overton park and the “new” administrative law environmental law fall 2008
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Overton Park and the “New” Administrative Law Environmental Law Fall 2008](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022080905/56649e2e5503460f94b1df7a/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Overton Park and the“New” Administrative Law
Environmental Law
Fall 2008
![Page 2: Overton Park and the “New” Administrative Law Environmental Law Fall 2008](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022080905/56649e2e5503460f94b1df7a/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
The “Old” Administrative Law
• Fights over New Deal proliferation of agencies, push for procedural checks
• 1946—”contending forces came to rest” on Administrative Procedure Act (APA)
• Emphasis on Independent Regulatory Agencies (economic regulation)
• Emphasis on big, formal proceedings (esp. trial-type hearings)
![Page 3: Overton Park and the “New” Administrative Law Environmental Law Fall 2008](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022080905/56649e2e5503460f94b1df7a/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Evolution of the (No Longer) New Administrative Law
• Capture and “Iron Triangle” theories– Debunking of neutral expertise
• Single-mission rather than single-industry agencies
• Executive rather than Congressional accountability
• Public participation, “new public interest lawyers”
• Aggressive judicial review (“hard look”)
![Page 4: Overton Park and the “New” Administrative Law Environmental Law Fall 2008](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022080905/56649e2e5503460f94b1df7a/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Simplified Iron Triangle:Forest Products
USDA Forest Service
Timber Industry Congressional Overseers
Recreational users, enviros, etc.
![Page 5: Overton Park and the “New” Administrative Law Environmental Law Fall 2008](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022080905/56649e2e5503460f94b1df7a/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Complex Iron Triangles:Major Dams
USACE, BLM, FERC, BPA
Electric Utilities,
Consumers,
Barge operators,
Irrigators, etc.
Congressional overseers,
Executive,
Media
Enviros
Endangered Species Bureaucracies
Tribal governments
Fishers (commercial, sport, agencies)
Etc., etc., etc.
![Page 6: Overton Park and the “New” Administrative Law Environmental Law Fall 2008](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022080905/56649e2e5503460f94b1df7a/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
The practice of Environmental Law is (almost always) political lawyering.
You need to be aware of the political context, and the problems
and opportunities it creates.
![Page 7: Overton Park and the “New” Administrative Law Environmental Law Fall 2008](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022080905/56649e2e5503460f94b1df7a/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
The Overton Era
• Things other than formal adjudication and formal rulemaking can be reviewed as “final agency action” (There is a strong presumption of reviewability.)
• “Proprietary functions” are as reviewable as other functions.
• A paper trail can be an “administrative record.”• If the administrator doesn’t create a proper
paper trail, s/he can be deposed and face trial in a district court.
![Page 8: Overton Park and the “New” Administrative Law Environmental Law Fall 2008](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022080905/56649e2e5503460f94b1df7a/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Overton, continued
• Agency discretion will be narrowly construed (loss of trust in objectivity and neutrality)
• Part of “abuse of discretion” review is policing whether the agency has looked at the right factors and assigned them the proper weights (under the statute).
• “Arbitrary and capricious” fact review is meaningful (“hard look”).
![Page 9: Overton Park and the “New” Administrative Law Environmental Law Fall 2008](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022080905/56649e2e5503460f94b1df7a/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Underlying assumption:Judicial review is an important
check on bias and capture. This accountability mechanism
should be widely available.
![Page 10: Overton Park and the “New” Administrative Law Environmental Law Fall 2008](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022080905/56649e2e5503460f94b1df7a/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Checklist of Grounds for Court Reversal
• Violation of statute (includes failure to consider proper factors, wrong weighting)
• Didn’t provide procedures required by law– Specific statute– APA or other general statute (e.g., NEPA)– Agency’s rules of practice
• Inadequate factual support– Substantial evidence (formal/hybrid rulemaking or
adjudication)– Arbitrary and capricious
• Constitutional defects