[p026] treatment(access(cascades:(effects ... - hiv...

1
Treatment Access Cascades: Effects of viral load, resistance tes7ng and safety in pregnancy on access to Dolutegravir in Low and Middle income countries Dr Jacob Levi 1 , Polly Clayden 2 and Dr Andrew Hill 2 1Imperial College London, School of Public Health, London, United Kingdom, 2HIV iBase London, 3Liverpool University, Transla7onal Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom, Correspondence to: Dr Andrew Hill PhD Department of Translational Medicine, 1st Floor Block H, 70 Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L69 3GF Tel:+44 7834 364 608 Email: [email protected] Objec7ves: Generic an*retroviral treatment with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/lamivudine/dolutegravir (TDF/3TC/DTG; TLD) is available in eligible countries for $75/personyear. There are big plans to transi*on millions of HIV+ people to TLD in 2018–2019. However, the Phase 3 trial programme for Dolutegravir excluded many important pa*ent groups. Pregnant women, ARTnaïve HIV+ people with transmiYed drug resistance, and ART experienced HIV+ People without genotypic resistance tes*ng were all not included in safety and feasibility studies. The DAWNING study also excluded ARTexperienced HIV+ people with no ac*ve NRTIs. Furthermore, recent reports of neural tube defects (NTDs) a\er use of DTG at concep*on could limit use in women of childbearing poten*al. We wanted to model how realis*c it is to start and switch diagnosed HIV+ people to TLD in low and middle income countries (LMIC) given these limita*ons. Method: Using UNAIDS 2016 data we made 4 separate cascades for each LMIC with available data. LMICS were categorised into low income <$1000 GDP/capita, lowermiddle income ($10003955 GDP/capita) and uppermiddle income (3956$12,235 GDP/Capita). We excluded countries with <100,000 HIV+ people. Cascade 1 shows all diagnosed HIV+ people, split into three categories; those diagnosed but not on ART (red), those on ART and HIVRNA suppressed (pink) and those on ART but unsuppressed (green). We subsequently modeled the impact on access to TLD if pa*ents could not be started or switched due to various factors. Cascade 2 models the impact of the lack of access to viral load tes*ng: HIV + people on ART cannot be switched to TLD without a viral load test in the last year – as they may actually be unsuppressed either due to low adherence or drug resistance. Viral load tes*ng access data was collected from the UNAIDS Spectrum model. Cascade 3 models the impact that lack of access to resistance tes*ng has on the number of people on ART that can be safely switched to TLD. We assumed 50% of PLWHIV on ART can access resistance tes*ng before switching due to a lack of available na*onal data. Cascade 4 shows the impact that the lack of safety data in pregnant women has on the number of HIV+ people that can be switched or started on TLD. We defined HIV+ women of childbearing poten*al as all of those aged 1549. Results: All of the data is displayed in the 19 na*onal cascades below, [key in top le\ corner]. Each graph is in order of the percentage of diagnosed PLWHIV that are eligible to start on or switch to TLD, in the final stage cascade 4. Access to Viral Load in the uppermiddle income countries was good. It was 100% in Brazil, 99% in Mexico, 82% in Thailand, 80% in Malaysia, 60% in South Africa and 38% in Botswana. Therefore the effects on access to TLD a\er excluding pa*ents without a HIVRNA test in the last 12 months (Cascade 2) was minimal for richer countries. The lowestincome countries had much worse access to viral load tes*ng: 64% in Malawi, 31% in Hai*, 27% in Ethiopia, 16% in Togo and just 14% in Zimbabwe. Therefore, many more HIV+ people on ART are being excluded from switching to TLD due to lack of access to viral load tes*ng in poorer countries. There is a lack of data in access to resistance tes*ng for LMICs, so it is not clear exactly how many people in each country will be excluded from taking TLD. We assumed that only those HIV+ people on ART who are found to be not HIVRNA virally suppressed would need a resistance test before switching to TLD. As the majority of people on ART are es*mated to be successfully HIVRNA suppressed in all countries, our assump*on that 50% of people can get resistance tes*ng in all countries did not have a big impact on the number of people able to switch to TLD in any country. The largest exclusion factor was unknown safety for HIV+ women of childbearing age (Cascade 4). In subSaharan African countries there is a high percentage of HIV+ women of childbearing poten*al. In total Zimbabwe (9%) and Nigeria (11%) had the lowest number of people who could be safely started on or switched to TLD. Conclusions: The clinical development programme for DTG excluded pregnant women, and with low access to contracep*on and abor*on in LMICs, along with the dangerous ideologically driven “Global Gag Rule” limi*ng PEPFAR, serious changes are needed to improve op*ons for HIV+ women. Access to TLD is par*cularly low for lowincome subSaharn African countries. Further analysis of DTG preconcep*on is needed to determine whether the adverse safety signal is maintained across cohorts. The lack of data in key popula*ons limits the poten*al to transi*on large numbers of pa*ents to TLD. We highlight the need for improved access to viralload and genotype tes*ng in LMICs. New trials are needed to evaluate TLD in treatmentexperienced pa*ents with limited or no NRTI op*ons. Presented at HIV DRUG THERAPY GLASGOW 2018 How many people can safely start on or be switched to TDF/3TC/DTG (TLD)? Data from 19 Na7onal Cascades 0 50,000 100,000 150,000 Cascade 1 = (UNAIDS 2016 es7mates)* DR Congo Total PLWHIV = 370,000 LowerMiddle Income Total = 37,176 Total 18,541 Total = 35,656 Total = 133,200 14% Cascade 3 Cascade 4 Cascade 2 28% 27% 0 200,000 400,000 600,000 800,000 Cascade 1 = (UNAIDS 2016 es7mates) Cascde 2 Cascade 3 Kenya Total PLWHIV = 1,600,000 LowerMiddle Income Total = 374,381 Total = 188,339 Total = 369,291 Total = 816,000 23% Cascade 4 45% 46% 0 200,000 400,000 600,000 800,000 1,000,000 1,200,000 Cascade 1 = (UNAIDS 2016 es7mates)* Nigeria Total PLWHIV = 3,200,000 LowerMiddle Income Total = 212,992 Total = 114,791 Total = 208,712 Total =1,024,000 11% Cascade 3 Cascade 2 Cascade 4 20% 21% 0 50,000 100,000 150,000 Cascade 1 = (UNAIDS 2016 es7mates)* Cascade 3*** Ukraine Total PLWHIV = 240,000 LowerMiddle Income Total = 115,772 Total = 70,583 Total = 108,589 Total = 134,400 53% Cascade 3 Cascade 4 Cascade 2 86% 81% 0 50,000 100,000 Cascade 1 = (UNAIDS 2016 es7mates)* Hai7 Total PLWHIV = 150,000 Low Income Total = 31,099 Total = 15,867 Total = 29,938 Total = 88,500 18% Cascade 2 Cascade 3 Cascade 4 34% 35% 0 50,000 100,000 150,000 200,000 250,000 300,000 350,000 Cascade 1 = (UNAIDS 2016 es7mates)* Cameroon Total PLWHIV = 560,000 LowerMiddle Income Total = 148,823 Total = 69,785 Total = 145,386 Total = 324,800 22% Cascade 3 Cascade 4 46% 45% Cascade 2 0 200,000 400,000 600,000 800,000 1,000,000 Cascade 1 = (UNAIDS 2016 es7mates) Cascde 2 Cascade 3 Cascade 4 Malawi Total PLWHIV = 1,100,000 LowIncome Total = 618,596 Total = 325,689 Total = 603,127 Total = 935,000 35% 65% 66% 0 100,000 200,000 300,000 Cascade 1 = (UNAIDS 2016 es7mates)* Botswana Total PLWHIV = 360,000 UpperMiddle Income Total = 114,138 Total = 61,960 Total = 112,655 Total = 306,000 20% Cascade 2 Cascade 3 Cascade 4 37% 37% 0 100,000 200,000 300,000 400,000 500,000 600,000 700,000 Cascade 1 = (UNAIDS 2016 es7mates)* Ethiopia Total PLWHIV = 710,000 LowIncome countries Total = 170,110 Total = 93,046 Total = 166,154 Total = 475,700 20% Cascade 2 Cascade 3 Cascade 4 36% 35% 0 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000 70,000 Cascade 1 = (UNAIDS 2016 es7mates)* Togo Total PLWHIV = 100,000 Low Income Total = 20,135 Total = 10,674 Total = 19,767 Total = 63,000 17% Cascade 3 Cascade 4 Cascade 2 32% 31% 0 200,000 400,000 600,000 800,000 1,000,000 Cascade 1 = (UNAIDS 2016 es7mates)* Zimbabwe Total PLWHIV = 1,300,000 Low Income Total = 187,425 Total = 89,578 Total = 172,265 Total = 975,000 9% Cascade 3 Cascade 4 Cascade 2 19% 18% On ART but not Virally Supressed Star7ng ART On ART and Virally Supressed Cascade 1 Cascade 2 Cascade 3 Cascade 4 The second cascade removes all of those diagnosed PLWHIV that were not able to access a viral load test in the last 12 months. This affects the number of people on ART who could be switched to TLD but not those in red who are diagnosed and yet to start ART. The third cascade removes those that are on ART, not suppressed and need resistance tes7ng. We have assumed that 50% need a resistance test. The fourth cascade removes all women of childbearing poten7al due to lack of safety data for TLD in pregnancy The first cascade shows all PLWHIV in the country that are already diagnosed that could safely start TLD. Those in red are diagnosed but not on ART so can start TLD. Those in pink are already on ART and virally suppressed. They can switch safely to TLD. Those in orange are on ART but not yet virally suppressed. We assume that some may have resistance, so roughly 50% will need resistance tes7ng, before being switched to TLD. 0 1,000,000 2,000,000 3,000,000 4,000,000 5,000,000 6,000,000 7,000,000 Cascade 1 = (UNAIDS 2016 es7mates) Cascde 2 Cascade 3 Cascade 4 South Africa Total PLWHIV = 7,100,000 UpperMiddle Income Total = 4,518,440 Total = 6,106,000 Total = 4,405,326 Total = 2,246,716 37% 72% 74% 0 50,000 100,000 150,000 200,000 Cascade 1 = (UNAIDS 2016 es7mates) Cascde 2 Cascade 3 Cascade 4 Vietnam Total PLWHIV = 250,000 LowerMiddle Income Total = 76,510 Total = 55,680 Total = 75,243 Total = 175,000 44% 32% 43% 0 50,000 100,000 Cascade 1 = (UNAIDS 2016 es7mates) Cascde 2 Cascade 3 Cascade 4 Angola Total PLWHIV = 280,000 Low Income Total = 52,248 Total = 25,538 Total = 52,119 Total = 112,000 23% 47% 57% 0 50,000 100,000 150,000 200,000 250,000 300,000 Cascade 1 = (UNAIDS 2016 es7mates) Cascde 2 Cascade 3 Cascade 4 Cote D'Ivoire Total PLWHIV = 460,000 LowerMiddle Income Total = 143,672 Total = 78,414 Total = 140,025 Total = 266,800 54% 30% 52% 0 100,000 200,000 300,000 400,000 Cascade 1 = (UNAIDS 2016 es7mates) Cascde 2 Cascade 3 Cascade 4 Thailand Total PLWHIV = 450,000 UpperMiddle Income Total = 354,218 Total = 211,417 Total = 340,996 Total = 409,500 0 50,000 100,000 Cascade 1 = (UNAIDS 2016 es7mates) Cascde 2 Cascade 3 Cascade 4 Malaysia Total PLWHIV = 97,000 UpperMiddle Income Total = 85,681 Total = 75,863 Total = 85,239 Total = 92,150 82% 93% 93% 0 50,000 100,000 150,000 Cascade 1 = (UNAIDS 2016 es7mates)* Cascde 2 ** Cascade 3*** Cascade 4**** Mexico Total PLWHIV = 220,000 UpperMiddle Income Total = 137,450 Total = 107,644 Total = 132,894 Total = 138,600 78% 96% 99% 0 200,000 400,000 600,000 800,000 Cascade 1 = (UNAIDS 2016 es7mates) Cascde 2 Cascade 3 Cascade 4 Brazil Total PLWHIV = 830,000 UpperMiddle Income Total = 713,800 Total = 499,500 Total = 703,521 Total = 713,800 70% 99% 100% 83% 52% 87% [P026]

Upload: others

Post on 21-Aug-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: [P026] Treatment(Access(Cascades:(Effects ... - HIV Glasgowhivglasgow.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/P026.pdf · Treatment(Access(Cascades:(Effects(of(viral(load,(resistance(tes7ng(and(safety(in(pregnancyonaccessto

Treatment  Access  Cascades:  Effects  of  viral  load,  resistance  tes7ng  and  safety  in  pregnancy  on  access  to  Dolutegravir  in  Low  and  Middle  income  countries  

 Dr  Jacob  Levi1,  Polly  Clayden2  and  Dr  Andrew  Hill2  

1-­‐Imperial  College  London,  School  of  Public  Health,  London,  United  Kingdom,  2-­‐HIV  i-­‐Base  London,  3-­‐Liverpool  University,  Transla7onal  Medicine,  Liverpool,  United  Kingdom,    

Correspondence to: Dr Andrew Hill PhD Department of Translational Medicine, 1st Floor Block H, 70 Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L69 3GF Tel:+44 7834 364 608 Email: [email protected]

Objec7ves:  Generic  an*retroviral  treatment  with  tenofovir  disoproxil  fumarate/lamivudine/dolutegravir  (TDF/3TC/DTG;  TLD)  is  available  in  eligible  countries  for  $75/person-­‐year.  There  are  big  plans  to  transi*on  millions  of  HIV+  people  to  TLD  in  2018–2019.  However,  the  Phase  3  trial  programme  for  Dolutegravir  excluded  many  important  pa*ent  groups.  Pregnant  women,  ART-­‐naïve  HIV+  people  with  transmiYed  drug  resistance,  and  ART  experienced  HIV+  People  without  genotypic  resistance  tes*ng  were  all  not  included  in  safety  and  feasibility  studies.  The  DAWNING  study  also  excluded  ART-­‐experienced  HIV+  people  with  no  ac*ve  NRTIs.  Furthermore,  recent  reports  of  neural  tube  defects  (NTDs)  a\er  use  of  DTG  at  concep*on  could  limit  use  in  women  of  child-­‐bearing  poten*al.  We  wanted  to  model  how  realis*c  it  is  to  start  and  switch  diagnosed  HIV+  people  to  TLD  in  low  and  middle  income  countries  (LMIC)  given  these  limita*ons.    Method:  Using  UNAIDS  2016  data  we  made  4  separate  cascades  for  each  LMIC  with  available  data.  LMICS  were  categorised  into  low  income  <$1000  GDP/capita,  lower-­‐middle  income  ($1000-­‐3955  GDP/capita)  and  upper-­‐middle  income  (3956-­‐$12,235  GDP/Capita).  We  excluded  countries  with  <100,000  HIV+  people.  Cascade  1  shows  all  diagnosed  HIV+  people,  split  into  three  categories;  those  diagnosed  but  not  on  ART  (red),  those  on  ART  and  HIV-­‐RNA  suppressed  (pink)  and  those  on  ART  but  unsuppressed  (green).  We  subsequently  modeled  the  impact  on  access  to  TLD  if  pa*ents  could  not  be  started  or  switched  due  to  various  factors.  Cascade  2  models  the  impact  of  the  lack  of  access  to  viral  load  tes*ng:  HIV  +  people  on  ART  cannot  be  switched  to  TLD  without  a  viral  load  test  in  the  last  year  –  as  they  may  actually  be  unsuppressed  either  due  to  low  adherence  or  drug  resistance.  Viral  load  tes*ng  access  data  was  collected  from  the  UNAIDS  Spectrum  model.  Cascade  3  models  the  impact  that  lack  of  access  to  resistance  tes*ng  has  on  the  number  of  people  on  ART  that  can  be  safely  switched  to  TLD.  We  assumed  50%  of  PLWHIV  on  ART  can  access  resistance  tes*ng  before  switching  due  to  a  lack  of  available  na*onal  data.  Cascade  4  shows  the  impact  that  the  lack  of  safety  data  in  pregnant  women  has  on  the  number  of  HIV+  people  that  can  be  switched  or  started  on  TLD.  We  defined  HIV+  women  of  childbearing  poten*al  as  all  of  those  aged  15-­‐49.    Results:  All  of  the  data  is  displayed  in  the  19  na*onal  cascades  below,  [key  in  top  le\  corner].  Each  graph  is  in  order  of  the  percentage  of  diagnosed  PLWHIV  that  are  eligible  to  start  on  or  switch  to  TLD,  in  the  final  stage  -­‐  cascade  4.  Access  to  Viral  Load  in  the  upper-­‐middle  income  countries  was  good.  It  was  100%  in  Brazil,  99%  in  Mexico,  82%  in  Thailand,  80%  in  Malaysia,  60%  in  South  Africa  and  38%  in  Botswana.  Therefore  the  effects  on  access  to  TLD  a\er  excluding  pa*ents  without  a  HIV-­‐RNA  test  in  the  last  12  months  (Cascade  2)  was  minimal  for  richer  countries.  The  lowest-­‐income  countries  had  much  worse  access  to  viral  load  tes*ng:  64%  in  Malawi,  31%  in  Hai*,  27%  in  Ethiopia,  16%  in  Togo  and  just  14%  in  Zimbabwe.  Therefore,  many  more  HIV+  people  on  ART  are  being  excluded  from  switching  to  TLD  due  to  lack  of  access  to  viral  load  tes*ng  in  poorer  countries.  There  is  a  lack  of  data  in  access  to  resistance  tes*ng  for  LMICs,  so  it  is  not  clear  exactly  how  many  people  in  each  country  will  be  excluded  from  taking  TLD.  We  assumed  that  only  those  HIV+  people  on  ART  who  are  found  to  be  not  HIV-­‐RNA  virally  suppressed  would  need  a  resistance  test  before  switching  to  TLD.  As  the  majority  of  people  on  ART  are  es*mated  to  be  successfully  HIV-­‐RNA  suppressed  in  all  countries,  our  assump*on  that  50%  of  people  can  get  resistance  tes*ng  in  all  countries  did  not  have  a  big  impact  on  the  number  of  people  able  to  switch  to  TLD  in  any  country.  The  largest  exclusion  factor  was  unknown  safety  for  HIV+  women  of  childbearing  age  (Cascade  4).  In  sub-­‐Saharan  African  countries  there  is  a  high  percentage  of  HIV+  women  of  childbearing  poten*al.  In  total  Zimbabwe  (9%)  and  Nigeria  (11%)  had  the  lowest  number  of  people  who  could  be  safely  started  on  or  switched  to  TLD.    Conclusions:  The  clinical  development  programme  for  DTG  excluded  pregnant  women,  and  with  low  access  to  contracep*on  and  abor*on  in  LMICs,  along  with  the  dangerous  ideologically  driven  “Global  Gag  Rule”  limi*ng  PEPFAR,  serious  changes  are  needed  to  improve  op*ons  for  HIV+  women.  Access  to  TLD  is  par*cularly  low  for  low-­‐income  sub-­‐Saharn  African  countries.  Further  analysis  of  DTG  pre-­‐concep*on  is  needed  to  determine  whether  the  adverse  safety  signal  is  maintained  across  cohorts.  The  lack  of  data  in  key  popula*ons  limits  the  poten*al  to  transi*on  large  numbers  of  pa*ents  to  TLD.  We  highlight  the  need  for  improved  access  to  viral-­‐load  and  genotype  tes*ng  in  LMICs.  New  trials  are  needed  to  evaluate  TLD  in  treatment-­‐experienced  pa*ents  with  limited  or  no  NRTI  op*ons.  

Presented at HIV DRUG THERAPY GLASGOW 2018

 

How  many  people  can  safely  start  on  or  be  switched  to  TDF/3TC/DTG  (TLD)?  Data  from  19  Na7onal  Cascades  

0  

50,000  

100,000  

150,000  

Cascade  1  =  (UNAIDS  2016  es7mates)*  

Cascde  2  **   Cascade  3***   Cascade  4****  

DR  Congo  Total  PLWHIV  =  370,000  Lower-­‐Middle  Income  

Total  =  37,176   Total  18,541  Total  =  35,656  Total  =  133,200  

14%  

   Cascade  3            Cascade  4            Cascade  2        

28%   27%  

0  

200,000  

400,000  

600,000  

800,000  

Cascade  1  =  (UNAIDS  2016  es7mates)  

Cascde  2   Cascade  3   Cascade  4****  

Kenya  Total  PLWHIV  =  1,600,000  Lower-­‐Middle  Income  

Total  =  374,381   Total  =  188,339  Total  =  369,291  Total  =  816,000  

23%  

     Cascade  4        

45%  46%  

0  

200,000  

400,000  

600,000  

800,000  

1,000,000  

1,200,000  

Cascade  1  =  (UNAIDS  2016  es7mates)*  

Cascde  2  **   Cascade  3***   Cascade  4****  

Nigeria  Total  PLWHIV  =  3,200,000  Lower-­‐Middle  Income  

Total  =  212,992   Total  =  114,791  Total  =  208,712  Total  =1,024,000  

11%  

           Cascade  3            Cascade  2                      Cascade  4      

20%  21%  

0  

50,000  

100,000  

150,000  

Cascade  1  =  (UNAIDS  2016  es7mates)*  

Cascde  2  **   Cascade  3***   Cascade  4****  

Ukraine  Total  PLWHIV  =  240,000  Lower-­‐Middle  Income  

Total  =  115,772   Total  =  70,583  Total  =  108,589  Total  =  134,400  

53%  

Cascade  3   Cascade  4  Cascade  2  

86%  81%  

0  

50,000  

100,000  

Cascade  1  =  (UNAIDS  2016  es7mates)*  

Cascde  2  **   Cascade  3***   Cascade  4****  

Hai7  Total  PLWHIV  =  150,000  

Low  Income  

Total  =  31,099   Total  =  15,867  Total  =  29,938  Total  =  88,500  

18%  

       Cascade  2        Cascade  3              Cascade  4  

34%  35%  

0  

50,000  

100,000  

150,000  

200,000  

250,000  

300,000  

350,000  

Cascade  1  =  (UNAIDS  2016  es7mates)*  

Cascde  2  **   Cascade  3***   Cascade  4****  

Cameroon  Total  PLWHIV  =  560,000  Lower-­‐Middle  Income  

Total  =  148,823   Total  =  69,785  Total  =  145,386  Total  =  324,800  

22%  

         Cascade  3            Cascade  3            Cascade  4        

   Cascade  2        

46%   45%  

   Cascade  2  

0  

200,000  

400,000  

600,000  

800,000  

1,000,000  

Cascade  1  =  (UNAIDS  2016  es7mates)  

Cascde  2     Cascade  3   Cascade  4  

Malawi  Total  PLWHIV  =  1,100,000  

Low-­‐Income  

Total  =  618,596  Total  =  325,689  Total  =  603,127  

Total  =  935,000  

35%  

65%  66%  

0  

100,000  

200,000  

300,000  

Cascade  1  =  (UNAIDS  2016  es7mates)*  

Cascde  2  **   Cascade  3***   Cascade  4****  

Botswana  Total  PLWHIV  =  360,000  Upper-­‐Middle  Income  

Total  =  114,138   Total  =  61,960  Total  =  112,655  Total  =  306,000  

20%  

   Cascade  2              Cascade  3              Cascade  4  

37%   37%  

0  

100,000  

200,000  

300,000  

400,000  

500,000  

600,000  

700,000  

Cascade  1  =  (UNAIDS  2016  es7mates)*  

Cascde  2  **   Cascade  3***   Cascade  4****  

Ethiopia  Total  PLWHIV  =  710,000  Low-­‐Income  countries  

Total  =  170,110   Total  =  93,046  Total  =  166,154  Total  =  475,700  

20%  

Cascade  2      Cascade  3            Cascade  4        

36%   35%  

0  

10,000  

20,000  

30,000  

40,000  

50,000  

60,000  

70,000  

Cascade  1  =  (UNAIDS  2016  es7mates)*  

Cascde  2  **   Cascade  3***   Cascade  4****  

Togo  Total  PLWHIV  =  100,000  

Low  Income  

Total  =  20,135   Total  =  10,674  Total  =  19,767  Total  =  63,000  

17%  

   Cascade  3                Cascade  4                    Cascade  2        

32%   31%  

0  

200,000  

400,000  

600,000  

800,000  

1,000,000  

Cascade  1  =  (UNAIDS  2016  es7mates)*  

Cascde  2  **   Cascade  3***   Cascade  4****  

Zimbabwe  Total  PLWHIV  =  1,300,000  

Low  Income    

Total  =  187,425   Total  =  89,578  Total  =  172,265  Total  =  975,000  

9%  

   Cascade  3                Cascade  4            Cascade  2        

19%   18%  

On  ART  but  not  Virally  Supressed  

Star7ng  ART  

On  ART  and  Virally  

Supressed  

Cascade  1  

Cascade  2  

Cascade  3  

Cascade  4  

The  second  cascade  

removes  all  of  those  diagnosed  PLWHIV  that  

were  not  able  to  access  a  viral  load  test  in  the  last  12  months.    

 This  affects  the  number  of  

people  on  ART  who  could  be  

switched  to  TLD  but  not  those  in  red  who  are  

diagnosed  and  yet  to  start  ART.  

The  third  cascade  removes  those  that  are  on  ART,  not  suppressed  

and  need  resistance  

tes7ng.      

We  have  assumed  that  50%  need  a  

resistance  test.  

The  fourth  cascade  

removes  all  women  of  childbearing  

poten7al  due  to  lack  of  safety  data  for  TLD  in  pregnancy  

The  first  cascade  shows  all  PLWHIV  in  the  country  that  are  already  diagnosed  that  could  safely  

start  TLD.      

Those  in  red  are  diagnosed  but  not  on  ART  so  can  start  

TLD.      

Those  in  pink  are  already  on  ART  and  virally  suppressed.  They  can  switch  safely  to  TLD.  

 Those  in  orange  are  on  ART  but  not  yet  virally  suppressed.  We  assume  that  some  may  have  resistance,  so  

roughly  50%  will  need  resistance  tes7ng,  before  

being  switched  to  TLD.    

0  

1,000,000  

2,000,000  

3,000,000  

4,000,000  

5,000,000  

6,000,000  

7,000,000  

Cascade  1  =  (UNAIDS  2016  es7mates)  

Cascde  2     Cascade  3   Cascade  4  

South  Africa  Total  PLWHIV  =  7,100,000  Upper-­‐Middle  Income  

Total  =  4,518,440  Total  =  6,106,000   Total  =  4,405,326   Total  =  2,246,716  

37%  

72%  74%  

0  

50,000  

100,000  

150,000  

200,000  

Cascade  1  =  (UNAIDS  2016  es7mates)  

Cascde  2   Cascade  3   Cascade  4  

Vietnam  Total  PLWHIV  =  250,000  Lower-­‐Middle  Income  

Total  =  76,510   Total  =  55,680  Total  =  75,243  Total  =  175,000  

44%  

32%  43%  

0  

50,000  

100,000  

Cascade  1  =  (UNAIDS  2016  es7mates)  

Cascde  2     Cascade  3   Cascade  4  

Angola  Total  PLWHIV  =  280,000  

Low  Income  

Total  =  52,248   Total  =  25,538  Total  =  52,119  Total  =  112,000  

23%  

47%  57%  

0  

50,000  

100,000  

150,000  

200,000  

250,000  

300,000  

Cascade  1  =  (UNAIDS  2016  es7mates)  

Cascde  2     Cascade  3   Cascade  4  

Cote  D'Ivoire  Total  PLWHIV  =  460,000  Lower-­‐Middle  Income  

Total  =  143,672   Total  =  78,414  Total  =  140,025  Total  =  266,800  

54%  

30%  

52%  

0  

100,000  

200,000  

300,000  

400,000  

Cascade  1  =  (UNAIDS  2016  es7mates)  

Cascde  2     Cascade  3   Cascade  4  

Thailand  Total  PLWHIV  =  450,000  Upper-­‐Middle  Income  

Total  =  354,218   Total  =  211,417  Total  =  340,996  Total  =  409,500  

0  

50,000  

100,000  

Cascade  1  =  (UNAIDS  2016  es7mates)  

Cascde  2   Cascade  3   Cascade  4  

Malaysia  Total  PLWHIV  =  97,000  Upper-­‐Middle  Income  

Total  =  85,681   Total  =  75,863  Total  =  85,239  Total  =  92,150  

82%  93%  93%  

0  

50,000  

100,000  

150,000  

Cascade  1  =  (UNAIDS  2016  es7mates)*  

Cascde  2  **   Cascade  3***   Cascade  4****  

Mexico  Total  PLWHIV  =  220,000  Upper-­‐Middle  Income  

Total  =  137,450   Total  =  107,644  Total  =  132,894  Total  =  138,600  

78%  

96%  99%  

0  

200,000  

400,000  

600,000  

800,000  

Cascade  1  =  (UNAIDS  2016  es7mates)  

Cascde  2     Cascade  3   Cascade  4  

Brazil  Total  PLWHIV  =  830,000  Upper-­‐Middle  Income  

Total  =  713,800   Total  =  499,500  Total  =  703,521  Total  =  713,800  

70%  

99%  100%  

83%  

52%  

87%  

[P026]