oregon framework
DESCRIPTION
Oregon Framework. Elements One and Two. Aligning to Standards : R equirements. OSBA Policies: Core Teaching Standards GCN-AR License Evaluation-Administrators CCG Evaluation of Staff GCN/GDN OR Reference InTASC and ISLLC standards in evaluation handbook. Adopting a Rubric. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Elements One and Two
OSBA Policies:Core Teaching Standards GCN-ARLicense Evaluation-Administrators CCGEvaluation of Staff GCN/GDN
ORReference InTASC and ISLLC
standards in evaluation handbook
ODE Recommended Rubricshttp://www.ode.state.or.us/search/page/?
id=3767If more then 10% of a rubric is changed a gap
analysis is needed
Who:Any district who changes more then 10% of an ODE
recommended rubricAny district who is creating their own rubricAny district who does not use one of the ODE
recommended rubricsWhat:
http://www.ode.state.or.us/search/page/?id=3784Why:
To ensure alignment with state adopted standardsHow:
http://www.ode.state.or.us/wma/teachlearn/educatoreffectiveness/danielson-gap-analysis.doc
What does the research say?Is there research behind the rubric to ensure it
is valid and reliable?What training is available to help with
implementation?How will educators understand and own the
rubric’s language?Are there Inter-Rater Reliability trainings
available?What rubrics are being used regionally?
Are there opportunities for collaboration?
Pilot Districts
What process, criteria and/or lens did you use to design or adopt a rubric that matched your values, goals and state requirements?
What are the strengths and challenges of your rubric?
How did you implement your rubric? What professional development was offered?
What were the strengths and challenges of your implementation plan and what will you do differently during whole district implementation?
What else do you feel is important to share regarding elements 1 and 2 of the Oregon Framework?