or ien t at ion for a fast - ch an gin g en er gy wor ld · c ont ribut ions to global oil product...
TRANSCRIPT
© OECD/IEA 2013
Dr Fatih BirolIEA Chief EconomistTokyo, 21 April 2014
Orientation for a fast-changing energy world
© OECD/IEA 2013
The world energy scene today
Some long-held tenets of the energy sector are being rewritten Countries are switching roles: importers are becoming exporters… … and exporters are among the major sources of growing demand New supply options re-orientate the energy trade map
But long-term solutions to global challenges remain scarce Renewed focus on energy efficiency, but CO2 emissions continue to rise Fossil-fuel subsidies increased to $544 billion in 2012 1.3 billion people lack electricity – especially in Africa and S.Asia
Energy prices add to the pressure on policymakers Sustained period of high oil prices without parallel in market history Large, persistent regional price differences for gas & electricity
© OECD/IEA 2013
The engine of energy demand growth moves to South Asia
Primary energy demand, 2035 (Mtoe)
China is the main driver of increasing energy demand in the current decade, but India takes over in the 2020s as the principal source of growth
4%
65%10%
8%
8%5%
OECD
Non-OECDAsia
MiddleEast
Africa
Latin America
Eurasia
Share of global growth2012-2035
480Brazil 1 540
India
1 000 SoutheastAsia
4 060China
1 030
Africa
2 240UnitedStates 440
Japan1 710
Europe1 370
Eurasia
1 050MiddleEast
© OECD/IEA 2013
A mix that is slow to change
Growth in total primary energy demand
Today's share of fossil fuels in the global mix, at 82%, is the same as it was 25 years ago; the strong rise of renewables only reduces this to around 75% in 2035
500 1 000 1 500 2 000 2 500 3 000
Nuclear
Oil
Renewables
Coal
Gas
Mtoe
1987-2011
2011-2035
the strong rise of renewables only reduces this to around 75% in 2035
© OECD/IEA 2013
Growth in US shale gas output since 2005 is equivalent to the total production of Qatar, Kuwait, UAE and Iraq combined; while shale oil output is equal to that of Iraq
Unconventional oil and gas has made a major contribution to global production
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Gas
bcm
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
Oil
mb/d
US shale gas and shale oil production increases: 2005-2014
while shale oil output is equal to that of Iraq
© OECD/IEA 2013
US oil imports are shrinking rapidly –thanks to shale oil only?
Reductions in US oil imports in 2035 relative to today
Increased oil supply
Natural gas use in transport Biofuels use in transport
Demand-side efficiency 35%
8%18%
39%
US oil imports are set to plummet due to increasing oil supplies and recently adopted policies to improve efficiency of cars and trucks
© OECD/IEA 2013
-2 0 2 4 6 8
Rest of the world
United States
Brazil
Middle East
mb/d
Two chapters to the oil production story
Contributions to global oil production growth
The United States (light tight oil) & Brazil (deepwater) step up until the mid-2020s, but the Middle East is critical to the longer-term oil outlook
2013-20252025-2035
© OECD/IEA 2013
US emissions on a downward trend
Energy-related CO2 emissions in the United States
CO2 emissions fell sharply since the shale gas revolution, but rebounded last year on the back of a partial gas-coal switch and increased industrial activity
4.0
4.5
5.0
5.5
6.0
6.5
1990 1995 2000 2007 2012 2013
Gt CO2
© OECD/IEA 2013
Who has flooded the markets?
Incremental steam coal exports
The US accounted for only 7% of the increase in global steam coal exports since 2007
020406080
100120140160180200
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Mt Indonesia
United States
Australia
© OECD/IEA 2013
The slowdown in Chinese demand caught the industry off-guard
Coal demand in China: real demand vs historical trend
China’s move away from coal will be a far greater determinant of the direction of the coal markets than the shale gas revolution in the US
3000
3200
3400
3600
3800
4000
4200
4400
2010 2011 2012 2013
Mt
Real consumption
Historical trend
Curbing in China ≈ 20 times US exports increase in 2012
© OECD/IEA 2013
3×
4×
5×
2003
Regional differences in natural gas prices narrow from today’s very high levels but remain large through to 2035; electricity price differentials also persistelectricity price differentials also persist
20132035
Reductionfrom 2013
Who has the energy to compete?
Ratio of industrial energy prices relative to the United States
United States
2×
Japan EuropeanUnion
China
ElectricityNatural gas
2003
Japan EuropeanUnion
China
© OECD/IEA 2013
Higher energy prices make it harder for Japanese industry to compete
Share of global export market for energy-intensive goods to 2035
Even in our Central Scenario (in which nuclear reactors gradually restart), higher energy prices result in a decline in Japan’s share of global trade in energy-intensive goods
Today 36% 10% 7% 7% 3% 2%
European Union
United StatesChina IndiaMiddle East
Japan
-3%
-10%
+3%+2% +2%+1%
© OECD/IEA 2013
LNG from the United States can alleviate strain on the gas markets, but is no silver bullet
Indicative economics of LNG export from the US Gulf Coast
New LNG supplies accelerate movement towards a more interconnected global market, but high costs of transport between regions mean no single global gas price
Average import price
Liquefaction, shipping& regasification
United States price3
6
9
12
15
18
To Asia
$/MBtu
3
6
9
12
To Europe
$/MBtu
but high costs of transport between regions mean no single global gas price
© OECD/IEA 2013
The implications of Zero Nuclear for Japan’s energy outlook to 2035
Energy import bills – the key to the record current account deficit –rise by an additional 1.3 Trillion Yen per year on average
To replace the nuclear capacity, investment in the power sector & in LNG terminals needs to rise by an additional 250 Billion Yen per year
Japan’s energy self-sufficiency deteriorates
Self-sufficiency drops by one-third to just 16% in 2035, which is 5 times lower than China’s & 6 times lower than that of the US
Effects on LNG market in Asia: low (or zero) nuclear power generation in Japan will contribute to a tightening of Asian LNG markets, leading to upward pressure on gas prices in Asia
© OECD/IEA 2013
Climate implications of Zero Nuclear
Japan’s CO2 emissions in power generation
With Zero Nuclear, expectations for declining CO2 emissions from the power sector are reversed, with emissions in 2035 higher than before Fukushima Daiichi
Zero Nuclear
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
1990 2000 2010 2035
Mt
CentralScenario
© OECD/IEA 2013
Orientation for a fast-changing energy world:Implications for Japan
Regional price gaps & concerns over competitiveness are here to stay, but there are ways to react – with efficiency first in line
Gas market reforms in the Asia-Pacific region and LNG exports from N. America could help to narrow the regional gas price gap
Nuclear power and renewables can contribute to energy security, climate change goals & enhancing energy competitiveness
Support schemes for renewables need to be carefully designed – & re-designed – to achieve their objectives in the most cost-effective way
The new Basic Energy Plan sends a strong message about Japan’s focus on delivering reliable, secure, affordable and clean energy