oral managements for hospitalized...
TRANSCRIPT
ORAL MANAGEMENTS FOR HOSPITALIZED PATIENTSBy : Dr. Elahe Ghasemzade Hosseini
In The Name Of Allah
Dr.
Ela
he
Gh
ase
mza
de
Ho
sse
ini
Nosocomial pneumonia is the
second most common
infection (after infections of
the urinary tract ) in long-termcare institutions. It accounts
for approximately 10% to 15%
of all hospital-acquired
infections, and 20% to 50% of
affected patients will die
because of the infection.
mortality rates among
institutionalized patients from
pneumonia are reported to
be as high as 41%.
VAP is a relatively common nosocomial
infection in critically ill patients, with a
reported prevalence ranging between
6%- 52% with some indications
Medically compromised
patients in ICUs or in
nursing homes, especially if
they are dentate, are at
risk of pneumonia, which
can be prevented by
professional oral hygiene
interventions and frequent
health care.
Aspiration Pneumonia occurs in surgical
patients and increases morbidity, mortality,
and cost of care.
Micro-aspiration of
pharyngeal secretions
may also occur around an
imperfect seal of the cuff
of the endotracheal tube
in a ventilated patient !
Two routes exist for oral microorganisms to reach the lower respiratory tract:1- Hematogenous spread (as an inevitable adverse effect of some dental treatment) 2- Aspiration This later is important in respiratory
disease In healthy patients, the distal airway and lung parenchyma are sterile, despite the heavy bacterial load (106 aerobic bacteria and 107 anaerobic bacteria per millilitre) found in the upper airway. An infection occurs when the host’s defences are compromised, the pathogen is particularly virulent or the inoculum is overwhelming.
The micro-organisms may enter the lung by
inhalation, but the most common route of
infection is aspiration of what pneumologists
have long referred to as oropharyngeal
secretions !
1.Periodontal Disease or poor
oral hygiene might result in a
higher concentration of oralpathogens in the saliva
2.Dental Plaque could harbor
colonies of pulmonary pathogensand promote their growth.
3.The proximity of tongue to the
lungdebris on the tongue is more likely to be aspirated into the lungs compared to debris on the teeth.
Mechanisms of infection related
to aspiration:
In a study approximately
40% of their intensive care
patients, dental plaque was
colonized by aerobic
respiratory pathogens.
Within 48 hours of admission
to the intensive care unit
(ICU), oral flora of critically ill
patients undergoes a change
to predominantly gram-
negative flora that includes
more virulent organisms.
Anaerobic and Gram negative
species of plaque > invasion +
bacterial Toxins > immune
system overreaction(neutrophils
degranulation,proteolytic
enzymes, …) > connective
tissue alteration and
periodontal disease.
Periodontal diseases result in
a higher concentration of
Gram-negative and anaerobic
oral pathogens in saliva as well
as in patients with neglected
oral hygiene.
The pathogens would then
be aspirated into the lung,
overwhelming the immune
defenses.
• Actinobacillus
actinomycetemcomitans
• Fusobacterium nucleatum
• Pseudomonas aeruginosa
• Bacteroides gingivalis
• Streptococcus intermedius
• Staphylococcus aureus
• Streptococcus pneumonia
• gram negative rods
Bacterial coinfection in the respiratory tractinvolving S. aureus, S. pneumoniae, and H.influenza commonly occurs. S. aureus with theinfluenza virus have a high fatality rate specially in
the elderly.
1) Alteration of receptors on the surface of the mucosal cells to promote adhesion of pulmonary pathogens.2) Degradation of the salivary pellicle coating pulmonary pathogens3) Degradation of Fibronectin4) cytokines and other molecules
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY
1. presence of a large variety
of cytokines and other
biologically active molecules.
2. peripheral mononuclear
cells may alter the
respiratory epithelium and
promote colonization by
respiratory pathogens
Effects of cytokines and other
molecules:
3.Salivary proteolytic enzymes (mannosidase, fucosidase, hexosaminidase,sialidase)
modify respiratory tract mucosal surfaces and promote adhesion and colonization by respiratory pathogens. source of these salivary enzymes(originated
from the gingival
sulcus/pocket) has been
attributed to both the oral microbiota and polymorphonuclear leukocytes.
The worse the oral hygiene & the poorer the
oral condition, the higher the enzymatic activity
& greater mucosal changes will be , resulting in
respiratory pathogens adhesion.
Hydrolytic enzymes from
periodontopathic bacteria
(like P.gingivalis) may destroy the
salivary film that protects against
pathogenic bacteria.
4.Immunoglobulins and
Antimicrobial Enzymes
(lactoferrin, lysozyme,
lactoperoxidase
statherin,histatins) is of
fundamental importance in
maintaining health & regulating
microbiome.
108 microorganisms have been detected per
milliliter of saliva, mostly derived from oral
mucosal surfaces such as the tongue.
5. The cryptic virus receptors in
the oral pharynx mucous
membranes are known to be
covered by salivary
components such as sialic acid,
and these receptors may be
exposed by microbial
enzymatic activities(e.g.
Neuroaminidase)
It is also possible that a lower
prevalence of infection by cold
viruses occurred in the POHC
group.
Maintaining good oral hygiene plays an important role in preventing respiratory infection as a part of the nursing regimen of elderly people, even for COVID-19
Generation of proteases by infected bacteria in the upper
airway play key role in activation of the hemagglutin (HA) to
HA1 and HA2 and in the virus infection. increase in oral bacteria
due to poor oral hygiene increase the risk of infection by
multiplication of the influenza virus. Professional oral care
reduced the level of oral bacteria and enzymatic activity ,and
that this lowered the risk of infection with the influenza virus.
The tongue has a rough and fissured surface which is an effective
colonization surface for formation of a microbial biofilm.
This is more important in hospitalized adults who have impaired
physical and immunological oral defenses (e.g. ineffective oral toilet,
decreased oral clearance due to low salivary flow from
polypharmacy).
90% of the dependent elderly harbored these organisms on the
tongue rather than plaque.
There are correlations between the tongue colonization of
H. influenzae and P. aeruginosa at baseline and their presence in the
sputum at time of pneumonia diagnosis. Tongue colonization by respiratory pathogens could serve as a
good proxy for the various risk factors and be used as a convenient
and accessible indicator for the risk of pneumonia development from
oral sources , because of The positive links between tongue
colonization with plaque colonization & naso-gastric feeding tube&
tracheostomy.
Three site-specific distinct
patterns were observed on:
-tongue
-hard palate
-dental plaque
suggesting that the location
of colonization of respiratory
pathogens may significantly
impact pneumonia
occurrence.
Different studies suggested cleaning of tongue
and hard palate separately in particular In
elderly population
Respiratory infections
the agent has to reach the
lower respiratory
tract
the host’s defenses must
be compromised
the pathogen must be
particularly virulent
Overwhelming
inoculum
Elderly Individuals present
alterations in the mucosa,
increasing their susceptibility
to oropharyngeal colonization
and diminishing their ability to
defend against respiratory
pathogens that way age has
been considered a risk factor
for nosocomial pneumonia and
respiratory infections.
It is essential to provide care that focuses on cleansing of the oral cavity in a regimen suitable for the elderly. There is the relationship between an individual’s length of hospital stay and their salivary flow.
Plaque colonization may be
exacerbated in the absence
of adequate oral hygiene
care.
Prolonged mouth opening
Drying of the oral cavity
Decrease in the buffering
and cleansing effects of
saliva
Salivary Secretion has a significant role in maintaining oral health and
that its suppression or diminution leads to difficulty in swallowing and
increases the risk of developing opportunistic infections by aspiration
of these pathogens ,so it is possible to aggravate the patient`s
condition and may perpetuate new infection by means of
inflammatory and immunologic intermediary factors.
milking of salivary glands is an efficient manoeuvre for balancing its
secretion.
Increased Bacterial
Colonization
Presence of the orotracheal
tube
Impossibility of self-care
Consequent formation of the biofilm & dental
plaque
Inadequate immunological
response
Low saliva flow
Decreased mastication &
tongue movement
Oral hygiene care (OHC)
Hospitalized individuals should be submitted to oral
examination for assessment of their oral condition.
those with poor oral health should be given oral health
care and monitored. Oral hygiene care (OHC), using
either a mouth rinse, gel, toothbrush, or combination,
together with aspiration of secretions, may reduce the
risk of VAP in these patients.
The typical coronavirus
structure includes the “spike
protein” in the membrane
envelope, and also other
polyproteins, nucleoproteins,
and membrane proteins, such
as RNA polymerase,
3-chymotrypsin-like protease,
papain-likeprotease, helicase,
glycoprotein, and accessory
proteins.
Structure
The S protein from
coronavirus can bind to the
receptors of the host to
facilitate viral entry into
target cell SO 2019-nCOV
can also bind to the human
angiotensinconvertingenzyme 2 (ACE2) which may
promote human-to-human
transmission .
The population with higher expression of ACE2
might be more susceptible to 2019-nCoV
because of the high affinity between ACE2 and
2019-nCoV S protein
ACE2+ cells are present
throughout the respiratory tract,
as well as the cells
morphologically compatible with
salivary gland duct epithelium in
human mouth. ACE2+ epithelial
cells of salivary gland ducts were
demonstrated to be a early
targets of SARSCoV infection,
and 2019-nCoV is likely to be the
same situation.
• ACE2 receptors are
highlyexpressed on the
mucosa of oral cavity and
are present notably in
large amounts in epithelial
cells of the tounge so
these findings indicate that
oral cavity is high risk
transmitter of 2019-n CoV
infection and this can be
prevented by oral hygine.
Dental care
cost savings1 .
Effect of oral health education and provision among the high-risk people:
Effect of oral health education and provision among the high-risk people:
improving the quality of life2 .
Effect of oral health education and provision among the high-risk people:
decreasing hospital
admissions
3 .
Effect of oral health education and provision among the high-risk people:
4 . reducing incidence of nosocomial
40 %
Interventions will most likely have greatest effect on the
incidence of early colonization and early VAP if they
are begun very early in the ICU stay.Additional strategies to reduce VAP, such as beginning
interventions earlier in the course of intubation, should
be developed and tested
Techniques for removing dental plaques and oral
pathogens:
Toothbrush
In each quadrant; every tooth
was brushed for 5 strokes on
lingual, buccal, and biting
surfaces with a soft toothbrush
3times or more daily at least
1_4 minutes
Bend the head forward and
downward while brushing to
reduce the risk of swallowing
the removed microorganisms
Tongue brush
Using sterile gauz or separate tissue paper to remove
microorganisms located on the dorsal surface of the
tongue.
Hard plate brush
Using sterile gauz
or separate tissue
paper to remove
microorganisms
located on hard
palate.
Dental floss
Using after each meal and during the day.
Edentulous adults’
people:
Professional oral health
care for elderly patients
requiring daily nursing
plays a significant role in
reducing the numbers of
potential respiratory
pathogens in the oral
cavity.
cleaning of
denture and
hard palate:
• Take out the denture
and put it in water (it
should be used only in
eating time)
• Clean all denture
surfaces
• Massage the gums
Denture
stomatitis:Candida albicans is
associated with denture
stomatitis, an inflammation
of the palatal mucosa
covered by denture.
An
gu
lar
Ch
eilitis
cleaning of denture
and hard palate and
Gargling regularly
every day with plain
sterile water or warm
normal saline
Wash the mouth with water after
using Inhalation spray
Xerostomia:
Risk factors:
-mouth opening
-drug side effect
-Immuno Compromise patient
-Changing in Content of saliva
Sy
ste
mic
Be alert!Missed diagnosis of
HSV
aphthous ulcer
SSC
Eritema multiform
aphthousulcer
Ap
hth
ou
su
lce
r
SCC
Primary HSV
Secondary HSV
Secondary HSV
Eritema
Multiform
COATED TONGUE IN POOR ORAL HYGIENE:
TASTE DISORDERS
They are continually
placed in environments
where they are
exposed to pathogens
(respiratory pathogens
readily adhere to the
mucous membranes in
the oral cavity)
They must gargle Povidone-
iodine even at very dilute
concentration or
chlorhexidine mouthwash
0.1 or 0.2 or 0.12 percent
between medical procedur.
The mucociliary clearance
of the airways and the
cough reflex are weaker in
elderly persons with
decreased ADL , so
aspiration of small amounts
of secretion from the oral
cavity tend to increase
during sleep and among
patients
Management
use appropriately-
maintained closed
suction systems and
appropriately-fitted
cuff around the
endotracheal tube.
Elevate head of bed ≥30’
Thanks For Your Attention