Overview of GEOSS & IEOS: Process and Progress VADM Conrad C. Lautenbacher, Jr. US Navy (Ret.) Under Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere May.

Download Overview of GEOSS & IEOS: Process and Progress VADM Conrad C. Lautenbacher, Jr. US Navy (Ret.) Under Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere May.

Post on 19-Dec-2015

220 views

Category:

Documents

0 download

TRANSCRIPT

<ul><li> Slide 1 </li> <li> Overview of GEOSS &amp; IEOS: Process and Progress VADM Conrad C. Lautenbacher, Jr. US Navy (Ret.) Under Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere May 9, 2005 </li> <li> Slide 2 </li> <li> 2 Presentation Outline The Global Earth Observation System of Systems (GEOSS) Overview International Earth Observationsan Update from GEO I The US RoleIEOS as US Component of GEOSS Vision for the FutureShared Challenges </li> <li> Slide 3 </li> <li> 3 GEOSS Overview EOS I July 31, 2003, Washington, D.C. 34 Countries + 20 International Organizations EOS II April 25, 2004, Tokyo, Japan 47 Countries + EC + 26 International Organizations EOS III February 2005, Brussels 60 Countries + EC and 34 International Organizations 10-Year Implementation Plan Commerce Secretary Gutierrez led the US delegation EOS III EOS II EOS I </li> <li> Slide 4 </li> <li> 4 Presentation Outline The Global Earth Observation System of Systems (GEOSS) Overview International Earth Observationsan Update from GEO I The US RoleIEOS as US Component of GEOSS Vision for the FutureShared Challenges </li> <li> Slide 5 </li> <li> 5 GEO I Geneva, Switzerland First meeting of new GEO at WMO headquarters on May 2-3 Iceland recognized as newest member of growing effort GEO agreed to 12 member Executive Committee Africa (2), Americas (3), Asia and Oceania (3), Commonwealth of Independent States (1), Europe (3) Co-Chairs: US, EC (developed); China, South Africa (developing) Tsunami Update IOC </li> <li> Slide 6 </li> <li> 6 3 2 3 1 3 AmericasEuropeAfricaAsia/Oceania Commonwealth of Independent States Brazil Honduras USA European Commission Italy Germany South Africa Morocco Russia China Japan Thailand GEO Executive Committee </li> <li> Slide 7 </li> <li> 7 GEO ExCom Initial Meeting Immediately after GEO I Establish Functions and Roles ExCom = Working Body / GEO = Decision Body Set Up Committee Structure S&amp;T Mechanism User Interface Mechanism Architecture Data Policy </li> <li> Slide 8 </li> <li> 8 Presentation Outline The Global Earth Observation System of Systems (GEOSS) Overview International Earth Observationsan Update from GEO I The US RoleIEOS as US Component of GEOSS Vision for the FutureShared Challenges </li> <li> Slide 9 </li> <li> 9 U.S. Contribution to GEOSS An Interagency Effort </li> <li> Slide 10 </li> <li> 10 U.S. IEOS U.S. IOOSGOOS Ocean Component of U.S. IEOS Ocean Component of GOOS U.S. Component GEOSS IEOS and GEOSS A System of Systems </li> <li> Slide 11 </li> <li> 11 Other National Earth Observation Efforts Other countries are following the lead of the US and Europe in developing their own national integration structures: Canada China Japan Morocco South Africa </li> <li> Slide 12 </li> <li> 12 Presentation Outline The Global Earth Observation System of Systems (GEOSS) Overview International Earth Observationsan Update from GEO I The US RoleIEOS as US Component of GEOSS Vision for the FutureShared Challenges </li> <li> Slide 13 </li> <li> 13 Vision for the Future Shared Challenges Challenges at the national level amplified at the international level 10 Year Implementation Plan Reference Document identifies about 500 near-, mid-, and long-term goals Opportunities for cooperation are also increased IEOS and GEOSS mutually dependent for success </li> <li> Slide 14 </li> <li> 14 Science and Technology Advice / User Interface Ensuring quality input from Science and Technical Community critical to GEOSS success Maintaining robust interface with user community to ensure that priorities are properly aligned with needs Maintaining political will by delivering on societal benefit opportunities </li> <li> Slide 15 </li> <li> 15 Common System Architecture Supports a range of implementation options Addresses planned, research and operational systems Capabilities interfaced through interoperability specifications Inclusion of metadata and quality indicators Continuity of observations, and instigation of new observations Builds on existing systems and historical data Federal Enterprise Architecture Framework </li> <li> Slide 16 </li> <li> 16 Data Management Data Management Needs New Systems mean 100-fold increase in data Current systems already face challenges Development of browser and visualization systems underpinned by core geospatial technologies Interoperability through protocols and standards </li> <li> Slide 17 </li> <li> 17 Data Management Geostationary Satellites CIMSS Current GOES Sounder coverage in one hour GOES-R HES Sounder coverage in one hour Much improved spatial and temporal coverage GOES-R: New generation of current U.S. geostationary operational environmental satellite (GOES) series </li> <li> Slide 18 </li> <li> 18 A final thought GEOSS can only succeed if the U.S. effectively implements IEOS. IEOS/GEOSS Implementation Issues, A Study Developed by the Atmospheric Policy Program, American Meteorological Society, p. 41. 2004. The success of both the international and national plans depends upon a healthy discourse between all providers and users, both in the public and private sectors. </li> <li> Slide 19 </li> <li> 19 Questions? </li> </ul>

Recommended

View more >