Elements One and Two

OSBA Policies:Core Teaching Standards GCN-ARLicense Evaluation-Administrators CCGEvaluation of Staff GCN/GDN

ORReference InTASC and ISLLC

standards in evaluation handbook

ODE Recommended Rubricshttp://www.ode.state.or.us/search/page/?

id=3767If more then 10% of a rubric is changed a gap

analysis is needed

Who:Any district who changes more then 10% of an ODE

recommended rubricAny district who is creating their own rubricAny district who does not use one of the ODE

recommended rubricsWhat:

http://www.ode.state.or.us/search/page/?id=3784Why:

To ensure alignment with state adopted standardsHow:

http://www.ode.state.or.us/wma/teachlearn/educatoreffectiveness/danielson-gap-analysis.doc

What does the research say?Is there research behind the rubric to ensure it

is valid and reliable?What training is available to help with

implementation?How will educators understand and own the

rubric’s language?Are there Inter-Rater Reliability trainings

available?What rubrics are being used regionally?

Are there opportunities for collaboration?

Pilot Districts

What process, criteria and/or lens did you use to design or adopt a rubric that matched your values, goals and state requirements?

What are the strengths and challenges of your rubric?

How did you implement your rubric? What professional development was offered?

What were the strengths and challenges of your implementation plan and what will you do differently during whole district implementation?

What else do you feel is important to share regarding elements 1 and 2 of the Oregon Framework?