our federal court system “ laws are a dead letter without courts to expound and define their true...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Our Federal Court System “ Laws are a dead letter without courts to expound and define their true meaning and operation.” – Alexander Hamilton](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062314/56649eab5503460f94bb0814/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Our Federal Court System
“Laws are a dead letter without courts to expound and define their true meaning and operation.”
– Alexander Hamilton
![Page 2: Our Federal Court System “ Laws are a dead letter without courts to expound and define their true meaning and operation.” – Alexander Hamilton](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062314/56649eab5503460f94bb0814/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Establishing the Court SystemThe Articles of Confederation
No national courtNo national judiciary
This created problems:The laws of the United States were interpreted
and applied as each State saw fit, and sometimes not at all
Disputes between two states were decided, if at all, in one of the two states involved, however . . . Often these decisions were ignored by the courts in
other states.
![Page 3: Our Federal Court System “ Laws are a dead letter without courts to expound and define their true meaning and operation.” – Alexander Hamilton](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062314/56649eab5503460f94bb0814/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
A Dual Court System
We have two separate court systems in the United StatesNational court system (more than 100 courts)State court system (more than 1000 courts)
Most cases are heard in state, not federal, courts
![Page 4: Our Federal Court System “ Laws are a dead letter without courts to expound and define their true meaning and operation.” – Alexander Hamilton](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062314/56649eab5503460f94bb0814/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
The Two Types of Federal Courts
The Supreme CourtInferior Courts
1. The Constitutional Courts Federal courts that Congress has formed under
Article III to exercise “the judicial power of the United States”
2. The Special Courts Created by Congress to hear cases arising out of
some of the expressed powers given to Congress in Article I
![Page 5: Our Federal Court System “ Laws are a dead letter without courts to expound and define their true meaning and operation.” – Alexander Hamilton](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062314/56649eab5503460f94bb0814/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
The Constitutional Courts1. 12 U.S. Courts of Appeals
2. 94 District Courts
3. U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
4. U.S. Court of International Trade
![Page 6: Our Federal Court System “ Laws are a dead letter without courts to expound and define their true meaning and operation.” – Alexander Hamilton](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062314/56649eab5503460f94bb0814/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
The Special Courts1. U.S. Court of Federal Claims
2. Territorial Courts
3. U.S. Tax Court
4. U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
5. U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
6. Courts of the District of ColumbiaWashington D.C.
![Page 7: Our Federal Court System “ Laws are a dead letter without courts to expound and define their true meaning and operation.” – Alexander Hamilton](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062314/56649eab5503460f94bb0814/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
The Supreme CourtThe only court specifically created by the
ConstitutionArticle III, Section I
Made up of the Chief Justice of the United States and eight associate judges
Supreme Court Justices are appointed for life or until they retireThey are appointed by the President
Can you name any of the Supreme Court justices?
![Page 8: Our Federal Court System “ Laws are a dead letter without courts to expound and define their true meaning and operation.” – Alexander Hamilton](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062314/56649eab5503460f94bb0814/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
John G. Roberts, Jr.17th Chief Justice of the
United States Supreme Court
Attended:HarvardHarvard Law School
ConservativeNominated by President
George W. Bush Took his seat September
29, 2005, after the death of former Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist.
![Page 9: Our Federal Court System “ Laws are a dead letter without courts to expound and define their true meaning and operation.” – Alexander Hamilton](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062314/56649eab5503460f94bb0814/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
John Paul StevensAssociate JusticeAttended:
University of ChicagoNorthwestern
University’s School of Law
LiberalNominated by President
Gerald Ford Took his seat December
19, 1975
![Page 10: Our Federal Court System “ Laws are a dead letter without courts to expound and define their true meaning and operation.” – Alexander Hamilton](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062314/56649eab5503460f94bb0814/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Antonin ScaliaAssociate JusticeAttended:
Georgetown UniversityUniversity of Fribourg
(Switzerland) Harvard Law School
ConservativeNominated by
President Ronald Reagan
Took his seat September 26, 1986
![Page 11: Our Federal Court System “ Laws are a dead letter without courts to expound and define their true meaning and operation.” – Alexander Hamilton](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062314/56649eab5503460f94bb0814/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Anthony M. KennedyAssociate JusticeAttended:
Stanford UniversityThe London School
of EconomicsHarvard Law School
Swing voterNominated by
President Ronald Reagan
Took his seat on February 18, 1988
![Page 12: Our Federal Court System “ Laws are a dead letter without courts to expound and define their true meaning and operation.” – Alexander Hamilton](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062314/56649eab5503460f94bb0814/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Clarence ThomasAssociate JusticeAttended:
Conception SeminaryThe Holy Cross
CollegeYale Law School
ConservativeNominated by George
H.W. BushTook his seat on
October 23, 1991
![Page 13: Our Federal Court System “ Laws are a dead letter without courts to expound and define their true meaning and operation.” – Alexander Hamilton](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062314/56649eab5503460f94bb0814/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Ruth Bader GinsburgAssociate JusticeAttended:
Cornell UniversityHarvard Law SchoolColumbia Law School
LiberalNominated by
President Bill ClintonTook her seat on
August 10, 1993
![Page 14: Our Federal Court System “ Laws are a dead letter without courts to expound and define their true meaning and operation.” – Alexander Hamilton](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062314/56649eab5503460f94bb0814/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Stephen G. BreyerAssociate JusticeAttended:
Stanford UniversityThe Magdalen College
(Oxford)Harvard Law School
LiberalNominated by
President Bill ClintonTook his seat on
August 3, 1994
![Page 15: Our Federal Court System “ Laws are a dead letter without courts to expound and define their true meaning and operation.” – Alexander Hamilton](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062314/56649eab5503460f94bb0814/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Samuel Anthony Alito, Jr.One of the newest
members of the Supreme CourtAppointed after the
retirement of Justice Sandra Day O’Connor
Associate JusticeConservativeNominated by George
W. Bush Took his seat on
January 31, 2006
![Page 16: Our Federal Court System “ Laws are a dead letter without courts to expound and define their true meaning and operation.” – Alexander Hamilton](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062314/56649eab5503460f94bb0814/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Sonia SotomayorAssociate JusticeAttended:
Princeton UniversityYale Law School
LiberalFirst Latina justice;
third female justiceNominated by Barack
ObamaReplaced David Souter
in August of 2009
![Page 17: Our Federal Court System “ Laws are a dead letter without courts to expound and define their true meaning and operation.” – Alexander Hamilton](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062314/56649eab5503460f94bb0814/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Judicial ReviewDefinition: the power of a court to determine
the constitutionality of a government action
Most courts in this country both federal and state may exercise this critically important power, however . . .
The ultimate exercise of that power rests with the Supreme Court of the United States
![Page 18: Our Federal Court System “ Laws are a dead letter without courts to expound and define their true meaning and operation.” – Alexander Hamilton](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062314/56649eab5503460f94bb0814/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Supreme Court JurisdictionThe Supreme Court has both original and
appellate jurisdiction, most cases come to the Supreme Court through:
Appellate JurisdictionThis means that they arrived there after going
through the appeals process These cases have already been through the
highest state courts and the lower federal courtsThere are, on average, some 8,000 cases that
reach the Supreme Court through the appeals process each year
![Page 19: Our Federal Court System “ Laws are a dead letter without courts to expound and define their true meaning and operation.” – Alexander Hamilton](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062314/56649eab5503460f94bb0814/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Supreme Court JurisdictionOriginal Jurisdiction
The Supreme Court can hear two classes of cases:1. Those to which a State is a party2. Those affecting ambassadors, other public ministers,
and consulsCongress cannot enlarge on this constitutional
grant of original jurisdiction, however . . . Congress was able to create a constitutional provision
granting the Supreme Court to also have exclusive jurisdiction over:
1. All controversies involving two or more states
2. All cases brought against ambassadors or other public ministers, but not consuls.
![Page 20: Our Federal Court System “ Laws are a dead letter without courts to expound and define their true meaning and operation.” – Alexander Hamilton](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062314/56649eab5503460f94bb0814/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
How Cases Reach the CourtThere are two ways in which cases reach the
Supreme Court1. By the writ of certiorari (Latin)
Means “to be made more certain” This writ is an order by the Supreme Court for a lower
court to send up the record in a given case for its review
Either party in a case can petition the Court to issue a writ, but cert is only granted in a limited number of cases – usually only when an important Constitutional question arises.
2. By certificate This is much less common, cases which arrived on
certificate arrive because a lower court is not clear about the procedure or the rule of law that should apply in a case.
![Page 21: Our Federal Court System “ Laws are a dead letter without courts to expound and define their true meaning and operation.” – Alexander Hamilton](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062314/56649eab5503460f94bb0814/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
How the Court Operates Briefs
Briefs are written documents filed with the Court before oral arguments begin
These detailed statements support one side of a case, presenting arguments built largely on relevant facts and the citation of previous cases
Oral Arguments When the Supreme Court accepts a case, it sets a
date for the case to be heard Typically they consider cases in two week cycles
They hear oral arguments for weeks, then recess for two weeks to consider those cases
![Page 22: Our Federal Court System “ Laws are a dead letter without courts to expound and define their true meaning and operation.” – Alexander Hamilton](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062314/56649eab5503460f94bb0814/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
The Court in ConferenceThe Justices meet in conference twice a week on
Wednesdays and Fridays; here, they consider in secrecy the oral arguments they’ve heard
The Chief Justice presides over the conference, he speaks first on each case and usually indicates how he intends to vote
He is followed by the Associate Justices who speak in order based on seniority (how long they’ve served)
Once each Justice has issued their initial opinion, they debate
![Page 23: Our Federal Court System “ Laws are a dead letter without courts to expound and define their true meaning and operation.” – Alexander Hamilton](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062314/56649eab5503460f94bb0814/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Issuing OpinionsAbout a third of the Supreme Court’s decisions
are unanimous, most find the Court divided.Opinions
Majority OpinionConcurring OpinionDissenting Opinions
PrecedenceThe written opinions of the Court are extremely
valuable, the majority opinion stands as precedence; that is, as an example to be followed in similar cases should they arise in lower courts.
![Page 24: Our Federal Court System “ Laws are a dead letter without courts to expound and define their true meaning and operation.” – Alexander Hamilton](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062314/56649eab5503460f94bb0814/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
OpinionsMajority Opinion
Officially called the Opinion of the Court, it announces the Court’s decision in a case and sets out the reasoning on which it is based.
Concurring Opinion Often one or more of the justices who agree with the Court’s
decision may write a concurring opinion, this is usually done to add or emphasize a point that was not made in the majority opinion.
Dissenting Opinion Often written by those justices who do not agree with the Court’s
majority decision; on rare occasions, the Court does reverse itself . . . the minority opinion of today could become the Court’s majority position in the future.
Knowing this, why is it considered such a big deal when a seat opens up and the President has the opportunity to fill it?