order denying sevier motion to intervene

3
Page 1 of 3 Consolidated Case No. 4:14cv107-RH/CAS IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION JAMES DOMER BRENNER et al., Plaintiffs, CONSOLIDATED v. CASE NO. 4:14cv107-RH/CAS RICK SCOTT, etc., et al., Defendants. _________________________________/ ORDER DENYING LEAVE FOR CHRIS SEVIER TO INTERVENE In these consolidated actions, the plaintiffs challenge provisions of the Florida Constitution and Florida Statutes on same-sex marriage. Chris Sevier has moved to intervene, apparently asserting he wishes to marry his computer. Perhaps the motion is satirical. Or perhaps it is only removed from reality. Either way, the motion has no place in this lawsuit. Mr. Sevier has alleged nothing that would support intervention. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 24. More egregiously, Mr. Sevier has tenderedbut I have directed the clerk not to filea document that purports to amend the plaintiffs’ amended motion for Case 4:14-cv-00107-RH-CAS Document 41 Filed 04/24/14 Page 1 of 3

Upload: anonymous-2nuafapcv

Post on 06-May-2017

216 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Order Denying Sevier Motion to Intervene

Page 1 of 3

Consolidated Case No. 4:14cv107-RH/CAS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

JAMES DOMER BRENNER et al.,

Plaintiffs,

CONSOLIDATED

v. CASE NO. 4:14cv107-RH/CAS

RICK SCOTT, etc., et al.,

Defendants.

_________________________________/

ORDER DENYING LEAVE FOR

CHRIS SEVIER TO INTERVENE

In these consolidated actions, the plaintiffs challenge provisions of the

Florida Constitution and Florida Statutes on same-sex marriage. Chris Sevier has

moved to intervene, apparently asserting he wishes to marry his computer.

Perhaps the motion is satirical. Or perhaps it is only removed from reality. Either

way, the motion has no place in this lawsuit. Mr. Sevier has alleged nothing that

would support intervention. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 24.

More egregiously, Mr. Sevier has tendered—but I have directed the clerk not

to file—a document that purports to amend the plaintiffs’ amended motion for

Case 4:14-cv-00107-RH-CAS Document 41 Filed 04/24/14 Page 1 of 3

Page 2: Order Denying Sevier Motion to Intervene

Page 2 of 3

Consolidated Case No. 4:14cv107-RH/CAS

declaratory and injunctive relief. The tendered document purports to be a “second

amended motion for declaratory and injunctive relief,” and it purports to be

tendered not just by Mr. Sevier on his own behalf but by the original plaintiffs

through their own attorneys. Mr. Sevier should take note: he has no authority to

tender a document on behalf of anyone other than himself. Filing a document in

someone else’s name without the person’s authority is a serious offense;

electronically signing or otherwise reproducing an attorney’s signature on a

document without the attorney’s authority is a serious offense; and doing any of

this again will have substantial consequences.

For these reasons,

IT IS ORDERED:

1. Mr. Sevier’s motion to intervene is DENIED.

2. The clerk must hold for 90 days (and make available for inspection by

any person on request) but must not file Mr. Sevier’s tendered “second amended

motion for declaratory and injunctive relief.”

3. Mr. Sevier must not tender for filing any document on behalf of

anyone other than himself.

4. The clerk must provide a copy of this order to the attorneys of record

through the electronic filing system and to Mr. Sevier by mail. The clerk must

provide to Mr. Sevier copies of further filings dealing specifically with his

Case 4:14-cv-00107-RH-CAS Document 41 Filed 04/24/14 Page 2 of 3

Page 3: Order Denying Sevier Motion to Intervene

Page 3 of 3

Consolidated Case No. 4:14cv107-RH/CAS

attempted intervention but must not add Mr. Sevier to the docket or service list for

other documents.

SO ORDERED on April 24, 2014.

s/Robert L. Hinkle

United States District Judge

Case 4:14-cv-00107-RH-CAS Document 41 Filed 04/24/14 Page 3 of 3