organizational structure

28
Organizational Structure Horizontal differentiation Vertical differentiation Spacial dispersion Degree of formalization Degree of centralization Need to create division of labor Need to integrate these groups to ensure organizational effectiveness Dimensions of Structure

Upload: mihaly

Post on 06-Jan-2016

23 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

DESCRIPTION

Organizational Structure. Need to create division of labor Need to integrate these groups to ensure organizational effectiveness Dimensions of Structure. Horizontal differentiation Vertical differentiation Spacial dispersion Degree of formalization Degree of centralization. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Organizational Structure

Organizational Structure

Horizontal differentiation Vertical differentiation Spacial dispersion Degree of formalization Degree of centralization

Need to create division of labor Need to integrate these groups to ensure

organizational effectiveness Dimensions of Structure

Page 2: Organizational Structure

Firm Growth as Evolutionary Process

Single Business

GeographicDiversification

(Foreign Sales as %Total Sales)

Product Diversification

(Product Diversity)

Product and GeographicDiversification

Page 3: Organizational Structure

Horizontal Differentiation

degree to which tasks are divided into distinct homogeneous groups– function-wise

– geographic-wise

– product-wise

– production stage-wise

Prod 1 Prod 2 Prod 3 Prod 4

C EO

M kt M fg F inance R & D Log is tics

C E O

Page 4: Organizational Structure

Vertical Differentiation

Number of levels within the organization

Sr. VP

VP

Asst. VP Asst. VP

Asst. B ranch Mgr

B ranch Mgr. B ranch Mgr.

Asst. VP

VP VP

Sr. VP

E VP E VP E VP

C EO

Page 5: Organizational Structure

Spacial Dispersion

Degree to which activities are located in different areas

Finance R &D Legal

Support

U S

Prod 1

Mfg.

Pacific

Prod 2

Mfg

Eur.

H Q

Page 6: Organizational Structure

Pre

ssu

res

for

Glo

bal

Eff

icie

ncy

and

Cen

tral

izat

ion

Pressures for Local Responsiveness and Decentralization

High

Low

HighLow

Horizontal Differentiation?

Vertical Differentiation?

Spacial Dispersion

Structure Follows Strategy

Page 7: Organizational Structure

Export

U.S.

Germany

Mexico

Malaysia

Page 8: Organizational Structure

Functional Structurew/ International Sales Division

F in ./Acct.

M anufacturing M arketing Log istics

In ternationa lSa les

R & D

H Q

Page 9: Organizational Structure

Multidomestic

U.S.

Germany

Mexico

Malaysia

Page 10: Organizational Structure

Geographic Structure

Mkt. M fg. R & D

N . Am er. Eur. Latin Am er.

Prod. A Prod. B Prod. C

Pac.R im

H Q

Page 11: Organizational Structure

Pure Global

U.S.

Germany

Mexico

Malaysia

Page 12: Organizational Structure

Global Functional StructureFor Single-business Firms

F in ./Acct.

M anufacturingM exico

M arketingG erm any

R & DM alaysia

H QU .S .

Page 13: Organizational Structure

Product Division StructureFor Product-diversified Firms

M fg . M kt. R &D

Product A

M fg . M kt. R &D

Product B

M fg . M kt. R &D

Product C

H Q

Page 14: Organizational Structure

Transnational (1)

U.S.

Germany

Mexico

Malaysia

Page 15: Organizational Structure

Matrix Structure (A)

R &D

U S

Eur

M exico

M alaysia

M arketing M anufacturingM exico

H QU .S .

Page 16: Organizational Structure

Matrix Structure (B)

U S

Eur

Asia

Geographic A reas Product 1 P roduct 2 P roduct 3 P roduct 4

H Q

Page 17: Organizational Structure

Transnational (2)

U.S.

Germany

Mexico

Malaysia

Engines

Final Assembly

Trim, seats,glass

Steel

Page 18: Organizational Structure

R &D

Log istics

IntegratedFunctions

M arketing

G erm any

D rive tra in

M arketing

U S

Body/F ram e

M arketing

M alaysia

G lass/P lastic

M arketing

M exico

F ina lAssem bly

H Q

Matrix Structure (B)

Page 19: Organizational Structure

Mixed Structure

Mfg.

Mkt.

R&D

PC s

Faxes

Mobil Phones

Copiers

U S

Faxes

Mobil Phones

Copiers

Europe

Faxes

Mobil Phones

Copiers

Pacific

H Q

Page 20: Organizational Structure

Stopford-Wells Structure Model P

rodu

ct D

iver

sity

Lo

Hi

Foreign Sales as % of Total Sales

0% 100%

Intl.Division

ProductDivisions

GeographicDivisions

Mixed /Matrix /Network

Page 21: Organizational Structure

Kimberly-Clark’s Old Structure

M fg . M kt.

U S

M fg . M kt.

Europe

U .S . H QC EO

Page 22: Organizational Structure

Kimberly-Clark’s New Structure

M anufacturing

U S

M anufacturing

Eur

Geographic A reas M arketingTissue P roducts

M arketingP ersonal C are P roducts

U .S . H QC EO

Page 23: Organizational Structure

Kimberly-Clark’s New Structure

M arketingP ersonal-C are

P roducts

M arketingTissue P roducts

Integ ratedU nits

U .S .M fg.

EuropeM fg.

U .S . H QC EO

Page 24: Organizational Structure

Formalization

Degree to which rules, procedure, lines of authority/responsibility are enunciated or specified

More formality: eliminates confusion and uncertainty, limits creativity and innovation

Less formality: imbues flexibility, creative solutions.

Page 25: Organizational Structure

Centralization

Degree to which authority and decision making is at higher levels of the organization

Centralized: tight org control, managers are order-takers

Decentralized: managers closest to product and/or customer able to make decisions

Page 26: Organizational Structure

Data Management Control Mechanisms

Information systems Measurement systems Resource allocation procedures Strategic planning Budgeting processes

Page 27: Organizational Structure

Managers’ Management Control Mechanisms

Choice/selection of key managers Career paths Rewards and punishment systems Management development Patterns of socialization

Page 28: Organizational Structure

Organizational Learning/Conflict Resolution Control Mechanisms

Decision responsibility assignments Integrators Transnational teams Coordination committees Task forces