overview of research oversight: u.s. perspective leslie k. ball, m.d., f.a.a.p. office for human...
TRANSCRIPT
Overview of Research Oversight: U.S. Perspective
Leslie K. Ball, M.D., F.A.A.P.Office for Human Research Protections
Department of Health and Human Services
Email: [email protected]
FDA Pediatric Oncology SubcommitteeJuly 15, 2003
2
Regulatory Oversight of Clinical Research in International Settings: U.S. Perspective
Increasing pace and scope of international biomedical research
Framework of U.S. regulatory oversight Role of OHRP in relation to FDA
Research involving children International Research Issues and Obstacles
International Clinical Trials for New Drugs
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
'91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00
Developed CountriesLess Developed Countries
Sources: FDA Biomonitoring Research database; Parexel’s Pharmaceutical R&D Sources: FDA Biomonitoring Research database; Parexel’s Pharmaceutical R&D Statistical Sourcebook 1999; Aculaunch; Washington Post ResearchStatistical Sourcebook 1999; Aculaunch; Washington Post Research
Courtesy of Dr. Melody Lin, Deputy Director, OHRP
0
20,000,000
40,000,000
60,000,000
80,000,000
100,000,000
120,000,000
140,000,000
1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000
Visiting Program
Direct Foreign Research Awards
Foreign Components of Domestic Awards
Training Grants
NIH International Research ExpendituresNIH International Research ExpendituresD
olla
rs
Fiscal Years 1994 to 2000Fiscal Years 1994 to 2000
Training = $103 million (34%)
Research = $203 million (66%)
Fiscal Year 2000Fiscal Year 2000
Courtesy of Dr. Melody Lin, Deputy Director, OHRP
5
Clinical Research Balance
Scientific advancementProduct development
Regulatory oversightHuman subject protections
6
Regulatory Oversight of Clinical Research in International Settings: U.S. Perspective
Increasing pace and scope of international biomedical research
Framework of U.S. regulatory oversight Role of OHRP in relation to FDA
Research involving children International Research Issues and Obstacles
Regulatory Framework: Drug Development
HHS conducted or supported research
Domestic* International
45 CFR 46 Subpart A
(“Common Rule”) Subpart B (Fetus,
Pregnant Women) Subpart C
(Prisoners) Subpart D (Children)
Research that involves products regulated by FDA
21 CFR 50, 56 Part 50: Protection
of Human Subjects Subpart D
(Children) Interim Rule
Part 56: IRBs 21 CFR 312 – INDs 21 CFR 361 – Drugs
used in research
Regulatory Protection of Human Subjects:
OHRP FDA
Applies to:
*Domestic institutions may elect to apply 45 CFR 46 to all of its research
regardless of source of support
Secretary of HHS
Commissioner
FDA
Assistant Secretary of Health
Office of Public Health and
Science
Director
OHRP
Department of Health and Human Services
U.S. Regulatory Oversight for Clinical Research
HHS conducted
or supported
(OHRP)
HHS conducted
or supported and FDA
regulated
FDA regulated
(FDA)
Studies that are neither HHS
conducted or funded nor FDA regulated
11
Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP)
Mission Develop and implement
regulations, policies and programs for protecting the rights and welfare of human subjects participating in research that is conducted or supported by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
12
Regulatory Oversight of Clinical Research in International Settings: U.S. Perspective
Increasing pace and scope of international biomedical research
Framework of U.S. regulatory oversight Role of OHRP in relation to FDA
Research involving children International research Issues and obstacles
13
Research Involving Children: Historical Context
Ethical lapses in the conduct of clinical research
Beecher HK. NEJM 1966; 274:1354-60 1974: National Research Act
Creation of the National Commission Charge included recommendations on research
involving children 1979: Belmont Report 1981: Final Rule – 45 CFR 46 1983: Final Rule – 45 CFR 46 Subpart D
Additional DHHS Protections for Children Involved as Research Subjects
1997: FDAMA 1997 Economic incentives to conduct pediatric
drug studies (marketing exclusivity)
14
Research Involving Children: Historical Context (cont.)
1998: FDA’s Pediatric Rule Requirement for assessing the safety and
effectiveness of certain drugs in pediatric subjects 10/02 Court ruling: FDA did not have authority to
issue Pediatric Rule and barred FDA from enforcement
2000: Children’s Health Act Directed Secretary of HHS to require all research
involving children conducted, supported or regulated by HHS (incl. FDA) to be in compliance with Subpart D
2001: FDA’s Subpart D (Interim Final Rule) 2002: Best Pharmaceuticals For Children Act
Reauthorized pediatric exclusivity incentives for drug products
IOM review of research involving children
15
Belmont ReportEthical Principles Respect for persons
Individuals should be treated as autonomous agents
Persons with diminished autonomy are entitled to protection
Beneficence: Maximize benefits and minimize possible harms
Justice: Relevant on individual and societal levels. Selection of subjects deserves scrutiny to determine whether some classes of subjects are unduly targeted for research
16
Belmont Report (cont.)Application of Ethical Principles Informed consent – special provisions should
be made when comprehension is limited Assessment of benefits and risks – when
vulnerable populations are involved in research, the appropriateness of involving them should be demonstrated
Selection of subjects –order of preference in selection of classes of subjects (e.g., adult before children); some classes of potential subjects may be involved as research subjects, if at all, only under certain conditions
17
Basic Protections of U.S Federal Regulations 45 CFR 46
Informed consent of research subject
Independent review of research
Institutional assurances of compliance
18
Assurances: Research conducted or supported by HHS
“Each institution engaged in research which is covered by this policy and which is supported by a Federal Department or Agency shall provide written assurance…that it will comply with the requirements set forth in this policy.” [45 CFR 46.103(a)]
Negotiated and approved by OHRP
19
Assurances: Research conducted or supported by HHS (cont.) Formalizes institution’s
commitment to protect human subjects
Requires filing of an Assurance by both "awardee“ receiving HHS funds and collaborating institutions
Requires designation of IRB or Independent Ethics Committees
21
45 CFR 46 Subpart A: Selected provisions relevant to children
IRB membership If an IRB regularly reviews research that
involves a vulnerable category of subjects, such as children consideration shall be given to inclusion of individuals who are knowledgeable about and experienced in working with these subject [45 CFR 46.107(a)]
Criteria for IRB approval Selection of subjects is equitable – IRB should
be particularly cognizant of the special problems of research involving vulnerable subjects, including children [45 CFR46.111(a)(3)]
22
45 CFR 46 Subpart D: Additional Protections for Children
IRBs review research and approve only research which satisfies the conditions specified by Subpart D regulations (e.g., minimal risk; more than minimal risk but prospect of direct benefit, etc.)
Generally, as risk increases in relation to the presence or absence of direct subject benefit, criteria for IRB approval under Subpart D categories become more stringent
23
45 CFR 46 Subpart D: Additional Protections for Children
46.404: Research not involving more than minimal risk 46.405: Research involving more than minimal risk but
presenting prospect of direct benefit to individual subjects
Risk justified by anticipated benefit The relation of anticipated benefit is at least as favorable to subjects
as that presented by available alternatives Adequate provisions for assent and permission
46.406: Research involving minor increase over minimal risk and no prospect of direct benefit but likely to yield generalizable knowledge about subject’s disorder or condition
46.407: Research not otherwise approvable which presents opportunity to understand, prevent or alleviate a serious problem affecting health or welfare of children
Review by panel of experts in relevant disciplines
24
Regulatory Oversight of Clinical Research in International Settings: U.S. Perspective
Increasing pace and scope of international Biomedical Research
Framework of U.S. regulatory oversight Role of OHRP in relation to FDA
Research involving children International research Issues and obstacles
25
International Research
Regulatory requirements for HHS conducted or supported research are the same, wherever research takes place
45 CFR 46.101(h): Procedures normally followed in foreign countries to protect human subjects may differ from those set forth in this policy…
If foreign institution’s protections are at least as equivalent, the U.S. Department or Agency Head may approve the substitution of foreign procedures
26
International Assurances
Institution assures that its activities: Will be guided by ethical
principles (one of the following) Declaration of Helsinki Belmont Report Other appropriate international
ethical standards
27
International Assurances (cont.)
45 CFR 46 Subparts A, B, C, D
45 CFR 46 Subpart A 21 CFR 50, 56 ICH-GCP-E-6 CIOMS Int’l Ethical
Guidelines
Canadian Tri-council Policy
Indian Council of Medical Research Guidelines
Other standards recognized by U.S. Federal Departments
Institution assures that its activitiesWill comply with procedural standards (one or more)*
*Under FWA “Terms of Assurance”, all U.S. federally-supported research must comply with requirements of any applicable U.S. federal regulatory agency.
28
Issues and Obstacles in Regulatory Oversight of International Research
Regulatory harmonization Different requirements of each regulatory agency
Development of consistent approaches for Study monitoring Reporting requirements
Ensuring review by IRB/Ethics Review Committees having knowledge of local research context
For developing countries: building of host country capacity to conduct and review research