ounlpractice

13
OpenER in Practice Approach & Experiences Jannes Eshuis (Assist. Professor, Psychology, OUNL)

Upload: cplp

Post on 26-Jun-2015

481 views

Category:

Technology


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Jannes Eshuis (Assist. Professor, Psychology, OUNL)

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: OUNLpractice

OpenER in Practice

Approach & Experiences

Jannes Eshuis (Assist. Professor, Psychology, OUNL)

Page 2: OUNLpractice

Primary aim

Inviting (adult) people to pursue academic study

Interesting content

Starters level

Offered material should be

Attractive (presentation)

Easily approachable

Do people seek further education after OpenER?

Page 3: OUNLpractice

Secondary aim

OpenER at OUNL was small scale

Disadvantage: low resourcesSmall team (3 people / part-time)Little material (graphics / presentation)

Advantage: forced to become creative & innovativeCreative Commons / Open Source

Learn about low cost innovation in online education

Page 4: OUNLpractice

1. Flash Courses (approach)

Tight integration of interactivity (Macromedia Flash)

Online experiments

Automated feedback

Self tests

Easy navigation

Popular theme (Evolutionary Psychology)

Two small Flash components

Page 5: OUNLpractice

1. Flash Courses (experience)

Main advantage was its attractivenessEasy exploration of subjectPlayful interactive experienceGraphic presentation

DisadvantagesDesign at the expense of contentFlash design is very labour-expensive

Attractive material but not suitable for our needs

Page 6: OUNLpractice

2. Moodle Course (approach)

Existing course (new revision in Moodle)

Diminish teacher workload

Automated feedback

Non-moderated collaborative assignments

OpenER: opportunity for a pilot with a large group

Server demands

Evaluation of new self-tuition methods

Page 7: OUNLpractice

2. Moodle Course (experience)

Hardly any complaints (approx. 4000 users)

Login problems

Demand for printed (printable) material

Self-tuition methods

Automated feedback (major improvement)

Non-moderated collaboration (sparsely used)

Assignments done by 11% of (OpenER) users

Page 8: OUNLpractice

Conclusion

Most of all, OpenER offered us freedom to innovate and opportunity to evaluate the results of this innovation.

Questions?

Some facts and figures…

Page 9: OUNLpractice

OpenER: Who does use it?

Age: avg 44 (range 15 to 82)

Sex: 69% female / 31% male

Education

01% primary

27% secondary

55% higher vocational

17% higher academic

Looking for academic education?

68% yes

32% no

0

20

40

60

primary secondary tertiary(vocational)

tertiary(academic)

0

20

40

60

yes no

Page 10: OUNLpractice

OpenER: Why do they use it?

Why browse the material?

56% interest in content

32% assess material / level

12% leisure / other

How intensive?

47% superficial browsing

23% superficial studying

22% studying / some assign.

08% studying / all assign.

0

20

40

60

content material / level leisure / other

0

20

40

60

superficialbrowsing

studying / noassignments

sudying / someassignments

studying / allassignments

Page 11: OUNLpractice

OpenER: What do they do next?

Inspired to purchase an academic course?

18% yes

82% no

What course?

67% introductory course

11% other psychology

22% other subject

0

20

40

60

80

yes no

0

20

40

60

80

introduction inpsychology

other course inpsychology

other subject

Page 12: OUNLpractice

OpenER: Window on the future?

Interested in more OpenER?

87% yes

13% no

Interested in support?

30% only for free

26% willing to pay

44% not interested

Interested in certification?

26% only for free

62% willing to pay

12% not interested

0

20

40

60

80

yes no

0

20

40

60

only for free willing to pay not interested

0

20

40

60

only for free willing to pay not interested

Page 13: OUNLpractice

Thank you for your attention