paai5 descartes in the pyrrhonian crisis
TRANSCRIPT
Philosophy as Adventures of Ideas
Week5
Descartes
in the Pyrrhonian Crisis
Kazuyoshi KAMIYAMANIT, Ibaraki College
2016/1/11
CONTENTS
Descartes
Descartes’ Project
The Meditation
Ontology
Ontology1
Ontology2
Mind-Body Dualism
References
RENÉ DESCARTES (1596-1650)
French mathematician, scientist, and philosopher
the “father of modern philosophy”
DESCARTES’ PROJECT
Distrust to the Scholasticism (a Medieval school of philosophy
taught by the academics of medieval universities and cathedrals
in the period from the 12th to 16th Century)
In ”the Pyrrhonian Crisis“ (Hopkin,2003)
→
Descartes’ Project: to reconstruct the whole philosophy on the
firm, certain ground
Meditations on First Philosophy(1641)
THE MEDITATION
I need to find a absolutely certain proposition, only on
which I can rebuild philosophy as the set of certain
propositions.
How to find the certain proposition(s) or an
epistemological ground-zero?
Answer
Through methodic doubt
searching for certainty by systematically though
tentatively doubting everything
DOUBT STEP1
What Senses report
They are not certain.
Because
The senses sometimes deceive.
ex. Objects at a distance appear to be quite small
(the Illusion Argument)
DOUBT STEP2
Survivors of the step1
“I am here, sitting by the fire, wearing a winter dressing gown,
holding this piece of paper in my hands, and so on.”
They are not certain.
Because
they might all be a dream.
(the Dreaming Argument)
DOUBT STEP3
Survivors of step2: mathematical beliefs such as 2 + 3 = 5
Not certain.
Because
there could be an evil demon with supreme power and cunning
(悪知恵)that puts all his efforts into deceiving him so that he is
always mistaken about everything, including mathematics.
(the Evil Demon Argument)
THE FINAL SURVIVOR OF DOUBTS
I cannot doubt my own existence. In order to doubt or to think, there
must be someone doing the doubting or thinking. Deceived as I may
be about other things, I cannot help but conclude that I exists.
“I must finally conclude that the proposition, ‘I am,’ ‘I exist,’ is
necessarily true whenever it is put forward by me or conceived in
my mind”
Cogito, ergo sum or “I think, therefore I am.”
BASIC LINE OF REASONING
God exists.[by the ontological argument(see next file)]
God is not a deceiver. [by the notion of God itself, God is
perfect.]
→We can dispel three doubts: doubts on senses, reason,
mathematics. We can rely on them.
Clear and distinct perceptions are indubitable.
→
World exists.
THE ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENTOF THE EXISTENCE OF GOD
It is apparent that the idea of God is that of a supremely perfect being, that
is, a being with all perfections to the highest degree. Moreover, actual
existence is a perfection, at least insofar as most would agree that it is better
to actually exist than not. Now, if the idea of God did not contain actual
existence, then it would lack a perfection. Accordingly, it would no longer be
the idea of a supremely perfect being but the idea of something with an
imperfection, namely non-existence, and, therefore, it would no longer be
the idea of God. Hence, the idea of a supremely perfect being or God
without existence is unintelligible. This means that existence is contained in
the essence of an infinite substance, and therefore God must exist by his
very nature. (www.iep.utm.edu/descarte/ )
ONTOLOGY2
Which entities, if any, are fundamental?
Decartes’ answer:
Cogitatio(pensee, thought) and Extensio(etendue, extension)
Thought and Extension are two substances of the world,
where a substance is something that does not require any other
creature to exist—it can exist with only the help of God’s
concurrence.
MIND-BODY DUALISM
What is the difference between human and animal?
Animal: just Extension, Automaton
Human: Automaton with rational soul
Humans are the union of these two substances: mind and body.
MIND-BODY PROBLEM
How do mind and body communicate?
(Descartes’ suggestion : through the pineal
gland松果腺)
REFERENCES
J. Skirry, “Descartes, Rene” Internet Encyclopedia of
Philosophy(www.iep.utm.edu/descarte/), 2008
“René Descartes” (http://philosophy.about.com/od/Major-
Philosophers/a/Ren-E-Descartes.htm)
Richard Popkin, The History of Scepticism from Savonarola to Bayle.
Third enlarged edition, Oxford University Press, 2003.