ant i- tech nology, even thu ugh I'd stat ed , "Loyally to your mission is not abou t be ing .1n l i -technologyor pro-technology, it's about bein g p ro- camp and pro -children ,"

Cam p d irectors began writing and re­vising thei r cam p's electronic tech nology po licies, including guidelines for ·taff use of the Intern et, rules for cam pers' contact with home d urin g the (;lnlj' Sea "o n, and parameters for camper-staff contact in the off-season. '\\a ny camps haw now aligned all of their electronic technology policies with their camp's miss ion. For exam ple, in the American Cam p AssociatiolJ's (ACA) 2007 EIIll' rgil/j; Iss ues sur vey, 5(, pe rcen t of ih e J(,:; camp professionals who completed the survey said they had a wri tten policy regard ­ing stafT W;l' of social networking Web sires,

In the two )TarSsincv "Th e Digital Um­bilical," various authors and cam p profes­

sio nals - hoth in Camping. lvfllgllzint and at conferences - - have upheld a variety of op inions. Som e asser t that w<:ekl r e-nt ails from camp ar c .1 necessi ty: o thers say e ­

mail s from camp arc a self-dest ructive play into the hands of helico pt er p M CTltS. So me

ha e wr itt en th at live We!lLaJ11 S ill ( amp arc inevi table: oth ers have w.rr ned th at live broadcasts arc a rast track 10 a lawsu it. (Who will be the first camper to flash the live \\'e bc;llll?) Som e have argued tha t campers' u 'e ofcell phon es is benign or that proh ibit­ing cd l phones at camp is lighting a losing bilt tle: \.Itbers see cd l pho nes as ulllleccssLlry, believing that cell phon es erode a camp's

mission of nu rt uring inde pende nce. Th ere arc certainly two valid sides to an}' argumen t abou t elect runic communicat ion s at cam p.

Amid this r-bivalancc, ;\LA\ C:EO Peg Sm ith wrote, "We'w lost our understanding o f chi ld and youth dc vclopmeura nd th e need to nurt lire and pro vide opport uni ties for independence as a result of our unrelen t­ing fear for safety." Sh . went on to di scuss

the irony that although we live in "a world of con nectivity thai binds us," it also "ho lds us bound to the point where we can't see beyond the horizon (Septem ber/Oc tober 2007 issue orCamping i'v[agrlZille j."

Time, Fear. and Trends These prescient words from Peg capture the tensi on I've sensed for years, The camp direc tors who pull me asid e at confere nce ask question s like: "Will we succ umb to the force of evolving technology or stay true to the core mission of camp?" and " Will we work hard \0 win any battl e that ensures our int egrity as an industry or be cru shed by cu ltur al inerti a!" I agree thai human COl1101 U nica:Ion habits are evolving, but that doesn't mean that the habits an.' healthy ill all environm en ts. And i f respe cted profe s­sionals posi t that t ime, fear, or trend s should shape CJ I11PS ' electronic communications

poli cies, where docs that leave' us' To sta rt, let's state the obvio us: \-\'(' know

th at cam p d irectors and fro nt-line cabi n leade rs don 't 1I<II1e to in tegrat e electronic technologies into parent-child co rnrn unicu­

I ion during ( am p. Even ll'chllolOlW cornpa­

nies un derstand thut we have that choice. Did you know that l i s. Cellular .uid 1'1.\1 ) Worldwide Fulfi llment Services haw "e-mail­free l-rida ys"? lnde ed, some peo ple receive so mu ch e-rnail thcse daysthat they periodically delete their entire iubox. If we wan t, we G ill

set limits with o ur campers and parents, just as we do with ourselves and own child ren.

Next , we mu st ( p h winn ing mi ssion sta tem ents for our cam ps and then design pol icies ar ou nd our stated youth develop­ment goals. (That pr inciple is embod ied in AC/\ -accrcditati on standards such as PD-G.) If, for example, a camp wants to cultiva te independence. th en perhaps it should let children really be apart from their pr imary ca regivers for a wb ile. But th at's the rub. How ca n we n urture children's ind epen ­de llce and 'at isfy loving par en ts who have becQll1e accustomed to frequ enl, ('I.:clrv nic com munica tion with thejl children ? Th e ,lllswcr is not as elusive a.\ some thi nk.

What Parents Say In the su m me r o f 200 7, I surveyed 293 paren ts at a tradi tional, .1 1l -gi rl , reside n t cam p an d 196 parents at a t raditional, fl ll­bov, reside nt camp. About three-qua rters of

the se pa rent s had household incomes above s I00,000, most were Wh ile, all had a "Oil o r daughter away from borne fo r rwo or four weeks, and all were qu estion ed after amp was over. Most of the f'lnl ilics were from the northeast U.S. and all of the camp ers wert' between the ages of eight und fi fteen, with an average age of twelve,

Par t ic ip at iug parents co m ple ted all

eighteen- item, paper-and -pencil question­naire on the closing day of thcir child 's stay. Among oth er questions, they were asked 10

rate the desirabil ity an d appropriaten ess of five kinds of electronic: conunu nication, using a numeri cal rating scale that vari ed

from 0 1<1 ) O. Th e parent ,' responses, and the semantic an chors for interpret ing till' rating scale, are present ed in Pigure 1 on r age 62.

As you (;111 see, these parentsaverage rat­ings()f electro n ic techn ologies were un favor­able. Person al mu sic players were viewed less negat ively, bUI average scores for desirability ,1)1<1app ropriateness on thi s item hovered a roun d 3, somewhere be twe en "not at all

desirable/ not .1t ,1I1appropriate"and "doesn't matter,' Perhaps the fact rh.u perso nal music

1.) I .l\, 'l' r~ are not IWO-W o1 ,l' ('OJl1 m UIl ication de­vices produced a less un favor able rating.

Whereas ot her pub lished stud ies lI1<1y

have been representative of some parents' atti tudes abou t co mmunica tion with older

firgure 1: Parents' Attitudes about Electronic Communication 01 Ca m p (N=489) parents ' inten tion al choices Wl'l'l' rcllectcd in

JO

'7

8

7

6

5

4

the dat a. If there were parents who desired III - Ve r ~ ' dr.$1r o b f ~1!

.,c r ~' op p/opnw (Oo 0.1 elect ron ic com municatio n with tlwil ch il­(o rnp/(m hQ11Ce s.

drcn , the y probahly fou nd different camps rJ u1offm'$ d l:"c loDmn(~ 1

with more liberal po licies. The un solici ted comm ents some parent­

D"'>Ir",bihty 1-,,-­ wrote III th l' margins of thl' survey»revealed -'I • AOi-l r ~r l r.J t f: n I3 SS som e of th e reasoning behind th eir camp selet t ion. For example : s --~ [) ll~ ~n ' l' nl ,-dIW !

I do '1.,; :p e i,JQf'$I1' 1 "I would not enroll my daughter here ,i f Infhlf"'-lce l-h j l d r ~ l1\ Ul11p allowed cell phones." d .... .... r.lc rll"J"l cr il

") want my daughter 10 have the valuable experi ence otbeing dW,W

from home,"

"It is fanta st i( to have the kids o I"'hil o j all de'ii:,:roh lt"' /

' unplugged' fo r a month." 1'0 1apprnp t" :ol ~ u !

': 0 ' n p / d t~rr(]cts [ro m "I brmg her here to have a totall y Lhildpen's d l;": doptr c nl

different environm en t: no elect ro n ics, Cell Phones Personal Sireorning We b bo ys, or clothes/hair/make-up issues." lor Co rnpers M usrc Video to Corn s/Video

"Vole would probably cho ose an 10 Coil Horne Plo ye rs or Po renis Pho nes

alter nate ( ,UH f) if th ese technol ogies iPods ;'" b ecame pa n of life h e re. It would

E-mail Access lor Cornpers

teens alVay 011 t rips, this study's sample was At the boys' camp, there were 110 camper d i ll1i nish I,hl' ~p O:: L i : i l exper ience our

1110\c representati ve of pa rents' attitudes cell phones, no e- mail. no srream ing vid eo, daul;hter, have her e."

.ibout communication with eight- to Jih~cn­ anJ 110 \Vebc~ ms. C~ 111 Pef'S we rc allowed "I like th ai my daughter is away from

rcar-olds at traditi on al. single-sex, ove-rnight only p~r S0I1,,1 music players (without video ] the pressur es of our m aterial S(h:i c ty."

camps. However, note thai this group of par­ ,\nd use was rest t ictcd to inside C<lb i ns "Do not taint the p ure, wholesome,

ent.'. was self- selected. Th ey chose to en ro ll during rest hour, The girls' cam p went a and au thent ic camp experience you

their children <1l camps with conservative step [urther. Their pol icy prohibi ted pn­provide fo r our <on.'

electronic technology policies. $0 11<1 1 mu sic players altogether. In both cases, "If rOU allowed <:<: 11 ph o nes, I'd think twice about sending my bo ys back. D Ull ' t change." " I don 't believe elect ronic lcrlm ologr has any place at camp." "Don't lose camp trad itions to the clutter of techllvJogy.V'k have that all rear." "Let me be clea 1': I HAlT cell ph on es auached to <1 child's ear ,"

In fairne ss, I should po in t out that a dozcu o[ these 489 parents th ough: they might like to e-m ail their so n or da ugh ter, some

had no problem with the: r child having <1

person al mu sic player, and a few were in ­tr igued with the idea of ,1 Webcam at camp. At tit udes d o va ry.

What Camp Directors Say One wonders whether parents il l these two camps are representative of mo st u.s.parents who enroll their children at camp. Someday, a large-scalenational study-one that includes cam ps with Iiberalelectronic technologypoIi. cics and more- cth nicallydiverse parenh - will answer that question .For now, it is interesting that these 2007 parent data closely mirror the results of t he Fl llergil1S Iss: iessurvey that t\Cr\ conducted online- in December 2007.

62 CAMPING mogazlne • Moy/ June 2 008

So me 74 percent 01'th e 36 5 C lIll l' d irectors

who C0111 plcrcd tha t f.'IIIClS I llS Issues 'U I've)'

,,:Iid thei r campers co uld nol lise elect ronic

technology while at camp. T his includes "II Pi" the devices covered in ["ig llre ] , Twentv­live: percent .q id tha t their campers could use

only ce rta in Io rrns of elect ronic tech nol 'l gy

and 01lJv during "limited, app ropr iate tunes ," web , IS listening to an 11,1P .~ player dUring rest

hour.Cam p directors were also surveyed ,lhoul

which ki Ild, of electron ics were "ava ila ble

a nrl ,Kces,q bk fur ap prove d use br ca mpers."

E-Mail

Their n:~ p O I1$~:; .11'(' depicted III Fig-u re 2 on

pa g ~' (,4 ,

The-e re<ult-, suppor t the con clusion that

parents and camp directors may actually be ,J]igll i1113 alongconscrvative electronk tech11 01­ogy and com m un i(' 11 ions po l iCIes. Pcrhaps the re i, less e-b ivalcn ce th an once believed .

lessons Leamed My research last sum mer revea led that most

parents ill th ese trad ition al cump -, were st wngly o pposed 10 elect ronic co m mu 11ica!ioll

How to w rite e lectronic lette rs tha t are act ua lly wo rth rea d ing .

To: Chris < cthu..ber@eQrnptech .net.> From : Do d < ' ci I8e@ loo .co m > Subiect: Re: HI Dod Dole: 7/ 24/05

, (4) (D ehrls: TY\/M lo r 7/23 fox. .glod ba seball

morn liked the lel,lil stew i mode on fri _

(3) CD (~

To: O ms .~ cthurberlr \ : omptech.net >

Fro m Dod < cftBeCil ) loo.co m

was f ~n FYI, dad (.0

( i) Suojeci Explod mg Baseba lls ond Zucclu ni ~ Dare : 7/2 "1 / 05

(:! Deor C hns . _ . (,~

It wos great 10 get your leit er yesterday. I read it once 0 1 the office ond oga in when I go t hom e Your ba sebo ll gome sounds ornozmq ' W hen you gel hom e, J won to ,_, heo r mo re abo ut the lost Inning e nd the double ploy ( "I) you ond Pot hooded ro Cam p DewlH It must feel good - ' to be getting better ond better ot bo sebo!l.

0') Last nlghl, I mode Morn's iovorue lentil stew, 'v'le 've '- ' a lso been eating lots of Ihe wcch "' I, which has been (6)

exploding from Jhe garden Don'J wo rry, though _'vV he ~­you come home, we' ll cook loi s of the thll1gs you like· moc and cheese, lasagna , ond borbeq LJ e .

( i) I' m psyched you' re haVing on Cl wesome time at camp. - V'v'rite ogOln when you have tIme We a lways love

hearin g how you're dOing 1

Love, _.- ' , Dad ( ,~)

wjlh th en ch ildren at ca m p. Indeed , m an y

parent- .ire searching for camps that embrace I hen atur.il world rather t ha n the elcct ron ic

on e, Th ese paren ts dis ag ree with those who

insist that e-mail i:; necessary or that Wch­cams d t ca111p IVill ITJ..:h p" pu [ar arccpta11ce. They Ji sagree witb th ose wh o predi ct that

cell phone usc at camp b inevitable.An d they

seem ro ;lgree with Peg Smith th.it (lUI' world

of conn ectivity can "hold us bound" If we're

no t mindful. conuoued on pag e 64

1. Auto molic reply sub ject line locks creotivi tv.

2 No formal greeti l'g ma kes your e-rno ll soun d

like a mem o . not 0 letter.

3 . Lock of copirc lizohon here and elsewhere

mc kes your e-mo rl hord 10 reod and

d rm inishes the nn po rtonce of key words.

·1 Unnecessa ry (101) ocro nvins give your e- ma il

a trendy, rusher] to ne

5. O verall brevity is disappointing and suggests

you ha d mom impo rt a nt th rnqs 10 do,

6 . Abbreviatio ns also convey o hurr ied to ne .

rather thou thoughtfu l co rrespondence thai

you eilloyod wri!lng.

7. Where' s the love ? Here was your chance 10

gIve (I cvbe r-huq .

I . Funny subje ct line stor ts thin gs of! with o smi le.

2. f o rmal w ee1ing is affectiona te and caring .

3 . The co ntent is newsy and upbeot. It reassures

the chi ld ond gives him something to look

forwa rd to when co rnp is over,

4. No pressure to write bock imrnedtotelv, eve n

tho ugh technology rnokes thot possible.

5. Warm closing conveys just the right message

ond can be reread as a ll en os needed .

6, Overo lll enqth is modest, bu t just lo ng

enough to show you care enough to wn te

tho ughtfull y. Vi rile mor e whenever yo u hove

time. Ch ildren cove t letters fr OiYl ho rne.

7. Capitallzotio n, punctualion, and pa ragraph

brea ks make your ' -mort e0 5Y ond pleasant

to read, while conve ying a range o f tones.

8. Interesting deta il shows you read ond

thought abou t previous cor respo ndence.

CAMPING mogomw • Moy/June 2008 63

DVD Players

Pe r~ O llC iI Video Cnrneros

Diq ltcJI C nrn e ros

Personol lectron ic C,JrnillfJ

Group Electro nic Go rn rr \~l

Blogs (onli ne jo urn al s)

O nline SQCIQI Nel worki ng

\Neb Sile C reo lio n

Inlerne l Acce ss

c-rnoil Access

Personol Laptop s

Pelson I Cell P;,o nes

Technology continued trom r,mw, 63

t\( :1\ ';;data revealed that l11<1 n )' C:JIll P d ircc­tor, ,lrl' ill , IL'1' - perhaps more in step than the)' realize - wilh these parents. Most 1<:11­i n~ lI'a" the question on the: EIllL'r gi n ~: Issun " Uf W }' lh,lt asked cam p d irectors to pick one or four paragraphs that be-t reflected their philo sophv ( no t necessar ily their pol icy} regarding dect ronics ,It camp, lust 3 percent Ipnh'lps .1 ft 'w of the c(,m!-'ulcr C:1J1lpS 1work wit11) CI1dorscd " Electron ie, a re ,\ necessnry

1' ,1rt o f all ,ISj",c lS of IiIed nd :;Jiould be' seen ,1S

an opportu11 iI Yfor camps' ,111 rl just 5 percent l.:nd(-rscd "Electronie.s maybc'wl11c ,I Ilcee,sary pal'! of all a,peet~ uf lif\: , ,md G II Tl p' will havE' to ,1J apt ,ll x l KCcp l the inl' \'it<.lblc."

In (Oll t!",l,,!, 70 p ~n':~' n t or th e d irectors

endorsed "Althuugh <.: ke tronic.' moll' bccom e <l n ec c~s ,1l"Y pdrt uf all a"p l'cIS o e life, camp should be <lne o(tlw place:;where dec t r() Jl i c.~

•1r<" )im ited." And 22 pcr("l'nl took 1he pllr ist

\ L1IlC c? by endorsing "Although eke tron irs IDol)' become i1 neCC5:;':lrr pan (If al)a .~p,, (l.\ of l i r~ , « 1I11P is not tbe f11acc fo r electro nics."

Ties Thai Bind In what ways (kl cleetromc" hold 11,,> L,<)und? 'l1lke cell phoIles, for (:Xdlllplt:. The biggest

l1n1blcIll with C8Jl1per, ta.lkinf!, 011 cell pholl es

to their paren ts is th,It they a ft 1101 IillkJllgto [he CII/IiP lltl.ll'or {(1 [heir cmnpfi"icnds. l low c.1I1 "t:J tf 11<'lp d child resolve ,1 personalor$tlci,ilproh km

at Glm p if they don't C\'t' ll klH,lw abUli t it?

A prim ary rC,l:;on paren ts provide ;)carnp ('xpcn CJlCCfor their 50n (,H daughter is to build wei,l] LOn neetio l1 s. Il1 d,,-ee!, 75 [' elc<"llt of the piHl,'l l !s ill my p.\r(!\l ,d ,1ttlludes study s;lid

lhat "m'ikin!,> new (ri t'll Lb " \Va ,~ olle of the top Ihrl.:C n::.r , ons they ~ C Jl t th(· i.1 .~ (.l n (,11' c!,l l1""h tcr

64 CAMP ING rnogOZ lne • !-.),oyiJ une 2008

1009080706050402010o

Mus ic. Players r~~~~~~~~~

I =~~:::'~..,I..---­

to C,l 111 1', And 32 percent "lid that " ~~]in ing

indepeu.lence" II'd ' al-.o amo ng. the ir top three reason s. But th is ( ,111\ happen iLl chdd i.\ WI/IllS lunuc with questious,comments,and concerns. \Vriling ho me. ho wever, I.' different, bee .ruse writing forces ,1 deeper <ynthcs.s ~111 d

anal ysis \1 ( ideas. Creating written narrutrves ofexperiences ;.tC tll,lll)'promote's understand ­ing. iVl or\'Ovl,T, 1he mod est speed O f.-I wriuen letter exchange Ie,we.s t i111(' !(.Ir pcr-on.il rcllcc­

tio ll and the developme nt of coping skiI!.I .md

~<" L' i '1 1 connectio ns. O nce ~l g J i ll , it a trad iti onal over night

«1[11p\ ll1i ~ .s i(lI1 include s 11urt L\rillS Ilickpen­dt'IKe,buikl in t:s(lci JI skilb,Jnd s(1('I](lil1g t il11C in nature, t h ~' n ~'kc l ronic I" cchl\ologio::s lTl i.sht

f1by,] limikcl n ile: or nune ,It .i1 I.C(llll<l Ll wit])

paren b i ~ importdl\t, but ' IS one pa rent put i t. " It's a wondnfll J th ing to write a I ~ II 'T. r Will keep my .son's handwrittcn kllers lrom camp fo r t' lre t ~n d tr l.: olSlIre thL'Ill ." Indecd,

my resei1!'c!l on homesickness SUggf sl s thM II'LLl'r writing i, om' effective .1Il tidote. These days, In ,Hly G1mpS ,\ rt' $101 up to rece'ive <O'- 111 ail I"n 1111 I'clrcn ts, but a ,' I1 <i il-I11,lik d,h,Jndwl·ittc:n resp ~) Il ~ C do ('~ have special appc:J] to I ) <l rl'n t~ .

ISec sidcb,1]" Oilpage (-,] t"r (ips f(lr pJfClltl> Oil

writing g(lvd f -I1lClilw (,lll1pcrs.]

Your Value Proposition F I ~( tron ic, do h;lVe their plaL'K.lI s\>mc ( ,111' 1"

iespccially((1m ~ll l ter G1Jl1P$),but (1<?rhap$I1{}tat .11 1C1m p.s.On!:' falher sLJ Jl1 11lt'd it upwd.l: "Ekc­tronics ,It C,lI11p \\'olrJ.d enable the very llL'havi '.lr

we're lo"k ing t" gel a f<:'spJle from, \\'c dn n't

W<l llt kiJs to be cnns l ~ n l )y (ethered to hovenn g parcllh ! I-'Iu" d ectl"llll ic.\ e m i:;o /;) te kids rrllm thci,· J' t: ~'r., at call1 p. l m l e~d orconsidcring the ,wg:ltin ' illl))a Lt of Ileins withoul ek ctruni(s, I

sug,ge,,1promoting allof the urtivities and peel' connections that (amp 1I IT<, r~ instead."

) Onle readers wil l objcct rhat their c1mp'.,

p,Hents arc not like th i,\ Iat hcr or the o ther chid.\ and rno m s ut Ihe cam p, j stud ied, This i~ t ruc. NeVCTtheless, even i I' a earnP had ,1 st.sunchlv pro -e lectro n ic: d i"nteI"" that

doesn't mean parents need to shape po licy,

At the I'el) least, it ', wort h collecting your own d.u a. Truly,we can (ln ly know how syn­chron ized our policies arc with our paren ts' attitudes by ask i ng. Hard d,ll,l ,l lwap tr umps a necd o tes and .umch.i ir .issu mpt ions.

This brin g, 1I ~ IuIIcircle, hack to conver­sati oris with ~) ~I !' eJ1( s . Th i ~ summer. when

yo u' re faCe-lo- r,leCwith <1 parent who wants

to know why your electronic com rnunica­li on, 1' (lJiq ' ls what it is, you'll have JOb IJlOI't'

to sav, Perh aps you'll e'vcn have vour own data to back up your answer.

.'\ 1I he'veryleast,Irecommend":\ying~\ un c­thins lik e,"Vy'C' wo rk hurd to (l'l"lk po lic i~, in

line wub ou r L\\I\1P '~ mission. That mission includes " lIl d .And

"ltho lll:,h 110 singk pOllcTwoul d s,l ti~ I) ' every­

on e, \\'~ embrace this policyh,'call' " it ';lIp!'ort,; ou r goa,", of .und _

t',lr o ur c;l111pt:r:,;:"That\ :1gr~'a l value proposi­tion . . . once you've tilled in the bb nb .

T he re is ro om o n o u r p lanet for all kinds of cam ps wit h <1 11 kinds of elect ron ic

techn o logy po licies dlld com mu nica tio n pra ctices. If ynll h,lVc- a rticulated a mission, desif', Ot'd p(,li..:ie$ ..:on gnK ll t with th,1t I n i~­

sion , <l o s L· s .~ ed }'o llr c Hn pni ,m elpalTnh' at ­

titudes, ,111 d marketed your <: :11 11 11 with vour co re \'alues ill hand , thell yuu a rc' d irect ing with j n tq~ r J t y. And if you're dm·lt illt, with Illtef',J'i tr,you r (am p wil l ,1ttr,lct the ki nds of l:lI11 ilJ "s w h\)s ~' mi ssion IlH1t Ch,C$ ~ '(-'lIr$ .

C1/ri~ t tll'hcr Tlll/rlier, PII.I)" A B. J~ P., is tlrc'

crt,l tOI o( l .c,u/cr,llIf' Essclllia!5, ,I l i imir) 0/ ()I'Il i llCvieico (milli // ,~ /lwilab F,r ('IIIII!' sraj]: Ihe

;(h(!()ll'sYl'!roJ"Sis l <II jJhillip, Hula ;learle m )';

(lml tlif II\ISI (II,ICt\ :,· h(J lJ lcsitl. ll cssP(('I'Cllli(lll

nVJ)/ClJ st'1.Th,' :" 'l'rt'l l n" rt'diI' Tl l 1If SUlllllle.r

Ca rn ~ l .1 I/C<."('.;'. VU[ C<lIllf' S!,II"I I.c"OIll <l r (" I/Ill il

Tfw rl lCr <1 / : (/11i,,(;/l(l ll llf' .-p ln l .c'll/ u.

el' lr,: 1:. !.llJrkin is rI seniur U[ PI/illif's I:xcla

Amdt'II/I'. /I ((I t'd ll ,'u /I()rJul /JtJan lill ,~ h~~ h ;"-/1()(11

ill E'l:cl l'r. ,'.It'll' Ihw ll'shn c, She lives ill Ry,', Nc'\\'

II' lI/1I' .,lI i l<.', ,wd fill:;"tlcl/,kd YMC 1C"/I11'H/lck­

Il/:;J llr CIS-'it ) 'i'<1I·.<, Til i..< p,.I.<I .<!IIIIII1CI; ,Ire Sp CIIt /I illL'

WCd 3 11.' rI Cc1/1 II;'c/rJr for ,ix /I: -!'.r,uI" :, 11'1:;. LJI/ I'kill

11'11.< Ih,: dl l {i lb ,I<C m' lll c"1f,cl 1M {hism uir She Cllll

I l l ' rCl1 c!r"d <//: (dllrkill@l'XClcr.cdll.