or - leg.mn.gov · hpp lb ''32 12: 82f'm mf'l court l:1f hfpehls stati or...
TRANSCRIPT
"
HPP lb ''32 12: 82F'M Mf'l COURT l:1F HFPEHLS
STATI or KINNISOTA
SPECIAL REDISTRICTING PA.NIL
CS-91-985
Patricia Cotlow, Phillip Krass Sharon Lacomb, James Stein, and Theodore Suss, individually and on behalf of all Citizens of Minnesota similarly situated,
Plaintiffs,
and
John Walker, Howard Miller, Don Suder, and Nkajlo Vangh,
Plaintiff-Intervenors,
P.2
I I
I/
·.'-4..
vs. FINAL ORDER
Joan Grewe, Secretary of State of Minnesota; and Patrick H. O'Connor, Hennepin County Auditor, individually and on behalf of all Minnesota county chief election officers,
Defendants,
and
The Seventy-seventh Minnesota State House of Representatives and the Seventy-seventh Minnesota State senate,
Defendant-Intervenors.
I
BaeJcgrounst
~u~EW . . ~ 1f.1 .... 3 ~VI d i \ l J: .,. ~ ~
LEGrSLATIVE REFERENCE LIBRARY STATE CAPITOL I
STr. f Al.ii., MN,. ~l~ .
On June 4, 1991, the Minnesota Supreme Cqurt appointed the
unders~gned panel to haar and decide thi& state legislative and
This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp
HPF: 16 '·:;:._:: 1.::: 0.3Ff l r If I 1~(1UF'T 1:1F HFFEriL3 F ' • .J
congressional redistricting action on its merits. This charge has
been met with respect to state legislative redistricting. on
December 9, 1991, subject. to the federal court's injunction in
Emison y, Growe, No. 4-91-202 (D. Minn. Dec. 5, 1991), we issued a
final and appealable partial judgment on the state legislative
redistricting plan. Cotlow v. Growe, No. CS-91-985 (Minn •. sp.
Redistricting Panel, Dae. 9, 1991). After the United State.s
Supreme Court vacated the federal oourt•s injunction, cotlow y,
Emison, _ u.s. __ (Jan. 10, 1992) (No. 91-1084)., we formally
entered final judgment as to state legislative r.edistrictinq on '"'
January 31, 1992.
With respect.to congressional redistricting, this action h~~
not yet been· concluded on its merits. on Septe~ber 13, 1991, we
adopted final criteria ·for congressional plans and provided a
format for submission of plans in the event the l~qislature failed
to enact a constitutionally valid congressional apportionment plan.
From mid-September to early December 1991, the panel reserved
substantive consideration of alternative congressional plans until
legisiative and executive consideration was complete.
On December 5; 1991, the federal court issued its order
enjoining' the parties to this action from implementing or enforcin9
any state court redistricting order, ·specifically enjoining the
parties from participating in th~ state proceedings, and enjoining
this panel from going forward on a congressional redistricting
plan. Subject to the injunction, we ordered submission of proposed
plans by January 17, 1992. This later date was selected to allow
the leqislature full opportunity to enact conqressional
-2-
~l
Ht-I- lo :\.:. L.:.; ._i~r-1 I 1II1 ,_._iui- 1 ·• 1r r;t-t-t..1-iL=, r=. --l
redistrictinq legislation . and to spare the parties potential
conflict with tha federal panel's injunction.
Although the Minnesota Legislature, on January 9, 1992, passed
a congressional redistricting plan based on the 1990 federal
census, the governor properly exercised his veto and the plan did
not become law. Seg Minn. Const. art. IV, S 2 :3 (providing governor
with veto power and requiring two-thirds vote of each house to
override); Duxbury y. Donovan, 272 Minn. 424, 432-33, 138 N.W.2d
692, 698 ·(1965). When the special session ended without enactment
of . a congressional plan and the injunction was vacated by the '•"'
united States Supreme Cou~t, ~his panel scheduled and conducted a
procedural and mo~ion h~arinq on February 17, 1992, to review the
status of congressional redistricting and to resolve pendin9
motions.
As stated in our March 3 order, the federal pane1•s issuance
on February 19, 1992 of a ~ongressional redistrictinq plan and 'its
correspondinq
jurisprudential
injunction imposed
constraints· . on
additional le9al and
publishinq a state-court
congressional plan. For a nwnber of reasons, and particularly
because an appeal of the federal panel's jud9'lllent was filed
immediately with the United States Supreme court, dismissal o.f this
action was inappropriate.
On March 11, 1992, the supreme court granted a temporary and
limited stay of the Emison court's judgme~t affecting state
legislative redistrictinq. Growe y. Emison, No. A-671 (U.S. March
11, 1992). The Supreme Court noted probable jurisdiction on
March 30, 1992 without dissolving the stay. Pending a final
-3-
Iii
HPR 16 ''32 12: 0--lPM M~I COURT 1JF HPF'EHL'.3 P.S
decision on that appeal, this court's leqislative redistricting
plan will govern the 1992 elections.
Implementation o! the tederal panel's con9ressional
redistrictinq plan has not been similarly stayed. Pendinq review
by the United States supreme Court and pursuant to the federal
court's February 19 judgment, the federal panel's plan will control
Minnesota's 1992 congressional elections.
The . supreme court• s. notinq probable jurisdiction over the
complex jurisdictional questions that have evolved in this
redistricting process puts the ultimate effecti-~eness of the
federal panel's plan in question. Because the Supreme Court will
ultimately determine this issue and has designated which plans will
apply in the interim, publication of our congressional plan will
not create undue confusion or exacerbate any difficulties of
federal-state interaction.
For these reasons and to fulfill our charge of decidinq th~s
action on the merits .and to allow a complete record on review, we
adopt, subject to the district court's injunction and the Supreme
Court's order of March· 11, 1992, a .plan of congressional
redistrict~ng created by this court.
II
conq~essional 'lan
The population shifts of the past decade have created
population deviations in the 1982 congressional redistricting plan
that exceed 22% in district 3 and 34% in the districts• overall
ranqe, in violation of the U.S. and Minnesota Constitutions• strict
population standards. The plan we adopt eliminates these
unconstitutional ·defects. As with the proposed plans submitted to
-4-
~"
HPR 16 ''32 12: lJSPM M~l COURT OF HPPEHLS P.S
the court and that created by the federal panel, the plan contains
five districts of absolutely equal and "ideal" population. 1 The
three remaining districts each exceed the ideal distr~ct size by
only one person. The plan thus compli~s with Article 1., ·S 2 of
the United states Constitution mandating equal representation and
requiring districts to be apportioned aa nearly to equal as is
practicable. ~ Wesb1rry y. Sandars, 376 u.s. l, 7-S (1964). SJll.
A.lJi2 Min~. Const. art. IV, SS 2, J.
Some· communities and counties have to be divided to achieve
near-equal apportionment. our congressional plan substantially ·o..i...
minimizes the number of municipal and county splits while
praservinq the integrity of Minneapolis and St. Paul as distinct.
communities. Care was taken to avoid splitting any of the larqer
outstate cities between two districts. Our plan splits only 10
counties and 11 cities and townships for a total of twenty-one
splits, far fewer than the plans proposed by the defendant
intervenors (28 total) and plaintiff-intervenors (40) and the plan
created by the federal court (33),
To the extent possible, the plan se9regates urban, suburban,
and rural areas into discrete districts. Al thouq~ not
constitutionally compelled, the compactness of each district was
also considered in this panel's attempt to create the most
geographically and demographically consistent and convenient
districts possible. ruut Minn. Const. art. IV, S 3.
1 Dividing Minnesota's total census population by the number of its apportioned congressional seats, eight, yields an ideal district size of 546,987 people, with three people remaining •
... 5 ....
HPR lS '':32 12: Ot:Pf"1 Mr l 1:\:t1RT ff HF'PEHLS P.-;--
As the plainti!t-intervenors' plan illustrates, greater
compactness could have been achieved at tha expense of splitting
political.subdivisions. our plan balanced these two criteria, and,
without expressly endorsing one· approach to the exclus·ion of
others, we note that,. usi~9 the federal court 1 s formula adopted
from Polsby and Popper, Ib• Third Criterion: Compagtness as a.
Procedural Safeguard Against Gerrymandering, 9 Yale Law & Policy
Review 301 (1991), our plan achieves a hi9h•r co~pactness
percentage (.394) than either the 1982 plan (.3A7) or the current
federal court plan (.346). ·."'
The parties have neither challengea the 1982 conqressional
plan under the Voting Rights Act nor presented any evidence ot.
possible violation. By maintaining two primarily urban districts,
the plan adopted attempts, in compliance with the Act, to avoid any
unnecessary divisions of core minority populations.
Maps and population tables of the plan are attached as
Exhibits A - F. Should any discrepancies exist, the c~nsus_tract
descriptions, which are on file, shall be deemed controlling. To
insure compliance with this court's judgment 'detepnininq the
legislative redistricting plan of the State of Minnesota, and, if
necessary, to oversee implementation of the continqent plan of
congressional redistrictinq adopted by. this court, we retain
jurisdiction over this matter,
By separat'e order, ·we tax costs of approximately $28, 000
against Joan Growe, secretary of state of the state of Minnesota.
-6-
--,.,,,
_,_ .
/
'l>\tl\Ol~~•lP•~ tVUOJS••.:l&UOO ~UW •Al~•t•l.a.t
eqq. Jtq ·ft:\•Oo t't~o~ ·~ en. •••tts.
Sltl3ddtl .:JC'1 lcJn((1 IJl~ l·Jd9[1: .? T ::?f,. 9 T C:ldtl
fl;
HPR 16 '·~2 L:.: O";"H1 f'l~l Ci)IJRT 1)F
l(/tllMln ~
MlnNlll
~L.d99
Pall
1992 Congressional Districts State·Court Plan
'~, I
~ Norman I
CaM I
Sedrcr
\ ) ~ Altdrl
OttmrTllll I ?he
_,,
~
~
s..11\
Llncxm I Lyon I I I L·- 'r·(f~-r 1 1- 1
1
EXHIBIT A
.._,,) "'""' I _.......I •-~ ( •~""' I w-1 •- I °""' I o..- I ..,_
- -M - .... l ........ 1 • ...,,.,,1 ....... IAI-•
(/.)
s "' (t>
Q e i
~ I f { f f 1 f r
::t
' f
J •
{ J l '""d i ..........
~ J ~' "'' IC ,....
I t if ( f r i l i
' .f l l l
[ r J
J J N J
r
' I
1 f f . J
I i I f t i i J .J J J
.f
M f
r i f r I J J i °'
I
i J f I • r J~ ..
J J l
~I &iJ r l ~
l i i ,, l' I l
I • ~
J \0 f ts
Q 0 (T'Q
~ ~ 5· 0 ~
e . Vi r;:r 8 J:iIHIHX3 a·
OT 'd Sl~3dd~ jO l~noJ NW Wd80:2T 26. 9T' ~d
HF'R 16 "32 L:: 0'3PM M~I l))URT t)F HPPEHLS
R•port Namlli Pla.n Typ. Plan n~ Date Time User
\II;
POLITICAL SUBDIVISION SPLITS a CONGRESS s STPANEL18
April 03, 1992 10127 AA
1 9tpariel
EXHIBIT C
~----·---~----w---------~-~---------w---••----~--------~---~~-----~-Number of times a eubdiviaion is ;plit into more than one district:
countieSJ: MCD11: VTOs:
10.00 11.00 11.00
-~-------------~·----"----·-·----~-----~---~~---~----p---·----------CountiH Split:
County District ''-4..
Benton 007 Benton ooa Dakota 001 Dakota 003 Da.kota 004 Dakota 006 Hennepin 002 Hennepin 003 Hennepin 004 Hennepin 005 La Sueur 001 Le Sueur 002 Morrison 007 Mo.rrieon 008 Nicollet 001 Nicollet 002 Scott 001 Scott. 002 Scott 003 ·SherburnGa 007 Sherburn a 008 Stearns 002 Stearns 007 Wri9ht 002 Wright 003
---·-------------------~~---~------~-----~---~·----"---~~~------~--~ MCOs Split1
County MCD District . Ramsey Blaine city· 004 Anoka Blaine city 006 Stearn a Edan Lake township 002 stea.rns EdQn LakQ township 007 Hennep-in Edina city 003 HunnEtpin Edina city 005 Dakota InvQr Grove Hei9hte city 004 Dakota Inver Grove Height; city 006 Dakota Lakeville city 003
P. ll
I}
APR lb I '32 12: HJPM MN COURT tJF APPEAL'3 EXHIBIT C ( c p. 12 om::.l.nued)
Dakota u.kev i.l le city 006
't~ SU$Ur Lane1burgh township 001
LG Sueur Laneebur9h township 002
Morrison Motley city 007
Ca es• Motley city ooa ti.ShG?rburna Palrnar township 007
Sherburne Palmet' towneship ooa cakota Ravenna. township 001
Dakota Ravenna township 006
Ra.msay Sprin9 iake Park city 004
Anoka sprin9 Lake Pa~k city 006
Ramsey White Bear Lake oity 004
Washington White Bear Lake city 006
-----~---~---~----·---~----~---------~·---~--~~----~~---~·---~~----~ •i VTDe Split;
County MCD VTD District
Dakota. 31076 INVER GROVE.HGHTS.P-1. 004
Dakota 31076 INVER GROVE HOHTS.P•l 006
Dakota 31076 INVER GROVE HGHTS,P-5 004'-
Dakota 31076 INVER GROV!" HGHTS. p ... 5 006
oakota 35180 LAKEVILLE P•3 003
Dakota 35180 LAKEVILLE P-3 006
Dakota 53260 RAVENNA TWP. 001
Dakota 53260 RAVENNA TWP. 006
Hennepin 18188 EDINA P- 2 003
Hennepin 19198 EDINA P- 2 005
Hennepin 18188 EDINA P- 7 OOJ
Hennepin 18188 EDINA P.- 7 005
Hennepin 18188 EDINA P-16 003
Henna pin 18188 EDINA· P-16 005
Hennepin 18188 MCD+ EOINA P-19 003
Hennepin 54214 MCD+ EDINA P-18 005
Le sueuJ: 35468 LANESBURGH TWP, 001
Le Sueur 35468 LANESSURGH TWP, . 002
Sherburne 49534 PALMER TWP, 007
Sherburne 49534 PALMER TWP. 008
Stearns 18098 EDEN LAKE TWP. 002
Stearns 18098 EDEN LAKE TWP. 007
APR 16 '':32 12: 10PM MN COURT (1F APPEALS
'f'eport Na.ma Plan Type Plan na.me Date Time User
Diatrict
Oi9trict Populations 1 CONGRESS
STPANEL18 a Ma.r:ch :u, 1992
12104 PM stpan•l
Total Pop 1 Ab~ Dev \ Dav
EXHIBIT D
: Totalla+ Pop: ~~----·~--+~----·~------+--~----~~----t----------·--+~~---p-------001 546,887 : 0 I o.oo r 399,240 002 546,988 I 1 I o.oo : 390,146 003 546,888 I l . o.oo • 401,451 . 004 546,887 : 0 : o.oo I 412, 608 005 546,887 I 0 a o.oo I 435,052 006 546,887 I 0 . o.oo I 377,110 . 007 546,887 ' 0 j o.oo ' 395,116 008 546,888 t 1 g o.oo . 397,593 .
m:=s.nn;:san;;;: 111=::e1111111111••••==· Plan Total i 4,375,099 J,208,315 ."4..
/
Mean Deviation is 1 · 0 Mean Percent Deviation iaa o.oo
Largest Positive Oeviation is: l o.oo Percent Largest Negative Deviation is: 0 o.oo Pe.t'eent
Overall Ran<;;ie 1 l o.oo Percent
p' 13
HPR lG 1 92 12:11PM MN COURT OF APPEALS ~. 14
~•p<:>rt Nam• ' MINORITY REPORT ~ TOTAL POPULATION EXHIBIT E Plan Type a CONGI\ESS
Han name l S'l'PAN!LlS oat• a April 03, 1992 Time I 9208 AH U1uu• s · atpanel
~
I .
Dist I Black \ I Indian \ I Adan \ 1 Hispanic ' : Other ' :
--"~-+------~-----~-+--~-~~~-------+---------"~---+--------------+··-------~~---+ OOl 1,706 0\ l,329 0\ 6,363 1' 5,403 1' 123 0\ 002 776 0, 1,aes 0, 2 ,.7 99 l\ s, 222 1' 92 0, 003 9,605 2\ 1,868 011 ll, 454 2\ 4, 945 1' 351 0\ 004 .22, 482 4, 4,347 1' 24,810 5, l.S, 61.5 3\ 519 0\ 005 50,735 9\ 12,596 2, lS,924 3\ 9,654 2' 888 ·Olts 006 4 1 63S l\ 2,890 l\ 7, 279 l\ 5,928 1' 214 0\ 007 l, ,160 0\ 12,005 2\ 2,569 0\ 4,334 1' 127 0\ 008 1,938 0\ 11, 328 2111 ·2, 031 0\ 2,783 1' 115 0\
STAT!: TOTAL '"
93·, 040 2, 48,.251 1\ 76,229 .. :a 53,884 1' 2,429 0\
HF'R 16 '32 L::: l lFn M~~ ((11.JRT (1F HPPE8L'3
03/27/92 PACE l
Compactness by District atpanell8
...
DISTRICT POLSBY•POPPER INDEX -------- -~P---~ff----~----wP
001 0.523 002 0.416 003 0.283 004 0.566 005 o. 514 006 0.255 007 0.269 008 o. 3~6
EXHIBIT F
······•••****************~·-••**************************ft****** ··~
Average compactnese iB: 0.394 Total Perimetet in MILES i•s 3,933
***********************~***************************************
F'. 15
•1
.;• ~
Plan Type Plan name T')ate
CONGRESS STPANEL18 02/23/93 4:19 PM wytten
ime User Report District Census Units
f,.
DISTRICT 001 Blue Earth County Dakota County
Castle Rock township Douglas township Eureka township Greenvale township Hampton city Hampton township Miesville city New Trier city Northfield city Randolph city Randolph township Ravenna township
RAVENNA TWP. CT 0614 CT 0614 CT 0614 CT 0614 CT 0614 CT 0614 CT 0614 CT 0614 CT 0614 CT 0614 CT 0614 CT 0614 CT 0614 CT 0614
Sciota township Waterford township
Dodge County Faribault County Fillmore County Freeborn County Goodhue County Houston County Le Sueur County
Cleveland city Cleveland township Cordova township Elysian city
B 426 B 428 B 429 B 431 B 432 B 435 B 436 B 437 B 438 B 439 B 440 B 441 B 442 B 443
'"'
Precinct Total
City Total
county Total
54,044
1,480 670
1,405 685 363., 866 135
96 170 331 448
145 141 132
13 11, 60 10 32
144 0
13 6 0
18
725
725 252 485
8, 111 15,731 16,937 20,777 33,060 40,690 18,497
699 559 533 443
02/23/1993 PAGE 2
District Census Units for CONGRESS Plan STPANEL18
CONGRESS District 001 (continued)
,,, Elysian township . 860
Kasota city 655
Kasota township 1,303
Kilkenny city 167
Kilkenny township 444
Lanesburgh township LANESBURGH TWP.
CT 9501 B 218 28
CT 9501 B 219 102
CT 9501 B 220 21
CT 9501 B 221 17,
CT 9501 B 222 18
CT 9501 B ~23 54
CT 9501 B 224 12
CT 9501 B 225 43
CT 9501 B 226 '"4.. 17
CT 9501 B 227 17
CT 9501 B 2J2 / 21
CT 9501 B 233 82
CT 9591 B 234 0
CT 9501 B 235 7
CT 9501 B 236 0
CT 9501 B 237 0
CT 9501 B 238 o· CT 9501 B 239 6
CT 9501 B 240 3
CT 9501 B 241 21
CT 9501 B 242 0
CT 9501 B 243 4
CT 9501 B 244 2
CT 9503 B lOlB 19
CT 9503 B 401A 0
----------Precinct Total 494
----------City Total 494
Le Center city 2,006
Lexington township 745
Montgomery city 2,399
Montgomery township 627
Sharon township 559
Washington township 652
Waterville city 1, 771
Waterville township 619
----------County Total 15' 53 5
Mower County 37,385
Nicollet County Belgrade township 1, 456
Mankato city 9
02/23/1993
District Census Units for CONGRESS Plan STPANEL18
CONGRESS District 001 (continued)
I\; North Mankato city
Olmsted Rice Scott
Elko city
County county County
New Market city New Market township
Steele Wabasha Waseca Winona
DISTRICT 002 Big Stone Brown Carver Chippewa Cottonwood Hennepin Jackson Kandiyohi
County County County County
Coun~y
County County County County County County County
Lac qui Parle County Le Sueur County
Derrynane township Heidelberg city Lanesburgh township
LANESBURGH TWP. CT 9501 CT 9501 CT 9501 CT 9501 CT 9501 CT 9501 CT 9S·Ol CT 9501 CT 9501 CT 9501 CT 9501 CT 9501 CT 9501 CT 9501 CT 9501 CT 9501 CT 9501 CT 9501
B 101 B 102 B 103 B 104B B 104C B 201 B 202 B 203 B 204 B 205 B 206B B 208B B 211B B 212 B 213B B 214 B 215 B 216
county Total
County Total
District Total
PAGE
·-....
3
10', 164
11,629· 106·,470
49,183
223 227
2,008
2, 45Ef 30, 729 19,744 18,079 47,828
546,887
6,285 26,984 47,915 13,228 12,694
0 p,677 38,761 8,924
600 73
113 20 :i 1 38
0 37 35
333 40 14
3 0
121 21 59 27 23 36
02/23/1993
District Census Units for CONGRESS Plan STPANEL18
CONGRESS District 002 (continued)
"' CT 9501 CT 9501 CT 9501 CT 9501 CT 9501 CT 9501 CT 9501 CT 9501 CT 9501 CT 9501 CT 9501 CT 9501 CT 9501 CT 9503 CT 9503
Le Sueur city New Prague city Ottawa township Tyrone township
Lincoln County Lyon County McLeod County Martin. County Meeker· County Murray County Nicollet County
Bernadotte township Brighton township Courtland city Courtland township Granby township Lafayette city Lafayette township Lake Prairie township New Sweden township Nicollet city Nicollet township
· Oshawa township Ridgely township St. Peter city Traverse township West Newton township
Nobles County
B 217 8 228 8 229 B 230 8 231 8 3018 8 316C 8 3178 8 3188 8 320C 8 3218 8 348 8 349 8 102A 8 103A
Precinct Total
City Total
County Total
County Total
PAGE 4
3 28 28' 15
2 13 11
8 16 22 20 'I
18 0 4 0 __ .'"tot:' _____ _
1, 119
1, 119 3,714 1,213
323 662
7,704 6,890
24,789 32,030 22,914 20,846 9,660
334 183 412. 710. 296 462 747 691 356 795 563
:471 139
9, 42.1 338 529
16,447 20,098
02/23/1993
District Census Units for CONGRESS Plan STPANEL18
CONGRESS District 002 (continued)
Pipestone County Redwood County Renville County Rock County Scott County
Belle Plaine city Belle Plaine township Blakeley township Cedar Lake township Credit River township Helena township Jackson township Jordan city Louisville township New Prague city Prior Lake city St~ Lawrence township Sand Creek township Shakopee city spring Lake township
Sibley Stearns
Eden Lake EDEN
County County
township LAKE TWP. CT 0111 CT 0111 CT 0111 CT 0111
Eden Valley city Paynesville city Paynesville township
Swift County Watonwan County Wright county
Albertville city Albion township Annandale city Buffalo city Buffalo township Chatham township Clearwater city Clearwater township Cokato city
B 711 B 712 B 713 B 718
/
county Total
Precinct Total
City Total
County Total
PAGE 5
10,491 17,254, 17,673' 9,806
3,149 691 456
1,688 2,854., 1,107 1,359 2,909
910 2,356
''-1..11,482 418.
1, 511 11, 739 2,853
45,482 14,366
5 39 15
8
67
67 315.
2,275 1,307
3,964 10' 724 11, 682
1,251 1;121 2,054 6,856 2,086
858 597
l,1156 2,180
02/23/1993
District Census Units for CONGRESS Plan STPANEL18
CONGRESS District 002 (continued)
fli, Cokato township Corinna township Delano city Frankfort township Franklin township French Lake township Howard Lake city Maple Lake city Maple Lake township Marysville township Middleville township Monticello city Monticello township Montrose city Otsego township Rockford township St. Michael city Silver Creek township South Haven city Southside township Stockholm township Victor township Waverly city Woodland township
Yellow Medicine County
DISTRICT 003 Dakota County
Burnsville city Lakeville city
LAKEVILLE P-3 CT 060808 CT 060808 CT 060808 CT 060808 CT 060808 CT 060808 CT 060808 CT 060808 CT 060808 CT 060808 CT 060808 CT 060808 CT 060808 CT 060808 CT 060808 CT 060808
B 101 B 102 B 103 B 104 B 105 B 106 B 107 B 108 B 109 B 110 B 111 B 112 B· 113 B 114 B 115 B 116
County Total
District Total
PAGE 6
1,100 2,053. 2,709 2,935 2,742
945 1,343 1,394 1,829 1, 839 'I
1,017 4,941 3,981 1,008
. 5,219 "' 3,380
2,506 1,835
193 1,241
773 1,083
600 1,091
65,916 11,684
546,888
51,288
8-9 14 85
0 0 8
37 133
9 21 35
7 58
8 26
180
02/23/1993
District Census Units for CONGRESS Plan STPANEL18
CONGRESS District 003 (continued)
CT 060808 ... CT 060808 CT 060808 CT 060808 CT 060808
1 CT 060808 CT 060808 CT 060808 CT 060808 CT 060808 CT 060808 CT 060808 CT 060808 CT 060808 CT 060808 CT 060808 CT 060808 CT 060808 CT 060808 CT 060808 CT 060808 CT 060808 CT 060808 CT 060808 CT 060808 CT 060808 CT 060808 CT 060808 CT 060808 CT 060808
Hennepin county Bloomington city Brooklyn Center city Brooklyn Park city Champlin city Corcoran city Dayton city Deephaven city Eden Prairie city Edina city
EDI.NA P- 1 EDINA P- 2 EDINA P- 5 EDINA P- 6
B 117 B 118 B 119 B 120 B 121 B 122 B 123 B 126 B 127 B 128 B 129 B 130 B 131 B 132
_B 133 B 134 B 135 B 136 B 137 B 138 B 139 B 140 B 202 B 203 B 204 B 205 B 206 B 207 B 208 B 209
Precinct Total
City Total
County Total
PAGE
''-I..
7
' 12 89
260 57 44 31 19
463 17 15 28· 1
50 54 28 14 19 29 16 40
2 53
2 261
5 80
3 74 21
103 35
2,634
2,634
53,922
86,335 28,887 56,381 1.6, 849
5,199 4,392 3,653
39,311
1,628 23
2,602 2,490
02/23/1993 PAGE 8
District Census Units for CONGRESS Plan STPANEL18
CONGRESS District 003 (continued)
~. EDINA P- 7
CT 0237 B 213 12
CT 0237 B 214 33
CT 0237 B 215 108
CT 0237 B 216 31
CT 0237 B 217 38
CT 0237 B 218 41
CT 0237 B 219 50
CT 0237 B 220 36
CT 0237 B 301 26
CT 0237 B 302 38
CT 0237 B 303 26
CT 0237 B 304 22
CT 0237 B 305 9.6
CT 0237 B 306 85
CT 0237 B 307 '-4.. 16
CT 0237 B 308 50
CT 0237 B 309 18
CT 0237 B 334 79
----------Precinct Total 805
EDINA P-10 2,250
EDINA P-11 2,844
EOINA P-12 1,964
EDINA P-13 2,854
MCD+ EDINA P-15 2,986
EDINA P-16 CT 024001 B 106 0
CT 024001 B 107 35
CT 024001 B 108 0
CT 024001 B 109 0
CT 024001 B 110 172
CT 024001 B 111 0
CT 024001 B 112 0
CT 024001 B 113 36
CT 024001 B 114 58
CT 024001 B 115 78
CT 024001 B 116 49
CT 024001 B 117 32
CT 024001 B 118 80
CT 0.24001 B 120 0
CT 024001 B 201 32
CT 024001 B .202 14
CT 024001 B 203 30
CT 024001 B 204 15
CT 024001 B 205 24
.CT 024001 B 209 0
CT 024001 B 220 67
CT 024001 B 221 21
CT 024001 B 222 35
CT 024001 B 226 171
02/23/1993
District Census Units for CONGRESS Plan STPANEL18
CONGRESS District 003 (continued)
fii CT 024001 CT 024002
EDINA P-17 . MCD+ EDINA P-18
EDINA P-19 EDINA P-20
Excelsior city Greenfield city Greenwood city Hanover city Hassan township Hopkins city Independence city Long Lake city Loretto city Maple Grove city Maple Plain city Medicine Lake city Medina city Minnetonka city Minnetonka Beach city Minnetrista city Mound city Orono city Osseo city Plymouth city Rockford city Rogers city St. Bonifacius city Shorewood city Spring Park city Tonka Bay city Wayzata city Woodland city
Scott Wright
County County
Dayton city Hanover city Rockford city
B 229 B 103
Precinct Total
City Tqtal
/
. County Total
County Total
District Total
PAGE 9
118 0
1,067 1,337 1,705 2,774
839
28,168 2,367'' 1,450
614 269
1,951 ""'4.. 16, 534
2,822 1,984
404 38,736
2,005 385
3,096 48,370
573 _3 I 439 9,634 7,285 2,704
50,889 440 698
1,180 5,917 1,571• 1, 472 3,?06
496
480,266 9,906
51 518
2,225
2,794
546,888
02/23/1993
District Census Units for CONGRESS Plan STPANEL18
DISTRICT 004 Dakota County
~ Inver Grove Heights cit INVER GROVE HGHTS.P-1
CT 060501 B 501 CT 060501 B 502 CT 060501 B 503 CT 060501 B 504 CT 060501 B 505 CT 060501 B 506 CT 060501 B 507 CT 060501 B 508
INVER GROVE HGHTS.P-5 CT 060502 B 302B CT 060502 B 315 CT 060502 B 316 CT 060502 B 317 CT 060502 B 318 CT 060502 B 319 CT 060502 ·B 320 CT 060502 B 417 CT 060502 B 418 CT 060502 B 419 CT 060502 B 426
INVER GROVE HGHTS.P-6
Lilydale city Mendota city Mendota Heights city South St. Paul city Sunfish ~ake city West St. Paul city
Hennepin Ramsey
DISTRICT 005
County County
Hennepin County Crystal city Edina city
EDINA P- 2 CT 023501 CT 023501 CT 023501 CT 023501
B 101 B' 102 B 103 B 104
Precinct Total
/
Precinct Total
city Total
County Total
District Total
PAGE 10
121. 39 33 63
470 95
178 o,I·
999
456 15.
.'-1..
225 42
110 36
135 38 50 24 36
~1, 167 3, 719
5,885 506 164
9,431 20,197
413 19,248
55,844 5,278
485,765
546,887
23,788
25 44 22
8
02/23/1993 PAGE 11
District Census Units for CONGRESS Plan STPANEL18
CONGRESS District 005 (continued)
CT 023501 B 105 25
CT 023501 B 106 7 I
CT 023501 B 107 27'
CT 023501 B 108 10
CT 023501 B 109 0
CT 023501 B 110 5
CT 023501 B 111 10
CT 023501 B 112 1
CT 023501 B 113 36
CT 023501 B 114 38.,
CT 023501 B 115 so CT 023501 B 116 64
CT 023501 B 117 53
CT 023501 B 118 55
CT 023501 B 119 42
CT 023501 B 120 ~ 34
CT 023501 B 121 /
76
CT 023501 B 122 25
CT 023501 B 123 222
CT 023501 B 124 356
CT 023501 B 125 0
CT 023501 B 126 0
CT 023501 B 201- 310
CT 023501. B 202 34
CT 023501 B 203 0
CT 023501 B 204 64
CT 023501 B 205 66
CT 023501 B 206 57
CT 023501 B 207 37
CT 023501 B 208 45
CT 023501 B 209 0
CT 023501 B 224 so CT 0237 B 101 0
CT 0237 B 102 0
CT 0237 B 103A 0
----------Precinct Total 1,898
EDINA P- 3 2,635
EDINA P- 4 2,498
EDINA P- 7 CT 0237 B 1038 · 0
CT 0237 B 104 71
CT 0237 B 105 0
CT 0237 B 106 44
CT 0237 B 107 15
CT 0237 B 108 26
CT 0237 B 109 90
CT 0237 B 110 30
CT 0237 8 111 54
CT 0237 B 112 63
CT 0237 B 113 107
02/23/1993 PAGE 12
District Census Units for CONGRESS Plan STPANEL18
CONGRESS District 005 (continued)
f.. CT 0237 B 115 36
CT 0237 B 118 65.
CT 0237 B 121 30'
CT. 023 7 B 122 38
CT 0237 B 125 41
CT 0237 B 126 40
CT 0237 B 132 57
CT 0237 B 133 55
CT 0237 B 134 49
CT 0237 B 137 12 .,
CT 0237 B 138 41
CT 0237 B 139 36
CT 0237 B 201 25
CT 0237 B 202 28
CT 0237 B 203 26
CT 0237 B 204 "'4.. 56
CT 0237 B 205 33
CT 0237 B 206 / 32
CT 0237 B 207 39
CT 0237 B 208 52
CT 0237 B 209 25
CT 0237 B 210 33
CT 0237 B 211 35
CT 0237 B 212 0
CT 0237 B 223 20
CT 0237 B 224 42
CT 0237 B 322 19
CT 0237 B 323 14
----------Precinct Total 1,479
EDINA P- 8 2,666
EDINA P- 9 2,431
EDINA P-14 2,654
EDINA P-16 CT 024001 B 101 422
CT 024001 B 102 138
CT 024001 B 103 528
CT 044001 B 104 0
CT 024001 B 105 0
CT 024001 B 122 553
CT 024001 B 123 0
----------Precinct Total 1,641
----------city Total 17,902
Fort Snelling unorg. 97
Golden Valley city 20' 971
Minneapolis city 368,383
New Hope city 21,853
Richfield city 35' 710
Robbinsdale city 14,396
02/23/1993
District Census Units for CONGRESS Plan STPANEL18
CONGRESS District 005 (continued)
" St. Louis Park city
DISTRICT 006 Anoka county Dakota county
Apple Valley city Coates city Eagan city Empire township Farmington city Hastings city Inver Grove Heights cit
INVER GROVE HGHTS.P-1 CT 060501 B 509 CT 060501 B 510 CT 060501 B 601 CT 060S01 B 602 CT 060501 B 603 CT 060501 B 604 CT 060501 B 605 CT 060501 B 606A CT 060501 B 701 CT 060501 B 702 CT 060501 B 703 CT 060501 B 705 CT 060501 B 801 CT 060501 B 802 CT 060501 B 803 CT 060501 B 804 CT 060501 B 805 CT 060501 B 806 CT 060501 B 807 CT 060501 B 808 CT 060501 B 809 CT 060501 B 810 CT 060501 B 811 CT 060501 B 812 CT 060501 B 813 CT 060501 B 814
INVER GROVE HGHTS.P-2 INVER 'GROVE HGHTS.P-3 INVER GROVE HGHTS.P-4 INVER GROVE HGHTS.P-5
CT 060502 B 101 CT 060502 B 102
County Total
District Total
Precinct Total
PAGE 13
43;787
546,887.
546,887
243,641
34,598 186 11
47,409 1,340 5,940
15,440 '"&..
267 27
541 25 39
6 17 72
157 39 26
4 470
71 551
50 20 35 Bi
121 109
27 322·
91 59
0
3,228 3,015 2,127 3,923
0 13
02/23/1993 PAGE 14
District Census Units for CONGRESS Plan STPANEL18
CONGRESS District 006 (continued)
1" CT 060502 B 103 'i 3
CT 060502 B 104 8
CT 060502 B 105 21
CT 060502 B 106 25
CT 060502 B 107 7
CT 060502 B 108 0
CT 060502 B 109 0
CT 060502 B 201 19
CT 060502 B 202A 119
CT 060502 B 203 . 71
CT 060.502 B 204 21
CT 060502 B 208 49
CT 060502 B 209 60
CT 060502 B 211 60
CT 060502 B 212 67
CT 060502 B 213 ''-4... 57
CT 060502 B 214 37
CT 060502 B 301 22
CT 060502 B 302A 220
CT 060502 B 302C 12
CT 060502 B 302D 5
CT 060502 B 303 63
CT 060502 B 304 65
CT 060502 B 305 97
CT 060502 B 306 37
CT 060502 B 307' 48
CT 060502 B 415 56
CT 060502 B 416 164
CT 060502 B 420 55
CT 060502 B 421 31
CT 060502 B 422 48
CT 060502 B 423 43
CT 060502 B 424 40
CT 060502 B 425 40
CT 060502 B 501 o· CT 060502 B 502 0
CT 060502 B 503 59
CT 060502 B 504 22
CT 060502 B 505 28
CT 060502 B 506 27
CT 060502 B 507 2
CT 060502 B 508 51
CT 060502 B 509 35 ______ ..... ___ Precinct Total 1,907
INVER GROVE HGHTS.P-7 2, 39.2
----------city Total ·16,592
Lakeville city LAKEVILLE P-1 4,586
LAKEVILLE P-2 1,733
02/23/1993 PAGE 15
District Census Units for CONGRESS Plan STPANEL18
CONGRESS District 006 (continued)
flJ LAKEVILLE P-3 CT 060808 B 124 5 I
. CT 060808 B 125 17 .
CT 060808 B 201 581
CT 060808 B 210 4
CT 060808 B 211 1,774
CT 060808 B 212 0
CT 060808 B 213 20
CT 060808 B 214 33
CT 060808 B 215 39.,.
CT 060808 B 216 0
CT 060808 B 217 7
CT 060808 B 218 934
CT 060808 B 219 141
CT 060808 B 220 115
CT 060808 B 221 ."-\..
82
CT 060808 B 222 96
CT 060808 B 223 / 91
CT 060808 B 224 180
CT 060$08 ·B 225 118
CT 060808 B 226 72
CT 060808 B 227 138
CT 060808 B 228 59
CT 06080~ B 229 102
CT 060808 B 230 0
CT 060808 B 231 470
CT 060808 B 232 27
CT 060808 B 235 71
----------Precinct Total S,176
LAKEVILLE P-4 4, 726
LAKEVILLE P-5 S,999
----------City Total 22,220
Marshan township 1,286.
Nininger.township 805
Ravenna township RAVEN~A TWP.
CT 0614 B 401 0
CT 0614 B 402 0
CT 0614 B 403 0
CT 0614 B 404 0
CT 0614 B 405 0
CT 0614 B 406 109
CT 0614 B 407 16
CT 0614 B 408 38
CT 0614 B 409 0
CT 0614 B 410 75
CT 0614 B 411 ,7
CT 0614 B 412 290
CT 0614 B 413 0
02/23/1993
District Census Units for CONGRESS Plan STPANE~l8
CONGRESS District 006 {continued)
II. CT 0614 CT 0614 CT 0614 CT 0614 CT 0614 CT 0614 CT 0614 CT 0614 CT 0614 CT 0614 CT 0614 CT 0614 CT 0614 CT 0614 CT 0614 CT 0614 CT 0614 CT 0614 CT 0614 CT 0614 CT 0614 CT 0614
Rosemount city Vermillion city Vermillion township
Washington County
DISTRICT 007 Becker County Beltrami County Benton County
Graham township Langola township Mayhew Lake township Minden township Rice city St. Cloud city Sartell city Sauk Rapids city Sauk Rapids township Watab township
B 414 B 415 B 416 B 417 B 418 B 419 B 420 B 421 B 422 B 423 B 424 B 425 B 427 B 430 B 433 B 434 B 444 B 445 B 446 B 447 B 448 B 449
Precinct Total
City Total
County Total
District Total
county Total
PAGE
."'
16
0 150
12 25 23 48
0 66 38
215 0
11 0
46 5 0 6
21 0 0 0 0
1,201
_1,201 8,622
510 1,201
157,350 145,896
' 546, 887
27,881 .34,384
549 795 751
1,900 610
5,950 1,844 7,825
850 2,394
23,468
02/2J/1993
District Census Units for CONGRESS Plan STPANEL18
CONGRESS District 007 (continued)
CJ.ay Clearwater Douglas Grant. Hubbard Kittson Lake of the Wood Mahnomen Marshall Morrison
County County County County County County County County County County
Bowlus city Culdrum township Cushing township Darling township Elmdale city Elmdale township Flensburg city Green Prairie township Motley city Motley township Parker township Pike Creek township Rail Prairie township Randall city · Rosing township Scandia Valley township. Sobieski city Swan River township Swanville city Swanville township Two Rivers township Upsala city
Norman County Otter Tail County Pennington County Polk County Pope County Red Lake County Roseau County Sherburne County
Haven township Palmer township
PALMER TWP. CT 0303 CT 0303 CT 0303 CT 0303 CT 0303 CT 0303
B 201 B 202 B 203 B 204 B 2108 B 301
County Total
PAGE
."'
17
50;422 8,309
28,674. 6,246
14,939 S,767 4,076 S,044
10,993
260' 487 502 597 130 847 213 672 441 179 453 937 127 571 105 822 199 759 324 504 576 371
10,076 7,975
50' 71.4 f3, 306 32,498 10,745
4,525 15' 026
1,921
0 0 0
15 6
25
02/23/1993 PAGE 18
District Census Units for CONGRESS Plan STPANEL18
CONGRESS District 007 (continued)
.. CT 0303 B 302 39
CT 0303 B 303 47
CT 0303 B 304 13
CT 0303 B 305 0
CT 0303 B 306 0
CT 0303 B 307 14
CT 0303 B 308 13
CT 0303 B 309 24
CT 0303 B 310 38
CT 0303 B 311 47
CT 0303 B 312 0
CT 0303 B 313 17
CT 0303 B 314 30
CT 0303 B 322 31
CT 0303 B 323 21
CT 0303 8 401 ." 12
CT 0303 8 402 13
CT 0303 B 403 / 71
CT 0303 B 404 .9
CT 0303 8 406 8
CT 0303 B 407 57
CT 0303 B 408 27
CT 0303 B 409 4
CT 0303 B 410 0
CT 0303 B 411 48
CT 0303 B 412 0
CT 0303 B 413 0
CT 0303 8 414 11
CT 0303 B 415 0
CT 0303 B 416 15
CT 0303 B 417 0
CT 0303 B 418 0
CT 0303 B 502 17
CT 0303 B 503 23
CT 0303 B 504 0
CT 0303 B 5058 0
CT 0303 B 5068 0
CT 0303 B 510C 0
----------Precinct Total 695
----------City Total 695
st. Cloud city 5,246
----------County Total 7,862
Stearns County Albany city 1,548
Albany township 918
Ashley township 273
Avon city 970
Avon township 3,385
02/23/1993 PAGE 19
District Census Units for CONGRESS Plan STPANEL18
CONGRESS District 007 (continued)
Iii Belgrade city \700
Brockway township 2,261
Brooten city 589
Cold Spring city 2,459
Collegeville township 1,624
Crow Lake township 390
Crow River township 387
Eden Lake township EDEN LAKE TWP.
CT 0111 B 101 66
CT 0111 B 102 34· 1
CT 0111 B 103 13
CT 0111 B 104 7
CT 0111 B 105 27
CT 0111 B 106 2
CT 0111 B 107 '" 0
CT 0111 B 108 38
CT 0111 B 109 / 28
CT 0111 B 201A 23
CT 0111 B 202A 7
CT 0111 B 203A 0
CT 0111 B 204A 0
CT 0111 B 205A 0
CT 0111 B 206 62
CT 0111 B 207 37
CT 0111 B 208 0
CT 0111 B 209 0
CT 0111 B 210 97
CT 0111 B 211 7
CT 0111 B 212 5
CT 0111 B 213 0
CT 0111 B 214 0
CT 0111 B 215 0
CT 0111 B 216 25
CT 0111 B 217 15·
CT 0111 B 218 32
CT 0111 B 219 8
CT 0111 B 220 15
CT 0111 B 221 2
CT 0111 B 222 0
CT 0111 B 223 0
CT 0111 B 224 1
CT 0111 B 225 0
CT 0111 B 226 25
CT 0111 B 227 0
CT 0111 . B 228 49
CT 0111 B 229 44
CT 0111 B 230 0
CT 0111 B 231 25
CT 0111 B 232 21
CT 0111 B 233 0
02/23/1993
District Census Units for CONGRESS Plan STPANEL18
CONGRESS District 007 (continued)
... CT 0111 CT 0111 CT 0111 CT 0111 CT 0111 CT 0111 CT 0111 CT 0111 CT 0111 CT 0111 CT 0111 CT 0111 CT 0111 CT 0111 CT 0111 CT 0111 CT 0111 CT 0111 CT 0111 CT 0111 CT 0111 CT 0111 CT 0111 CT 0111 CT 0111 CT 0111 CT 0111 CT 0111 CT 0111 CT 0111 CT 0111 CT 0111 CT 0111 CT 0111
Elrosa city Fair Haven township Farming township Freeport city Getty township Greenwald city Grove township Holding township Holdingford city Kimball Prairie city Krain township · ·Lake George township Lake Henry city
B 234 B 235 B 236 B 237 B 238 B 239 B 240 B 336A B 435A B 701 B 702 B 703 B 704 8 705 8 706 8 707 8 708 B 709 B 710 .8 714 B 715 B 7168 B 717 B 7198 B 720 B 721 B 722 B 723 B 724 B 725 B 7268 B 7308 B 730C B 7300
Precinct Total
City Total
PAGE
......
20
50 27
€).
5 0 0
22 1
28 10
5 'I
21 62 43
0 23 . 18 17 12
0 2
30 0
26 7 0 0 8
16 0 0 0
·o 9
1,163
1;163 205
1,129 777 556 420 209 629
1,160 561 690 889 388
90
02/23/1993
District Census Units for CONGRESS Plan STPANEL18
CONGRESS District 007 (continued)
fu Lake Henry township Le Sauk township Luxemburg township Lynden township Maine Prairie township Meire Grove city Melrose city Melrose township Millwood township Munson township New Munich city North Fork township Oak township Pleasant Lake city Raymond township Richmond city Rockville city Rockville township Roscoe city St. Anthony city St. Augusta township St. Cloud city St. Cloud to~nship St. Joseph city St. Joseph township St. Martin city St. Martin township St. Rosa city St. Stephen city St. Wendel township Sartell city Sauk Centre city Sauk Centre township Spring Hill city Spring Hill township Waite Park city Wakefield township Zion township
Stevens Todd Traverse Wadena Wilkin
DISTRICT 008 'Aitkin
County County County County County
County
/
County Total
·District Total
PAGE 21
349 2,173
788 1,616 1,536
124 2,561
767 884
1, 114 314' 289 629
79 239
......... 965 579
1,390 141
81 2,657
37,616 7,549 3,294 2,567
274 525
75 607
1,995 3,549 3,581 1, 111
77 438
5,020 2,461
443
114,827 10,634 23,363
4,463 13,154
7,516
546,887
12,425
02/23/1993
District Census Units for CONGRESS Plan STPANEL18
CONGRESS District 008 (continued)
Banton County Alberta township Foley city Gilman city Gilmanton township Glendorado township Granite Ledge township Maywood township Ronneby city St. George township
Carlton County Cass County Chisago County Cook. County Crow Wing County Isanti County Itasca County Kanabec Coun~y
Koochiching County Lake County Mille Lacs County Morrison County
Agram township Belle Prairie township Bellevue township Buckman city Buckman township Buh township Genola city Granite township Harding city Hillman city Hillman township Lakin township Lastrup city Leigh township Little Falls c1ty Little Falls township Morrill township Mount Morris township Pierz city Pierz township Platte township Pulaski township Richardson township Ripley township Royalton city
County Total
County Total
PAGE 22
760 1,854
192 775 762 615 845
58 856
6,717 29,259 21,791 30,521
''-1-. 3,868 44,249 25,921 40,863 12,802 16,299 10,415 18,670
444 1,620
852 201 716 582
85 520·
76 45
167 334 i12 174
7,232 1,532
608 93
1,014 636 369 295 412 607 802
19,528
02/23/1993 PAGE 23
District Census Units for CONGRESS Plan STPANEL18
CONGRESS District 008 (continued)
PJ.ne county 211264
St. Louis county 198,213
Sherqurne county Baldwin township 2,909
Becker city 902
Becker township 2,336
Big Lake city 3,113
Big Lake township 4,452
Blue Hill township 763
Clear Lake city 315
qlear Lake township 1,225
Elk River city 11, 143
Livonia township 2,288
Orrock township 1,474
Palmer township PALMER TWP. ."'
CT 0303 B 315 76
CT 0303 B 316 / 29
CT 0303 B 317 46
CT 0303 B 318 41
CT 0303 B 319 37
CT 0303 B 320 161
CT 0303 B 321 0
CT 0303 B 324 6
CT 0303 B 325 0
CT 0303 B 326 44
CT 0303 B 327 10
CT 0303 B 328 19
CT 0303 B 329 9
CT 0303 B 405 0
CT 0303 B 419 12
CT 0303 B 420 0
CT 0303 B 421 17
CT 0303 B 422 77
CT 0303 B 423 33
CT 0303 B 424 9·0
CT 0303 ·a 425 38
CT 0303 B 426 30
CT 0303 B 427 0
CT 0303 B 428 106
CT 0303 B 429 0
CT 0303 B 430 62
CT 0303 B 431 48
CT 0303 B 432 0
CT 0303 B 433 17
CT 0303 B 5018 14
----------Precinct Total 1,022
----------City Total 1,022
Princeton city 2
02/23/1993
District Census Units for CONGRESS Plan STPANEL18
CONGRESS District 008 (continued)
~ Santiago township Zimmerman city
County Total
District Total
State Total
PAGE 24
789 1, 3 so.
34,083
546,888 ==========
4,375,099
''-'
ii"
l
....
G 0
D
9
B9JV' UBl!IOdOJl9V\I S8!l!8 U!MJ_
UBld IBUO!SS9JDU08 -:µnoo 9lBlS