pa environment digest june 20, 2011
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/6/2019 Pa Environment Digest June 20, 2011
1/45
PA Environment DigestAn Update On Environmental Issues In PAEdited By: David E. Hess, Crisci Associates
Winner 2009 PAEE Business Partner Of The Year Award
Harrisburg, Pa June 20, 2011
Senate Committee Reports Out Marcellus Shale Fee Bill To Move Process
The Senate Environmental Resources and Energy Committee this week amended and reported
out Senate Bill 1100 (Scarnati-R-Jefferson) establishing a Marcellus Shale Impact fee and
requiring the development of a model local zoning ordinance to control drilling activities to
provide a vehicle for the impact fee issue.The vote on the amendment and the bill were unanimous, but Committee members took
turns expressing concerns about the amendment and the bill itself, some noting they plan to offer
amendments of their own once the bill reaches the Senate Floor.
Sen. Mary Jo White (R-Venango), Majority Chair of the Committee, described the
amendment as turning the bill into a pure impact fee bill, rather than what she said was a
severance tax based in part on well production.
We want to be clear to distinguish an impact fee from a tax. A fee is tailored to defray
the cost of an activity, while a tax is levied on an activity and the revenue redistributed elsewhere
a redistribution of income, said Sen. White. Weve all been put on notice that there will be
no new taxes. This is an attempt to provide some relief to communities that experience direct
impacts due to drilling.
The amendment establishes only a per well fee for the first 10 years of production
starting at $40,000 per year, dropping to $10,000.
The amendment also makes a number of changes to the distribution of the funds raised--
-- Creates a housing credit for up to 30 percent of a well fee owed by an operator for
contributions to a local affordable housing fund or organization;
-- Allocates $1 million per year to the State Fire Commissioner for local community emergency
service organization training and equipment grants;
-- Removes trails, parks and recreation, open space, floodplain management and agricultural
preservation from eligible uses of the local and state share funding;
-- Revises the way local share funds going to county conservation districts are handled, but keepsthe conservation allocation in the bill;
-- Reduces the amount allocated to the Commonwealth Financing Authority under the state share
from 80 to 60 percent and provides that no more than 40 percent of the funds can go for water,
stormwater and sewer system projects;
-- Increases the amount of the state share funding going to the Motor License Fund for state road
and bridge repairs;
http://www.paenvironmentdigest.com/newsletter/default.asp?NewsletterArticleID=11953http://www.senatormjwhite.com/environmental/2011/061411/agenda.htmhttp://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2011&sind=0&body=S&type=B&BN=1100http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2011&sind=0&body=S&type=B&BN=1100http://www.senatormjwhite.com/environmental/2011/061411/agenda.htmhttp://www.paenvironmentdigest.com/newsletter/default.asp?NewsletterArticleID=11953 -
8/6/2019 Pa Environment Digest June 20, 2011
2/45
-- Increases the amount of money going to the Hazardous Sites Cleanup Fund from 10 to 20
percent of the state share;
-- A priority for state share money was added to include acid mine drainage, cleanup and
reclamation projects which recycle and treat mine drainage water for use in drilling operations;
and
-- Adds a provision requiring the elimination of the impact fee if a severance tax is adopted.Sen. John Yudichak (D-Luzerne), Minority Chair of the Committee, noted the
significance of the action taken this week saying this is the first action by the Senate on any
Marcellus Shale fee or tax bill, although he said the structure and allocation of funds in Senate
Bill 905, which he and Sen. Ted Erickson (R-Delaware) sponsored, were closer to what he
thought was needed.
It is imperative to move impact fee legislation to the full Senate, Sen. Yudichak said.
This legislation may not be the final version of a severance tax or impact fee, but it moves the
process and debate on this key legislation forward as we negotiate a state spending plan.
We owe it to the citizens, especially those who live in the Marcellus Shale region, to
alleviate some of the environmental burdens they face due to natural gas drilling.
He said, like Sen. Scarnati, the impact fee legislation should be part of the budget talksbecause the revenue generated by the bill is necessary to offset local impacts of drilling and
expressed concerns about taking away local authority to control the impacts of drilling through
zoning.
While I remain concerned that this bill does not go far enough to protect Pennsylvanias
citizens and environment, I know how important it is to have a severance tax or fee in place,
Sen. Yudichak said. I am pleased with the bipartisan effort and the serious discussions that have
progressed on this issue. I hope we can reach an agreement on a fair and responsible severance
tax before this summers recess.
A new poll out this week from Quinnipiac University shows voters support imposition of
a Marcellus Shale tax 69 to 24 percent and for the first time regional support tops 60 percent inevery region of the state.
The bill now goes to the Senate Floor and is expected to be referred to the Senate
Appropriations Committee.
A copy of the amendment and a summary is available at the Committee website. A
summary of the original bill is available online.
NewsClips: Marcellus Impact Fee Momentum Picking Up
Proposed Drilling Fee May Piggyback On Budget Bill
New Marcellus Shale Fee Plan Introduced In House
Gas Drilling Fee Proposal Moves Forward In Senate
Marcellus Shale Impact Fee Moves Forward
Senate Edges Closer To Shale Gas Driller FeeShale Impact Fee Bills May Collide With Budget
Drilling Impact Fee Bill Goes To Full Senate
Senate Panel Revises Drilling Fee Proposal
Senate Panel Advances Gas Drilling Fee
Editorial: Maximize Gas Fee's Impact
Editorial: Choose Impact Fee Alternative
http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2011&sind=0&body=S&type=B&BN=0905http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2011&sind=0&body=S&type=B&BN=0905http://paenvironmentdaily.blogspot.com/2011/06/new-poll-finds-voters-support-new-tax.htmlhttp://www.senatormjwhite.com/environmental/2011/061411/agenda.htmhttp://www.paenvironmentdigest.com/newsletter/default.asp?NewsletterArticleID=19156http://www.witf.org/state-house-sound-bites/impact-fee-momentum-picking-uphttp://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/state/s_742252.htmlhttp://www.pocononews.net/news/2011/June/16/16Jun11-2.htmlhttp://www.pennlive.com/midstate/index.ssf/2011/06/gas-drilling_fee_proposal_move.htmlhttp://www.witf.org/state-house-sound-bites/impact-fee-moves-forwardhttp://www.philly.com/philly/news/20110615_Pa__Senate_edges_closer_to_shale-gas-driller_fee.htmlhttp://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/state/s_742077.htmlhttp://www.timesleader.com/news/Drilling_impact_fee_bill__goes_to_full_Pa__Senate_06-15-2011.htmlhttp://www.post-gazette.com/pg/11166/1153717-53.stmhttp://www.newsworks.org/index.php/health-science/item/21543-pa-senate-panel-advances-gas-drilling-feehttp://thetimes-tribune.com/opinion/maximize-gas-fee-s-impact-1.1162584http://citizensvoice.com/opinion/choose-impact-fee-alternative-1.1162508?cache=03D163D03D163Dp%3A%2Fhe3D03Dn63Freporti3D19.11145issed-1.1176%2F%3FparentPage%3D2.1188%3Fcache%3D03D163D03D163Dp%3A%2Fhe3D03Dn63Freporti3D19.11145issed-1.1176%2F%3FparentPage%3D2.1188%3Fcache%3D03D163D03D163Dp%3A%2Fhe3D03Dn63Freporti3D19.11145issed-1.1176%2F%3FparentPage%3D2.1188%3Fcache%3D03D163D03D163Dp%3A%2Fhe3D03Dn63Freporti3D19.11145issed-1.1176%2F%3FparentPage%3D2.1188http://citizensvoice.com/opinion/choose-impact-fee-alternative-1.1162508?cache=03D163D03D163Dp%3A%2Fhe3D03Dn63Freporti3D19.11145issed-1.1176%2F%3FparentPage%3D2.1188%3Fcache%3D03D163D03D163Dp%3A%2Fhe3D03Dn63Freporti3D19.11145issed-1.1176%2F%3FparentPage%3D2.1188%3Fcache%3D03D163D03D163Dp%3A%2Fhe3D03Dn63Freporti3D19.11145issed-1.1176%2F%3FparentPage%3D2.1188%3Fcache%3D03D163D03D163Dp%3A%2Fhe3D03Dn63Freporti3D19.11145issed-1.1176%2F%3FparentPage%3D2.1188http://thetimes-tribune.com/opinion/maximize-gas-fee-s-impact-1.1162584http://www.newsworks.org/index.php/health-science/item/21543-pa-senate-panel-advances-gas-drilling-feehttp://www.post-gazette.com/pg/11166/1153717-53.stmhttp://www.timesleader.com/news/Drilling_impact_fee_bill__goes_to_full_Pa__Senate_06-15-2011.htmlhttp://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/state/s_742077.htmlhttp://www.philly.com/philly/news/20110615_Pa__Senate_edges_closer_to_shale-gas-driller_fee.htmlhttp://www.witf.org/state-house-sound-bites/impact-fee-moves-forwardhttp://www.pennlive.com/midstate/index.ssf/2011/06/gas-drilling_fee_proposal_move.htmlhttp://www.pocononews.net/news/2011/June/16/16Jun11-2.htmlhttp://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/state/s_742252.htmlhttp://www.witf.org/state-house-sound-bites/impact-fee-momentum-picking-uphttp://www.paenvironmentdigest.com/newsletter/default.asp?NewsletterArticleID=19156http://www.senatormjwhite.com/environmental/2011/061411/agenda.htmhttp://paenvironmentdaily.blogspot.com/2011/06/new-poll-finds-voters-support-new-tax.htmlhttp://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2011&sind=0&body=S&type=B&BN=0905http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2011&sind=0&body=S&type=B&BN=0905 -
8/6/2019 Pa Environment Digest June 20, 2011
3/45
Editorial: Quinn Bill A Better Fee Plan For Gas Drillers
PA Voters Like Shale Tax: Q Poll
Poll: State's Voters Say, Drill Baby Drill
Poll: Strong Support For Drilling Impact Fee Looks In Budget Debate
Growing Greener Coalition: Amended Impact Fee Bill Unfortunate Step Backward
The Renew Growing Greener Coalition expressed disappointment in amendments made by the
Senate Environmental Resources and Energy Committee to legislation sponsored by Senate
President Pro Tempore Joseph Scarnati (R-Jefferson)-- Senate Bill 1100-- which establishes an
impact fee on natural gas drilling, but fails to include funding for key programs to protect the
environment.
Coalition Executive Director Andrew Heath issued the following statement:
The amended Scarnati impact fee legislation is an unfortunate step backward. By
removing critical funding for key environmental programs, the legislation leaves the future of
our natural resources, community vitality, and economy at risk.
Without funding for farmland, forests, community parks, trails and green open spacesour children and grandchildren may never get to appropriately enjoy the wealth of our natural
heritage, which has defined Pennsylvania as a great place to live and raise a family.
Moreover, by failing to invest in Growing Greener the legislation fails to invest in our
economy. Growing Greener projects have not only addressed millions of dollars in
environmental legacy costs, they have generated billions of dollars for Pennsylvania in jobs,
taxes, and tourism.
In addition, by changing the existing funding mechanism for Growing Greener, the
legislation raises real concerns about fairness and transparency. The current way of funding
vetted through public agencies that are experts in their fields has worked since 1999. Why
change something that isnt broken?As this legislation moves forward, the Renew Growing Greener Coalition is counting on
Legislators from across the great state of Pennsylvania to stand up for the environment, stand up
for our children and grandchildren and restore funding for Growing Greener.
Growing Greener is a bipartisan program established in 1999 under Gov. Tom Ridge and
later expanded by Governors Schweiker and Rendell. Since its establishment, Growing Greener
has created a legacy of success, preserving more than 33,700 acres of Pennsylvanias family
farmland, conserving more than 42,300 acres of threatened open space, adding 26,000 acres to
state parks and forests, and restoring over 16,000 acres of abandoned mine lands.
In 2002, during the post 9-11 recession, a dedicated source of revenue for Growing
Greener was identified in an increase in the states tipping fee, the fee charged for dumping
trash in Pennsylvanias landfills. Those funds were supplemented by a $625 million bondapproved by voters in 2005, called Growing Greener II. Unless action is taken, those funds will
be largely exhausted as of June 30th, with most of the Growing Greener I tipping fees going to
the debt service on the Growing Greener II bonds.
More than 90 Pennsylvania municipalities and counties have passed resolutions urging
the Governor and legislature to renew Growing Greener funding. Counties passing resolutions
include: Blair, Cambria, Erie, Fayette, Greene, Indiana Lackawanna, Lawrence, Lehigh,
http://standardspeaker.com/opinion/a-better-fee-plan-for-gas-drillers-1.1163021http://earlyreturns.sites.post-gazette.com/index.php/early-returns-20/53-post-gazette-staff/2906-pa-voters-like-shale-tax-q-pollhttp://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/state/s_742047.htmlhttp://thetimes-tribune.com/news/gas-drilling/poll-strong-support-for-drilling-impact-fee-looms-larger-in-budget-debate-1.1161934http://www.renewgrowinggreener.org/http://www.senatormjwhite.com/environmental/2011/061411/agenda.htmhttp://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2011&sind=0&body=S&type=B&BN=1100http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2011&sind=0&body=S&type=B&BN=1100http://www.senatormjwhite.com/environmental/2011/061411/agenda.htmhttp://www.renewgrowinggreener.org/http://thetimes-tribune.com/news/gas-drilling/poll-strong-support-for-drilling-impact-fee-looms-larger-in-budget-debate-1.1161934http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/state/s_742047.htmlhttp://earlyreturns.sites.post-gazette.com/index.php/early-returns-20/53-post-gazette-staff/2906-pa-voters-like-shale-tax-q-pollhttp://standardspeaker.com/opinion/a-better-fee-plan-for-gas-drillers-1.1163021 -
8/6/2019 Pa Environment Digest June 20, 2011
4/45
Luzerne, Lycoming, Monroe, Philadelphia, Pike, Somerset, Sullivan, Susquehanna, Washington,
Westmoreland, Wyoming and York.
A new poll out this week from Quinnipiac University shows voters support imposition of
a Marcellus Shale tax 69 to 24 percent and for the first time regional support tops 60 percent in
every region of the state.
The Renew Growing Greener Coalition is the Commonwealths largest coalition ofconservation, recreation and environmental organizations representing nearly organizations and
government entities.
NewsClips: Marcellus Impact Fee Momentum Picking Up
Proposed Drilling Fee May Piggyback On Budget Bill
New Marcellus Shale Fee Plan Introduced In House
Gas Drilling Fee Proposal Moves Forward In Senate
Marcellus Shale Impact Fee Moves Forward
Senate Edges Closer To Shale Gas Driller Fee
Shale Impact Fee Bills May Collide With Budget
Drilling Impact Fee Bill Goes To Full Senate
Senate Panel Revises Drilling Fee ProposalSenate Panel Advances Gas Drilling Fee
Editorial: Maximize Gas Fee's Impact
Editorial: Choose Impact Fee Alternative
Editorial: Quinn Bill A Better Fee Plan For Gas Drillers
PA Voters Like Shale Tax: Q Poll
Poll: State's Voters Say, Drill Baby Drill
Poll: Strong Support For Drilling Impact Fee Looks In Budget Debate
Conservation Districts See Hope In Marcellus Shale Impact Fee Bill Moving
In response to the action on Senate Bill 1100 (Scarnati-R-Jefferson) establishing a Marcellus
Shale impact fee, the PA Association of Conservation Districts issued this statement--
I thank and applaud Sen. White and members of the committee for moving this important bill
forward that will benefit and safeguard our precious environmental resources, said MaryAnn
Warren, President, Pennsylvania Association of Conservation Districts. The County
Conservation Districts provide essential environmental protection services in every county across
the commonwealth and stable funding and resources are needed to support their mission and the
critical work they do every day to protect our communities.
Senate Bill 1100 will supply a steady, long-term funding stream to Pennsylvanias county
conservation districts that continue to provide crucial permitting and environmental protectionactivities in the Marcellus Shale region. The bill appropriates $7.5 million in funds annually to
assist conservation districts in their efforts to provide vital services at the local level. Money for
the districts would be placed into a Conservation District Fund administered by the State
Conservation Commission.
We are very pleased with the action taken today by the committee, said Robert B.
Maiden, Executive Director, Pennsylvania Association of Conservation Districts. We are
looking forward to the Senates consideration of this bill and once again commend Senator
http://paenvironmentdaily.blogspot.com/2011/06/new-poll-finds-voters-support-new-tax.htmlhttp://www.renewgrowinggreener.org/http://www.witf.org/state-house-sound-bites/impact-fee-momentum-picking-uphttp://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/state/s_742252.htmlhttp://www.pocononews.net/news/2011/June/16/16Jun11-2.htmlhttp://www.pennlive.com/midstate/index.ssf/2011/06/gas-drilling_fee_proposal_move.htmlhttp://www.witf.org/state-house-sound-bites/impact-fee-moves-forwardhttp://www.philly.com/philly/news/20110615_Pa__Senate_edges_closer_to_shale-gas-driller_fee.htmlhttp://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/state/s_742077.htmlhttp://www.timesleader.com/news/Drilling_impact_fee_bill__goes_to_full_Pa__Senate_06-15-2011.htmlhttp://www.post-gazette.com/pg/11166/1153717-53.stmhttp://www.newsworks.org/index.php/health-science/item/21543-pa-senate-panel-advances-gas-drilling-feehttp://thetimes-tribune.com/opinion/maximize-gas-fee-s-impact-1.1162584http://citizensvoice.com/opinion/choose-impact-fee-alternative-1.1162508?cache=03D163D03D163Dp%3A%2Fhe3D03Dn63Freporti3D19.11145issed-1.1176%2F%3FparentPage%3D2.1188%3Fcache%3D03D163D03D163Dp%3A%2Fhe3D03Dn63Freporti3D19.11145issed-1.1176%2F%3FparentPage%3D2.1188%3Fcache%3D03D163D03D163Dp%3A%2Fhe3D03Dn63Freporti3D19.11145issed-1.1176%2F%3FparentPage%3D2.1188%3Fcache%3D03D163D03D163Dp%3A%2Fhe3D03Dn63Freporti3D19.11145issed-1.1176%2F%3FparentPage%3D2.1188http://standardspeaker.com/opinion/a-better-fee-plan-for-gas-drillers-1.1163021http://earlyreturns.sites.post-gazette.com/index.php/early-returns-20/53-post-gazette-staff/2906-pa-voters-like-shale-tax-q-pollhttp://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/state/s_742047.htmlhttp://thetimes-tribune.com/news/gas-drilling/poll-strong-support-for-drilling-impact-fee-looms-larger-in-budget-debate-1.1161934http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2011&sind=0&body=S&type=B&BN=1100http://www.pacd.org/http://www.pacd.org/http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2011&sind=0&body=S&type=B&BN=1100http://thetimes-tribune.com/news/gas-drilling/poll-strong-support-for-drilling-impact-fee-looms-larger-in-budget-debate-1.1161934http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/state/s_742047.htmlhttp://earlyreturns.sites.post-gazette.com/index.php/early-returns-20/53-post-gazette-staff/2906-pa-voters-like-shale-tax-q-pollhttp://standardspeaker.com/opinion/a-better-fee-plan-for-gas-drillers-1.1163021http://citizensvoice.com/opinion/choose-impact-fee-alternative-1.1162508?cache=03D163D03D163Dp%3A%2Fhe3D03Dn63Freporti3D19.11145issed-1.1176%2F%3FparentPage%3D2.1188%3Fcache%3D03D163D03D163Dp%3A%2Fhe3D03Dn63Freporti3D19.11145issed-1.1176%2F%3FparentPage%3D2.1188%3Fcache%3D03D163D03D163Dp%3A%2Fhe3D03Dn63Freporti3D19.11145issed-1.1176%2F%3FparentPage%3D2.1188%3Fcache%3D03D163D03D163Dp%3A%2Fhe3D03Dn63Freporti3D19.11145issed-1.1176%2F%3FparentPage%3D2.1188http://thetimes-tribune.com/opinion/maximize-gas-fee-s-impact-1.1162584http://www.newsworks.org/index.php/health-science/item/21543-pa-senate-panel-advances-gas-drilling-feehttp://www.post-gazette.com/pg/11166/1153717-53.stmhttp://www.timesleader.com/news/Drilling_impact_fee_bill__goes_to_full_Pa__Senate_06-15-2011.htmlhttp://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/state/s_742077.htmlhttp://www.philly.com/philly/news/20110615_Pa__Senate_edges_closer_to_shale-gas-driller_fee.htmlhttp://www.witf.org/state-house-sound-bites/impact-fee-moves-forwardhttp://www.pennlive.com/midstate/index.ssf/2011/06/gas-drilling_fee_proposal_move.htmlhttp://www.pocononews.net/news/2011/June/16/16Jun11-2.htmlhttp://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/state/s_742252.htmlhttp://www.witf.org/state-house-sound-bites/impact-fee-momentum-picking-uphttp://www.renewgrowinggreener.org/http://paenvironmentdaily.blogspot.com/2011/06/new-poll-finds-voters-support-new-tax.html -
8/6/2019 Pa Environment Digest June 20, 2011
5/45
Scarnati for having the fortitude and commitment to protect Pennsylvanias environment and its
resources at this very pivotal moment in its history.
Over the last decade, Pennsylvanias county conservation districts have seen a decline in
state funding, but an increase in work load and responsibilities. Each of the 66 conservation
districts takes its work to protect our natural resources and our environment seriously, but is
often left struggling to find new resources, avenues and additional funding to keep our waterresources pollution free, the air we breathe clean and the land we live on sustainable.
The staff at the conservation districts works tirelessly for the federal, state and local
governments in almost every facet of environmental protection. From permitting and farm land
preservation to stream erosion programs and protecting the water you drink, the Conservation
Districts respond quickly without reservation to all environmental issues and needs within the
Commonwealth.
Pennsylvania now finds itself at a crossroads as it relates to protecting its environmental
resources. The massive exploration and development of natural gas from the vast Marcellus
Shale formation, while positive for our economy and livelihood, can also be detrimental to our
environment.
That is why, now more than ever, it is important that the conservation districts beprovided with a dedicated annual stream of funding that will support the increased demand on
the conservation districts as a result of the drilling for natural gas in communities throughout the
state.
A new poll out this week from Quinnipiac University shows voters support imposition of
a Marcellus Shale tax 69 to 24 percent and for the first time regional support tops 60 percent in
every region of the state.
NewsClips: Marcellus Impact Fee Momentum Picking Up
Proposed Drilling Fee May Piggyback On Budget Bill
New Marcellus Shale Fee Plan Introduced In HouseGas Drilling Fee Proposal Moves Forward In Senate
Marcellus Shale Impact Fee Moves Forward
Senate Edges Closer To Shale Gas Driller Fee
Shale Impact Fee Bills May Collide With Budget
Drilling Impact Fee Bill Goes To Full Senate
Senate Panel Revises Drilling Fee Proposal
Senate Panel Advances Gas Drilling Fee
Editorial: Maximize Gas Fee's Impact
Editorial: Choose Impact Fee Alternative
Editorial: Quinn Bill A Better Fee Plan For Gas Drillers
PA Voters Like Shale Tax: Q PollPoll: State's Voters Say, Drill Baby Drill
Poll: Strong Support For Drilling Impact Fee Looks In Budget Debate
Sen. Yaw Supports Impact Fee Bill, Urges Action To Make Royalty Interests Taxable
http://paenvironmentdaily.blogspot.com/2011/06/new-poll-finds-voters-support-new-tax.htmlhttp://www.witf.org/state-house-sound-bites/impact-fee-momentum-picking-uphttp://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/state/s_742252.htmlhttp://www.pocononews.net/news/2011/June/16/16Jun11-2.htmlhttp://www.pennlive.com/midstate/index.ssf/2011/06/gas-drilling_fee_proposal_move.htmlhttp://www.witf.org/state-house-sound-bites/impact-fee-moves-forwardhttp://www.philly.com/philly/news/20110615_Pa__Senate_edges_closer_to_shale-gas-driller_fee.htmlhttp://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/state/s_742077.htmlhttp://www.timesleader.com/news/Drilling_impact_fee_bill__goes_to_full_Pa__Senate_06-15-2011.htmlhttp://www.post-gazette.com/pg/11166/1153717-53.stmhttp://www.newsworks.org/index.php/health-science/item/21543-pa-senate-panel-advances-gas-drilling-feehttp://thetimes-tribune.com/opinion/maximize-gas-fee-s-impact-1.1162584http://citizensvoice.com/opinion/choose-impact-fee-alternative-1.1162508?cache=03D163D03D163Dp%3A%2Fhe3D03Dn63Freporti3D19.11145issed-1.1176%2F%3FparentPage%3D2.1188%3Fcache%3D03D163D03D163Dp%3A%2Fhe3D03Dn63Freporti3D19.11145issed-1.1176%2F%3FparentPage%3D2.1188%3Fcache%3D03D163D03D163Dp%3A%2Fhe3D03Dn63Freporti3D19.11145issed-1.1176%2F%3FparentPage%3D2.1188%3Fcache%3D03D163D03D163Dp%3A%2Fhe3D03Dn63Freporti3D19.11145issed-1.1176%2F%3FparentPage%3D2.1188http://standardspeaker.com/opinion/a-better-fee-plan-for-gas-drillers-1.1163021http://earlyreturns.sites.post-gazette.com/index.php/early-returns-20/53-post-gazette-staff/2906-pa-voters-like-shale-tax-q-pollhttp://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/state/s_742047.htmlhttp://thetimes-tribune.com/news/gas-drilling/poll-strong-support-for-drilling-impact-fee-looms-larger-in-budget-debate-1.1161934http://thetimes-tribune.com/news/gas-drilling/poll-strong-support-for-drilling-impact-fee-looms-larger-in-budget-debate-1.1161934http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/state/s_742047.htmlhttp://earlyreturns.sites.post-gazette.com/index.php/early-returns-20/53-post-gazette-staff/2906-pa-voters-like-shale-tax-q-pollhttp://standardspeaker.com/opinion/a-better-fee-plan-for-gas-drillers-1.1163021http://citizensvoice.com/opinion/choose-impact-fee-alternative-1.1162508?cache=03D163D03D163Dp%3A%2Fhe3D03Dn63Freporti3D19.11145issed-1.1176%2F%3FparentPage%3D2.1188%3Fcache%3D03D163D03D163Dp%3A%2Fhe3D03Dn63Freporti3D19.11145issed-1.1176%2F%3FparentPage%3D2.1188%3Fcache%3D03D163D03D163Dp%3A%2Fhe3D03Dn63Freporti3D19.11145issed-1.1176%2F%3FparentPage%3D2.1188%3Fcache%3D03D163D03D163Dp%3A%2Fhe3D03Dn63Freporti3D19.11145issed-1.1176%2F%3FparentPage%3D2.1188http://thetimes-tribune.com/opinion/maximize-gas-fee-s-impact-1.1162584http://www.newsworks.org/index.php/health-science/item/21543-pa-senate-panel-advances-gas-drilling-feehttp://www.post-gazette.com/pg/11166/1153717-53.stmhttp://www.timesleader.com/news/Drilling_impact_fee_bill__goes_to_full_Pa__Senate_06-15-2011.htmlhttp://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/state/s_742077.htmlhttp://www.philly.com/philly/news/20110615_Pa__Senate_edges_closer_to_shale-gas-driller_fee.htmlhttp://www.witf.org/state-house-sound-bites/impact-fee-moves-forwardhttp://www.pennlive.com/midstate/index.ssf/2011/06/gas-drilling_fee_proposal_move.htmlhttp://www.pocononews.net/news/2011/June/16/16Jun11-2.htmlhttp://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/state/s_742252.htmlhttp://www.witf.org/state-house-sound-bites/impact-fee-momentum-picking-uphttp://paenvironmentdaily.blogspot.com/2011/06/new-poll-finds-voters-support-new-tax.html -
8/6/2019 Pa Environment Digest June 20, 2011
6/45
Sen. Gene Yaw (R-Bradford) said action this week by the Senate Environmental Resources and
Energy Committee improved Senate Bill 1100 (Scarnati-R-Jefferson) by adding provisions
creating a shale impact fee housing credit.
"This legislation is an important step forward to ensuring that local communities and
local governments impacted by the drilling receive much-needed support in the form of an
impact fee," said Sen. Yaw."Increased investment driven by the natural gas industry has resulted in unprecedented
levels of growth throughout the Northern Tier. Never before has there been such an urgent need
for residential and commercial real estate to fully serve this area. We have an obligation to
ensure that the local housing market is viable for all area residents," Sen. Yaw added.
Sen. Yaw also urged support for legislation that would make "royalty interests derived
from Marcellus Shale irrespective of the well location" a real estate interest and thus a subject of
taxation under the assessment law.
Senate Bill 744, sponsored by Yaw, would seek to give local governments a stake in their
own decision-making regarding the industry within the respective municipal boundaries.
"As a real estate interest, the value of the gas well would be determined according to the
law in the same manner as any other real estate interest in Pennsylvania, such as hotels, minimarkets, shopping malls, industrial properties and homes," Sen. Yaw said. "This bill (Senate Bill
744) is the only pending legislation, which would allow school districts to directly benefit from
the gas industry."
He added that until 2002, gas wells were taxed in this manner. In 2002, however, the
Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled that our statute was not broad enough to include gas wells.
A new poll out this week from Quinnipiac University shows voters support imposition of
a Marcellus Shale tax 69 to 24 percent and for the first time regional support tops 60 percent in
every region of the state.
NewsClips: Marcellus Impact Fee Momentum Picking Up
Proposed Drilling Fee May Piggyback On Budget BillNew Marcellus Shale Fee Plan Introduced In House
Gas Drilling Fee Proposal Moves Forward In Senate
Marcellus Shale Impact Fee Moves Forward
Senate Edges Closer To Shale Gas Driller Fee
Shale Impact Fee Bills May Collide With Budget
Drilling Impact Fee Bill Goes To Full Senate
Senate Panel Revises Drilling Fee Proposal
Senate Panel Advances Gas Drilling Fee
Editorial: Maximize Gas Fee's Impact
Editorial: Choose Impact Fee Alternative
Editorial: Quinn Bill A Better Fee Plan For Gas DrillersPA Voters Like Shale Tax: Q Poll
Poll: State's Voters Say, Drill Baby Drill
Poll: Strong Support For Drilling Impact Fee Looks In Budget Debate
Reps Scavello, Peifer, Brown Co-Sponsor Rep. Quinn's Marcellus Fee Plan
http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2011&sind=0&body=S&type=B&BN=1100http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2011&sind=0&body=S&type=B&BN=0744http://paenvironmentdaily.blogspot.com/2011/06/new-poll-finds-voters-support-new-tax.htmlhttp://www.witf.org/state-house-sound-bites/impact-fee-momentum-picking-uphttp://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/state/s_742252.htmlhttp://www.pocononews.net/news/2011/June/16/16Jun11-2.htmlhttp://www.pennlive.com/midstate/index.ssf/2011/06/gas-drilling_fee_proposal_move.htmlhttp://www.witf.org/state-house-sound-bites/impact-fee-moves-forwardhttp://www.philly.com/philly/news/20110615_Pa__Senate_edges_closer_to_shale-gas-driller_fee.htmlhttp://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/state/s_742077.htmlhttp://www.timesleader.com/news/Drilling_impact_fee_bill__goes_to_full_Pa__Senate_06-15-2011.htmlhttp://www.post-gazette.com/pg/11166/1153717-53.stmhttp://www.newsworks.org/index.php/health-science/item/21543-pa-senate-panel-advances-gas-drilling-feehttp://thetimes-tribune.com/opinion/maximize-gas-fee-s-impact-1.1162584http://citizensvoice.com/opinion/choose-impact-fee-alternative-1.1162508?cache=03D163D03D163Dp%3A%2Fhe3D03Dn63Freporti3D19.11145issed-1.1176%2F%3FparentPage%3D2.1188%3Fcache%3D03D163D03D163Dp%3A%2Fhe3D03Dn63Freporti3D19.11145issed-1.1176%2F%3FparentPage%3D2.1188%3Fcache%3D03D163D03D163Dp%3A%2Fhe3D03Dn63Freporti3D19.11145issed-1.1176%2F%3FparentPage%3D2.1188%3Fcache%3D03D163D03D163Dp%3A%2Fhe3D03Dn63Freporti3D19.11145issed-1.1176%2F%3FparentPage%3D2.1188http://standardspeaker.com/opinion/a-better-fee-plan-for-gas-drillers-1.1163021http://earlyreturns.sites.post-gazette.com/index.php/early-returns-20/53-post-gazette-staff/2906-pa-voters-like-shale-tax-q-pollhttp://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/state/s_742047.htmlhttp://thetimes-tribune.com/news/gas-drilling/poll-strong-support-for-drilling-impact-fee-looms-larger-in-budget-debate-1.1161934http://thetimes-tribune.com/news/gas-drilling/poll-strong-support-for-drilling-impact-fee-looms-larger-in-budget-debate-1.1161934http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/state/s_742047.htmlhttp://earlyreturns.sites.post-gazette.com/index.php/early-returns-20/53-post-gazette-staff/2906-pa-voters-like-shale-tax-q-pollhttp://standardspeaker.com/opinion/a-better-fee-plan-for-gas-drillers-1.1163021http://citizensvoice.com/opinion/choose-impact-fee-alternative-1.1162508?cache=03D163D03D163Dp%3A%2Fhe3D03Dn63Freporti3D19.11145issed-1.1176%2F%3FparentPage%3D2.1188%3Fcache%3D03D163D03D163Dp%3A%2Fhe3D03Dn63Freporti3D19.11145issed-1.1176%2F%3FparentPage%3D2.1188%3Fcache%3D03D163D03D163Dp%3A%2Fhe3D03Dn63Freporti3D19.11145issed-1.1176%2F%3FparentPage%3D2.1188%3Fcache%3D03D163D03D163Dp%3A%2Fhe3D03Dn63Freporti3D19.11145issed-1.1176%2F%3FparentPage%3D2.1188http://thetimes-tribune.com/opinion/maximize-gas-fee-s-impact-1.1162584http://www.newsworks.org/index.php/health-science/item/21543-pa-senate-panel-advances-gas-drilling-feehttp://www.post-gazette.com/pg/11166/1153717-53.stmhttp://www.timesleader.com/news/Drilling_impact_fee_bill__goes_to_full_Pa__Senate_06-15-2011.htmlhttp://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/state/s_742077.htmlhttp://www.philly.com/philly/news/20110615_Pa__Senate_edges_closer_to_shale-gas-driller_fee.htmlhttp://www.witf.org/state-house-sound-bites/impact-fee-moves-forwardhttp://www.pennlive.com/midstate/index.ssf/2011/06/gas-drilling_fee_proposal_move.htmlhttp://www.pocononews.net/news/2011/June/16/16Jun11-2.htmlhttp://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/state/s_742252.htmlhttp://www.witf.org/state-house-sound-bites/impact-fee-momentum-picking-uphttp://paenvironmentdaily.blogspot.com/2011/06/new-poll-finds-voters-support-new-tax.htmlhttp://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2011&sind=0&body=S&type=B&BN=0744http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2011&sind=0&body=S&type=B&BN=1100 -
8/6/2019 Pa Environment Digest June 20, 2011
7/45
Reps. Mario M. Scavello (R-Monroe), Mike Peifer (R-Monroe) and Rosemary M. Brown (R-
Monroe) have co-sponsored House Bill 1700 (Quinn-R-Bucks) that will create an
unconventional well impact fee applied to Marcellus Shale wells that would be distributed to
local governments, environmental programs and road and bridge repairs.
The proposal, known as the Shale Impact Mitigation Policy for Local Government, the
Environment and Roads Act (SIMPLER), divides proceeds from the impact fees between threenew funds in the State Treasury benefiting local governments and environmental concerns in
shale impact areas, and roads and bridges across the Commonwealth.
No matter how many wells are physically located in the districts we represent, the
potential environmental impact on the lakes and watersheds in Monroe, Pike and Wayne counties
is our primary concern, said Rep. Scavello. Our area depends on environmental tourism,
boating, fishing, hunting, skiing, canoeing, biking and hiking, so naturally we are most
concerned with the possible impact of wells on watersheds, lakes and rivers.
House Bill 1700 would assess a $50,000 impact fee per well for the first two years of
production on an unconventional well, such as those being drilled for Marcellus Shale. The
impact fee decreases $5,000 every two years from $45,000 in years three to four to $20,000 in
years 13 through 14, and is set at $15,000 for the next six years of production and $10,000 inyear 21 and thereafter.
Our constituents support an impact fee that stays locally and is used to monitor and
remediate any issues that arise from Marcellus shale gas wells drilled in our counties or in
neighboring areas, said Rep. Peifer. Marcellus Shale jobs have been a boon to Pennsylvania,
which is third in the nation in job creation during the past nine months, but we must have a
balance between jobs and the impact of the wells on our natural areas.
We want to ensure that the health and safety of the people we represent is protected
specifically by the companies conducting the drilling, said Rep. Brown. We don't want to see a
similar situation as what happened with the coal industry where decades of mining resulted in
environmental impacts we are still addressing today. The impact fees will stay local and allowmunicipalities and counties the financial means to protect our area and the areas experiencing the
majority of drilling.
House Bill 1700 is sponsored by Rep. Quinn and has bipartisan support. It will be
referred to the House Environmental Resources and Energy Committee, but Rep. Quinn did not
rule out introducing the proposal as an amendment to a bill moving through the Legislature
during June so that it can be considered as part of the budget process.
Impact Fee Distribution Fact Sheet
-- The Local Government Shale Impact Mitigation Fund would receive 50 percent of the
revenue.
-- Half would be provided to municipalities in which wells are located. The funds could be used
for:-- Water, storm water and sewer system construction, repair and maintenance;
-- Preservation and reclamation of surface and subsurface water supplies; and
-- Construction and maintenance of municipal roads and bridges.
-- Half would be provided to counties in which wells are located. The funds could be used for:
-- Municipal police, fire and emergency medical services, equipment and training;
-- Equipment for countywide training for municipal first responders and emergency preparedness
associated specifically relation to gas well incidents; and
http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2011&sind=0&body=H&type=B&BN=1700http://www.paenvironmentdigest.com/newsletter/default.asp?NewsletterArticleID=19230&SubjectID=&SearchWord=quinnhttp://www.paenvironmentdigest.com/newsletter/default.asp?NewsletterArticleID=19230&SubjectID=&SearchWord=quinnhttp://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2011&sind=0&body=H&type=B&BN=1700 -
8/6/2019 Pa Environment Digest June 20, 2011
8/45
-- Grants to municipalities for environmental projects relating to watershed protection and flood
control, and planning and enforcement activities.
-- The Environmental Shale Impact Mitigation Fund would receive 30 percent of the revenue.
-- 25 percent would be transferred to the Environmental Stewardship Fund until the 2014-15
fiscal year.
-- 15 percent from the 2015-16 fiscal year and beyond.-- 10 percent would be transferred to the Hazardous Sites Cleanup Fund from the 2015-16 fiscal
year and beyond.
-- 5 percent would be transferred to the Conservation District Fund.
-- The Impact Road and Bridge Shale Impact Mitigation Fund would receive 20 percent of the
revenue for funding highway and bridge construction priority projects across the
Commonwealth.
A new poll out this week from Quinnipiac University shows voters support imposition of
a Marcellus Shale tax 69 to 24 percent and for the first time regional support tops 60 percent in
every region of the state.
NewsClips: Marcellus Impact Fee Momentum Picking Up
Proposed Drilling Fee May Piggyback On Budget BillNew Marcellus Shale Fee Plan Introduced In House
Gas Drilling Fee Proposal Moves Forward In Senate
Marcellus Shale Impact Fee Moves Forward
Senate Edges Closer To Shale Gas Driller Fee
Shale Impact Fee Bills May Collide With Budget
Drilling Impact Fee Bill Goes To Full Senate
Senate Panel Revises Drilling Fee Proposal
Senate Panel Advances Gas Drilling Fee
Editorial: Maximize Gas Fee's Impact
Editorial: Choose Impact Fee AlternativeEditorial: Quinn Bill A Better Fee Plan For Gas Drillers
PA Voters Like Shale Tax: Q Poll
Poll: State's Voters Say, Drill Baby Drill
Poll: Strong Support For Drilling Impact Fee Looks In Budget Debate
Renew Growing Greener Coalition Applauds Rep. Quinn On Marcellus Fee Bill
The Renew Growing Greener Coalition this week commended Rep. Marguerite Quinn (R-Bucks)
for proposing Marcellus Shale local impact fee legislation-- House Bill 1700-- that includes
funding for the states Growing Greener program through the Environmental Stewardship Fund.
Coalition Executive Director Andrew Heath issued the following statement:The Renew Growing Greener Coalition is pleased with legislation proposed by Rep.
Quinn that provides dedicated funding for the states Growing Greener program through the
Environmental Stewardship Fund and also takes care of our conservation districts, which are our
first line of defense for our waterways.
Rep. Quinns legislation gets back to basics and is a simple, common sense approach to
addressing the impact of the natural gas industry on local communities and our natural resources.
http://paenvironmentdaily.blogspot.com/2011/06/new-poll-finds-voters-support-new-tax.htmlhttp://www.witf.org/state-house-sound-bites/impact-fee-momentum-picking-uphttp://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/state/s_742252.htmlhttp://www.pocononews.net/news/2011/June/16/16Jun11-2.htmlhttp://www.pennlive.com/midstate/index.ssf/2011/06/gas-drilling_fee_proposal_move.htmlhttp://www.witf.org/state-house-sound-bites/impact-fee-moves-forwardhttp://www.philly.com/philly/news/20110615_Pa__Senate_edges_closer_to_shale-gas-driller_fee.htmlhttp://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/state/s_742077.htmlhttp://www.timesleader.com/news/Drilling_impact_fee_bill__goes_to_full_Pa__Senate_06-15-2011.htmlhttp://www.post-gazette.com/pg/11166/1153717-53.stmhttp://www.newsworks.org/index.php/health-science/item/21543-pa-senate-panel-advances-gas-drilling-feehttp://thetimes-tribune.com/opinion/maximize-gas-fee-s-impact-1.1162584http://citizensvoice.com/opinion/choose-impact-fee-alternative-1.1162508?cache=03D163D03D163Dp%3A%2Fhe3D03Dn63Freporti3D19.11145issed-1.1176%2F%3FparentPage%3D2.1188%3Fcache%3D03D163D03D163Dp%3A%2Fhe3D03Dn63Freporti3D19.11145issed-1.1176%2F%3FparentPage%3D2.1188%3Fcache%3D03D163D03D163Dp%3A%2Fhe3D03Dn63Freporti3D19.11145issed-1.1176%2F%3FparentPage%3D2.1188%3Fcache%3D03D163D03D163Dp%3A%2Fhe3D03Dn63Freporti3D19.11145issed-1.1176%2F%3FparentPage%3D2.1188http://standardspeaker.com/opinion/a-better-fee-plan-for-gas-drillers-1.1163021http://earlyreturns.sites.post-gazette.com/index.php/early-returns-20/53-post-gazette-staff/2906-pa-voters-like-shale-tax-q-pollhttp://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/state/s_742047.htmlhttp://thetimes-tribune.com/news/gas-drilling/poll-strong-support-for-drilling-impact-fee-looms-larger-in-budget-debate-1.1161934http://www.renewgrowinggreener.org/http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2011&sind=0&body=H&type=B&BN=1700http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2011&sind=0&body=H&type=B&BN=1700http://www.renewgrowinggreener.org/http://thetimes-tribune.com/news/gas-drilling/poll-strong-support-for-drilling-impact-fee-looms-larger-in-budget-debate-1.1161934http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/state/s_742047.htmlhttp://earlyreturns.sites.post-gazette.com/index.php/early-returns-20/53-post-gazette-staff/2906-pa-voters-like-shale-tax-q-pollhttp://standardspeaker.com/opinion/a-better-fee-plan-for-gas-drillers-1.1163021http://citizensvoice.com/opinion/choose-impact-fee-alternative-1.1162508?cache=03D163D03D163Dp%3A%2Fhe3D03Dn63Freporti3D19.11145issed-1.1176%2F%3FparentPage%3D2.1188%3Fcache%3D03D163D03D163Dp%3A%2Fhe3D03Dn63Freporti3D19.11145issed-1.1176%2F%3FparentPage%3D2.1188%3Fcache%3D03D163D03D163Dp%3A%2Fhe3D03Dn63Freporti3D19.11145issed-1.1176%2F%3FparentPage%3D2.1188%3Fcache%3D03D163D03D163Dp%3A%2Fhe3D03Dn63Freporti3D19.11145issed-1.1176%2F%3FparentPage%3D2.1188http://thetimes-tribune.com/opinion/maximize-gas-fee-s-impact-1.1162584http://www.newsworks.org/index.php/health-science/item/21543-pa-senate-panel-advances-gas-drilling-feehttp://www.post-gazette.com/pg/11166/1153717-53.stmhttp://www.timesleader.com/news/Drilling_impact_fee_bill__goes_to_full_Pa__Senate_06-15-2011.htmlhttp://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/state/s_742077.htmlhttp://www.philly.com/philly/news/20110615_Pa__Senate_edges_closer_to_shale-gas-driller_fee.htmlhttp://www.witf.org/state-house-sound-bites/impact-fee-moves-forwardhttp://www.pennlive.com/midstate/index.ssf/2011/06/gas-drilling_fee_proposal_move.htmlhttp://www.pocononews.net/news/2011/June/16/16Jun11-2.htmlhttp://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/state/s_742252.htmlhttp://www.witf.org/state-house-sound-bites/impact-fee-momentum-picking-uphttp://paenvironmentdaily.blogspot.com/2011/06/new-poll-finds-voters-support-new-tax.html -
8/6/2019 Pa Environment Digest June 20, 2011
9/45
By establishing a fair and reasonable fee based on well construction rather than
production or market rates, Rep. Quinn has put forth a plan that we believe the Governor can
support while keeping his promise not to raise taxes.
The Renew Growing Greener Coalition supports Rep. Quinns efforts to restore funding
to protect and preserve our environment for future generations.
Growing Greener is a bipartisan program established in 1999 under Gov. Tom Ridge andlater expanded by Governors Schweiker and Rendell. Since its establishment, Growing Greener
has created a legacy of success, preserving more than 33,700 acres of Pennsylvanias family
farmland, conserving more than 42,300 acres of threatened open space, adding 26,000 acres to
state parks and forests, and restoring over 16,000 acres of abandoned mine lands.
In 2002, during the post 9-11 recession, a dedicated source of revenue for Growing
Greener was identified in an increase in the states tipping fee, the fee charged for dumping
trash in Pennsylvanias landfills. Those funds were supplemented by a $625 million bond
approved by voters in 2005, called Growing Greener II. Unless action is taken, those funds will
be largely exhausted as of June 30th, with most of the Growing Greener I tipping fees going to
the debt service on the Growing Greener II bonds.
More than 90 Pennsylvania municipalities and counties have passed resolutions urgingthe Governor and legislature to renew Growing Greener funding. Counties passing resolutions
include: Blair, Cambria, Erie, Fayette, Greene, Indiana Lackawanna, Lawrence, Lehigh,
Luzerne, Lycoming, Monroe, Philadelphia, Pike, Somerset, Sullivan, Susquehanna, Washington,
Westmoreland, Wyoming and York.
A new poll out this week from Quinnipiac University shows voters support imposition of
a Marcellus Shale tax 69 to 24 percent and for the first time regional support tops 60 percent in
every region of the state.
The Renew Growing Greener Coalition is the Commonwealths largest coalition of
conservation, recreation and environmental organizations representing nearly 300 organizations
and government entities.NewsClips: Marcellus Impact Fee Momentum Picking Up
Proposed Drilling Fee May Piggyback On Budget Bill
New Marcellus Shale Fee Plan Introduced In House
Gas Drilling Fee Proposal Moves Forward In Senate
Marcellus Shale Impact Fee Moves Forward
Senate Edges Closer To Shale Gas Driller Fee
Shale Impact Fee Bills May Collide With Budget
Drilling Impact Fee Bill Goes To Full Senate
Senate Panel Revises Drilling Fee Proposal
Senate Panel Advances Gas Drilling Fee
Editorial: Maximize Gas Fee's ImpactEditorial: Choose Impact Fee Alternative
Editorial: Quinn Bill A Better Fee Plan For Gas Drillers
PA Voters Like Shale Tax: Q Poll
Poll: State's Voters Say, Drill Baby Drill
Poll: Strong Support For Drilling Impact Fee Looks In Budget Debate
http://paenvironmentdaily.blogspot.com/2011/06/new-poll-finds-voters-support-new-tax.htmlhttp://www.renewgrowinggreener.org/http://www.witf.org/state-house-sound-bites/impact-fee-momentum-picking-uphttp://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/state/s_742252.htmlhttp://www.pocononews.net/news/2011/June/16/16Jun11-2.htmlhttp://www.pennlive.com/midstate/index.ssf/2011/06/gas-drilling_fee_proposal_move.htmlhttp://www.witf.org/state-house-sound-bites/impact-fee-moves-forwardhttp://www.philly.com/philly/news/20110615_Pa__Senate_edges_closer_to_shale-gas-driller_fee.htmlhttp://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/state/s_742077.htmlhttp://www.timesleader.com/news/Drilling_impact_fee_bill__goes_to_full_Pa__Senate_06-15-2011.htmlhttp://www.post-gazette.com/pg/11166/1153717-53.stmhttp://www.newsworks.org/index.php/health-science/item/21543-pa-senate-panel-advances-gas-drilling-feehttp://thetimes-tribune.com/opinion/maximize-gas-fee-s-impact-1.1162584http://citizensvoice.com/opinion/choose-impact-fee-alternative-1.1162508?cache=03D163D03D163Dp%3A%2Fhe3D03Dn63Freporti3D19.11145issed-1.1176%2F%3FparentPage%3D2.1188%3Fcache%3D03D163D03D163Dp%3A%2Fhe3D03Dn63Freporti3D19.11145issed-1.1176%2F%3FparentPage%3D2.1188%3Fcache%3D03D163D03D163Dp%3A%2Fhe3D03Dn63Freporti3D19.11145issed-1.1176%2F%3FparentPage%3D2.1188%3Fcache%3D03D163D03D163Dp%3A%2Fhe3D03Dn63Freporti3D19.11145issed-1.1176%2F%3FparentPage%3D2.1188http://standardspeaker.com/opinion/a-better-fee-plan-for-gas-drillers-1.1163021http://earlyreturns.sites.post-gazette.com/index.php/early-returns-20/53-post-gazette-staff/2906-pa-voters-like-shale-tax-q-pollhttp://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/state/s_742047.htmlhttp://thetimes-tribune.com/news/gas-drilling/poll-strong-support-for-drilling-impact-fee-looms-larger-in-budget-debate-1.1161934http://thetimes-tribune.com/news/gas-drilling/poll-strong-support-for-drilling-impact-fee-looms-larger-in-budget-debate-1.1161934http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/state/s_742047.htmlhttp://earlyreturns.sites.post-gazette.com/index.php/early-returns-20/53-post-gazette-staff/2906-pa-voters-like-shale-tax-q-pollhttp://standardspeaker.com/opinion/a-better-fee-plan-for-gas-drillers-1.1163021http://citizensvoice.com/opinion/choose-impact-fee-alternative-1.1162508?cache=03D163D03D163Dp%3A%2Fhe3D03Dn63Freporti3D19.11145issed-1.1176%2F%3FparentPage%3D2.1188%3Fcache%3D03D163D03D163Dp%3A%2Fhe3D03Dn63Freporti3D19.11145issed-1.1176%2F%3FparentPage%3D2.1188%3Fcache%3D03D163D03D163Dp%3A%2Fhe3D03Dn63Freporti3D19.11145issed-1.1176%2F%3FparentPage%3D2.1188%3Fcache%3D03D163D03D163Dp%3A%2Fhe3D03Dn63Freporti3D19.11145issed-1.1176%2F%3FparentPage%3D2.1188http://thetimes-tribune.com/opinion/maximize-gas-fee-s-impact-1.1162584http://www.newsworks.org/index.php/health-science/item/21543-pa-senate-panel-advances-gas-drilling-feehttp://www.post-gazette.com/pg/11166/1153717-53.stmhttp://www.timesleader.com/news/Drilling_impact_fee_bill__goes_to_full_Pa__Senate_06-15-2011.htmlhttp://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/state/s_742077.htmlhttp://www.philly.com/philly/news/20110615_Pa__Senate_edges_closer_to_shale-gas-driller_fee.htmlhttp://www.witf.org/state-house-sound-bites/impact-fee-moves-forwardhttp://www.pennlive.com/midstate/index.ssf/2011/06/gas-drilling_fee_proposal_move.htmlhttp://www.pocononews.net/news/2011/June/16/16Jun11-2.htmlhttp://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/state/s_742252.htmlhttp://www.witf.org/state-house-sound-bites/impact-fee-momentum-picking-uphttp://www.renewgrowinggreener.org/http://paenvironmentdaily.blogspot.com/2011/06/new-poll-finds-voters-support-new-tax.html -
8/6/2019 Pa Environment Digest June 20, 2011
10/45
New Poll Finds Voters Support New Tax On Drilling Companies 69 to 30 Percent
A new poll released by Quinnipiac University this week shows voters support a new tax on
companies drilling for natural gas 69 - 24 percent. Even Republicans support such a tax 59 - 33
percent. Support tops 60 percent among all other groups and in all regions.Pennsylvania voters say 63 - 30 percent that the economic benefits of natural gas drilling
in the Marcellus Shale outweigh the environmental impacts. Support is strong among men,
women, all parties and in all regions, ranging from 55 - 38 percent among voters in the northeast
corner of the state to 69 - 25 percent among voters in the northwest corner.
"'Drill, baby, drill,' is the call from Pennsylvania voters, and 'tax, baby, tax,' is the follow-
up as voters see natural gas drilling in the Marcellus Shale as an economic plus more than an
environmental negative," said Tim Malloy, assistant director of the Quinnipiac University
Polling Institute. "They also see added taxes on gas drillers as one of the few acceptable ways to
help balance the budget."
In the same poll, voters disapprove 52 - 33 percent of the way Corbett is handling the
state budget and say 48 - 36 percent that Gov. Tom Corbett's proposals to balance the budget areunfair to people like them. Democrats say unfair 66 - 19 percent while Republicans say fair 55 -
31 percent. Independent voters say unfair 45 - 38 percent.
Overall, voters give Gov. Corbett a 39 - 38 percent job approval rating, with 23 percent
of voters still undecided.
A complete copy of the poll results is available online.
NewsClips: PA Voters Like Shale Tax: Q Poll
Poll: State's Voters Say, Drill Baby Drill
Poll: Strong Support For Drilling Impact Fee Looks In Budget Debate
Poll: Corbett Approval Found To Founder
Poll Shows Gender Gap On Corbett's Job ApprovalMarcellus Impact Fee Momentum Picking Up
Proposed Drilling Fee May Piggyback On Budget Bill
New Marcellus Shale Fee Plan Introduced In House
Gas Drilling Fee Proposal Moves Forward In Senate
Marcellus Shale Impact Fee Moves Forward
Senate Edges Closer To Shale Gas Driller Fee
Shale Impact Fee Bills May Collide With Budget
Drilling Impact Fee Bill Goes To Full Senate
Senate Panel Revises Drilling Fee Proposal
Senate Panel Advances Gas Drilling Fee
Editorial: Maximize Gas Fee's ImpactEditorial: Choose Impact Fee Alternative
Editorial: Quinn Bill A Better Fee Plan For Gas Drillers
Chester County, 11 Organizations Join Support For Renewal Of Growing Greener
Program
http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x1327.xml?ReleaseID=1610http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x1327.xml?ReleaseID=1610http://earlyreturns.sites.post-gazette.com/index.php/early-returns-20/53-post-gazette-staff/2906-pa-voters-like-shale-tax-q-pollhttp://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/state/s_742047.htmlhttp://thetimes-tribune.com/news/gas-drilling/poll-strong-support-for-drilling-impact-fee-looms-larger-in-budget-debate-1.1161934http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/state/s_742144.htmlhttp://www.post-gazette.com/pg/11166/1153719-454.stmhttp://www.witf.org/state-house-sound-bites/impact-fee-momentum-picking-uphttp://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/state/s_742252.htmlhttp://www.pocononews.net/news/2011/June/16/16Jun11-2.htmlhttp://www.pennlive.com/midstate/index.ssf/2011/06/gas-drilling_fee_proposal_move.htmlhttp://www.witf.org/state-house-sound-bites/impact-fee-moves-forwardhttp://www.philly.com/philly/news/20110615_Pa__Senate_edges_closer_to_shale-gas-driller_fee.htmlhttp://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/state/s_742077.htmlhttp://www.timesleader.com/news/Drilling_impact_fee_bill__goes_to_full_Pa__Senate_06-15-2011.htmlhttp://www.post-gazette.com/pg/11166/1153717-53.stmhttp://www.newsworks.org/index.php/health-science/item/21543-pa-senate-panel-advances-gas-drilling-feehttp://thetimes-tribune.com/opinion/maximize-gas-fee-s-impact-1.1162584http://citizensvoice.com/opinion/choose-impact-fee-alternative-1.1162508?cache=03D163D03D163Dp%3A%2Fhe3D03Dn63Freporti3D19.11145issed-1.1176%2F%3FparentPage%3D2.1188%3Fcache%3D03D163D03D163Dp%3A%2Fhe3D03Dn63Freporti3D19.11145issed-1.1176%2F%3FparentPage%3D2.1188%3Fcache%3D03D163D03D163Dp%3A%2Fhe3D03Dn63Freporti3D19.11145issed-1.1176%2F%3FparentPage%3D2.1188%3Fcache%3D03D163D03D163Dp%3A%2Fhe3D03Dn63Freporti3D19.11145issed-1.1176%2F%3FparentPage%3D2.1188http://standardspeaker.com/opinion/a-better-fee-plan-for-gas-drillers-1.1163021http://standardspeaker.com/opinion/a-better-fee-plan-for-gas-drillers-1.1163021http://citizensvoice.com/opinion/choose-impact-fee-alternative-1.1162508?cache=03D163D03D163Dp%3A%2Fhe3D03Dn63Freporti3D19.11145issed-1.1176%2F%3FparentPage%3D2.1188%3Fcache%3D03D163D03D163Dp%3A%2Fhe3D03Dn63Freporti3D19.11145issed-1.1176%2F%3FparentPage%3D2.1188%3Fcache%3D03D163D03D163Dp%3A%2Fhe3D03Dn63Freporti3D19.11145issed-1.1176%2F%3FparentPage%3D2.1188%3Fcache%3D03D163D03D163Dp%3A%2Fhe3D03Dn63Freporti3D19.11145issed-1.1176%2F%3FparentPage%3D2.1188http://thetimes-tribune.com/opinion/maximize-gas-fee-s-impact-1.1162584http://www.newsworks.org/index.php/health-science/item/21543-pa-senate-panel-advances-gas-drilling-feehttp://www.post-gazette.com/pg/11166/1153717-53.stmhttp://www.timesleader.com/news/Drilling_impact_fee_bill__goes_to_full_Pa__Senate_06-15-2011.htmlhttp://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/state/s_742077.htmlhttp://www.philly.com/philly/news/20110615_Pa__Senate_edges_closer_to_shale-gas-driller_fee.htmlhttp://www.witf.org/state-house-sound-bites/impact-fee-moves-forwardhttp://www.pennlive.com/midstate/index.ssf/2011/06/gas-drilling_fee_proposal_move.htmlhttp://www.pocononews.net/news/2011/June/16/16Jun11-2.htmlhttp://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/state/s_742252.htmlhttp://www.witf.org/state-house-sound-bites/impact-fee-momentum-picking-uphttp://www.post-gazette.com/pg/11166/1153719-454.stmhttp://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/state/s_742144.htmlhttp://thetimes-tribune.com/news/gas-drilling/poll-strong-support-for-drilling-impact-fee-looms-larger-in-budget-debate-1.1161934http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/state/s_742047.htmlhttp://earlyreturns.sites.post-gazette.com/index.php/early-returns-20/53-post-gazette-staff/2906-pa-voters-like-shale-tax-q-pollhttp://www.quinnipiac.edu/x1327.xml?ReleaseID=1610http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x1327.xml?ReleaseID=1610 -
8/6/2019 Pa Environment Digest June 20, 2011
11/45
The Renew Growing Greener Coalition this week applauded the Chester County Board of
Commissioners for passing a resolution calling for the renewal of Growing Greener, the states
primary source of funding to help local communities preserve open space and farmland, protect
water quality, and enhance parks, trails and recreational opportunities.
In addition, 12 other groups and local governments joined the Coalition this week:
Delaware River City Corporation (Philadelphia), Hay Creek Watershed Association(Geigertown), Peoples Emergency Center (Philadelphia), and The W2Group (Philadelphia) as
well as City of Coatesville (Chester County), East Vincent Township (Chester County), Newlin
Township (Chester County), London Grove Township (Chester County), Phoenixville Borough
(Chester County), Sadsbury Township (Chester County) and West Nantmeal Township (Chester
County).
They join more than 215 other organizations and groups that have also announced their
support for renewing Growing Greener.
Funding for Growing Greener will dry up unless the state Legislature and Governor
Corbett act now to renew it, said Andrew Heath, Executive Director of the Renew Growing
Greener Coalition. County Commissioners and Pennsylvanians from across the
Commonwealth understand the incredible importance of renewing funding to the EnvironmentalStewardship Fund for Growing Greener in order to ensure families have access to clean drinking
water, fresh air and green open spaces.
Growing Greener has provided tremendous support for preservation and conservation
efforts throughout Chester County, said Terence Farrell, chairman of the Chester County Board
of Commissioners. The Commissioners urge the Governor and the Legislature to renew
funding for Growing Greener. Without it, Chester County may not be the special place it is
today.
Commissioner Kathi Cozzone stated, The economic benefits of preserving Open Space
are very real. As confirmed in a study conducted by the Delaware Valley Regional Planning
Commission and the GreenSpace Alliance, Open Space preservation creates jobs, brings moneyinto the community, enhances home values, filters drinking water and cleans the air. In addition,
trails, parks and preserves provide low or no cost recreation for citizens, saving money and
improving health. There is certainly a tremendous return on the investment of Growing Greener
funds in our communities.
"There have been many successful and meaningful projects that the County and our
municipalities have been able to implement as a result of utilizing Growing Greener funds," said
Commissioner Ryan Costello. "We are cognizant that the state budget is under consideration
right now, and that times are tough, but we hope our legislature and the Governor will recognize
that Growing Greener has been a successful program, and therefore give it worthy consideration,
so that if funds are available, Chester County can once again utilize them for more successful
projects."In Chester County, Growing Greener funds have helped to:
-- Preserve nearly 3,500 acres of working farmland throughout the county.
-- Reduce flooding and minimize stormwater flowing from the athletic fields at Conestoga High
School, protecting area streams from pollution carried by water runoff.
-- Restore 2,000 feet of East Branch Chester Creek in East Goshen Township, improving water
quality, wildlife habitat and natural vegetation.
http://www.renewgrowinggreener.org/http://www.renewgrowinggreener.org/ -
8/6/2019 Pa Environment Digest June 20, 2011
12/45
-- Acquire 113 acres of land to establish the Peacedale Preserve owned by the Natural Lands
Trust and located Franklin Township.
-- Fund the environmental clean up for the River Station redevelopment project on the site of the
former Sonoco Products paper plant in Downingtown.
-- Acquire 50 acres to complete the Rushton Woods Preserve where the Willistown Conservation
Trust offers several youth outreach programs, a community supported agriculture program, and acenter for bird conservation.
-- Support the creation of the Schuylkill River Greenway trail, which will run through Berks,
Chester and Montgomery Counties and continue into Philadelphia.
Chester County joins nearly 90 other Pennsylvania municipalities and counties in passing
a resolution urging the Governor and Legislature to renew Growing Greener funding. Counties
passing resolutions include: Blair, Cambria, Erie, Fayette, Greene, Indiana, Lackawanna,
Lawrence, Lehigh, Luzerne, Lycoming, Monroe, Philadelphia, Pike, Somerset, Sullivan,
Susquehanna, Washington, Westmoreland, Wyoming and York and represent over 5 million
Pennsylvanians.
Growing Greener is a bipartisan program established in 1999 under Gov. Tom Ridge and
later expanded by Governors Schweiker and Rendell. Since its establishment, Growing Greenerhas created a legacy of success, preserving more than 34,000 acres of Pennsylvanias family
farmland, conserving more than 42,300 acres of threatened open space, adding 26,000 acres to
state parks and forests, and restoring over 16,000 acres of abandoned mine lands.
In 2002, during the post 9-11 recession, a dedicated source of revenue for Growing
Greener was identified in an increase in the states tipping fee, the fee charged for dumping
trash in Pennsylvanias landfills. Those funds were supplemented by a $625 million bond
approved by voters in 2005, called Growing Greener II. Unless action is taken, Growing Greener
I funds will be largely exhausted as of June 30th, with most of the Growing Greener I tipping
fees going to the debt service on the Growing Greener II bonds.
The Renew Growing Greener Coalition is the Commonwealths largest coalition ofconservation, recreation and environmental organizations representing over 300 organizations
and government entities.
Senate/House Agenda/Session Schedule/Bills Introduced
Here are the Senate and House Calendars and Committee meetings showing bills of interest as
well as a list of new environmental bills introduced--
Session Schedule
Here is the Senate and House schedule-- 9 voting days until budget deadline.
Senate
June 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 27, 28, 29, 30
House
June 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 27, 28, 29, 30
http://www.renewgrowinggreener.org/http://www.renewgrowinggreener.org/ -
8/6/2019 Pa Environment Digest June 20, 2011
13/45
Bill Calendars
House (June 20): House Bill 1054 (Mustio-R-Allegheny) further providing for continuing
education of engineers and geologists; House Resolution 70 (Harhart-R-Lehigh) requesting the
Department of Transportation to study the potential use of quarry and other mining waste in
highway and civil engineering projects Click Here for full House Bill Calendar.
Senate (June 20): House Bill 1485 (Adolph-R-Delaware) providing for the 2011-12 General
Fund Budget; Senate Bill 1100 (Scarnati-R-Jefferson) establishing a Marcellus Shale Impact fee
and requiring the development of a model local zoning ordinance to control drilling
activities; Senate Bill 276 (Argall-R-Schuylkill) amending the Downtown Relocation law to
allow for compliance with economic revitalization plans; Senate Bill 469 (Argall-R-Schuylkill)
Allows walking, jogging, bicycling, exercising and horseback riding on nature trails as a
recreational purpose by limiting liability and was changed by a technical amendment; Click
Here for full Senate Bill Calendar.
Committees
NOTE: In this budget season, Committee meetings can happen at anytime without any notice to
move any bill that might be part of a budget agreement.
House: the State Government Committee meets to considerSenate Bill 263 (Erickson-R-
Delaware) requiring data to support rulemakings. Click Here for full House Committee
Schedule.
Senate: the Appropriations Committee meets to considerSenate Bill 995 (Baker-R-Luzerne)
requiring the posting of certain emergency information for each gas well, House Bill 143 (Major-R-Susquehanna) amending Act 319 to authorize the splitting off of land for noncoal
mining, House Bill 144 (Pickett-R-Bradford) amending Act 319 to authorize taxation of oil and
gas well production; the Local Government Committee meets to considerSenate Bill
394 (Brubaker-R-Lancaster) further providing for local authority to preserve open space.
Click Here for full Senate Committee Schedule.
Bills Introduced
The following bills of interest were introduced this week--
Biofuels: House Bill 1652 (Grove-R-York) amending the Biofuel Development ProductionIncentive Act to remove a section related to cellulosic ethanol content in gasoline.
Energy Efficiency Funding: House Bill 1667 (Galloway-D-Bucks) establishing the Property
Assessed Clean Energy Program to allow local funding of energy efficiency improvements.
Severance Tax: House Bill 1671 (Miccarelli-R-Delaware) enacting a severance tax on natural
gas product to provide senior citizen property tax relief.
http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2011&sind=0&body=H&type=B&bn=1054http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2011&sind=0&body=H&type=R&bn=70http://www.legis.state.pa.us/WU01/LI/SC/HC/0/RC/SCHC.HTMhttp://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2011&sind=0&body=H&type=B&BN=1485http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2011&sind=0&body=S&type=B&BN=1100http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2011&sind=0&body=S&type=B&BN=0276http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2011&sInd=0&body=S&type=B&bn=469http://www.legis.state.pa.us/WU01/LI/SC/SC/0/RC/CAL.HTMhttp://www.legis.state.pa.us/WU01/LI/SC/SC/0/RC/CAL.HTMhttp://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2011&sind=0&body=S&type=B&BN=0263http://www.legis.state.pa.us/WU01/LI/CO/HM/COHM.HTMhttp://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2011&sInd=0&body=S&type=B&bn=995http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2011&sInd=0&body=H&type=B&bn=143http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2011&sInd=0&body=H&type=B&bn=144http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2011&sind=0&body=S&type=B&BN=0394http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2011&sind=0&body=S&type=B&BN=0394http://www.legis.state.pa.us/WU01/LI/CO/SM/COSM.HTMhttp://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2011&sind=0&body=H&type=B&BN=1652http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2011&sind=0&body=H&type=B&bn=1667http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2011&sind=0&body=H&type=B&BN=1671http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2011&sind=0&body=H&type=B&BN=1671http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2011&sind=0&body=H&type=B&bn=1667http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2011&sind=0&body=H&type=B&BN=1652http://www.legis.state.pa.us/WU01/LI/CO/SM/COSM.HTMhttp://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2011&sind=0&body=S&type=B&BN=0394http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2011&sind=0&body=S&type=B&BN=0394http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2011&sInd=0&body=H&type=B&bn=144http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2011&sInd=0&body=H&type=B&bn=143http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2011&sInd=0&body=S&type=B&bn=995http://www.legis.state.pa.us/WU01/LI/CO/HM/COHM.HTMhttp://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2011&sind=0&body=S&type=B&BN=0263http://www.legis.state.pa.us/WU01/LI/SC/SC/0/RC/CAL.HTMhttp://www.legis.state.pa.us/WU01/LI/SC/SC/0/RC/CAL.HTMhttp://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2011&sInd=0&body=S&type=B&bn=469http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2011&sind=0&body=S&type=B&BN=0276http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2011&sind=0&body=S&type=B&BN=1100http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2011&sind=0&body=H&type=B&BN=1485http://www.legis.state.pa.us/WU01/LI/SC/HC/0/RC/SCHC.HTMhttp://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2011&sind=0&body=H&type=R&bn=70http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2011&sind=0&body=H&type=B&bn=1054 -
8/6/2019 Pa Environment Digest June 20, 2011
14/45
Taxing Gas Leases: House Bill 1674 (Kula-D-Fayette) making oil and gas leases held by
property owners to be assessed and tax by political subdivisions.
Electric Corridor: House Bill 1675 (Cohen-D-Philadelphia) establishing an Electric Vehicle
Charging Corridor Tax Credit.
Fracking Chemicals: House Bill 1680 (Johnson-D-Philadelphia) amending the Safe Drinking
Water Act to require the disclosure of fracking chemicals.
Land Banks: House Bill 1682 (Taylor-R-Philadelphia) authorizing municipal land banks to
provide for the reuse of abandoned or vacant properties.
Biomass Fund: House Bill 1684 (Rapp-R-Forest) establishing a Biomass Energy Program
within DCED to provide financial assistance.
Leaf Waste: House Bill 1691 (Godshall-R-Montgomery) further providing for the recycling ofleaf waste.
Water Trail Impacts: Senate Resolution 143 (Pippy-R-Allegheny) directing the Legislative
Budget and Finance Committee to study the economic impact of recreational water trails.
Solar Energy: Senate Bill 1146 (Hughes-D-Philadelphia) amending the Alternative Energy
Portfolio Standards Act to further provide for solar energy mandates.
Sewage Program: Senate Resolution 140 (Brubaker-R-Lancaster) directing the Legislative
Budget and Finance Committee to review the state's sewage facilities management programunder Act 537.
Senate/House Bills Moving
The following bills of interest saw action this week in the House and Senate--
House
Bioenergy Crops/Mine Reclamation: House Bill 608 (Brooks-R-Crawford) encouraging the
use of bioenergy crops for mine reclamation purposes was reported out of the House
Appropriations Committee and passed by the House. It now goes to the Senate forconsideration.
Biofuels: House Bill 807 (Sonney-R-Erie) further providing for biodiesel standards and blending
requirements and establishing fees for enforcement of biodiesel mandate was referred into and
out of the House Appropriations Committee and was passed by the House. The bill now goes to
the Senate for consideration.
http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2011&sind=0&body=H&type=B&BN=1674http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2011&sind=0&body=H&type=B&BN=1675http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2011&sind=0&body=H&type=B&BN=1680http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2011&sind=0&body=H&type=B&BN=1682http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2011&sind=0&body=H&type=B&BN=1684http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2011&sind=0&body=H&type=B&BN=1691http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2011&sind=0&body=S&type=R&BN=0143http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2011&sind=0&body=S&type=B&BN=1146http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2011&sind=0&body=S&type=R&bn=140http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2011&sind=0&body=H&type=B&BN=0608http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2011&sind=0&body=H&type=B&bn=807http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2011&sind=0&body=H&type=B&bn=807http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2011&sind=0&body=H&type=B&BN=0608http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2011&sind=0&body=S&type=R&bn=140http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2011&sind=0&body=S&type=B&BN=1146http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2011&sind=0&body=S&type=R&BN=0143http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2011&sind=0&body=H&type=B&BN=1691http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2011&sind=0&body=H&type=B&BN=1684http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2011&sind=0&body=H&type=B&BN=1682http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2011&sind=0&body=H&type=B&BN=1680http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2011&sind=0&body=H&type=B&BN=1675http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2011&sind=0&body=H&type=B&BN=1674 -
8/6/2019 Pa Environment Digest June 20, 2011
15/45
Geologist Continuing Education: House Bill 1054 (Mustio-R-Allegheny) further providing for
continuing education of engineers and geologists was removed from the Table and is now on the
House Calendar for action.
Senate
Nominations: The nomination of Bernard A. Labuskes, Jr. to the Environmental Hearing Board
was approved unanimously by the Senate Environmental Resources and Energy Committee and
is now before the full Senate.
General Fund Budget: House Bill 1485 (Adolph-R-Delaware) providing for the 2011-12
General Fund Budget was reported from the Senate Appropriations Committee and is now on the
Senate Calendar for action.
Marcellus Shale Impact Fee: Senate Bill 1100 (Scarnati-R-Jefferson) establishing a Marcellus
Shale Impact fee and requiring the development of a model local zoning ordinance to controldrilling activities was amended and reported from the Senate Environmental Resources and
Energy Committee to provide a vehicle for adopting an impact fee. The bill is now on the Senate
Calendar for action.
Gas Well Emergencies: Senate Bill 995 (Baker-R-Luzerne) requiring gas well operators to post
certain 911 response information at the entrance to each well site was referred to the Senate
Appropriations Committee.
Downtown Relocation: Senate Bill 276 (Argall-R-Schuylkill) amending the Downtown
Relocation law to allow for compliance with economic revitalization plans was amended andreported from the Senate Community, Economic and Recreational Development Committee and
is now on the Senate Calendar for action.
Fuel Testing: Senate Bill 341 (Greenleaf-R-Montgomery) establishing a automotive fuel testing
program was referred to the Senate Appropriations Committee.
News From The Capitol
Proposal To Use Bioenergy Crops For Land Reclamation Passes House
The House this week passed House Bill 608 (Brooks-R-Crawford) that would help promoteprivate investment in bioenergy resources while assisting to reclaim mine lands in Pennsylvania.
The potential created by this legislation will help spur economic development by
helping private businesses mitigate their costs, and providing them additional resources to invest
in jobs. This legislation is also a perfect fit to help address our energy security concerns. These
crops can also be used as a biomass fuel creating another homegrown energy resource, Rep.
Brooks said.
http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2011&sind=0&body=H&type=B&bn=1054http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2011&sind=0&body=H&type=B&BN=1485http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2011&sind=0&body=S&type=B&BN=1100http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2011&sInd=0&body=S&type=B&bn=995http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2011&sind=0&body=S&type=B&BN=0276http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2011&sind=0&body=S&type=B&BN=0341http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2011&sind=0&body=H&type=B&BN=0608http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2011&sind=0&body=H&type=B&BN=0608http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2011&sind=0&body=S&type=B&BN=0341http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2011&sind=0&body=S&type=B&BN=0276http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2011&sInd=0&body=S&type=B&bn=995http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2011&sind=0&body=S&type=B&BN=1100http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2011&sind=0&body=H&type=B&BN=1485http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2011&sind=0&body=H&type=B&bn=1054 -
8/6/2019 Pa Environment Digest June 20, 2011
16/45
For the past three sessions, I have been working to advance this bill through the
legislative process to encourage the use of various grasses such as switchgrass, camelina and
canola to assist Pennsylvania with energy independence while also facilitating the repair of
abandoned mine lands. Studies have been done in other states to prove that these fast-growing
crops can flourish in all types of environments. The robust nature of these plants can help repair
mine lands faster than traditional plants that are grown on previously mined lands, said Rep.Brooks.
House Bill 608, which received overwhelming bipartisan support from the committee and
on the House floor, would authorize the Department of Environmental Protection to encourage
the planting of switchgrass or other fast-growing crops to revegetate lands affected by surface
mining.
Under the legislation, if a mine operator uses one or more of these crops in reclamation,
the bond can be fully released at the Stage II level instead of Stage III, provided other criteria are
met. This means that the financial guarantee bonds will be available to be used on other
reclamation sites increasing the rate on which mine lands are reclaimed.
The proposal, which is now with the Senate for consideration, would apply to all lands
affected by surface mining activities, not just to re-mined lands.
Senate Bill Proposes Arbitration For Gas Well Site Disputes
Sen. Don White (R-Indiana) recently introduced Senate Bill 1108 to provide an expeditious and
less costly way for property owners and drillers to settle disputes over well locations rather than
taking the issue to court.
Under the bill, those disputes could be considered by a special review board set up to
arbitrate coal bed methane well location disputes between land owners and gas companies.
My bill extends the purview of the Coal Bed Methane Review Board to include natural
gas wells, Sen. White said. Under the bill, both parties would retain the right to appeal theboards decision to their county court of common pleas. As Marcellus Shale activity grows, I
believe such a review process would be a beneficial and less costly option for landowners with
natural gas development on their properties.
Act 4 of 2010 authorized the creation of the three-member Coal Bed Methane Review
Board to consider objections by property owners and reach agreements with gas companies on
issues such as the location of coal bed methane wells and/or access roads. Previously, disputes
between surface land owners and the holders of mineral rights for those properties were often
unresolved as landowners had very little recourse if they did not approve of the location of a
well.
Just as with Act 4, Senate Bill 1108 does not change the ownership of property or rights,
but creates a timely, less expensive process for property owners to clear up disputes that ariseover the location of natural gas well sites without going to court, Sen. White said.
Sen. White sent a copy of Senate Bill 1108 to Lt. Governor Jim Cawley, Chairman of the
Governors Marcellus Shale Advisory Commission, and requested that it be considered as part of
that panels recommendations.
As Chairman of the Marcellus Shale Advisory Commission, I would appreciate your
sharing this legislation with the other members of the commission and consider it as part of its
overall initiative, Sen. White wrote in a letter to the Lieutenant Governor. Thank you for your
http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2011&sind=0&body=S&type=B&BN=1108http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2011&sind=0&body=S&type=B&BN=1108 -
8/6/2019 Pa Environment Digest June 20, 2011
17/45
consideration of Senate Bill 1108 as a way to address the needs of both the natural gas industry
as well as those who own the property where the resources are located.
Sen. White authored Senate Bill 275 during last session, which set the framework for the
review board. The key provisions of Senate Bill 275 were amended into House Bill 1847by the
Senate and subsequently enacted as Act 4.
The Coal Bed Methane Review Board is made up of a member appointed by thePennsylvania Farm Bureau, a member appointed jointly by the PA Oil and Gas Association, the
Independent Oil and Gas Association and the Pennsylvania Coal Association, and a member
appointed jointly by the deans of the College of Agricultural Sciences and the College of Earth
and Mineral Sciences of Penn State University. The board is required to make a decision within
10 days from the time a hearing is held on a well location dispute.
Senate Bill 1108 is now before the Senate Environmental Resources and Energy
Committee for consideration.
Bill Authorizes Low Interest Loans For Energy Improvements
Rep. John Galloway (D-Bucks) introduced House Bill 1667 to allow local governments to offerproperty owners low-interest loans to finance renewable energy upgrades.
"By making it easier for homeowners and businesses to finance alternative energy
upgrades, we help them cut their energy bills, plus we help to create local jobs for businesses that
make and install the equipment," said Rep. Galloway. "In addition, this bill would send a
message to industries that produce such power that Pennsylvania is ready to be a partner in the
development and use of sustainable alternative energy."
Under the Property Assessed Clean Energy Program, or PACE, that would be created by
House Bill 1667, eligible property owners would finance such improvements as installing solar
panels through a voluntary assessment on their property taxes. They would pay back the loan to
their municipalities or townships as part of their property tax bill."PACE is a tool for local governments to stimulate their local green economy while
providing competitive financing for commercial and residential property owners," said Rep.
Galloway.
Rep. Galloway first introduced his PACE legislation last session after officials from Falls
Township, Bucks County, who were working with AE Polysilicon and the Department of
Environmental Protection, had attempted to create a municipal finance program for solar projects
in 2009. DEP told the township that the plan was not feasible due to current state law that
prohibits such financing arrangements.
California was the first state to implement a PACE program in 2008. Since then,
Colorado, Illinois, Louisiana, Maryland, Nevada, New Mexico, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Texas,
Vermont, Virginia and Wisconsin have followed suit.More information about PACE can be found online.
Senate Resolution Proposes Study Of Water Trail Economic Impact In PA
http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2011&sind=0&body=S&type=B&BN=0275http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2011&