pa hyperloop study update - pennsylvania state university · pa hyperloop study structure. phase...

20
PA Hyperloop Study Update

Upload: others

Post on 29-May-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: PA Hyperloop Study Update - Pennsylvania State University · PA Hyperloop Study Structure. Phase II. Scenario Development (September –December 2019) Phase I. Industry State of Practice

PA Hyperloop StudyUp d a t e

Page 2: PA Hyperloop Study Update - Pennsylvania State University · PA Hyperloop Study Structure. Phase II. Scenario Development (September –December 2019) Phase I. Industry State of Practice

PA Hyperloop Study Structure

Phase IISc e na r io De ve lop me nt

(Se pte mbe r–De ce mbe r 2019)

Phase IInd us t ry S t a t e o f Pra c t ic e

(May–Augus t 2019)

Phase IllSc e na r io Eva lua t ion & Fina l Re p or t

(De ce mbe r 2019–April 2020)

Approach

Page 3: PA Hyperloop Study Update - Pennsylvania State University · PA Hyperloop Study Structure. Phase II. Scenario Development (September –December 2019) Phase I. Industry State of Practice

Project Focus Points

ChallengesPotential Benefits Financial

• Economics

• Mobility

• Quality of Life

• Safety

• Constructability

• Environmental

• lntermodal

• Connectivity

• Land Use

• Legislative/

• Regulatory

• Right of Way

• Capital Cost

• Operations and Maintenance

• Revenue

Page 4: PA Hyperloop Study Update - Pennsylvania State University · PA Hyperloop Study Structure. Phase II. Scenario Development (September –December 2019) Phase I. Industry State of Practice

Project Goals and Approach

Routes withhigh truck

volume

Linking airfreight andpassengers

High-valuedgoods

movement

Point-to-pointService

(fewer stops)

Page 5: PA Hyperloop Study Update - Pennsylvania State University · PA Hyperloop Study Structure. Phase II. Scenario Development (September –December 2019) Phase I. Industry State of Practice

Alignment Scenario

Page 6: PA Hyperloop Study Update - Pennsylvania State University · PA Hyperloop Study Structure. Phase II. Scenario Development (September –December 2019) Phase I. Industry State of Practice

PA Freight & Passenger Targe ts (TAM)

Hyp e r loo p Pie

E-commerce Express Parcelhigh-value, time-sensitive freight

Express parcels Express mail Pharmaceuticals Consumer merchandise Precision instrumentation Electronic components/subsystems Medical equipment Perishable foods

Air passengers Rail passengers Automobile passengers

Page 7: PA Hyperloop Study Update - Pennsylvania State University · PA Hyperloop Study Structure. Phase II. Scenario Development (September –December 2019) Phase I. Industry State of Practice

Bulk Freight: low -value, non -time -sensitive

• Express parcels

• Express mail

• Pharmaceuticals

• Consumer merchandise

• Precision instrumentation

• Electronic components / subsystems

• Medical equipment

• Perishable foods

PA Freight Targets

• Oil• Chemicals• Gases• Fuels• Aggregates• Minerals• Large farm machinery• Large farm

construction machinery

• Large geometry objects• Lumber• Automobiles/trucks• Metallic pipe/beams• Modular housing• Minerals• Acids• Petroleum

E-commerce Express Parcel: high -value, time -sensitive freight

Page 8: PA Hyperloop Study Update - Pennsylvania State University · PA Hyperloop Study Structure. Phase II. Scenario Development (September –December 2019) Phase I. Industry State of Practice

PA Freight Targets FTL, LTL, Air Cargo

Page 9: PA Hyperloop Study Update - Pennsylvania State University · PA Hyperloop Study Structure. Phase II. Scenario Development (September –December 2019) Phase I. Industry State of Practice

Hyperloop Based Freight Transport

Page 10: PA Hyperloop Study Update - Pennsylvania State University · PA Hyperloop Study Structure. Phase II. Scenario Development (September –December 2019) Phase I. Industry State of Practice

Hyperloop Based Passenger Transport

Page 11: PA Hyperloop Study Update - Pennsylvania State University · PA Hyperloop Study Structure. Phase II. Scenario Development (September –December 2019) Phase I. Industry State of Practice

National Mainline Scenario Alignment

Page 12: PA Hyperloop Study Update - Pennsylvania State University · PA Hyperloop Study Structure. Phase II. Scenario Development (September –December 2019) Phase I. Industry State of Practice

National Mainline Scenario

Page 13: PA Hyperloop Study Update - Pennsylvania State University · PA Hyperloop Study Structure. Phase II. Scenario Development (September –December 2019) Phase I. Industry State of Practice

PA Freight & Passenger Sources

Page 14: PA Hyperloop Study Update - Pennsylvania State University · PA Hyperloop Study Structure. Phase II. Scenario Development (September –December 2019) Phase I. Industry State of Practice

PA Freight & Passenger Sources

Page 15: PA Hyperloop Study Update - Pennsylvania State University · PA Hyperloop Study Structure. Phase II. Scenario Development (September –December 2019) Phase I. Industry State of Practice

PA Freight & Passenger Sources

Page 16: PA Hyperloop Study Update - Pennsylvania State University · PA Hyperloop Study Structure. Phase II. Scenario Development (September –December 2019) Phase I. Industry State of Practice

Air Freight & Passenger Sources

Page 17: PA Hyperloop Study Update - Pennsylvania State University · PA Hyperloop Study Structure. Phase II. Scenario Development (September –December 2019) Phase I. Industry State of Practice

Leading Midwest Airport Stats

• No. 3 U.S. pas s e nge r airport and No. 6 in world with ne arly 80M total pas s e nge rs

• No. 1 U.S. cargo airport by s hipme nt value

• No. 6 U.S. cargo airport / No. 20 in world by tonnage (1.8M+ me tric tons )

• Dominant U.S. Midwe s t air cargo airport : 33%+ total re gional air cargo (s e e pie chart); 66%+ inte rnational air cargo

• Le ading gate way for air cargo be twe e n U.S. and China by value and tonnage

• Large s t air trade partne rs (by tonnage ) inc lude China, Ge rmany, J apan, U.K.

(2017 statistics)

Kansas City2%

Detroit4%

Minneapolis5%Rockford9%

Indianapolis20%

Cincinnati20%

Chicago38%

Columbus2%

Chic a g o O’Ha re Airp o r t

Page 18: PA Hyperloop Study Update - Pennsylvania State University · PA Hyperloop Study Structure. Phase II. Scenario Development (September –December 2019) Phase I. Industry State of Practice

Ne wa rk Lib e r t y Airp o r t

Leading NY/NJ Airport Stats

• 458,674 flights pe r ye ar

• 46 million pas s e nge rs pe r ye ar

• 826,227 tons of fre ight pe r ye ar

• 55,623 tons of air mail pe r ye ar

• Ove rnight s mall package ce nte r for NY/NJ re gion

• Cargo hubs for Fe dEx, UPS, DHL

(2018 statistics)

• 455,542 flights pe r ye ar

• 61.6 million pas s e nge rs pe r ye ar

• 1.4 million tons of fre ight pe r ye ar

(2018 statistics)

J FK Airp o r t

Page 19: PA Hyperloop Study Update - Pennsylvania State University · PA Hyperloop Study Structure. Phase II. Scenario Development (September –December 2019) Phase I. Industry State of Practice

Air Freight & Passenger Stats 2018

Page 20: PA Hyperloop Study Update - Pennsylvania State University · PA Hyperloop Study Structure. Phase II. Scenario Development (September –December 2019) Phase I. Industry State of Practice

Concluding Takeaway