p53 is frequently mutated in barrett’ s metaplasia of the ... · in be metaplasia. formalin-fixed...
TRANSCRIPT
Vol. 5, 559-565, July 1996 Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention 559
p53 Is Frequently Mutated in Barrett’ s Metaplasia of the
Intestinal Type’
Paola Campomenosi, Massimo Conio, Massimo Bogliolo,Stefania Urbini, Paola Assereto, Anna Aprile,Paola Monti, Hugo Aste, Gabnella Lapertosa,Alberto Inga, Angelo Abbondandolo, andGilberto Fronza2
Centre for the Study of Tumors of Environmental Origins-Mutagenesis
Laboratory [P. C.. M. B.. S. U.. P. A., A. Ap.. P. M., A. I., A. Ab., G. F.l and
Gastroenterological Unit lM. C., H. Al. National Institute for Cancer Research(1ST) Largo R. Benzi 10. 16132 Genoa; and Chairs of Anatomical Pathology
1G. L.l and Genetics A. Ah.I, University of Genoa, Genoa. Italy
Abstract
Barrett’s Esophagus (BE) is a complication ofgastroesophageal reflux in which the normal squamousepithelium of the lower esophagus is replaced bymetaplastic tissue. The clinical significance of thiscondition is the associated predisposition toadenocarcinomas (ADCs). Three types of BE have beencharacterized: the gastric fundic (F) type, the gastriccardial (C) type, and the intestinal (I) type. The latter isthe most closely associated with the development ofADCs; the causes of this bias remain unknown. Todetermine whether p53 and/or K-ras gene alterations (a)are present in preneoplastic lesions and (b) are associatedwith a specific histotype, we performed PCR-baseddenaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) analysisof exon 1 (codons 12-13) of K-ras gene and of exons 5-8
of the p53 gene in biopsies obtained from 30 patients withBE of the I type (9 patients), combined I type (I + C ± F;
10 patients) and non-I type (C, F, or C + F; 1 1 patients).None of the cases under study revealed K-ras mutations,whereas biopsies from 12 patients showed at least one p53DGGE variant. Four patients showed the exact same
variants in leukocytes also (polymorphisms), whereaseight cases revealed specific DGGE variants only inbiopsies. The molecular characterization of these variantsrevealed that four of them showed a single base pair
substitution, and four showed multiple mutations. Of 17somatic mutations, all but 1 were base pair substitutionslocated mainly in exons 7 and 8. The majority of thesemutations were GC targeted (13 of 16; 81%), 54% (7 of13) of which were transitions occurring at CpG sites. Allsomatic mutations were found in BE with at least one Icomponent. The association with the histotype was
Received 1/4/96; revised 4/3/96; accepted 4/8/96.
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of
page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in
accordance with I 8 U.S.C. Section 1 734 solely to indicate this fact.
I This work was partially supported by Contract CHRX-CT94-058l from the
Commission of the European Communities and by the Italian Association for
Cancer Research (AIRC).2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed.
statistically significant (P < 0.03; pure I type versus non-Itype; P < 0.04, combined I type versus non-I type;Fisher’s exact test). Loss of heterozygosity in the vicinityof the p53 locus was evaluated by PCR using a highlypolymorphic variable number of tandem repeats markeron 25 out of 30 cases. Ninety-two % of the cases analyzedwere informative, and none of them showed LOH. Inconclusion, we showed that p53 mutations are frequentlyobserved in specimens from BE patients of the I-type,whereas no involvement of K-ras (exon 1) mutationalactivation was observed. In light of the key roles that thep53 protein plays in controlling cell cycle and celldiploidy, this result may suggest why this type ofmetaplasia is the most closely associated to thedevelopment of ADCs.
Introduction
BE3 is a complication of GER in which the normal squamousepithelium of the lower esophagus is replaced by metaplastic
tissue. The clinical significance of this condition is the associ-ated predisposition to ADCs. Endoscopy reveals that 10% and
1% of patients with symptoms of chronic GER are affected byBE or ADCs, respectively. Individuals with BE have a risk ofdeveloping esophageal ADC 30-I 25 times greater than the
general population. Three types of BE have been characterized:the gastric fundic (F) type, the gastric cardial (C) type, and theintestinal (I) type. The latter is the most closely associated withthe development of ADCs (1-3), and the causes of this biasremain unknown.
Barren’s associated ADCs develop by a multistep processthat can be recognized morphologically as a metaplasia -�
dysplasia -* cancer sequence (Ref. 4 and references citedtherein). Diagnosis of dysplasia, especially low-grade dyspla-sia, is far from being conclusive because of the subjective
nature of histological interpretation and low intra- and inter-observer agreement. The neoplastic progression has been de-scribed more objectively through the determination of molec-
ular markers. With DNA content flow cytometry, thehistological progression of BE has been shown to parallel the
changes in DNA content indicating a diploid/aneuploid Se-quence (4-6). Aneuploidy might be triggered by the functionalinactivation of the tumor suppressor gene p53. Its gene productis a 53-kDa nuclear phosphoprotein. which acts as a transcrip-tional activator of cell proliferation inhibitor genes (7). Several
studies suggest that p53 may be required for the maintenance ofdiploidy because loss or inactivation of p53 can be associatedwith tetraploidy or aneuploidy (8-10). Mutational inactivation
3 The abbreviations used are: BE, Barrett’s esophagus; GER. gastroesophageal
reflux; ADC, adenocarcinoma; F, gastric fundic; C. gastric cardial; I. intestinal;
DGGE, denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis; LOH. loss of heterozygosity;
VNTR, variable number of tandem repeats.
Association for Cancer Research. by guest on November 2, 2020. Copyright 1996 Americanhttps://bloodcancerdiscov.aacrjournals.orgDownloaded from
560 p53 Mutations tn Barrett’s Esophagus
of the p53 gene, a frequent feature of many human neoplasms,occurring as either early or late event during specific carcino-
genic processes ( 1 1 ), has been reported for BE-associatedADCs. In BE. p53 mutations have been characterized especially
in dysplastic BE or Barrett’s ADCs (8, 9, 12, 13). Different
authors, using an immunohistochemical approach, observed anincreasing incidence of p53 protein accumulation along thedifferent stages of the carcinogenic process (14-18).
K-ras proto-oncogene activation by point mutation may be
another factor contributing to the loss of cell cycle control. Rasproteins are key transducers of extracellular stimuli from theplasma membrane to the nucleus ( 19, 20). Mutations in theK-nis gene are observed in many human cancers (21) and areinvolved in both early and late stages of tumorigenesis. Using
an immunohistochemical approach, Jankowski et a!. (22) foundsimilar incidences (20%) of ras overexpression in metaplasia
and ADC, suggesting that alterations at the ras loci could be
early events but are not particularly associated with advancedstages in the BE progression. To our knowledge, no direct
studies of ras gene alterations in BE metaplasia are present inthe literature.
In the present study, we addressed the questions ofwhether p53 and/or K-ras gene alterations (a) are present inpreneoplastic lesions and (b) are associated with a specifichistotype. For this purpose, we screened for K-ras and p53 genemutations endoscopic biopsies histologically confirmed as BEmetaplasia, obtained from 30 patients undergoing endoscopicsurveillance (23), by applying the highly sensitive PCR-basedDGGE and sequencing methods (24, 25).
Patients and Methods
Patients. Thirty patients (27 males and 3 females; ages 36-85
years: mean age, 6 1 ) undergoing upper gastrointestinal endos-copy for upper-digestive tract symptoms, were diagnosed to be
affected by histologically confirmed BE (23). Endoscopically,BE was defined as the presence of velvety red gastric-likemucosa lining the distal esophagus for at least 3 cm between thegastroesophageal junction and the proximal displaced squamo-columnar junction (Z-line). Four to six biopsies per patient,taken from the metaplastic epithelium, were immediately fro-zen in liquid nitrogen. From each patient, 10 ml of blood werewithdrawn as control tissue. The analysis at the molecular level
was usually performed on pooled biopsies. In a few cases,
however, biopsies were analyzed separately. In the latter situ-
ation, the majority of cases (but not all) were concordant. Thissuggests that p53 mutations may be heterogeneously distributedin BE metaplasia. Formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded ma-terial was histologically evaluated to characterize columnarepithelium as gastric type (C or F) and/or I type as describedpreviously (23). A single type ofmetaplasia was observed in 17patients, whereas in the remaining cases, more than one type of
metaplasia was observed. Biopsies were then classified as pureI type. combined I type (I + C ± F), and non-I type (C and/or
F; Ref. 23). Dysplasia was classified according to Schmidt et a!.
(26). No low- or high-grade dysplasia was found in any biopsy,but four cases showed indefinite dysplasia. In a follow-upranging from I to 3 years, none of the 30 cases progressed tohigh-grade dysplastic BE.
PCR Conditions. High molecular weight DNA was prepared
from biopsy and blood sample (control tissue) as describedpreviously (24). The region encompassing exons 5-8 of the p53
gene was selectively amplified using five pairs of meltingdomain specific primers. Primers and PCR conditions were asdescribed previously (24). The first exon of the K-ras gene was
amplified according to Pellegata et a!. (25). Briefly, for K-ras,PCR amplifications were performed using about 200 ng ofDNA, 15 pmol of each primer, 250 �M each dNTP, 50 mrvi KC1,10 msi Tris-HC1 (pH 8.3), 1 .5 m� MgCl2, and 1 .5 units of Taq
Polymerase (Promega, Madison, WI) in a final volume of 50;.tl. PCRs were performed in a MJPT-l00 thermal cycler (MJResearch, Inc., Watertown, MA) for 35 cycles. Each cycle
consisted of 1 mm at 95#{176}C,1 .5 mm at 55#{176}C,and 2 mm at 72#{176}C.Positive controls for K-ras analysis, consisting of DNA sam-ples extracted from four cell lines bearing known K-ras muta-
tions [SW 480 (codon 12: gGt-�gTt), SW 837 (codon 12Ggt-*Tgt), DLD-l (codon 13: gGc-’-�gAc), NIH�3T3* (NIH3T3 transformed with human mutated K-ras; codon 12:
Ggt-�Cgt)] were a generous gift from Dr. W. Giaretti (NationalInstitute for Research on Cancer, 1ST, Genoa, Italy).
DGGE Conditions. The PCR products obtained with the GC-
clamped ampliprimers were analyzed by DGGE. The DGGE
apparatus was from CBS Scientific Co. (Del Mar, CA). Paralleldenaturing gradient gels were prepared with 8% acrylamide-bisacrylamide (37: 1) in TAE [40 mrvi Tris acetate-l mrvi EDTA
(pH 8.0)1 and by varying denaturant concentrations (100%denaturant corresponds to 7 M urea and 40% formamide). Therange of the denaturing gradient was different and specific foreach amplified fragment (24, 25). Gels were run in TAE at60#{176}Cand 50 V for 16-20 h. After electrophoresis, the gels were
stained in ethidium bromide and photographed using Polaroidtype 55 films. DNA samples showing PCR-amplified fragmentswith altered DGGE profile were reanalyzed to confirm their
abnormal behavior, thus avoiding misinterpretation of possiblePCR artifacts.
DNA Sequencing. PCR products for sequencing were ob-tamed starting from either genomic DNA or eluted DGGEmutant homoduplex bands. The PCR products were cloned into
the plasmid pGEM-T (Promega, Madison, WI) according to themanufacturer’s instructions. The inserts of a series of independ-ent clones were characterized by PCR-DGGE analysis. Three tofive independent clones showing the same mutant homoduplexband pattern as the one obtained starting from genomic DNAwere then sequenced as previously described (24).
LOH. LOH in proximity to the p53 locus was evaluated byPCR using the highly polymorphic (VNTR) marker YNZ22(band Vlpl3.3) on 25 of 30 cases. Primers and PCR conditionswere those described by Batanian et a!. (27). For each case, 300
ng of DNA extracted from biopsies and blood sample (controltissue) were separately used as template for VNTR-specific
amplifications. PCR products were separated on a 2% agarosegel, stained with 0.5 p�g/ml ethidium bromide, and visualizedusing a UV transilluminator. LOH was considered to haveoccurred when one of the two alleles present in PCR productsobtained with leukocyte DNA was missing from PCR productsobtained from the biopsy DNA.
Results
We performed PCR-based DGGE analysis of exon 1 (codons12-13) of the K-ras gene and of exons 5 to 8 of the p53 genein biopsies obtained from 30 patients with BE of the pure I type(9 patients), combined I-type (I + C ± F; 10 patients) and non-I
type (C and/or F; 1 1 patients). Metaplastic tissue was observedin all samples, and no high-grade dysplasia was observed. Four
cases showed indefinite dysplasia. The screening allowed us toidentify DGGE variants, which were molecularly characterized
by sequencing.A typical result of PCR-based DGGE analysis on exon 1
of K-ras is shown in Fig. 1 . DNA extracted from four cell lines
Association for Cancer Research. by guest on November 2, 2020. Copyright 1996 Americanhttps://bloodcancerdiscov.aacrjournals.orgDownloaded from
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention 561
Fig. I. PCR-hased DGGE analysis on K-ras exon I from positive controls and
BE biopsies. The first four lanes on the left show DGGE variants of positive
controls (NIH 3T3, DLDI. StV837, and SW480 cell line DNA). Because SW480
atsd NIH-3T3’ are homozygous for the K-ras mutation, PCR products were
titixed. denatured, atsd renatured in presence of wild-type PCR products to induce
the fortoation of heteroduplexes. before DGGE analysis. Numbered lanes show
the wild-type DGGE pattem of biopsies DNA from nine BE patients (cases I , 3,5. 6. 10. 1 1. 12. 20. and 21 (. Homod. wt and mutant homoduplexes; heterod,
heteroduplexes.
[three human: SW480, SW837, and DLD-l, and a murine cellline (NIH 3T3) transformed with human mutated K-ras, re-
ferred as NIH 3T3*] carrying known mutations in either codon12 or codon I 3 of the human K-ras gene, were used as positivecontrols. No biopsy from BE patients showed any DGGEvariant (Table 1 ), whereas DGGE patterns of the positive con-
trol DNAs (Fig. I ) were consistent with the mutation reportedfor each of them. This result suggests that mutational activation
of K-nis oncogene, at least in codons 12 and 13, plays amarginal role (if any) in BE metaplasia.
Biopsies from 12 patients showed at least one p53 DGGE
variant (Table I ). All samples bearing a mutated p53 alleleshowed a DGGE band pattern that also contained the wild-type
allele. This may indicate either that cells with mutated p53 wereheterozygous for the observed mutation or that normal cells
carrying wild-type alleles were present in sample tissues fromwhich DNA was extracted. The relative intensity of mutantversus wild-type bands suggests that the mutated allele was
present in a considerable fraction of cells in the specimen(>25-35%). Four patients showed exactly the same variantsalso in leukocytes (control tissue), and the remaining eightcases revealed specific DGGE variants only in the biopsies. Fig.2 shows a typical result of PCR-based DGGE analysis on p53
exon 6 (A) or exon 7 (B). All somatic mutations were found inBE with at least one I component. The association with the
histotype was statistically significant (P < 0.03 for pure I-typeversus non-I type; P < 0.04 for combined I-type versus non-I
type: Fisher’s exact test).DGGE variants at the p53 locus were further characterized
at the molecular level (Table 2). Sequence analysis confirmedthe presence of a known polymorphism (Ref. 28; AT-�GCtransition at codon 213, resulting in no amino acid substitution)in three out of four cases in which the same variant was present
both in blood and biopsy (cases 3, 29. and 30). Case 28 showedan AT-SGC transition located in intron 6, 3 1 bp downstreamfrom the 3’ end of the exon 6. By applying a method able to
Table I Molecular characterization of biopsies from 30 BE patients for the
presence of K-ras and p53 mutations and LOH at the l7pl3 region
DGGEc variants” LOH I 7p I . I 3Case Sex/age Histotype -�-----� - number
ras p53 (alleles)”
Pure I (9 patients, 4 p53 mutations
1 M/46 I Mut NI’
2 M/75 I ND
3 M/SS I” Pol 2(lO.ll(
4 M/53 I” ND
S F/56 I Mut 2(1.3)
6 M/42 I 2(4.12
7 M/SS I Mut 2(3.6)
8 M/67 I Mut ND
9 M/36 I” 23,12
Combined (10 patients, 4 p53 mutations)
10 M/62 C+I 2(1.2)
11 MflO C+F+I” 2(4,11)
12 Mfll C+l Mut ND
13 M/73 C+I 2(5,11)
14 M/54 C+F+I 2(3.11)
15 M/68 C+I Mut 2(2.10)
16 M/67 C+F+I Mut NI
17 M/42 C+I Mut 22.3
18 M/77 C+I 24.9
19 M/63 C+I 24.12)
Non-I ( I I patients. no p53 mutations)
20 F/37 F 23,4
21 M/72 C 2(4.12)
22 M/6l C 2(4.10)
23 M/64 C+F 2(2.4)
24 M/6l C+F ND
25 M/70 F 2(4,9)
26 M185 C 24.ll)
27 F/46 C+F 2(2.11)
28 M/60 C Pol 2(3.5)
29 M/42 C Pol 2(4.12)
30 M/68 C Pol 2(3,10)
“ DGGE variant present in the DNA extracted from biopsy or from blood sample.
When biopsy and blood sample showed identical DGGE variant(s) the mutationwas considered to be of germinal origin (Pol, polymorphism) when the variant(s)
were present exclusively in the biopsy the mutation was of somatic origin (Mut).
b Number of alleles present in the samples analyzed; in parenthesis. number of
repeats of each allele.‘- NI, not informative; ND. not done.
‘I Indefinite dysplasia.
identify splice sites with a high degree of accuracy (29), weverified that this mutation was predicted not to create an alter-native splice site, suggesting that this gene alteration has no
consequence for p53 mRNA splicing and may represent a newpolymorphism.
The molecular characterization of the p53 DGGE variantspresent only in the biopsies from eight patients revealed that
four of them (cases 5, 7, 12, and 16) showed a single base pairsubstitution, whereas the remaining four showed multiple (2-5)mutations (Table 2). Of 17 somatic mutations, all but 1 ( + IT,
case 16) were base pair substitutions located mainly (82%) in
exons 7 and 8. The majority of these mutations were GC
targeted (13 of 16; 81%), 54% (7 of 13) of which were tran-sitions occurring at CpG sites. DNA sequencing results of p53DGGE variants from sample 12 (exon 6) and 15 (exons 7 and
8) are shown in Fig. 3.
Inactivation of the p53 gene is usually a two-hit phenom-
enon: point mutation in one allele and deletion in the other or.alternatively, point mutations in both alleles. LOH at the highlypolymorphic (VNTR) marker YNZ22 was evaluated in 25 out
Association for Cancer Research. by guest on November 2, 2020. Copyright 1996 Americanhttps://bloodcancerdiscov.aacrjournals.orgDownloaded from
ex6
12 812 Cl 13
h�emd[
H:
A
ex7
C2 c3 17 817 8 B8 7 B7
� � � -� _
B
562 p53 Mutations in Barrett’s Esophagus
All p53 mutations were in the sequence coding for the
Fig. 2. PCR-based DGGE analy-sis on p53 exon 6 (A) and exon 7
(B) from positive controls (Cl. C2.
and C3) and a series of biopsies
(cases 12 and 13 for exon 6; cases
17, 8, and 7 for exon 7) along with
their matching blood samples (B12.
817, B8, and B7). A, the DGGE
variant present in the biopsies of
case 12 is clearly absent in DNA
heIsrod extracted from blood (B12). Case
13 shows a wild-type DGGE pat-tern in the biopsy. CI, positive con-
trol (cGa > cAa. Arg2t3 > Gln). B,
similarly. DGGE variants present in
biopsies from patients /7, 8, and 7
are absent in the matching blood
samples (B17. 88. and B7). C2,
positive control (eGg > cAG,
Arg24#{176}> GIn); C3, positive control
(tAc > tGc, Tyr�34 > Cys). Ho-
mod, wt and mutant homoduplexes;
heterod, heteroduplexes.
Table 2 Molecu lar characterization o f p53 DGGE variants observed in BE biopsies
Case Sex/age Histotype Exon Base change Amino acid change CpG site
Polymorphysm (4 cases)
3 M/SS I” 6 cgA-’cgG Arg213-”Arg
28 M/60 C 6 ggA-sggG l6:+31”
29 M/42 C 6 cgA-*cgG 21
30 M/68 C 6 cgA-scgG Arg2tS��sArg
Mutations (8 cases. 17 mutational events observed)
I M/46 I 7
7
8
tAc-”tGc
aaC-#{176}aaT
Cgt-.Tgt
Tyr�34-’Cys
Asn235-’Ser
Arg273-sCys
-
-
+
S F/56 I 7 gGc-sgAc G1y245-sAsp -
7 M/SS I 7 Atc-”Ttc 11e255-+Phe -
8 M/67 I S
6
7
7
8
cGc-’cAc
Cga-sTga
gGc-sgAc
cGg-�cAg
Cgt-”Tgt
Arg’55-*His
Arg2t3-*Stop
G1y245-+Asp
Arg248-#{176}Gln
Arg273-#{176}Cys
+
+
-
+
+
12 M/7l C + I 6 Cag-+Tag Gln#{176}’2-�Stop -
IS M/68 C + I 7
7
8
tAc-’tGc
aaC-�aaT
Cgt-+Tgt
Tyr�34-’Cys
Asn235-’Ser
Arg273-*Cys
-
-
+
I 6 M/67 C + F + I 7 gac-*Tgac Asp259-*Stop -
I 7 M/42 C + I 7
8
gGc-sgAc
Cgt-+Tgt
Gly245-Asp
Arg273-’Cys
-
+
“ Indefinite dysplasia.
S Mutation located in intron 6, 3 1 bp downstreans from the 3 ‘ end of exon 6. This mutation was not predicted to create an alternative splice site. Thus, this gene alteration
may represent a new polymorphism.
of 30 cases. Batanian et a!. (27) described 12 types of alleles,characterized by different numbers of repeats. In the 25 cases
analyzed, we observed all these types of alleles but two (7 and8 repeats). LOH was considered to have occurred when one of
the two alleles present in PCR products obtained with leuko-
cytes was missing from PCR products obtained from the match-ing biopsy. With this criterion, 23 of 25 cases analyzed (92%)were informative, and none of them showed LOH (Table 1). Atypical result of this analysis is shown in Fig. 4.
Discussion
BE may be regarded as a model of an in viva multistep carci-nogenic process, in which the replacement of the normal squa-
mous epithelium of the lower esophagus with metaplastic tissue
represents its first step. In the hypothetical cascade of genetic
alterations leading to the formation and progression of BE to
ADCs, aneuploidy and p53 mutations seem to be early events
(3), both strongly associated with the appearance of dysplasia
(4, 8, 9, 18). In the present study, we determined that p53
mutations occurred in 27% (8 of 30) of patients with BE of the
I type in absence of dysplasia. Other authors, using mainly
immunohistochemical approaches, reported that in the absence
of dysplasia and/or in the presence of indefinite dysplasia, the
incidences of BE positive for p53 accumulation ranged from 0
to 25% (14-16, 18, 30, 31).
Association for Cancer Research. by guest on November 2, 2020. Copyright 1996 Americanhttps://bloodcancerdiscov.aacrjournals.orgDownloaded from
ag ct
casel5 casel5
exon 7 exon 8
agct agct
*c > I � G > A *
‘p � #{149}*c>TA>G* �
B CA
�‘�2 � � � �1
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention 563
Fig. 3. Sequence analysis of
DGGE variants observed in biop-
sies from eases 12 and 15. A, C T
transition (Cag > Tag. sense
strand) at codon 192 resulting in
the substitution of a glutammine
with a stop codon (case 12). B.
double transition observed in
((iSP’ /.5. es-on 7 A > G (tAc > tGc
sense strand. Tyr�34 > Cys) and
C > T (aaC > aaT sense strand;
Asn’5 > Ser). C. third mutationobserved in case 15. exon 8
(Cgt > Tgt. antisense strand.
Arg273 > Cys).
case 12
exon 6
csJ
Fig. 4. Analysis of the LOH at the YNZ22 marker in biopsies (samples 16, 29,
22. and 30) and in the corresponding control tissue (JOB, 29B, 22B, and 30B). A
100-hp ladder was used as a DNA size marker. The kind of alleles present in each
sample are indicated in parentheses beside each pair of samples.
highly conserved domains (or amino acids) of the protein (32);
thus, they might all alter the biological functions of the p53protein. The presence of p53 mutations does not imply, how-
ever, that p53 functions were completely abolished, although itis known that some mutant p53 proteins, when present in aheterozygous state, behave in vivo in a dominant, negativefashion (33, 34). The features of the DGGE variants (three orfour bands) we observed, suggest the presence of both thewild-type and the mutated p53 alleles in the DNA extractedfrom the biopsy. Analysis of LOH at the highly polymorphiclocus YNZ22 (telomeric with respect to the p53 locus) revealedthat none of the informative cases showed LOH. Becausenormal cells are expected to be present in the biopsy, our
approach may have underestimated l7p LOH. However, this isin keeping with an early finding by Meltzer et a!. (35), who
found no l7p LOH in Barrett’s metaplasia. These results sug-
gest that p53 mutations may precede complete loss of p53functions in absence of dominant negative phenotype of the
mutant protein. Complete p53 inactivation might, nevertheless,
be hypothesized in half of the BE patients, in whom multiple
somatic p53 mutations in different exons were observed, ifthese mutations involved different alleles.
All somatic mutations were found in BE with at least oneI component, and the association with the histotype was statis-
tically significant (P < 0.03 for pure I type versus non-I-type;
P < 0.04 for combined I-type versus non-I type; Fisher’s exacttest). Reid et a!. (36) found that, in the absence of dysplasia, BE
of the I type but not BE of the gastric type showed the presenceof aneuploid cell populations. These results (Ref. 36; this study)
may give a molecular explanation to the clinical observationthat the I type metaplasia is the most closely associated withBE-associated tumor development. Hurlimann and Saraga (37),
studying the expression of p53 by immunohistochemistry, dem-
onstrated an association between p53 accumulation and I-typegastric cancers. More recently, Ranzani et a!. (38) elegantlyshowed that p53 gene mutations and protein nuclear accumu-
lation are early events in I-type gastric cancer but late events in
diffuse-type. All of these results (Refs. 36-38; this study) mayindicate that the intestinal metaplasia in the upper digestivetract is particularly prone to cancer-promoting gene alterations.
Why were p53 mutations only found in association withthe I-type metaplasia? It could be hypothesized that this meta-plasia is more exposed and/or less resistant to endogenous orexogenous mutagenic factor(s). BE results from long-lasting
GER and is accompanied by inflammatory processes. I-typemetaplasia is expected to be more sensitive than non-I type to
acid, an important component of GER. At the site of inflam-mation, a plethora of mutagenic leukocyte-derived oxidant free
radicals (39, 40) are delivered. Finally, some features of theintestinal metaplastic cells, such as high proliferation rates andthe ability to metabolically activate carcinogens (41), may also
contribute to the observed phenomenon.In light of the molecular epidemiology notion that a car-
cinogen leaves fingerprints on DNA (42), can we pinpoint apotential agent responsible for these mutations? The molecular
features of the p53 mutants observed in BE indicate that theputative mutagenic factor(s) specific for I-type metaplasia are
Association for Cancer Research. by guest on November 2, 2020. Copyright 1996 Americanhttps://bloodcancerdiscov.aacrjournals.orgDownloaded from
564 p53 Mutations in Barrett’s Esophagus
mainly GC-�AT inducer(s). The majority of these transitions
(7 of 13) occurred at CpG sites. A similar mutation profile hasbeen found in gastric ADC (43-45) and esophageal ADC (8, 9,13). It has been recently demonstrated that cytosines in the CpGdinucleotides present in p53 are methylated in vivo (5-methyl-cytosine; Ref. 46). It is known that 5-methylcytosine deamina-tion occurs frequently in the genome and that the repair of theresulting GrI’ mismatch is relatively inefficient (47). This may
suggest that some of the p53 mutations observed in BE had aspontaneous origin. The role of tobacco and alcohol in ADC on
BE is still debated (48-50). A high frequency of GC-�TA
transversions has been observed in squamous cell carcinomasof the esophagus (1 1) and in lung carcinomas, closely related tocigarette smoking (5 1 , I 1 ). The absence of such transversionsin Barrett’s metaplasia and in BE-associated ADC (Refs. 8, 9,
and 13; this work) gives a hint to tentatively exclude a muta-genic role for these two risk factors in the genesis of BE.
In conclusion, we showed that p53 mutations are fre-quently observed in biopsies from BE patients of the I type inthe absence of dysplasia, whereas no involvement of K-ras(exon 1) mutational activation was observed. In light of the keyroles that the p53 protein plays in controlling cell cycle and celldiploidy, this result suggests why this type of metaplasia is themost closely associated to the development of ADCs.
Acknowledgments
We thank Prof. A. J. Cameron for critical reading of the manuscript; and Drs. F.
Munizzi and M. Picasso (Gastrocnterology Unit, National Institute for Cancer
Research, Genoa, Italy), F. Morchi and F. Costa (Operative Unit of Gastroenter-ology. University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy), and P. Ravelli and R. Cestari (Chair of
Diagnostics and Endoscopic Surgery, University of Brescia, Brescia. Italy) for
having provided some of the clinical materials for this study.
References
I. Spechler, S. J., and Goyal, R. K. Barrett’s esophagus. N. EngI. J. Med., 315:
362-371. 1986.
2. Spechler. S. J. Barrett’s Esophagus. Semin. Oncol.. 21: 431-437, 1994.
3. Wright, T. A., and Kingsnorth, A. N. Barrett’s oesophagus and markers of
malignant potential. Eur. J. Gastrocnterol. Hepatol., 6: 656-662, 1994.
4. Levine, D. S. Barrett’s oesophagus and p53. Lancet, 344: 212-213, 1994.
S. Rabinovitch, P. S., Reid, B. J., Haggitt, R. C., Norwood, T. H., and Rubin, C.
E. Progression to cancer in Barrett’s esophagus is associated with genomicinstability. Lab. Invest., 60: 65-71. 1988.
6. Reid, B. J., Blount, P. L., Rubin, C. E., Levine, D. S., Haggitt, R. C., and
Rabinovitch, P. S. Flow-cytometric and histological progression to malignancy inBarrett’s esophagus: prospective endoscopic surveillance of a cohort. Gastrocn-
terology. 102: 1212-1219, 1992.
7. Vogelstein. B., and Kinzler, K. W. p53 function and dysfunction. Cell, 70:
523-526, 1992.
8. Blount, P. L., Galipeau, P. C., Sanchez, C. A., Neshat, K., Levine, D. S., Yin,J., Suzuki, H.. Abraham, J. M., Meltzer, S. J., and Reid, B. J. l7p allelic losses
in diploid cells of patients with Barrett’s esophagus who develop aneuploidy.
Cancer Res., 54: 2292-2295, 1994.
9. Neshat, K., Sanchez, C. A.. Galipeau. P. C.. Blount, P. L., Levine, D. S.,
Joslyn, G., and Reid, B. J. p53 mutations in Barrett’s adenocarcinoma and
high-grade dysplasia. Gastroenterology, 106: 1589-1595, 1994.
10. Cross, S. M., Sanchez, C. A., Morgan, C. A., Schimke, M. K., Ramel, S.,
Idzerda, R. L., Raskind, W. H., and Reid, B. J. A p53-dependent mouse spindle
checkpoint. Science (Washington DC), 267: 1353-1356, 1995.
I I . Greenblatt, M. S., Bennett, W. P., Hollstein, M., and Harris, C. C. Mutations
in the p53 tumor suppressor gene: clues to cancer etiology and molecular patho-
genesis. Cancer Res.. 54: 4855-4878, 1994.
12. Casson, A. G., Mukhopadhyay, T.. Cleary, K. R., Ro, J. Y., Levin, B.. andRoth, J. A. p53 gene mutations in Barrett’s epithelium and esophageal cancer.
Cancer Res.. 51: 4495-4499, 1991.
13. Hamelin, R., Fl#{235}jou,J-F., Muzeau, F., Potet, F., Laurent-Puig, P., Fek#{233}te,F.,
and Thomas, G. TPS3 gene mutations and p53 protein immunoreactivity in
malignant and premalignant Barrett’s esophagus. Gastroenterology, 107: 1012-
1018, 1994.
14. Ramel, S., Reid, B. J., Sanchez, C. A., Blount, P. L., Levine, D. S., Neshat,
K., Haggitt, R. C., Dean, P. J., Thor, K., and Rabinovitch, P. 5. Evaluation of p53protein expression in Barrett’s esophagus by two-parameter flow cytometry.
Gastroenterology, 102: 1220-1228, 1992.
IS. Fl#{233}jou,i-F., Potet, F., Muzeau, F.. Le Pelletier, F., Fek#{233}te,F., and H#{233}nin,D.
Overexpression ofp53 protein in Barrett’s syndrome with malignant transforma-
tion. I. Clin. Pathol., 46: 330-333, 1993.
16. Younes, M., Lebovitz, R. M., Lechago, L. V., and Lechago, J. p53 protein
accumulation in Barren’s metaplasia. dysplasia, and carcinoma: a follow-up
study. Gastroenterology. /05: 1 637-1642, 1993.
17. Symmans, P. J., Linehan, M., Brito, M. I., and Filipe. M. I. p53 expression
in Barrett’s oesophagus, dysplasia. and adenocarcinoma using antibody 00-7.J. Pathol., 73: 221-226, 1994.
18. Krishnadath, K. K., Tilanus, H. W., van Blankenstein, M., Bosman, F. T., and
Mulder, A. H. Accumulation of p53 protein in normal, dysplastic and neoplastic
Barrett’s oesophagus. J. Pathol., 175: 175-180, 1995.
19. Boume, H. R., Sanders, 0. A., and McCormick, F. The GTPase superfamily,
conserved structure and molecular mechanism. Nature (Land.), 349: 1 17-127,
1991.
20. Bogusky, M. S., and McCormick, F. Proteins regulating ras and its relatives.
Nature (Lond.), 366: 643-654, 1993.
21. Bos, J. L. Ras oncogenes in human cancer: a review. Cancer Res., 49:
4682-4689, 1989.
22. Jankowski. J., Coghill. G., Hopwood, D., and Wormsley, K. G. Oncogenes
and onco-suppressor gene in adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus. Gut. 33: 1033-1038, 1992.
23. Gruppo Operativo per lo Studio delle Precancerosi dell’Esofago (GOSPE).
Barrett’s esophagus: epidemiological and clinical results of a multicentric survey.
Int. J. Cancer, 48: 364-368, 1991.
24. D’Agostini, F., Fronza, G., Campomenosi, P., Izzotti, A., Petrilli, G. L.,
Abbondandolo, A., and Dc Flora, S. Cancer biomarkers in human atheroscleroticlesions: no evidence ofp53 involvement. Cancer Epidemiol., Biomarkers & Prey.,
4: 111-115, 1995.
25. Pellegata, N. S., Sessa, F., Renault, B., Bonato, M., Leone, B. E., Solcia, E.,
and Ranzani, G. N. K-ras and p53 gene mutations in pancreatic cancer: ductal and
nonductal tumors progress through different genetic lesions. Cancer Res.. 54:
1556-1560, 1994.
26. Schmidt, H. G., Riddel, R. H., Walter, B.. Skinner, 0. B., and Riemann, i. F.Dysplasia in Barrett’s esophagus. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol., 110: 145-152,
1985.
27. Batanian, J. R., Ledbetter, S. A., Wolff, R. K., Nakamura, Y.. White, R..
Dobyns, W. B., and Ledbetter, D. H. Rapid diagnosis of Miller-Dieker syndrome
and isolated lissencephaly sequence by the polymerase chain reaction. Hum.
Genet., 85: 555-559, 1990.
28. Semi, A., Gaidano, G. L., Revello, D., Guerrasio, A., Ballerini, P., DaIla
Favera, R., and Saglio, G. A new TaqI polymorphism in the p53 gene. Nucleic
Acids Res., 20: 928, 1992.
29. Shapiro, M. V., and Senapathy, P. RNA splice junctions of different classesof eukaryotes: sequence statistics and functional implications in gene expression.
Nucleic Acids Res., 15: 7155-7174, 1987.
30. Ferec, C., Audrezet, M-P., Mercier, B., and Robaszkiewicz, M. TP53 gene
alterations during neoplastic progression of Barrett’s mucosa. Gastroenterol. Clin.
Biol.. 18: D46-DSI, 1994.
31 . Hardwick, R. H., Shepherd, N. A., Moorghen, M., Newcomb, P. V., and
Alderson, D. Adenocarcinoma arising in Barrett’s oesophagus: evidence for theparticipation of p53 dysfunction in the dysplasia/carcinoma sequence. Gut, 35:
764-768, 1994.
32. Soussi, T., Caron de Fromentel, C., and May, P. Structural aspects of the p53
protein in relation to gene evolution. Oncogene, 5: 945-952, 1990.
33. Kern, S. E., Pietenpol, I. A., Thiagalingant. S., Seymour, A., Kinzler, K. W.,
and Vogelstein, B. Oncogenic forms of p53 inhibit p53 regulated gene expression.
Science (Washington DC), 256: 827-830, 1992.
34. Hachiya, M., Chumakov, A., Miller, C. W., Akashi, M., Said, J., and
Koeffler, H. P. Mutant p53 proteins behave in a dominant, negative fashion in
s,ivo. Anticancer Res., 14: 1853- 1860, 1994.
35. Meltzer, S. J., Yin, J., Huang, Y., McDaniel, T. K., Newkirk, C., Iseri, 0.,Vogelstein. B., and Resau, J. H. Reduction to homozygosity involving p53 in
esophageal cancers demonstrated by the polymerase chain reaction. Proc. NatI.Acad. Sci. USA, 88: 4976-4980, 1991.
36. Reid, B. J., Haggitt, R. C., Rubin, C. E., and Rabinovitch, P. S. Barrett’sesophagus. Correlation between flow cytometry and histology in detection of
patients at risk for adenocarcinoma. Gastroenterology, 93: 1-1 1, 1987.
37. Hurlimann, J., and Saraga, E. P. Expression of p53 protein in gastric carci-
nomas: association with histologic type and prognosis. Am. J. Surg. Pathol., 18:
1247-1253, 1994.
Association for Cancer Research. by guest on November 2, 2020. Copyright 1996 Americanhttps://bloodcancerdiscov.aacrjournals.orgDownloaded from
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention 565
38. Ranzani, G. N., Luinetti, 0., Padovan, L. S., Calistri, D., Renault, B., Burrel,M., Amadori, D., Fiocca, R., and Solcia, E. p53 gene mutations and protein
nuclear accumulation are early events in intestinal type gastric cancer but late
events in diffuse type.
39. Cerutti, P. A. Oxy-radicals and cancer. Lancet, 344: 862-863, 1994.
40. Grisham, M. B. Oxidants and free radicals in inflammatory bowel disease.
Lancet, 344: 859-861, 1994.
41. McDonnell, W. M., Scheiman, J. M., and Traber, P. G. Induction of cyto-
chrome P4SOIA genes (CYP1A) by omeprazole in the human alimentary tract.
Gastroenterology, 103: 1509-1516, 1992.
42. Vogelstein. B., and Kinzler, K. W. Carcinogens leave fingerprints. Nature
(Land.), 355: 209-210, 1992.
43. Imazeki, F., Omata, M., Nose, H., Ohto, M., and Isono, K. p53 genemutations in gastric and esophageal cancers. Gastrocnterology, 103: 892-896,
1992.
44. Renault, B., Van Der Brock, M., Fodde, R., Wijnen, J., Pellegata, N. S.,
Amadori, D., Meera Khan, P., and Ranzani, G. N. Base transitions are the most
frequent genetic changes at p53 in gastric cancer. Cancer Res., 53: 2614-2617,
1993.
45. Uchino, S., Noguchi, M., Ochiai, A., Saito, T., Kobayashi, M., and Hirohashi,
S. p53 mutations in gastric cancer: a genetic model for carcinogenesis is common
to gastric and colorectal cancer. Int. I. Cancer, 54: 759-764, 1993.
46. Tornaletti, S., and Pfeifer, G. P. Complete and tissue independent methylation
of CpG sites in the p53 gene: implications for mutations in human cancers.
Oncogene, 10: 1493-1499, 1995.
47. Lindahl, T. Instability and decay of the primary structure of DNA. Nature
(Lond.), 362: 709-715, 1993.
48. Levi, F., Ollyo, J. B., La Vecchia, C., Boyle, P., Monnier, P., and Savary, M.
The consumption of tobacco, alcohol, and the risk of adenocarcinoma in Barrett’s
oesophagus. tnt. I. Cancer, 45: 852-854, 1990.
49. Gray, M. R., Donnelly. R. J., and Kingsnorth, A. N. The role of smoking and
alcohol in metaplasia and cancer risk in Barrett’s columnar-lined oesophagus.
Gut, 34: 727-731, 1993.
So. Menke-Pluymers, M. B. E., Hop, W. C. J., Dees, J., van Blankenstein, M.,
and Tilanus, H. W. The Rotterdam esophageal tumor study group. Risk factors forthe development of an adenocarcinoma in columnar-lined (Barrett) esophagus.
Cancer(Phila.), 72: 1155-1158, 1993.
51. Suzuki, H., Takahashi, T., Kuroishi, T., Suyama, M., Ariyoshi. Y.,
Takahashi, T., and Ueda, R. p53 mutations in non-small cell lung cancer in Japan:
association between mutations and smoking. Cancer Res., 52: 734-736, 1992.
Association for Cancer Research. by guest on November 2, 2020. Copyright 1996 Americanhttps://bloodcancerdiscov.aacrjournals.orgDownloaded from
1996;5:559-565. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev P Campomenosi, M Conio, M Bogliolo, et al. intestinal type.p53 is frequently mutated in Barrett's metaplasia of the
Updated version
http://cebp.aacrjournals.org/content/5/7/559
Access the most recent version of this article at:
E-mail alerts related to this article or journal.Sign up to receive free email-alerts
Subscriptions
Reprints and
To order reprints of this article or to subscribe to the journal, contact the AACR Publications
Permissions
Rightslink site. Click on "Request Permissions" which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center's (CCC)
.http://cebp.aacrjournals.org/content/5/7/559To request permission to re-use all or part of this article, use this link
Association for Cancer Research. by guest on November 2, 2020. Copyright 1996 Americanhttps://bloodcancerdiscov.aacrjournals.orgDownloaded from