optimization of muffler acoustics using gt-power · optimization of muffler acoustics using...
TRANSCRIPT
Optimization of Muffler Acoustics usingGT-POWER
Manish Dixit, Sundaram V, Sathish Kumar SFCA Engineering India Pvt Ltd
GT CONFERENCE INDIA 2015 – Pune, India.Dec 07, 2015.
©2015 FCA US LLC
Agenda
2
• Introduction
• Methodology
• Pre-Processing
• Transmission Loss
• Results & Correlation
• Acoustics Optimization
• Conclusions
©2015 FCA US LLC Dec 07, 2015GT CONFERENCE INDIA 2015
Introduction
3
Significance of Exhaust Tail Pipe Noise
Engine Performance
Pass By Noise norms achievement Cabin Interior and Exterior noise assessment Objective and Subjective noise assessment
Simulation Requirement
Tail pipe noise prediction with full engine model, engine performance validation
Accuracy of predicted results Reduced development time Reduced number of proto samples for testing ,saves cost and time
©2015 FCA US LLC Dec 07, 2015GT CONFERENCE INDIA 2015
Acoustics Simulation Methodology
4
Conceptual Design / Muffler Tuning Code
Acoustics TargetsBack Pressure TargetsSystem Layout
Engine ModelEngine InputsInputs
Component Modeling - GEM3D & GT-SPACECLAIM
Exhaust System Modeling / Simulation – GT-ISE
Acoustic & Back Pressure Results Evaluation – GT-POST
Engine Bench Testing
Results Review / Design Freeze
©2015 FCA US LLC Dec 07, 2015GT CONFERENCE INDIA 2015
Acoustic Development Flow Chart
5
Muffler Conceptual Design
Acoustics TargetsBack Pressure TargetsSystem Layout
Inputs from Supplier
Acoustics and Back Pressure Simulation
Engine Bench Test Validation
Noise Validation in Vehicle
Subjective Evaluation
Freeze Design
Transmission Loss
Tail Pipe NoiseOrder AnalysisBack Pressure
©2015 FCA US LLC Dec 07, 2015GT CONFERENCE INDIA 2015
Pre Processing
6
GEM3D Discretization Discretized 1D Model
Muffler
Resonator
©2015 FCA US LLC Dec 07, 2015GT CONFERENCE INDIA 2015
Transmission Loss (TL)
7
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
Tra
nsm
issi
on
Lo
ss(d
B)
Frequency(Hz)
Test Baseline
• Four pole method simulation set up• White noise speaker : Sound Source• Anechoic termination: End Environment
• Better Correlation in low & mid frequency• Variation in results above 600 Hz
©2015 FCA US LLC Dec 07, 2015GT CONFERENCE INDIA 2015
Inlet
Outlet
Results & Correlation:- Back Pressure & Tail Pipe Noise
8
1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 5500 6000
SP
L(d
BA
)
Engine Speed(rpm)
TARGET TEST BASELINE Order-2
1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 5500 6000
SP
L(d
BA
)Engine Speed(rpm)
TARGET TEST BASELINE Order-4
0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300
Bac
kP
ress
ure
(mb
ar)
Mass Flow Rate(m3/h)
TARGET TEST BASELINE BackPressure
1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 5500 6000
SP
L(d
BA
)
Engine Speed(rpm)
TARGET TEST BASELINE Overall
Baseline results are correlating well with test but not passing the target.
©2015 FCA US LLC Dec 07, 2015GT CONFERENCE INDIA 2015
Acoustics Optimization with DoE in GT-POWER
9
DOE significance Parameterization of the model Definition of independent variables Selection of Simulation Methodology – DOE type
Optimization Parameters Inlet and outlet pipe diameter Tuned pipe diameter Position of Perforations on pipes Position of Baffles Glass wool density
Optimized Results Results obtained from DOE optimization are compared with Target
Perforations Position
Glass wool
Baffle Location
Inlet Pipe ø
Outlet Pipe ø
©2015 FCA US LLC Dec 07, 2015GT CONFERENCE INDIA 2015
Tuned Pipe ø
Acoustics Optimization with DoE in GT-POWER
10©2015 FCA US LLC Dec 07, 2015GT CONFERENCE INDIA 2015
DOE Set-Up AutoDOE-GT : Main Frame
Acoustics Optimization with DoE in GT-POWER
11
1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 5500 6000
SP
L(d
BA
)
Engine Speed(rpm)
TARGET TEST OPTIMIZED Overall
1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 5500 6000
SP
L(d
BA
)Engine Speed(rpm)
TARGET TEST OPTIMIZED Order-4Order-2
0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300
Bac
kP
ress
ure
(mb
ar)
Mass Flow Rate(m3/h)
TARGET TEST OPTIMIZED BackPressure
1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 5500 6000
SP
L(d
BA
)
Engine Speed(rpm)
TARGET TEST OPTIMIZED
Baseline results are correlating well with test and at par with the target.
Conclusions
12
GEM3D is capable of discretizing muffler and resonator volume into proper subvolumes (flow splits) which has lead to good correlation in back pressure and tailpipe noise for baseline design.
The GT-POWER shows enhanced ability to conduct a complete system analysis(intake/engine/exhaust) with relatively low computational effort is a greatadvantage.
DoE integration in the simulation procedure is a significant step towards efficientproduct development providing optimized solutions.
The optimized results are at par with target in back pressure and tail pipe noise(overall and orders).
©2015 FCA US LLC Dec 07, 2015GT CONFERENCE INDIA 2015
13©2015 FCA US LLC Dec 07, 2015GT CONFERENCE INDIA 2015