalies match/mismatch was used as the component of multiple regressive model:
Sj = Σi=3,4,5,6[K * S j-i * (f + kWTW(j-i) +kMM(j-i) + kDSj-i) * (1-m)i]
that accounts number of producers (Sj-i), their density, annual mortality (m) and two environmental factors(TW — winter SST at spawning grounds; M — parameter of match/mismatch); f, kW, kM, kD andК – empirical constants
годы ослабления Куросио
-2
-1
0
1
2
-2 -1 0 1 2летние временные коэффициенты EOF-1, град.
зимние временные коэффициенты
EO
F-1
, град
.
spring anomalies
win
ter
ano
mal
ies
0
500
1000
1500
1950
1955
1960
1965
1970
1975
1980
1985
1990
1995
2000
2005
tota
l cat
ch,
103 t
ons
real catch
modeled catch
R = 0.60 without lagR = 0.88 for smoothed
-150
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
1960
1965
1970
1975
1980
1985
1990
1995
2000
2005
численность поколений, млн. экз
.
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
1100
1200
биомасса зоопланктона, мг/м
3
ОЧП минтая, без тренда биомасса зоопланктона в зоне России
Walleye pollock (generations abundance):
The pollock generations abundance has close formal relation with the zooplankton biomass in the Russian EEZ (positive, lag 0-1years). However, this result is not accurate because the number of comparable data is insufficient.
In the decadal scale, the pollock generations correlate negatively with the subsurface temperature, that could be a result of ecosystem reconstructions because of competitive relations between pollack and warm-water predators in “warm” years.
After removing decadal trends, weak positive correlation is revealed between the generations abundance and subsurface temperature, that confirms the positive relation with zooplankton abundance (the mechanism of larvae survival is possibly responsible).
Thus, pollock abundance increasing in the mid 1990s after water temperature rising was weak and followed by its decreasing.
-0,1
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
1960
1970
1980
1990
2000
subs
urfa
ce te
mpe
ratu
re, o
C
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
pollo
ck g
ener
atio
ns, 1
06 in
d.
subsurface temperature pollock generations
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
19
55
19
60
19
65
19
70
19
75
19
80
19
85
19
90
19
95
20
00
de
tre
nd
ed
ab
un
da
nce
of g
en
era
tion
s,
mln
. sp
.-1
-0,8
-0,6
-0,4
-0,2
0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
de
tre
nd
ed
su
bsu
rfa
ce te
mp
era
ture
, оС
detrernded generations abundancedetrended subsurface temperature
R = 0.53 without lagR = 0.75 for smoothed
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1960
1965
1970
1975
1980
1985
1990
1995
2000
2005
catc
h, t
1020
1025
1030
Sib
eria
n H
igh
Inde
x, h
Pa
saffron cod catch Siberian High Index
Saffron cod:
Annual catch of saffron cod correlates well directly with theSiberian High index (positive,1 year lag). For coastal areas, this index can be used as the measure ofclimate severity, including sea icedevelopment. So, the more severe winter, the more abundant population.
The saffron cod spawns only in the period of water temperature below zero, under sea ice usually. Its period of spawning is longer in the severe winters, so its reproduction is more successful. The temporal lag 1 year corresponds to the age of mass fishery of the saffron cod (1+).
The saffron cod catch decreased sharply in 1990-1991 after SHI decreasing in the late 1980s, but increased again in the period of winter warming relaxation in early 2000s.
Intermediate Water spreading
Intermediate Water formation
In the south (subduction)
Subsurface
temperature in the
south of Russian EEZ
Zooplankton biomassZooplankton biomass
Siberian High Index
Winter SST, south
0 years
0 years
3 years 3 years
Zooplankton biomass
3 years
1 year
0 years
Winter SST, north
0 years
Intermediate Water formation
In the north (deep convection)
0 years
Subsurface temperature in the
south of Japanese EEZ (no data)
0 years
Subsurface temperature
In the Korean EEZ
1 year
3 years
Japanese common
squid catch
Saury
catch
2-3 years
Chub mackerel
catch
0-1 years
Walleye pollock
generations
abundance
0-1 years 0 years
Japanese sardine catch
3 years
Saffron
cod catch
1 year
PDO, NPI
Summer SST, north
Summer SST, south
0 years
0 years
Summer conditions have no direct
influence on the tested biotic
components of the ecosystem
Gradient
Siber.High-Aleut.Low
PDO, WP
Cushing
match/mismatch
mechanism
0 years
0 years
3-4 years
Scheme of climate changes impacts on the Japan Sea ecosystem:
Conclusions:
Shift to winter warming in the late 1980s had strong consequences for the Japan Sea ecosystem:
driving reason was winter monsoon weakening that caused:
- winter SST increasing synchronously
- subsurface temperature increasing with lags 0-3 years- zooplankton biomass increasing with lags 3-6 years- zooplanktophages fish and squid populations increasing and catch rising with lags 0-3 years - winter and spring thermal conditions mismatch synchronously- sardine population decreasing and catch decline with lag 3-4 years- temporary increasing of the walleye pollock population with further decreasing- saffron cod population decreasing, with further increasing after the warming relaxation
Shift to summer warming in the late 1990s had weak consequences for biotic components:
driving reason was summer monsoon weakening that caused:
- summer SST increasing synchronously
- winter and spring thermal conditions mismatch (because of winter warming relaxation)
Generally, the regime shifts to warming make physical conditions of the Japan Sea more similar to subarctic ones, and its ecosystem became more effective, but commercial productivity decreases.
The
End