organization: structure and culture

33
PowerPoint Presentation by Charlie Cook PowerPoint Presentation by Charlie Cook Copyright Copyright © © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. THE MANAGERIAL PROCESS Clifford F. Gray Eric W. Larson Third Edition P ro ject M a n a g em en t P ro ject M a n a g em en t Chapter 3 Chapter 3 Organization: Structure and Culture Organization: Structure and Culture

Post on 21-Oct-2014

9.678 views

Category:

Business


26 download

DESCRIPTION

Project Management, Authors: Clifford F. Gray, Eric W. Larson, Third Edition, Ch 3

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Organization: Structure and Culture

PowerPoint Presentation by Charlie CookPowerPoint Presentation by Charlie CookCopyright Copyright © © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved.2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved.

THE MANAGERIAL PROCESSTHE MANAGERIAL PROCESS Clifford F. GrayEric W. Larson

Third Edition

Clifford F. GrayEric W. Larson

Third Edition

Pr ojec t ManagementPr ojec t Management

Chapter 3Chapter 3

Organization: Structure and CultureOrganization: Structure and Culture

Page 2: Organization: Structure and Culture

Copyright Copyright © © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 3McGraw-Hill/Irwin 3––22

Page 3: Organization: Structure and Culture

Copyright Copyright © © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 3McGraw-Hill/Irwin 3––33

Project Management StructuresProject Management StructuresProject Management StructuresProject Management Structures

• Challenges to Organizing Projects–The uniqueness and short duration of projects relative

to ongoing longer-term organizational activities–The multidisciplinary and cross-functional nature of

projects creates authority and responsibility dilemmas.

• Choosing an Appropriate Project Management Structure–The best system balances

the needs of the project with the needs of the organization.

Page 4: Organization: Structure and Culture

Copyright Copyright © © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 3McGraw-Hill/Irwin 3––44

Project Management StructuresProject Management StructuresProject Management StructuresProject Management Structures

• Organizing Projects: Functional organization

–Different segments of the project are delegated to respective functional units.

–Coordination is maintained through normal management channels.

–Used when the interest of one functional area dominates the project or one functional area has a dominant interest in the project’s success.

Page 5: Organization: Structure and Culture

Copyright Copyright © © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 3McGraw-Hill/Irwin 3––55

Functional OrganizationsFunctional OrganizationsFunctional OrganizationsFunctional Organizations

FIGURE 3.1

Page 6: Organization: Structure and Culture

Copyright Copyright © © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 3McGraw-Hill/Irwin 3––66

Functional Organization of ProjectsFunctional Organization of ProjectsFunctional Organization of ProjectsFunctional Organization of Projects

• Advantages

–No Structural Change

–Flexibility

–In-Depth Expertise

–Easy Post-Project Transition

• Disadvantages

–Lack of Focus

–Poor Integration

–Slow

–Lack of Ownership

Page 7: Organization: Structure and Culture

Copyright Copyright © © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 3McGraw-Hill/Irwin 3––77

Project Management Structures (cont’d)Project Management Structures (cont’d)Project Management Structures (cont’d)Project Management Structures (cont’d)

• Organizing Projects: Dedicated Teams

–Teams operate as separate units under the leadership of a full-time project manager.

–In a projectized organization where projects are the dominant form of business, functional departments are responsible for providing support for its teams.

Page 8: Organization: Structure and Culture

Copyright Copyright © © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 3McGraw-Hill/Irwin 3––88

Dedicated Project TeamDedicated Project TeamDedicated Project TeamDedicated Project Team

FIGURE 3.2

Page 9: Organization: Structure and Culture

Copyright Copyright © © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 3McGraw-Hill/Irwin 3––99

Project Organization: Dedicated TeamProject Organization: Dedicated TeamProject Organization: Dedicated TeamProject Organization: Dedicated Team

• Advantages

–Simple

–Fast

–Cohesive

–Cross-Functional Integration

• Disadvantages

–Expensive

–Internal Strife

–Limited Technological Expertise

–Difficult Post-Project Transition

Page 10: Organization: Structure and Culture

Copyright Copyright © © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 3McGraw-Hill/Irwin 3––1010

Project Organizational StructureProject Organizational StructureProject Organizational StructureProject Organizational Structure

FIGURE 3.3

Page 11: Organization: Structure and Culture

Copyright Copyright © © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 3McGraw-Hill/Irwin 3––1111

Project Management Structures (cont’d)Project Management Structures (cont’d)Project Management Structures (cont’d)Project Management Structures (cont’d)

• Organizing Projects: Matrix Structure–Hybrid organizational structure (matrix) is overlaid on

the normal functional structure.•Two chains of command (functional and project)•Project participants report simultaneously to both

functional and project managers.

–Matrix structure optimizes the use of resources.•Allows for participation on multiple projects while

performing normal functional duties.•Achieves a greater integration of expertise and project

requirements.

Page 12: Organization: Structure and Culture

Copyright Copyright © © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 3McGraw-Hill/Irwin 3––1212

Matrix Organization StructureMatrix Organization StructureMatrix Organization StructureMatrix Organization Structure

FIGURE 3.4

Page 13: Organization: Structure and Culture

Copyright Copyright © © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 3McGraw-Hill/Irwin 3––1313

Division of Project Manager and Functional Division of Project Manager and Functional Manager Responsibilities in a Matrix StructureManager Responsibilities in a Matrix StructureDivision of Project Manager and Functional Division of Project Manager and Functional

Manager Responsibilities in a Matrix StructureManager Responsibilities in a Matrix Structure

TABLE 3.1

Project Manager Negotiated Issues Functional Manager

What has to be done? Who will do the task? How will it be done?

When should the task be done? Where will the task be done?

How much money is available to Why will the task be done? How will the project involvementdo the task? impact normal functional activities?

How well has the total project Is the task satisfactorily How well has the functional been done? completed? input been integrated?

Page 14: Organization: Structure and Culture

Copyright Copyright © © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 3McGraw-Hill/Irwin 3––1414

Different Matrix FormsDifferent Matrix FormsDifferent Matrix FormsDifferent Matrix Forms

• Functional (also Weak or Lightweight) Form–Matrices in which the authority of the functional

manager predominates and the project manager has indirect authority.

• Balance (or Middleweight) Form–The traditional matrix form in which the project

manager sets the overall plan and the functional manager determines how work to be done.

• Strong (Heavyweight) Form–Resembles a project team in which the project

manager has broader control and functional departments act as subcontractors to the project.

Page 15: Organization: Structure and Culture

Copyright Copyright © © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 3McGraw-Hill/Irwin 3––1515

Project Organization: Matrix FormProject Organization: Matrix FormProject Organization: Matrix FormProject Organization: Matrix Form

• Advantages

–Efficient

–Strong Project Focus

–Easier Post-Project Transition

–Flexible

• Disadvantages

–Dysfunctional Conflict

–Infighting

–Stressful

–Slow

Page 16: Organization: Structure and Culture

Copyright Copyright © © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 3McGraw-Hill/Irwin 3––1616

Project Management Structures (cont’d)Project Management Structures (cont’d)Project Management Structures (cont’d)Project Management Structures (cont’d)

• Organizing Projects: Network Organizations–An alliance of several organizations for the purpose of

creating products or services.•A “hub” or “core” firm with strong core competencies

outsources key activities to a collaborative cluster of satellite organizations.

Page 17: Organization: Structure and Culture

Copyright Copyright © © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 3McGraw-Hill/Irwin 3––1717

Mountain Bicycle Network ProjectMountain Bicycle Network ProjectMountain Bicycle Network ProjectMountain Bicycle Network Project

FIGURE 3.5

Page 18: Organization: Structure and Culture

Copyright Copyright © © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 3McGraw-Hill/Irwin 3––1818

Project Organization: Network FormProject Organization: Network FormProject Organization: Network FormProject Organization: Network Form

• Advantages

–Cost Reduction

–High Level of Expertise

–Flexible

• Disadvantages

–Coordination of Breakdowns

–Loss of Control

–Conflict

Page 19: Organization: Structure and Culture

Copyright Copyright © © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 3McGraw-Hill/Irwin 3––1919

Rated Effectiveness of Different Project Rated Effectiveness of Different Project Structures by Type of ProjectStructures by Type of Project

Rated Effectiveness of Different Project Rated Effectiveness of Different Project Structures by Type of ProjectStructures by Type of Project

FIGURE 3.6Source: Larson, E. W., and Gobeli, D. H., “Matrix Management: Contradictions and Insights,” California Management Review, vol. 29, no. 4 (Summer 1987), p. 137.

Page 20: Organization: Structure and Culture

Copyright Copyright © © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 3McGraw-Hill/Irwin 3––2020

Choosing the Appropriate Project Choosing the Appropriate Project Management StructureManagement Structure

Choosing the Appropriate Project Choosing the Appropriate Project Management StructureManagement Structure

• Organization (Form) Considerations–How important is the project to the firm’s success?–What percentage of core work involves projects?–What level of resources (human and physical) are

available?

Page 21: Organization: Structure and Culture

Copyright Copyright © © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 3McGraw-Hill/Irwin 3––2121

Choosing the Appropriate Project Choosing the Appropriate Project Management Structure (cont’d)Management Structure (cont’d)

Choosing the Appropriate Project Choosing the Appropriate Project Management Structure (cont’d)Management Structure (cont’d)

• Project Considerations–Size of project–Strategic importance–Novelty and need for innovation–Need for integration (number of departments involved)–Environmental complexity (number of external

interfaces)–Budget and time constraints–Stability of resource requirements

Page 22: Organization: Structure and Culture

Copyright Copyright © © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 3McGraw-Hill/Irwin 3––2222

Organizational CultureOrganizational CultureOrganizational CultureOrganizational Culture

• Organizational Culture Defined

–A system of shared norms, beliefs, values, and assumptions which bind people together, thereby creating shared meanings.

–The “personality” of the organization that sets it apart from other organizations.

•Provides a sense of identify to its members.

•Helps legitimize the management system of the organization.

•Clarifies and reinforces standards of behavior.

Page 23: Organization: Structure and Culture

Copyright Copyright © © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 3McGraw-Hill/Irwin 3––2323

Key Dimensions Defining an Organization’s CultureKey Dimensions Defining an Organization’s CultureKey Dimensions Defining an Organization’s CultureKey Dimensions Defining an Organization’s Culture

FIGURE 3.7

Page 24: Organization: Structure and Culture

Copyright Copyright © © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 3McGraw-Hill/Irwin 3––2424

Identifying Cultural CharacteristicsIdentifying Cultural CharacteristicsIdentifying Cultural CharacteristicsIdentifying Cultural Characteristics

• Study the physical characteristics of an organization.

• Read about the organization.

• Observe how people interact within the organization.

• Interpret stories and folklore surrounding the organization.

Page 25: Organization: Structure and Culture

Copyright Copyright © © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 3McGraw-Hill/Irwin 3––2525

Organizational Culture Diagnosis WorksheetOrganizational Culture Diagnosis WorksheetOrganizational Culture Diagnosis WorksheetOrganizational Culture Diagnosis Worksheet

FIGURE 3.8

Page 26: Organization: Structure and Culture

Copyright Copyright © © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 3McGraw-Hill/Irwin 3––2626

Implications of Organizational Culture Implications of Organizational Culture for Organizing Projectsfor Organizing Projects

Implications of Organizational Culture Implications of Organizational Culture for Organizing Projectsfor Organizing Projects

• Challenges for Project Managers in Navigating Organizational Cultures–Interacting with the culture and subcultures of the

parent organization–Interacting with the project’s clients or customer

organizations–Interacting with other organizations

connected to the project

Page 27: Organization: Structure and Culture

Copyright Copyright © © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 3McGraw-Hill/Irwin 3––2727

Cultural Dimensions of an Organization Supportive Cultural Dimensions of an Organization Supportive of Project Managementof Project Management

Cultural Dimensions of an Organization Supportive Cultural Dimensions of an Organization Supportive of Project Managementof Project Management

FIGURE 3.9

Page 28: Organization: Structure and Culture

Copyright Copyright © © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 3McGraw-Hill/Irwin 3––2828

Key TermsKey TermsKey TermsKey Terms

Balanced matrix

Dedicated project team

Strong matrix

Matrix

Organizational culture

Weak matrix

Projectitis

Projectized organization

Network organization

Page 29: Organization: Structure and Culture

Copyright Copyright © © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 3McGraw-Hill/Irwin 3––2929

Organization of Product Development Projects at ORIONOrganization of Product Development Projects at ORIONOrganization of Product Development Projects at ORIONOrganization of Product Development Projects at ORION

FIGURE C3.1

Page 30: Organization: Structure and Culture

Copyright Copyright © © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 3McGraw-Hill/Irwin 3––3030

Traditional Master Plan at ORIONTraditional Master Plan at ORIONTraditional Master Plan at ORIONTraditional Master Plan at ORION

FIGURE C3.2

Page 31: Organization: Structure and Culture

Copyright Copyright © © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 3McGraw-Hill/Irwin 3––3131

Proposed Project Organization for the Jaguar ProjectProposed Project Organization for the Jaguar ProjectProposed Project Organization for the Jaguar ProjectProposed Project Organization for the Jaguar Project

FIGURE C3.3

Page 32: Organization: Structure and Culture

Copyright Copyright © © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 3McGraw-Hill/Irwin 3––3232

Jaguar Master PlanJaguar Master PlanJaguar Master PlanJaguar Master Plan

FIGURE C3.4

Page 33: Organization: Structure and Culture

Copyright Copyright © © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 3McGraw-Hill/Irwin 3––3333

Mechanisms for Sustaining Organizational CultureMechanisms for Sustaining Organizational CultureMechanisms for Sustaining Organizational CultureMechanisms for Sustaining Organizational Culture

FIGURE A3.1