osteotomies about the knee geoffrey f dervin, md, msc associate professor chairman, division of...
TRANSCRIPT
Osteotomiesabout the Knee
Geoffrey F Dervin, MD, MSc
Associate Professor
Chairman, Division of Orthopaedic Surgery
University of Ottawa
Symptomatic medial OA
• UNI ?
• HTO ?
• TKR ?
• How to decide ?
• Who to decide ? Surgeon or patient
B.S. 50 yo active male tennis playerDisabling medial pain
Degenerative medial Meniscal tear
After partial resection
….but 3 months post scope - still very symptomatic
IndicationsBest patient:
• Moderate OA …Grade 3 or focal area of grade 4 kissing lesion
• ROM 10 – 100 minimum
• Not obese
• Active ….physiologically young – sportive
• Non smoker
Major determinants in deciding whether to offer HTO for medial OA :
1. Patient needs , expectations
2. Patient age
3. Disease severity
4. Patient preference
Indications• Best patient…..rarely exists
• Compromise some indications if younger, i.e. accept worse severity
• Act as a bridge to total knee replacement
Issues in selection: Patient expectations
Compliance with rehab a concern ?
– Lean to UNI
• Pain relief needed
– Expect a little less with HTO
• ADLs wishes….sports..
– Permit a little more with HTO
Issues in selection: Age !Life Remaining
35 40 50 60 70 80 85
18 years
23 years
32 years
40 years
Courtesy J Rudan
Goals of osteotomy: 1.Correction of coronal alignment
• Some discretion based on OA severity
• More extensive the bone loss – more lateral desired mechanical WBL
Posterior Tibial Slope1.Take midpoint of lateral tibia 1.Take midpoint of lateral tibia at 10 and 20 cm inferior to at 10 and 20 cm inferior to tibial plateautibial plateau
2. Draw perpendicular line2. Draw perpendicular line
3. Trace line along posterior 3. Trace line along posterior plateauplateau
4. Measure angle subtended 4. Measure angle subtended between linesbetween lines
10cm &20 cm
Posterior Tibial SlopeNormative Data - Sagittal PlaneNormative Data - Sagittal Plane
StudyStudy Slope AngleSlope Angle
Lecuire, 1980Lecuire, 1980 6 °6 °Bonnin, 1990Bonnin, 1990 10 10 ++ 3.1° 3.1°Paley, 1992Paley, 1992 10 °10 °Insall, 1993Insall, 1993 10 °10 °Dejour, 1994Dejour, 1994 10 10 ++ 3.1° 3.1°Paley, 1994Paley, 1994 9 9 ++ 3° 3°
10cm &20 cm
10°± 2°
Tibial vs. Meniscal SlopeJenny JY et al Jenny JY et al
Rev Chirurg Orthop 1997, 83; 435-438.Rev Chirurg Orthop 1997, 83; 435-438.
• Posterior horn of Posterior horn of menisci thickermenisci thicker
• Bony slope mean 84.4Bony slope mean 84.4ºº ± 2.9 SD± 2.9 SD
• Meniscal slope 90.5Meniscal slope 90.5º ± º ± 4.1 SD4.1 SD
Bony slope Meniscal slope
Sagittal wear patterns in OA of knee Anteromedial osteoarthritis of the knee
White, Ludkowski, Goodfellow JBJS 73 B(4): 1991
• Medial compartment arthrosis – 46 specimens
• ACL intact • Deepest erosion anterior
to midpoint• Posterior tibial plateau
consistently spared
Sagittal wear patterns in OA of ACL intact knee
Anteromedial osteoarthritis of the knee White, Ludkowski, Goodfellow
JBJS 73 B(4): 1991
• Medial compartment arthrosis – 46 specimens
• ACL intact • Deepest erosion
anterior to midpoint• Posterior tibial
plateau consistently spared
Posterior
Anterior
Sagittal wear patterns in OA of knee – ACL deficient - posteromedial
Anterior subluxation…
Posterior wear
Contributors to AP Knee Stability:
• Cruciate Ligaments Cruciate Ligaments
• MenisciMenisci
• Joint CapsuleJoint Capsule
• Tibial slopeTibial slope
Surgically should aim to adjust sagittal slope according to patient
characteristics
• Ligamentous intact knee
• ACL deficient knee
• PCL deficient knee
Effects of Increasing Tibial Slope onthe Biomechanics of the Knee
J. Robert Giffin, MD, Tracy M. Vogrin, MS, Thore Zantop, Savio L-Y. Woo, PhD, DSc, and
Christopher D. Harner,* MD
• The American Journal of Sports Medicine, Vol. 32, No. 2; 376-82: 2004.
Effects of Increasing Tibial Slope onthe Biomechanics of the Knee
• The American Journal of Sports Medicine, Vol. 32, No. 2; 376-82: 2004.
Total AP laxity & in-situ forces unchangedTotal AP laxity & in-situ forces unchangedat the new anterior resting positionat the new anterior resting position
Deflexion (Extension) Osteotomy
• First described by Slocum (1983)
– Dogs (tibial slope > 20°)
• Indications (humans):
– pre-osteoarthritis
– a large ATT (> 10°)
– excessive tibial slope (>13°)
Dejour 1994With ACL DEFICIENT KNEE
Surgically should aim to adjust sagittal slope according to patient
characteristics
ACL deficient knee – decrease slope
• PCL deficient knee – increase slope
• Ligamentous intact knee – maintain slope
Techniques
• Lateral closing wedge
• Medial opening wedge
– Acute opening
– Distraction osteogenesis
• Dome
Lateral closing wedge – current systems
• Accurate cuts• Accurate angle• Predetermined wedge apex• Tight closure• Rigid fixation• More likely to decrease slope
Rx of the Fibula options
• Take down tib./fib. joint• Shell out fib. head• Resect at fib. neck• Resect at prox. 1/3
Courtesy D Paley, Principles of Deformity Correction, Springer Verlag, 2002
Techniques – Domebest for severe deformities
Opening Wedge/Ext. Fix
• Compress x 1 week• Open @ 1 mm/day• Correction + 1.0 mm• Lock• Fix. locked until bony healing (~10-12 wks)• Remove fix. but leave pins-1 wk.• Recheck correction• Remove pins
Advantages of Open Wedge/Ext. Fix
• No fibular osteotomy• Small skin incisions• Exact correction of deformity• No change in prox. tibia shape• No added lat. soft tissue lax.• No shortening of limb
Disadvantages of Open Wedge/Ext. Fix
• Frame worn medially• Pos. pin tract infection • Pos. joint infection• 2nd procedure to remove• Tightens ext. mech.• Time to healing
Opening wedge osteotomy - my preference
• Easier exposure
• Dial in correction intraoperatively
• Less distortion of proximal tibia anatomy
• PCL insertion preserved
Opening Wedge Tibial OsteotomyThe 3-Triangle Method to CorrectAxial Alignment and Tibial Slope
• Noyes et al, The American Journal of Sports Medicine, Vol. 33, No. 3; 378-87: 2005
Technical success features
• Intact lateral cortex• Long stable screw
purchase• Appropriate coronal
correction ( complete posterior osteotomy)
• Filled defect
Advantages of Opening Wedge
• No fibular osteotomy• No change in prox. tibia shape• No added lat. soft tissue lax.• No shortening of limb• Fewer Neuro. Comps.
Opening wedge-disadvantages• Bone graft or substitute usually needed• NWB/PWB Status• Healing Time longer• Hardware can be irritable in medial
subcutaneous location• Best reserved for mild to moderate corrections
up to 12 degrees• Beware of increasing sagittal tibial slope…
Results: Personal experienceFirst 14 OW vs historical CW cases
Demographics
Open Wedge Closing Wedge
Patient Number 14 16
Age 51.9 9.5 44.8 7.3
Male / Female 10 / 4 13 / 3
Right / Left 5 / 9 9 / 7
Open Wedge Closing Wedge
Pre-Op 5.9 4.6° 8.9 2.9°
Post-Op 11.3 5.0° * 6.7 2.5° *
Results : Posterior tibial slope
Combined HTO/ACL reconstruction
Anterior cruciate reconstruction combined with valgus upper tibial osteotomy: 12 years follow-up. Knee, 2004
Bonin N et al., Lyon, France
• 30 knees in 29 patients – ACL deficient, med comp OA (IDKC grade B and C)
• Mean age 30yrs (18-41yrs)• Simultaneous HTO/ACL reconstruction• Mean 12 year f/u (6-16yrs)• 5 knees progressed one arthritic grade• Stable – mean 3mm side to side difference in KT-1000• 84% moderate to intensive sports/activities
Combined HTO/ACL reconstruction
Outcome following simultaneous ACL reconstruction and medial opening wedge high
tibial osteotomy.Jerome J DaSilva, Nicolas Graveleau, Robert Litchfield, Peter Fowler, Robert Giffinfrom the Fowler Kennedy Sports Medicine Centre, London, Ontario
• 36 knees – med comp OA, ACL deficient, varus• Average age 37yrs (20-54yrs)• Mean f/u 3yrs (1 - 4.5yrs)• No progression of OA• Improved KOOS, WOMAC• 29 returned to previous sports• 7 had not returned to previous level – 2 no desire, 2 progressing,
2 symptomatic laxity, 1 infection
Combined HTO/ACL reconstruction
Tips for OW osteotomy & ACL:
1. Make osteotomy low enough on medial tibia
2. Keep tibial tunnel in untouched proximal tibial bone, easier by starting more obliquely
3. Anteromedial portal for femoral tunnel leaves more options for tibial tunnel
4. Order not critical
5. Keep tibial slope neutral or try to decrease a little
Patient AS - Examination
• L knee
• 30 – 0 – 130 vs 10- 0 – 130 (R)
• Post drawer Grade1 - 2
• Other ligaments normal
A.S. Summary
• Need to control hyperextension symptoms from primarily posterior capsular attenuation
• PCL (AL bundle) normal on Telos posterior stress view and clinical examination
• Rx options:• Brace locked at 10 º• Anterior OW osteotomy• Posterior capsular imbrication• Combined procedure most likely required
Contributors to AP Knee Stability:
• Cruciate Ligaments Cruciate Ligaments
• MenisciMenisci
• Joint CapsuleJoint Capsule
• Tibial slopeTibial slope
High Tibial Osteotomy
• Important surgical option in the treatment of the young patient with OA and malalignment
• Able to be combined with ACL reconstruction for instability• Results deteriorate with time – good pain relief and
restoration of function in 80-90% at 5yrs and 50-65% at 10yrs
BUT
Joint is preserved and activity encouraged• Later conversion to TKR should not be significantly
affected (Medial Opening Wedge better than Lateral Closing Wedge)