order granting in part plaintiff's ex parte motion to exceed page limitation
DESCRIPTION
A most unusual order in the fashion / IP litigation matter in Phillipe Charriol Int'l Ltd. v. A'lor Int'l Ltd in the Southern District of CaliforniaTRANSCRIPT
– 1 – 13cv1257
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA PHILIPPE CHARRIOL INTERNATIONAL LIMITED,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 13-cv-01257-BAS(JLB) ORDER GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE MOTION TO EXCEED PAGE LIMITATION (ECF No. 336)
v. A’LOR INTERNATIONAL LIMITED,
Defendant.
AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS
Presently before the Court is an ex parte motion filed by Plaintiff Philippe
Charriol International Limited (“Plaintiff”) seeking leave to file a 60-page
consolidated Memorandum of Points and Authorities in support of its intended
“Omnibus Motion for relief arising out of Defendant A’lor International Limited’s
(‘A’lor’) serious and serial violation of the Court’s April 10, 2014 Preliminary
Injunction.” (ECF No. 336 at p. 1.) In support of its request, Plaintiff contends that
some of A’lor’s alleged conduct “is more subtle and is intentionally difficult to
verify” and therefore has to be described in detail and requires further explanation.
(ECF No. 338 at p. 2.) Plaintiff further contends that the “law supporting the
Case 3:13-cv-01257-BAS-JLB Document 341 Filed 02/19/15 Page 1 of 2
– 2 – 13cv1257
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
various forms of relief is complex and requires in-depth explanation, including
combining facts and legal tests for Injunction compliance.” (Id. at pp. 2-3.)
Plaintiff asserts that “[n]one of this can be accomplished in 25 pages.” (Id. at p. 3.)
Defendant A’lor International Limited opposes the motion. (ECF Nos. 337, 339.)
Having read and considered the moving papers, and good cause appearing,
the Court GRANTS IN PART Plaintiff’s ex parte motion (ECF No. 336). Plaintiff
may file a 35-page consolidated Memorandum of Points and Authorities in support
of its intended “Omnibus Motion for Eight Categories of Relief Arising from
A’lor’s Serial Contempt of Injunction.” If the Court decides it needs additional
information after the motion is fully briefed, it will set the matter for oral argument
or request additional briefing.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: February 19, 2015
Case 3:13-cv-01257-BAS-JLB Document 341 Filed 02/19/15 Page 2 of 2