orange county concurrency management ordinance board of county commissioners public hearing may 21,...
TRANSCRIPT
Orange CountyOrange County
Concurrency Management Concurrency Management OrdinanceOrdinance
Board Of County Commissioners Board Of County Commissioners Public HearingPublic Hearing
May 21, 2013May 21, 2013
Orange CountyOrange County
Concurrency Management Concurrency Management OrdinanceOrdinance
Board Of County Commissioners Board Of County Commissioners Public HearingPublic Hearing
May 21, 2013May 21, 2013
Presentation OutlinePresentation Outline
PurposePurpose
BackgroundBackground
Ordinance AmendmentsOrdinance Amendments
Consistency DeterminationConsistency Determination
Requested ActionRequested Action
Presentation OutlinePresentation Outline
PurposePurpose
BackgroundBackground
Ordinance AmendmentsOrdinance Amendments
Consistency DeterminationConsistency Determination
Requested ActionRequested Action
RequestRequest
Public Hearing For AmendmentsPublic Hearing For Amendments
To The Concurrency Management To The Concurrency Management OrdinanceOrdinance
PurposePurpose
Presentation OutlinePresentation Outline
PurposePurpose
BackgroundBackground
Ordinance AmendmentsOrdinance Amendments
Consistency DeterminationConsistency Determination
Requested ActionRequested Action
RequestRequest
BackgroundBackgroundBackgroundBackground
2011 Amendment – HB 72072011 Amendment – HB 7207 Removed Financial Feasibility Requirements
Made Transportation Concurrency Optional
• Orange County Retained Concurrency
Changed application of Proportionate Share
• Formula Revision
2011 Amendment – HB 72072011 Amendment – HB 7207 Removed Financial Feasibility Requirements
Made Transportation Concurrency Optional
• Orange County Retained Concurrency
Changed application of Proportionate Share
• Formula Revision
BackgroundBackgroundBackgroundBackground
Proposed Changes Are Intended to Achieve Proposed Changes Are Intended to Achieve The Following:The Following:
•Promote Development Of A Multi-Modal Transportation Promote Development Of A Multi-Modal Transportation InfrastructureInfrastructure
•Support Urban Infill RedevelopmentSupport Urban Infill Redevelopment
•Streamline Concurrency ProcessStreamline Concurrency Process
•Streamline School Mitigation Agreement ProcessStreamline School Mitigation Agreement Process
Proposed Changes Are Intended to Achieve Proposed Changes Are Intended to Achieve The Following:The Following:
•Promote Development Of A Multi-Modal Transportation Promote Development Of A Multi-Modal Transportation InfrastructureInfrastructure
•Support Urban Infill RedevelopmentSupport Urban Infill Redevelopment
•Streamline Concurrency ProcessStreamline Concurrency Process
•Streamline School Mitigation Agreement ProcessStreamline School Mitigation Agreement Process
Presentation OutlinePresentation Outline
PurposePurpose
BackgroundBackground
Ordinance AmendmentsOrdinance Amendments
Consistency DeterminationConsistency Determination
Requested ActionRequested Action
Ordinance AmendmentsOrdinance AmendmentsOrdinance AmendmentsOrdinance Amendments
Revisions Include Sec. 30-501 Definitions Sec. 30-501 Definitions
• Alternative Mobility AreaAlternative Mobility Area
• Pedestrian Connectivity IndexPedestrian Connectivity Index
• Projects That Promote Public TransportationProjects That Promote Public Transportation
• Deleted Concurrency Review Committee Deleted Concurrency Review Committee
Sec. 30-506Sec. 30-506
• Defines Transportation Concurrency Exception AreaDefines Transportation Concurrency Exception Area
Sec. 30-507Sec. 30-507
• Defines Criteria And Process For Projects That Promote Public Defines Criteria And Process For Projects That Promote Public TransportationTransportation
Revisions Include Sec. 30-501 Definitions Sec. 30-501 Definitions
• Alternative Mobility AreaAlternative Mobility Area
• Pedestrian Connectivity IndexPedestrian Connectivity Index
• Projects That Promote Public TransportationProjects That Promote Public Transportation
• Deleted Concurrency Review Committee Deleted Concurrency Review Committee
Sec. 30-506Sec. 30-506
• Defines Transportation Concurrency Exception AreaDefines Transportation Concurrency Exception Area
Sec. 30-507Sec. 30-507
• Defines Criteria And Process For Projects That Promote Public Defines Criteria And Process For Projects That Promote Public TransportationTransportation
Ordinance AmendmentsOrdinance AmendmentsOrdinance AmendmentsOrdinance Amendments
Revisions IncludeRevisions Include
Page 23, Line 978Page 23, Line 978• Concurrency Review Committee (CRC) Eliminated Concurrency Review Committee (CRC) Eliminated
(RAC to Review and Recommend To BCC)(RAC to Review and Recommend To BCC)
Page 24, Section 30-581Page 24, Section 30-581
• Transportation Concurrency Procedure Flow Chart Transportation Concurrency Procedure Flow Chart RevisedRevised
Page 39 (4) and Page 47 (m) Page 39 (4) and Page 47 (m)
• Expedited Prop. Share Approval Process DeletedExpedited Prop. Share Approval Process Deleted
Revisions IncludeRevisions Include
Page 23, Line 978Page 23, Line 978• Concurrency Review Committee (CRC) Eliminated Concurrency Review Committee (CRC) Eliminated
(RAC to Review and Recommend To BCC)(RAC to Review and Recommend To BCC)
Page 24, Section 30-581Page 24, Section 30-581
• Transportation Concurrency Procedure Flow Chart Transportation Concurrency Procedure Flow Chart RevisedRevised
Page 39 (4) and Page 47 (m) Page 39 (4) and Page 47 (m)
• Expedited Prop. Share Approval Process DeletedExpedited Prop. Share Approval Process Deleted
Ordinance Amendments Ordinance Amendments Ordinance Amendments Ordinance Amendments
Revisions IncludeRevisions Include
Sec. 30-621 Process For Denials, Mitigation, Sec. 30-621 Process For Denials, Mitigation, Proportionate Share Contribution Proportionate Share Contribution
• Prop. Share Contribution = Proportionate Share Prop. Share Contribution = Proportionate Share Of Cost Of Cost OF OF
Improvement Improvement Funded For Construction Funded For Construction In CIP, CIS or LTTCMS In CIP, CIS or LTTCMS
• If No Improvement Available, Applicant May Propose If No Improvement Available, Applicant May Propose And Contribute To A Mobility ImprovementAnd Contribute To A Mobility Improvement
• Sec. 30-622 Proportionate Share Formula RevisedSec. 30-622 Proportionate Share Formula Revised
Revisions IncludeRevisions Include
Sec. 30-621 Process For Denials, Mitigation, Sec. 30-621 Process For Denials, Mitigation, Proportionate Share Contribution Proportionate Share Contribution
• Prop. Share Contribution = Proportionate Share Prop. Share Contribution = Proportionate Share Of Cost Of Cost OF OF
Improvement Improvement Funded For Construction Funded For Construction In CIP, CIS or LTTCMS In CIP, CIS or LTTCMS
• If No Improvement Available, Applicant May Propose If No Improvement Available, Applicant May Propose And Contribute To A Mobility ImprovementAnd Contribute To A Mobility Improvement
• Sec. 30-622 Proportionate Share Formula RevisedSec. 30-622 Proportionate Share Formula Revised
Ordinance AmendmentsOrdinance AmendmentsOrdinance AmendmentsOrdinance Amendments
Revisions IncludeRevisions Include
Page 46 (f)Page 46 (f)
• Impact Fee Credits Now Disbursed On A Dollar For Impact Fee Credits Now Disbursed On A Dollar For Dollar BasisDollar Basis
• CMO to recommend School Mitigation Agreement to CMO to recommend School Mitigation Agreement to BCC for approval BCC for approval
Revisions IncludeRevisions Include
Page 46 (f)Page 46 (f)
• Impact Fee Credits Now Disbursed On A Dollar For Impact Fee Credits Now Disbursed On A Dollar For Dollar BasisDollar Basis
• CMO to recommend School Mitigation Agreement to CMO to recommend School Mitigation Agreement to BCC for approval BCC for approval
Presentation OutlinePresentation Outline
PurposePurpose
BackgroundBackground
Ordinance AmendmentsOrdinance Amendments
Consistency DeterminationConsistency Determination
Requested ActionRequested Action
Consistency DeterminationConsistency DeterminationConsistency DeterminationConsistency Determination
Consistency of Proposed OrdinanceConsistency of Proposed Ordinance
• T2.2.1 : Maintain Level Of Service And Ensure Roadway T2.2.1 : Maintain Level Of Service And Ensure Roadway Projects Are Financially Feasible Projects Are Financially Feasible
• T2.2.3: The County shall enforce applicable concurrency T2.2.3: The County shall enforce applicable concurrency regulations on new development permits for non-vested regulations on new development permits for non-vested development that adversely impact constrained or development that adversely impact constrained or backlogged facilities. backlogged facilities.
Consistency of Proposed OrdinanceConsistency of Proposed Ordinance
• T2.2.1 : Maintain Level Of Service And Ensure Roadway T2.2.1 : Maintain Level Of Service And Ensure Roadway Projects Are Financially Feasible Projects Are Financially Feasible
• T2.2.3: The County shall enforce applicable concurrency T2.2.3: The County shall enforce applicable concurrency regulations on new development permits for non-vested regulations on new development permits for non-vested development that adversely impact constrained or development that adversely impact constrained or backlogged facilities. backlogged facilities.
Presentation OutlinePresentation Outline
PurposePurpose
BackgroundBackground
Ordinance AmendmentsOrdinance Amendments
Consistency DeterminationConsistency Determination
Requested ActionRequested Action
Staff Recommendation:Staff Recommendation: AdoptAdopt
LPALPA Recommendation: Recommendation: AdoptAdopt
Make A Finding Of Consistency With Make A Finding Of Consistency With
The Comprehensive Plan And Adopt The Comprehensive Plan And Adopt
The Proposed Ordinance As AmendedThe Proposed Ordinance As Amended
Requested ActionRequested Action