overview on financial status · overview of executive proposal 2016-17 2017-18 increase %...
TRANSCRIPT
Overview on Financial Status
Presented to: Maine Endwell CSD
Presented on: February 9, 2017
Presented by: Kathy Blackman, C.P.A.
Controller, Central Business Office
Tonight’s topics• Projections 2016-17 updated
• Status of Reserves• Repair Reserve
• Overview of Executive Proposal
• Long Range Plan• Assumptions including State Aid
• Tax Levy Limit Calculation
• Review of Benefits
Projection of 2016-20172016-2017
Projected Revenues $49,994,191
Projected Expenditures $49,434,326
Projected Operating Surplus $ 358,584
Projected Gain in Total Fund Balance $ 358,584
Note: This projection is expected to be refined as additional information on such things as staffing changes, boces services, tuition costs and utilities become available.
16-17 projected fund balance changes from January – if any
• Projected fund balance decreased from last month primarily due to increases in special education costs for placements and related services.
Projection of 2016-2017 fund balance
6/30/2016 6/30/2017
Restricted Fund Balance $6,578,821 $7,138,549
Assigned Appropriated Fund Balance
$250,000 $250,000
Assigned Encumbrances $201,371 $0
Unassigned Fund Balance $1,926,518 $1,926,745
TOTAL FUND BALANCE $8,956,710 $9,315,294
In the 2016-2017 projection, the Reserves or Restricted Fund Balance is funded by a net of $559,727. This includes potential funding to the capital or repair reserve in the amount of $700,000, use of the retirement Contribution Reserve ($100,000), Tax Certiorari ($39,998), and EBALR ($2,618) and a small amount of interest earnings.
STATUS OF RESERVESBalance 6/30/16
Projected Funding (use) in 2016-2017
Retirement Contribution Reserve $ 2,395,906 ($ 100,000)
Tax Certiorari Reserve $ 524,022 ($ 39,998)
Unemployment Insurance Reserve $ 97,471 $0
Capital Reserve $ 1,245,766 $700,000
Employee Benefit Accrued Liability Reserve (EBLAR) $ 2,315,657 ($ 2,618)
TOTAL RESERVES $ 6,578,822 $557,384
Repair Reserve6/30/2016 Balance: $-0- (Does not currently exist)It is recommended that the District consider the establishment of a Repair Reserve.
◦ Is established by the BOE resolution
◦ Funded by voter referendum
◦ To use in non-emergent situations, a public hearing is required; however, no public vote is required
◦ For payment of non-reoccurring maintenance costs:
◦ Items identified on Building Condition Survey that cannot wait until the next capital project
◦ Tennis Courts
◦ Track Resurfacing
Recommended Funding: up to $1,000,000 over 3 years
Overview of Executive Proposal
2016-17 2017-18 Increase %
Foundation Aid $13,381,858 $13,769,016 $387,158 2.89%
Building Aid $5,711,993 $5,727,514 $15,521 0.27%
Expense Driven Aid $6,076,344 $6,048,623 ($27,721) (0.46%)
Total Aid $25,170,195 $25,545,153 $374,958 1.49%
ME’s property wealth as compared to the state increased by a higher percentage thereby increasing the district’s CWR. The increase is causing decreases in the district’s aid ratios. This resulted in a reduction in the building aid and expense driven aids. These aid would have been higher without this change.
The Combined Wealth Ratio (CWR) compares district wealth, both property and income, to the State average wealth. This measure is updated annually.
Assumptions in the long range projection
Revenues:
•Foundation Aid would increase 2.89% in 2017-18 and 2% each year thereafter
•Expenditure Driven State Aid (excluding Building Aid) would increase 2% each year, except for 17-18 which would decrease of (0.46%)
•The tax levy limit is 0.89% in 17-18
•The tax levy is projected to be 2% in 18-19 and beyond
Expenditures:
•Staff is based on current staff of record, including open positions
•Health Insurance is projected at an estimated 11.28% increase in 17-18 and increase to a lesser degree in the next 3 years
•Teacher Retirement System costs are projected at 9.8% increase then a slight increase after that, while the Employee Retirement System costs are projected to be relatively flat
•The average expenditure increase overall is projected at 3.61% per year
Long Term projection: 2/3/2017Based on 2016-17 Projection of Fund Balance
2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21
Tax Levy % 1.28% 0.89% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00%
FoundationAid %
1.31% 2.89% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00%
BeginningFund Balance $8,956,710 $9,315,294 $8,412,147 $6,225,939 $2,866,465
Operating Surplus/ (Deficit)
$358,584 $(903,147) $(2,186,208) $(3,359,474) $(4,378,003)
Ending Fund Balance $9,315,294 $8,412,147 $6,225,939 $2,866,465 $(1,511,538)
Long Term projection: 2/3/2017Based on 2016-17 Projection of Fund Balance
(5,000,000)
(4,000,000)
(3,000,000)
(2,000,000)
(1,000,000)
0
1,000,000
2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021
Operating Surplus/Deficit
Tax Levy Limit CalculationStep 1
• Prior Year Tax Levy
Step 2• Tax Base Growth Factor
Step 3 •PILOTS 2016-17
Step 4 •Exclusions 2016-17 (Capital Levy & Torts)
Step 5• Allowable Growth Factor
Step 6• Available Carryover
Step 7• PILOTS 2017-18
Step 8• Exclusions 2017-18 (Capital Levy, Pensions & Torts)
Result• Maximum Allowable Levy Limit
12
STEPS
Step 1 Prior Tax Levy $ 23,237,142
Step 2 x Tax Base Growth Factor 1.0006
$ 23,251,084
Step 3 + PILOTS current year $ 124,501
Step 4 - Exclusion: Capital Levy, current year $ (1,255,002)
$ 22,120,583
Step 5 x Allowable Growth Factor 1.26%
$ 22,399,303
Step 6 + Available Carryover -0-
Step 7 - PILOTS next year $ (129,118)
TAX LEVY LIMIT $ 22,270,185
Step 8 + Exclusion: Capital Levy, next year $ 1,173,127
MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE LEVY LIMIT $ 23,443,312
13
Tax Levy Limit Calculation
STEPS
Step 1 Prior Tax Levy $ 23,237,142
Step 2 x Tax Base Growth Factor 1.0006
$ 23,251,084
14
Tax Levy Limit Calculation – Step 2
Tax Base Growth Factor • Determined by the NYS Department of Taxation and Finance• Represents the bricks and mortar development in the district
• ME is primarily residential• The past 5 years the district has had very little change in the assessed
values, indicating there has been no marked development/growth in the district.
15
Tax Levy Limit Calculation – Step 5
Allowable Growth Factor • Determined by the Bureau of Labor Statistics• Consumer Price Index (CPI) is the monthly data on changes in the process
paid by consumers for certain goods and services. This measures is recalculated to produce the annual CPI used in the tax levy limit calculation.
• This is the lower of CPI or 2%. It has not been 2% since 2012-13.• 2013-14 2.00%• 2014-15 1.46%• 2015-16 1.62%• 2016-17 0.12%• 2017-18 1.26%
Maximum allowable levy LIMIT Maximum Tax Levy Increase without “Super Majority”
2017-18 Maximum Allowable Tax Levy*
$23,443,312
2016-17 Tax Levy $23,237,142
Maximum increase in Tax Levy to remain under Tax Levy Limit
$ 206,170
Percentage Increase 0.89%
*Without voter approval in excess of 60%
16
ME Variables impacting levy limit
Tax Base Growth Factor
Allowable Growth Factor
Capital Levy
PILOTS
17
Review of Benefits2016-17 Budget - Expenditures
Salaries, $18,586,497,
37%
BOCES, $6,834,674,
14%
Debt Service,
$7,120,811, 14%
Benefits, $13,212,189,
27%
Other Expenditures, $3,973,667,
8%
2016-17 Budget
Review of Benefits2016-17 Budget - Expenditures
Retirement Contributions,
$2,281,423, 17%
Social Security, $1,462,766, 11%
Health & Dental, $9,191,000, 70%
Other, $277,000,
2%
Benefits
Health/Dental Insurance
accounts for over 18% of the annual
budget
Health Insurance
Active Employees – BTDHIC*
• Excellus BlueCross BlueShield
• Indemnity Plan
• Preferred Provider Organization (PPO)
Retirees
• Hartford Insurance
• Medicare Advantage Plan
*BTDHIC – Broome Tioga Delaware Health Insurance Consortium
Health Insurance
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
120%
130%
140%
150%
Maine Endwell CSD vs. BTDHIC Loss Ratio(Claims / Contributions)
District Loss Ratio Consortium Loss Ratio
The Loss Ratio measures the difference between premiums and paid claims. The optimal loss ratio runs in the 93% to 95% range. This allows premium dollars to cover the claim and administrative expenses.
Health Insurance
The Plan Performance illustrates the result of net contributions by the district vs. paid claims and administrative costs. Net contribution includes the annual paid premiums less any surplus distribution received by the district.
-$2,500,000
-$2,000,000
-$1,500,000
-$1,000,000
-$500,000
$0
$500,000
$1,000,000
$1,500,000
$2,000,000
$2,500,000
Plan Performance
Plan Performance
Health Insurance
This graph illustrates Maine Endwell CSD’s paid premiums to the Consortium vs. claims paid on behalf of the District dating back to the beginning of the 2012/13 plan year.
$0
$200,000
$400,000
$600,000
$800,000
$1,000,000
$1,200,000
Premiums vs. Claims
Paid Premium Paid Claims
Health Insurance
This graph takes the data from the previous exhibit and “normalizes” claim costs by removing large dollar claimant effect and calculating a a three month claim cost average. This provides a more accurate representation of the loss of premium vs. the loss of claim experience applicable to the Medicare population.
$0
$100,000
$200,000
$300,000
$400,000
$500,000
$600,000
$700,000
$800,000
Premiums vs. Normalized Claims
Paid Premium Normalized Claims
Health Insurance
This graph looks at the average cost per contract dating back to the 2012/13 plan year.
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
Average Cost per Contract
Maine Endwell CSD BTD Consortium
Health InsuranceKaiser Family Foundation –and-
Health Research & Education Trust
• Annual Survey conducted to provide current information about employer-sponsored health benefits for private and nonfederal public employers with three or more employees
• Information provided reflects employer-sponsored health benefits in 2016
• 18th annual survey conducted
Health Insurance
Kaiser Family Foundation –and-Health Research & Education Trust
Employer Health
Benefits
• Premiums for family coverage have increased 20% since 2011 and 58% since 2006
• On average covered workers contribute 18% of the premium for single coverage and 30% of the premium for family coverage. Dollar amounts average $1,129 for single coverage & $5,277 for family coverage
• Less than 1% of subscribers are in a conventional indemnity plan
• Average annual deductible is $1,221 for covered workers
First Look at 2017-2018 Budget
Questions?