overview of session
DESCRIPTION
FAIR Session III Managing Major Asian Collapses: The Importance of Insolvency Frameworks for Foreign Direct Investment and Risk Management in Asia. Overview of Session. Ron Harmer, International Consultant to the ADB. Overview of Session. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
1
ADB - RETA 5975 Regional Insolvency Cooperation
FAIR Session III
Managing Major Asian Collapses:
The Importance of Insolvency Frameworks for Foreign Direct Investment and Risk Management in Asia
2
ADB - RETA 5975 Regional Insolvency Cooperation
Overview of Session
Ron Harmer, International Consultant to the ADB
3
ADB - RETA 5975 Regional Insolvency Cooperation
Overview of Session
Insolvency laws part of systemic risk management infrastructure of region and countries
Only one country - Japan - has a “modern” cross border insolvency regime in Asia
Proposals developed in Korea and the Philippines No viable formal means of dealing with a pan-Asian
collapse in spite of increasing interdependence
4
ADB - RETA 5975 Regional Insolvency Cooperation
Overview of Session
Complete inability for dealing with major corporate collapses in Asia adversely impacts on systemic risk management
Asian Pulp and Paper exemplifies the need to reform of cross border insolvency regimes
Michael Sloan to present APP case study
5
ADB - RETA 5975 Regional Insolvency Cooperation
Overview of Session
Regional treaty for cross border insolvency law reform is an option
Lessons can be learned from initial difficulties with EEC cross-border insolvency regulation
Ron Harmer to review the EEC experience
Economic arguments in favour of insolvency law reform
Michael Sloan
6
ADB - RETA 5975 Regional Insolvency Cooperation
Overview of Session
Insolvency law reform will aid attraction of foreign investment
Stanley Tai of the New York Life International LLC and Mr. Nagarajan Srinivasan of the Indian Commonwealth Development Corporation.
Possible regional solutions Ron Harmer
7
ADB - RETA 5975 Regional Insolvency Cooperation
APP Case Study
Michael Sloan, Blake Dawson Waldron
8
ADB - RETA 5975 Regional Insolvency Cooperation
APP Case Study
AP&P incorporated in Singapore Operations throughout Asia $US 13.9 billion “collapse” Lenders, shareholders and bondholders
affected worldwide
9
ADB - RETA 5975 Regional Insolvency Cooperation
10
ADB - RETA 5975 Regional Insolvency Cooperation
11
ADB - RETA 5975 Regional Insolvency Cooperation
12
ADB - RETA 5975 Regional Insolvency Cooperation
13
ADB - RETA 5975 Regional Insolvency Cooperation
14
ADB - RETA 5975 Regional Insolvency CooperationSubsidiaries
Australia BelgiumBritish Virgin IslandsChinaFrance Hong Kong India IndonesiaItaly JapanMalaysiaSpainSingaporeTaiwanUK USA
15
ADB - RETA 5975 Regional Insolvency CooperationLenders
AustriaBahrainBelgiumCanadaChinaDenmarkFinlandFranceGermanyHong KongIndonesia
ItalyJapan NetherlandsNorwaySingaporeSouth AfricaSpainSwedenTaiwanThailand UKUSA
16
ADB - RETA 5975 Regional Insolvency CooperationShareholders
ChinaFranceGermanyIndonesiaJapanNetherlandsSingaporeSwitzerlandUKUSA
17
ADB - RETA 5975 Regional Insolvency Cooperation
APP Case Study
12 March 2001 unilateral debt standstill announced by AP&P
Application in Singapore for appointment of judicial managers
Basis for application: Unilateral declaration of Standstill Lack of progress with Standstill Need for independent control
18
ADB - RETA 5975 Regional Insolvency Cooperation
APP Case Study
APP successfully resisted application due to: Lack of creditor support Inability of judicial mangers to take effective control of
group
No reorganisation plan agreed yet
19
ADB - RETA 5975 Regional Insolvency CooperationDealing with multi-national administrations
Ron Harmer, International Consultant to ADB
20
ADB - RETA 5975 Regional Insolvency CooperationEuropean Insolvency Regulation An ambition of the Treaty of Rome (1960) Attempt at a convention failed (2001) Commenced life as a regulation (31 May 2002) Now applies to 25 member states (Denmark is
the only exception; binds all accession states) Deals solely with cases of insolvency in which
the debtor has its centre of main interests or an establishment in at least one of the member states
21
ADB - RETA 5975 Regional Insolvency Cooperation
Member countries of the EURecent accession countries
22
ADB - RETA 5975 Regional Insolvency Cooperation
EUR: Jurisdiction
Article 3.1: “The courts of a Member State within the territory of which the ‘centre of a debtor’s main interests is situated’ shall have jurisdiction to open insolvency proceedings. In the case of a company or legal person, the ‘place of the registered office’ shall be presumed to be the ‘centre of main interests’ in the absence of proof to the contrary.”
23
ADB - RETA 5975 Regional Insolvency Cooperation
EUR: Jurisdiction (continued)
Recital 13 to the preamble of the EUR states: “The centre of main interests should correspond to the place where the debtor conducts the administration of his interests on a regular basis and is therefore ascertainable by third parties.”
24
ADB - RETA 5975 Regional Insolvency CooperationEUR: Applicable Law and Effect of Opening Article 4 states that the “law applicable to an
insolvency proceeding shall be the law of the member state in which the proceedings are opened.”
Article 16 states that “any judgment opening proceedings that is handed down in a Member State shall be recognised in all other Member States.”
25
ADB - RETA 5975 Regional Insolvency Cooperation
EUR: Public Policy Provision
Article 26 states that a Member State may refuse to recognise insolvency proceedings opened in another state…if the effects of such recognition…would be manifestly “contrary to the state’s public policy and….its fundamental principles or the constitutional rights and liberties of the individual.”
26
ADB - RETA 5975 Regional Insolvency Cooperation
27
ADB - RETA 5975 Regional Insolvency Cooperation
EUR: COMI Use and Practice
Statistical and other information is not provided
Many decisions are unreported UK/Irish decisions suggest problems with
issues of jurisdiction Consider cases of Enron Directo SA (2002),
Brac Rent-a Car (2003), Daisytek (2003) and Parmalat (2004)
28
ADB - RETA 5975 Regional Insolvency Cooperation
Brac Rent-a-Car case
Brac was incorporated in Delaware, USA It never traded in USA Its operations were conducted in England The English court held that insolvency
proceedings could be opened in England because its COMI was in England
29
ADB - RETA 5975 Regional Insolvency Cooperation
Enron Directo case
Enron Directo was incorporated in Spain It conducted its daily operations there English court held that insolvency proceedings
could be commenced against Enron Directo in England on the basis that the ‘head office’ functions of Enron Directo were run from the European headquarters of Enron Directo which was situated in London
30
ADB - RETA 5975 Regional Insolvency Cooperation
Daisytek case
Holding (or parent company) incorporated in England
Three, wholly owned by the parent, subsidiaries were incorporated in Germany and one in France
English court opened insolvency proceedings in respect of all four subsidiaries on the basis that their respective COMI was in England because most of the trade creditors considered that the important functions of the subsidiaries were carried out in England, in the office of the parent
31
ADB - RETA 5975 Regional Insolvency Cooperation
Daisytek case (continued)
Insolvency proceedings were brought in France in respect of the French subsidiary and in Germany in respect of one of the three German subsidiaries
In France, court of first instance determined that the COMI of the French subsidiary was in France and purported to open main proceedings accordingly. That was overturned on appeal.
32
ADB - RETA 5975 Regional Insolvency Cooperation
Daisytek case (continued)
In Germany, court of first instance opened main proceedings in respect of the subsidiary. On appeal the German proceedings were closed, following a finding that the manager of the German subsidiary had authorised the English proceedings.
33
ADB - RETA 5975 Regional Insolvency Cooperation
Parmalat case
Parmalat SpA was incorporated in Italy in [] It commenced life in Collecchio, Italy as a
producer of dairy products Although itself controlled by a family group,
Parmalat spread throughout Europe, South America, Asia and Australia
34
ADB - RETA 5975 Regional Insolvency Cooperation
Parmalat (continued)
It performed this growth through a 20 year long acquisitions policy
That policy was financed through offshore financing vehicles, including Eurofood IFSC Limited (‘Eurofood’)
Eurofood was incorporated in Ireland It was a single purpose vehicle formed for the
purpose of raising USD150 million through a bond issue
35
ADB - RETA 5975 Regional Insolvency Cooperation
Insolvency of Parmalat
A massive hole of some USD7 billion in the assets of Parmalat SpA was discovered in December 2003
The Italian government, acting under a decree passed on 23 December 2003, placed Parmalat under extraordinary administration on 24 December and appointed a special commissioner
36
ADB - RETA 5975 Regional Insolvency Cooperation
Insolvency of Eurofood
Eurofood is incorporated in Ireland It is a wholly owned subsidiary of Parmalat SpA On 27 January 2004, Bank of America filed a
winding up petition against Eurofood in the High Court of Ireland
On the same day the Irish court appointed a provisional liquidator to Eurofood
37
ADB - RETA 5975 Regional Insolvency CooperationInsolvency of Eurofood (continued) On 9 February 2004 the Italian government
purported to place Eurofood under extraordinary administration and appointed Bondi as special commissioner (subsequently confirmed by an Italian court on 20 February)
38
ADB - RETA 5975 Regional Insolvency CooperationInsolvency of Eurofood (continued)
On 23 March 2004, the Irish court determined that:
The Italian court lacked jurisdiction (because it could not ignore the Irish decision of January 2004)
The COMI of Eurofood was in Ireland (because it was incorporated there and because that was where its creditors believed its COMI to be)
The decision of the Italian court was against public policy (because no notice and no opportunity was given to the Irish creditors to be heard in the Italian proceedings)
39
ADB - RETA 5975 Regional Insolvency CooperationInsolvency of Eurofood (continued) An appeal was made to the decision of the
Irish court The appeal court, although it upheld the
judgment of the Irish court, referred two matters to the European Court of Justice:
Whether the Irish or Italian courts had ‘opened main proceedings
Whether the Irish court was entitled to invoke Article 26 of the EUR (the ‘public policy’ issue)
40
ADB - RETA 5975 Regional Insolvency CooperationComparisons with the Uncitral X Border Model Law No experience of it Adopts similar jurisdiction criteria to that of the
EUR
41
ADB - RETA 5975 Regional Insolvency CooperationHow big is the ‘problem’ of COMI under the EUR? It may be argued that the problem should be
confined and should not be regarded as a general issue concerning COMI (and consequent ‘forum shopping’) but rather in the failure of the EUR to deal with that issue in the context of groups of companies and associated companies (note that the Uncitral X Border Model Law is also silent on this issue)
There is an absence of a provision in the EUR that requires co-operation between courts, judges and administrators (cf. UNCITRAL Model Law)
42
ADB - RETA 5975 Regional Insolvency Cooperation
Relevance for Asia
Any bi or multi-lateral cross-border arrangements should address more particularly the issue of COMI (or similar)
Particular provisions concerning the approach to be taken in respect of groups/ related/or associated companies may be desirable and necessary
43
ADB - RETA 5975 Regional Insolvency Cooperation
44
ADB - RETA 5975 Regional Insolvency CooperationEconomic Rationale for Reform Asian economies linked to global economy:
Degree of dependence on international trade Level of foreign investment Degree of foreign ownership of share market Overseas debt
Insolvency laws: Don’t yet recognise globalisation Weak protection of domestic and international interests
45
ADB - RETA 5975 Regional Insolvency CooperationEconomic Rationale for Reform
Michael Sloan, BDW
46
ADB - RETA 5975 Regional Insolvency CooperationSizes of economy
Source of data: The World Bank Group
47
ADB - RETA 5975 Regional Insolvency CooperationTrade in goods as a share of GDP
Source of data: The World Bank Group
48
ADB - RETA 5975 Regional Insolvency CooperationPresent value of debt in 2002
Source of data: The World Bank Group and the Korean Ministry of Finance and Economy
49
ADB - RETA 5975 Regional Insolvency CooperationEconomic Rationale for Reform Investment flows linked to quality insolvency
laws Weak insolvency systems result in longer and
deeper recessions
50
ADB - RETA 5975 Regional Insolvency CooperationEconomic Rationale for Reform Weak governance systems:
Discourage investment Increase price of capital
Weak insolvency systems could: Undermine effectiveness of bond markets Discourage investment in bond markets
51
ADB - RETA 5975 Regional Insolvency CooperationAdequacy of Liquidation Laws and their application
52
ADB - RETA 5975 Regional Insolvency CooperationAdequacy of Rescue Laws and their application
53
ADB - RETA 5975 Regional Insolvency CooperationAttitude of International Investors to Inadequate Insolvency laws Stanley Tai, New York Life International LLC Nagarajan Srinivasan of the Indian
Commonwealth Development Corporation.
54
ADB - RETA 5975 Regional Insolvency Cooperation
Solutions
Ron Harmer, Consultant BDW
55
ADB - RETA 5975 Regional Insolvency Cooperation
Major Corporate Collapses
No ability to deal with a major Asian corporate collapse
Need to implement law reform Options include regional treaty and model law Not mutually exclusive Treaty preferred option at present Also require informal workout protocols to
operate across borders
56
ADB - RETA 5975 Regional Insolvency Cooperation
Institutional Capacity
Quality laws not sufficient, need institutional capacity
Problems include: Lack of fairness in trials Corruption Lack of expert judges Lack of qualified professionals
57
ADB - RETA 5975 Regional Insolvency Cooperation
Institutional Capacity
No quick fix but measures to improve include: Develop rules for communications between courts Employment of Interpreters Development mutual understanding by judicial
conferences and exchange of information between courts
Development of court protocols
58
ADB - RETA 5975 Regional Insolvency Cooperation
Out of Court Proceedings
Courts do not have to be involved in all areas of an insolvency administration
Out of court processes possible United Kingdom, Singapore, Hong Kong, China and
Australia all have out of court processes
Introduction of such frameworks in Asia may circumvent some issues around institutional capacity
59
ADB - RETA 5975 Regional Insolvency Cooperation
Cross Border Treaty A regional cross border treaty would assist in dealing with major
corporate collapses That treaty must address:
Issues surrounding the definition of the location of the centre of main interest for a group of companies
Cooperation between courts Formalities required for commencement of an application for recognition Recognition for both 'in-bound' and 'out-bound' insolvency administrations the effect of recognition; cooperation between courts; the possible approaches to accommodating different types of insolvency
administrations; evidence required of commencement of insolvency administrations the formalities required for commencement of an application for recognition.
60
ADB - RETA 5975 Regional Insolvency CooperationSolutions – Informal Workout Principles Adoption of Informal Workout Protocols by
Banking Associations
61
ADB - RETA 5975 Regional Insolvency Cooperation
Facilitation Agreement
Administrative Committee
Financial Institution Creditors
>10% Initiate Workout
First Meeting of Financial Institution Creditors
No Workou
t
Workout Committee
Negotiate Workout
Agreement
No Workout
FIC Meeting to Consider Workout
Initial Standstill Period
Standstill Ends
Extended Standstill
Standstill Ends
No Cooperation by Creditor
No Workout
Workout Agreemen
tFailure Success
Exte
nded S
tandstill
Standstill Ends