oxidizer selectivity comparison of the measured residual vs. dosage of clo 2 with cl 2 for a heavily...

13
Oxidizer Selectivity

Upload: damaris-becking

Post on 15-Dec-2015

216 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Oxidizer Selectivity Comparison of the Measured Residual vs. Dosage of ClO 2 with Cl 2 for a Heavily Contaminated Water

Oxidizer Selectivity

Page 2: Oxidizer Selectivity Comparison of the Measured Residual vs. Dosage of ClO 2 with Cl 2 for a Heavily Contaminated Water

Comparison of the Measured Residual vs. Dosage of ClO2 with Cl2 for a Heavily Contaminated Water.

Page 3: Oxidizer Selectivity Comparison of the Measured Residual vs. Dosage of ClO 2 with Cl 2 for a Heavily Contaminated Water

Comparison of Oxidation Potential and Oxidation Capacity of Several Oxidants Along with Relative Oxidation of Materials Commonly Found in Cooling Water.

Page 4: Oxidizer Selectivity Comparison of the Measured Residual vs. Dosage of ClO 2 with Cl 2 for a Heavily Contaminated Water

Effect of different Peroxygen Oxidizers on Stain Removal in Laundry Water

Page 5: Oxidizer Selectivity Comparison of the Measured Residual vs. Dosage of ClO 2 with Cl 2 for a Heavily Contaminated Water

Breakpoint w/ Ammonia

Page 6: Oxidizer Selectivity Comparison of the Measured Residual vs. Dosage of ClO 2 with Cl 2 for a Heavily Contaminated Water

Breakpoint w/ Organic Nitrogen

Page 7: Oxidizer Selectivity Comparison of the Measured Residual vs. Dosage of ClO 2 with Cl 2 for a Heavily Contaminated Water

Chlorine Demand Test

680

690

700

710

720

730

740

750

760

770

0 2 3 4 5 6 8 9 11 12 13 14 17 19 21 24 25 27 29 32 35 37 39 43 46 48

Lapsed Time (Minutes)

OR

P

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

pH

/pp

m ORP

pH

FAC

Glycine Addition

Page 8: Oxidizer Selectivity Comparison of the Measured Residual vs. Dosage of ClO 2 with Cl 2 for a Heavily Contaminated Water

Truox Treatment Demand Test

680

690

700

710

720

730

740

750

760

770

0 1 3 5 8 9 11 13 18 19 20 21 22 24 26 29 30 32 34 37 39 41 45 46

Lapsed Time (Minutes)

OR

P

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

pH

/pp

m ORP

pH

FACDPD = Total Oxidant

Glycine Addition

Page 9: Oxidizer Selectivity Comparison of the Measured Residual vs. Dosage of ClO 2 with Cl 2 for a Heavily Contaminated Water

Chloramine Destruction CBHChloramine Destruction CBH

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

0 240 360 1440Lapsed Time (minutes)

pp

m

CombinedChlorine

Chloramine DestructionWith Chlorine FeedNo Hydroxyl RadicalsORP Setpoint 780mV

Circulation Rate - 500 gpmVolume - 13,000 gallonsTurnover Time - 26 minutes

Page 10: Oxidizer Selectivity Comparison of the Measured Residual vs. Dosage of ClO 2 with Cl 2 for a Heavily Contaminated Water

OH* Enhanced CBHOH* Enhanced CBH

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

0 55 125 130 140 150 210 240 275 360 365Lapsed Time (minutes)

pp

m

CombinedChlorine

Chloramine DestructionChlorine Feed w/Hydroxyl Radicals ORP Setpoint 780mV

Circulation Rate - 500 gpmVolume - 13,000 gallonsTurnover Time - 26 minutes

Page 11: Oxidizer Selectivity Comparison of the Measured Residual vs. Dosage of ClO 2 with Cl 2 for a Heavily Contaminated Water

Designer Oxidizer - Applications

Bleaching-Whitening– Laundry Bleaching– Stain Removal– Pulp & Paper– Dental

Sanitizers//Disinfectants– Water Treatment– Medical-Dental– Janitorial– Agriculture– Household Cleansers

Oxidation-Decomposition– Decontamination– General Water Treatment– Pool & Spa– Drinking Water– Waste Water– Mining

Page 12: Oxidizer Selectivity Comparison of the Measured Residual vs. Dosage of ClO 2 with Cl 2 for a Heavily Contaminated Water

Peracid Hydroxyl Radicals

Chlorine Dioxide

Dioxirane

N-halo-amide

Hypo-halite

CombinationsSinglet Oxygen

Micro-Reactors Micro-Reactors Solvent Activated In-situ generation

Page 13: Oxidizer Selectivity Comparison of the Measured Residual vs. Dosage of ClO 2 with Cl 2 for a Heavily Contaminated Water

Truox®, Inc.4724 Arnold AveMcClellan, CA 95652Contact: Perry Martin916-920-4051