outline what’s new in 2008 weed control refresher common questions about interpreting and using...

28
Outline What’s New in 2008 Weed Control Refresher Common Questions about Interpreting and Using Forage Quality Data Potential research/demo projects.

Upload: lester-roberts

Post on 04-Jan-2016

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Outline What’s New in 2008 Weed Control Refresher Common Questions about Interpreting and Using Forage Quality Data Potential research/demo projects

Outline

• What’s New in 2008• Weed Control Refresher• Common Questions about Interpreting

and Using Forage Quality Data• Potential research/demo projects.

Page 2: Outline What’s New in 2008 Weed Control Refresher Common Questions about Interpreting and Using Forage Quality Data Potential research/demo projects

Common Questions about Interpreting and Using Forage

Quality Data

Page 3: Outline What’s New in 2008 Weed Control Refresher Common Questions about Interpreting and Using Forage Quality Data Potential research/demo projects

How good is this hay?

Crude Protein = 13.5%

Page 4: Outline What’s New in 2008 Weed Control Refresher Common Questions about Interpreting and Using Forage Quality Data Potential research/demo projects

Crude Protein and Hay Quality

Crude Protein and Hay Quality

• CP is the most overrated measure of quality! Total N x 6.25 = CP, %

• Tells you nothing about the form nitrogen is in Protein (AA), Bound Protein, Nitrates etc.

• Tells you very little about energy content• Protein requirements are (typically) easily

met• Somewhat related to maturity• Important- just overemphasized

• CP is the most overrated measure of quality! Total N x 6.25 = CP, %

• Tells you nothing about the form nitrogen is in Protein (AA), Bound Protein, Nitrates etc.

• Tells you very little about energy content• Protein requirements are (typically) easily

met• Somewhat related to maturity• Important- just overemphasized

Page 5: Outline What’s New in 2008 Weed Control Refresher Common Questions about Interpreting and Using Forage Quality Data Potential research/demo projects

Common Questions about Interpreting and Using Forage

Quality Data

High Quality Forage: Forage that is highly digestible (i.e., high TDN) and capable of being consumed in large amounts (i.e., high DMI).

• RFQ = TDN * DMI/1.23http://www.caes.uga.edu/commodities/fieldcrops/forages/questions/rfq.html

NDF and NDFd

HORSES?

Page 6: Outline What’s New in 2008 Weed Control Refresher Common Questions about Interpreting and Using Forage Quality Data Potential research/demo projects

The Plant CellThe Plant Cell

PectinsHemicelluloseCelluloseLigninSilica

ProteinOilMineralsSugarsOrganic Acids

Easily Digestible

Neutral Detergent Fiber

Total Digestible NutrientsRelative Forage Quality (RFQ)

Metabolizable Energy

TDNRFQ

Metabolizable Energy

Page 7: Outline What’s New in 2008 Weed Control Refresher Common Questions about Interpreting and Using Forage Quality Data Potential research/demo projects

Reading Forage Quality Data

Page 8: Outline What’s New in 2008 Weed Control Refresher Common Questions about Interpreting and Using Forage Quality Data Potential research/demo projects

What can you make out of Crude Fiber?

• Crude fiber is not an accurate measure of total fiber Much of the lignin and hemicellulose

is lost during the analysis. Even cellulose is not totally

recovered in the CF fraction.

• Crude fiber is not an accurate measure of total fiber Much of the lignin and hemicellulose

is lost during the analysis. Even cellulose is not totally

recovered in the CF fraction.

Page 9: Outline What’s New in 2008 Weed Control Refresher Common Questions about Interpreting and Using Forage Quality Data Potential research/demo projects

The Plant CellThe Plant Cell

PectinsHemicelluloseCelluloseLigninSilica

ProteinOilMineralsSugarsOrganic Acids

Neutral Detergent Fiber

Total Digestible NutrientsRelative Forage Quality (RFQ)

Metabolizable Energy

Page 10: Outline What’s New in 2008 Weed Control Refresher Common Questions about Interpreting and Using Forage Quality Data Potential research/demo projects

What can you make out of Crude Fiber?

• Crude fiber is not an accurate measure of total fiber Much of the lignin and hemicellulose

is lost during the analysis. Even cellulose is not totally

recovered in the CF fraction.

• Most testing labs no longer report CF. It is required on tags of purchased

feeds.

• Crude fiber is not an accurate measure of total fiber Much of the lignin and hemicellulose

is lost during the analysis. Even cellulose is not totally

recovered in the CF fraction.

• Most testing labs no longer report CF. It is required on tags of purchased

feeds.

Feeding the Dairy Herd:http://www.extension.umn.edu/distribution/livestocksystems/DI0469.html

• Section: Feed Nutrientshttp://www.extension.umn.edu/distribution/livestocksystems/components/DI0469-03.html

Page 11: Outline What’s New in 2008 Weed Control Refresher Common Questions about Interpreting and Using Forage Quality Data Potential research/demo projects

Forage Quality Question

On the forage reports, it lists:Net energy.... lactation

maintenance gain

Metabolizable energy

What is the practical significance of these variables?Is there a target range for these variables?

Page 12: Outline What’s New in 2008 Weed Control Refresher Common Questions about Interpreting and Using Forage Quality Data Potential research/demo projects

Energy Fractionation

GrossEnergy

DigestibleEnergy

MetabolizableEnergy

NetEnergy

Maintenance

Growth

Milk

Other

Loss infeces

Loss inurine & gas

Loss asheat

Page 13: Outline What’s New in 2008 Weed Control Refresher Common Questions about Interpreting and Using Forage Quality Data Potential research/demo projects

Forage Quality Question

On the forage reports it lists:Net energy....lactation

maintenance gain

Metabolizable energy

What is the practical significance of these variables?Is there a target range for these variables?

http://www.nap.edu/catalog/nrs/

Page 14: Outline What’s New in 2008 Weed Control Refresher Common Questions about Interpreting and Using Forage Quality Data Potential research/demo projects

What is the value of forage quality information?

What is the value of forage quality information?

$60/1000 lb roll51% TDN

$65/1000 lb roll58% TDN

A)

B)

Scenario: Dry Cows• Bale A cost:

No supplement; $65/bale

• Bale B cost: 56 lbs of supplement/1000 lb

bale $4.20 supp. + $60 = $64.20 + labor

Page 15: Outline What’s New in 2008 Weed Control Refresher Common Questions about Interpreting and Using Forage Quality Data Potential research/demo projects

What is the value of forage quality information?

What is the value of forage quality information?

$60/1000 lb roll51% TDN

$65/1000 lb roll58% TDN

A)

B)

Scenario: Lact. Cows• Bale A cost:

No supplement; $65/bale

• Bale B cost: 180 lbs of supplement/1000 lb

bale $13.50 supp. + $60 =

$73.50 + labor

In this case, the feeding of one bale paid for the forage

test.

Page 16: Outline What’s New in 2008 Weed Control Refresher Common Questions about Interpreting and Using Forage Quality Data Potential research/demo projects

Outline

• What’s New in 2008• Weed Control Refresher• Common Questions about Interpreting

and Using Forage Quality Data• Potential research/demo projects.

Page 17: Outline What’s New in 2008 Weed Control Refresher Common Questions about Interpreting and Using Forage Quality Data Potential research/demo projects

Demonstration Projects - 08

Demonstration Projects - 08

Perennial legumes for Coastal Plain pastures.

• Tri-state effort (MS, AL, GA) to establish and evaluate perennial legumes (white & red clovers) for persistence in the region.

• Cost-share program (CIG) 75% of establishment costs Up to ~$110/A (Don’t hold me to that)

• Needs: Good cooperator, ready access to equipment, perennial

grass in good condition (good stand, weed control, fertility, etc.)

Willing to allow field day/pasture walk.

Perennial legumes for Coastal Plain pastures.

• Tri-state effort (MS, AL, GA) to establish and evaluate perennial legumes (white & red clovers) for persistence in the region.

• Cost-share program (CIG) 75% of establishment costs Up to ~$110/A (Don’t hold me to that)

• Needs: Good cooperator, ready access to equipment, perennial

grass in good condition (good stand, weed control, fertility, etc.)

Willing to allow field day/pasture walk.

Page 18: Outline What’s New in 2008 Weed Control Refresher Common Questions about Interpreting and Using Forage Quality Data Potential research/demo projects

Demonstration Projects - 08

Demonstration Projects - 08

Perennial legumes for Coastal Plain pastures.

• Site Options:

Perennial legumes for Coastal Plain pastures.

• Site Options:

Page 19: Outline What’s New in 2008 Weed Control Refresher Common Questions about Interpreting and Using Forage Quality Data Potential research/demo projects

Demonstration Projects - 08

Demonstration Projects - 08

Calibrate and evaluate the variability of drills and seeders.

• Some drills (no-till, et al.) result in over application. High seed costs are here to stay.

Calibrate and evaluate the variability of drills and seeders.

• Some drills (no-till, et al.) result in over application. High seed costs are here to stay.

Page 20: Outline What’s New in 2008 Weed Control Refresher Common Questions about Interpreting and Using Forage Quality Data Potential research/demo projects

Demonstration Projects - 08

Demonstration Projects - 08

Calibrate and evaluate the variability of drills and seeders.

• Size of some forage seeds and mixtures create inaccuracy.

Calibrate and evaluate the variability of drills and seeders.

• Size of some forage seeds and mixtures create inaccuracy.

Page 21: Outline What’s New in 2008 Weed Control Refresher Common Questions about Interpreting and Using Forage Quality Data Potential research/demo projects

Revisiting Some Old Friends

Revisiting Some Old Friends

Old N Fertilizer ProductsOld N Fertilizer Products

Photo courtesy of Dr. Ray Smith, TAES

Page 22: Outline What’s New in 2008 Weed Control Refresher Common Questions about Interpreting and Using Forage Quality Data Potential research/demo projects

The effect of annual clover addition on ‘Coastal’ bermudagrass yields.

The effect of annual clover addition on ‘Coastal’ bermudagrass yields.

Treatment 1965 1966 1967 1968

-------------- dry lbs/acre -------------- Crimson; 200 lbs N/Acre 22500 22300 17500 24500Arrowleaf; 200 lbs N/Acre 24000 21600 16500 27100No Clover; 200 lbs N/Acre 17100 19800 15400 21600

No Clover; 0 N 7700 6600 3500 6200Location: Starkville, MS Source: Knight, W.E. 1970. Agron. J. 62:773-775.

Page 23: Outline What’s New in 2008 Weed Control Refresher Common Questions about Interpreting and Using Forage Quality Data Potential research/demo projects

Research Projects - 08Research Projects - 08

Sodseeding winter annual legumes into bermudagrass (and bahiagrass) hayfields

• Evaluate the benefit of annual legume addition to WSP hayfields.

• Funding? Seed will be made available to provide uniform conditions Producer/County may have to provide for other costs

• Needs: Good cooperator, ready access to equipment, perennial

grass in good condition (good stand, weed control, fertility, etc.)

Willing to allow field day/pasture walk.

Sodseeding winter annual legumes into bermudagrass (and bahiagrass) hayfields

• Evaluate the benefit of annual legume addition to WSP hayfields.

• Funding? Seed will be made available to provide uniform conditions Producer/County may have to provide for other costs

• Needs: Good cooperator, ready access to equipment, perennial

grass in good condition (good stand, weed control, fertility, etc.)

Willing to allow field day/pasture walk.

Page 24: Outline What’s New in 2008 Weed Control Refresher Common Questions about Interpreting and Using Forage Quality Data Potential research/demo projects

Research Projects - 08Research Projects - 08

Sodseeding winter annual legumes into bermudagrass (and bahiagrass) hayfields

• Treatments (4 replications): Arrowleaf, crimson, and check plot 4 levels of N fertilization (100, 150, 200, and 250 lbs

N/acre)

• No poultry litter applied to area

• Take yield measurements before each harvest. Clippers, 1 ft2 or m2 quadrat, scales (1 - 0.1 g)

• Send samples to Hancock or dry on your own.

Sodseeding winter annual legumes into bermudagrass (and bahiagrass) hayfields

• Treatments (4 replications): Arrowleaf, crimson, and check plot 4 levels of N fertilization (100, 150, 200, and 250 lbs

N/acre)

• No poultry litter applied to area

• Take yield measurements before each harvest. Clippers, 1 ft2 or m2 quadrat, scales (1 - 0.1 g)

• Send samples to Hancock or dry on your own.

Page 25: Outline What’s New in 2008 Weed Control Refresher Common Questions about Interpreting and Using Forage Quality Data Potential research/demo projects

Research Projects - 08Research Projects - 08

Page 26: Outline What’s New in 2008 Weed Control Refresher Common Questions about Interpreting and Using Forage Quality Data Potential research/demo projects

Research Projects - 08Research Projects - 08

Developing better estimates of bale weights.

• Bale weight = f(density and volume) 5’ x 5’ bale ~= 100 ft3 (π r2 * h) Density runs ~ 9 - 12.5 ft3

• Factors that will need to be accounted for: Forage species Quality (fiber strength) Variation between sites within a bale

• Overcome variation with a large, diverse sample size

Developing better estimates of bale weights.

• Bale weight = f(density and volume) 5’ x 5’ bale ~= 100 ft3 (π r2 * h) Density runs ~ 9 - 12.5 ft3

• Factors that will need to be accounted for: Forage species Quality (fiber strength) Variation between sites within a bale

• Overcome variation with a large, diverse sample size

Page 27: Outline What’s New in 2008 Weed Control Refresher Common Questions about Interpreting and Using Forage Quality Data Potential research/demo projects

Research Projects - 08Research Projects - 08

Developing better estimates of bale weights.

• Commitment: Obtain data and weights on 50 or more bales

Forage, baler model, bale size, visual density, penetrometer reading from several locations, true bale weight, dry matter sample, ….

• Requires: Scale for dry matter readings (1 - 0.1 g) Large scale for weighing bales

Can borrow my scale Obtain/own soil compaction tester

Granger, Nasco, etc.

Developing better estimates of bale weights.

• Commitment: Obtain data and weights on 50 or more bales

Forage, baler model, bale size, visual density, penetrometer reading from several locations, true bale weight, dry matter sample, ….

• Requires: Scale for dry matter readings (1 - 0.1 g) Large scale for weighing bales

Can borrow my scale Obtain/own soil compaction tester

Granger, Nasco, etc.

Page 28: Outline What’s New in 2008 Weed Control Refresher Common Questions about Interpreting and Using Forage Quality Data Potential research/demo projects

QUESTIONS?QUESTIONS?

www.georgiaforages.com1-800-ASK-UGA1

www.georgiaforages.com1-800-ASK-UGA1