open, transparent and reproducible science is stronger science · 2016. 11. 9. · open sharing...

35
9/11/2016 1 Open, transparent and reproducible science is stronger science Natalie Meyers Partnerships and Collaborations Manager, Center for Open Science University of Notre Dame Natalie K. Meyers Center for Open Science http://cos.io/ | http://osf.io OPEN, TRANSPARENT, AND REPRODUCIBLE SCIENCE IS STRONGER SCIENCE

Upload: others

Post on 24-Aug-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Open, transparent and reproducible science is stronger science · 2016. 11. 9. · Open sharing Universalism Evaluate research on own merit Disinterestedness Motivated by knowledge

9/11/2016

1

Open, transparent and reproducible science is stronger science

Natalie MeyersPartnerships and Collaborations Manager, Center for Open Science

University of Notre Dame

Natalie K. Meyers

Center for Open Science

http://cos.io/ | http://osf.io

OPEN, TRANSPARENT, AND REPRODUCIBLE SCIENCE IS STRONGER SCIENCE

Page 2: Open, transparent and reproducible science is stronger science · 2016. 11. 9. · Open sharing Universalism Evaluate research on own merit Disinterestedness Motivated by knowledge

9/11/2016

2

Mission

Increase openness,

integrity, and

reproducibility of

scholarly research.

Technology to enable change

Training to enact change

Incentives to embrace change

Page 3: Open, transparent and reproducible science is stronger science · 2016. 11. 9. · Open sharing Universalism Evaluate research on own merit Disinterestedness Motivated by knowledge

9/11/2016

3

Infrastructure Metascience

Community

COS by the Numbers

Page 4: Open, transparent and reproducible science is stronger science · 2016. 11. 9. · Open sharing Universalism Evaluate research on own merit Disinterestedness Motivated by knowledge

9/11/2016

4

Incentives for

individual success

are focused on

getting it published,

not getting it right

Nosek, Spies, & Motyl, 2012

Page 5: Open, transparent and reproducible science is stronger science · 2016. 11. 9. · Open sharing Universalism Evaluate research on own merit Disinterestedness Motivated by knowledge

9/11/2016

5

Figure 1. Positive Results by Discipline.

Fanelli D (2010) “Positive” Results Increase Down the Hierarchy of the Sciences. PLoS ONE 5(4): e10068. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0010068http://127.0.0.1:8081/plosone/article?id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0010068

Page 6: Open, transparent and reproducible science is stronger science · 2016. 11. 9. · Open sharing Universalism Evaluate research on own merit Disinterestedness Motivated by knowledge

9/11/2016

6

Scientific Ideals

- Innovative ideas- Reproducible results- Accumulation of knowledge

Page 7: Open, transparent and reproducible science is stronger science · 2016. 11. 9. · Open sharing Universalism Evaluate research on own merit Disinterestedness Motivated by knowledge

9/11/2016

7

What is reproducibility?

•Computational Reproducibility:–If we took your data and code/analysis scripts and reran it, we can reproduce the numbers/graphs in your paper

•Empirical Reproducibility:–We have enough information to rerun the experiment or survey the way it was originally conducted

•Replicability:–We use your exact methods and analyses, but collect new data, and we get the same statistical results

Page 8: Open, transparent and reproducible science is stronger science · 2016. 11. 9. · Open sharing Universalism Evaluate research on own merit Disinterestedness Motivated by knowledge

9/11/2016

8

Metascience

Repeat After Me by Maki Naro, Oct 6, 2016 in The Nib Used with Permission URL=https://thenib.com/repeat-after-me

© C

OP

YRIG

HT

FIR

ST L

OO

K M

ED

IA 2

016

Page 9: Open, transparent and reproducible science is stronger science · 2016. 11. 9. · Open sharing Universalism Evaluate research on own merit Disinterestedness Motivated by knowledge

9/11/2016

9

http://michaelinzlicht.com/getting-better/

/2016/2/29/reckoning-with-the-

past/

Repeat After Me by Maki Naro, Oct 6, 2016 in The Nib Used with Permission URL=https://thenib.com/repeat-after-me

© C

OP

YRIG

HT

FIR

ST L

OO

K M

ED

IA 2

01

6

https://osf.io/ezcuj/

Page 10: Open, transparent and reproducible science is stronger science · 2016. 11. 9. · Open sharing Universalism Evaluate research on own merit Disinterestedness Motivated by knowledge

9/11/2016

10

Repeat After Me by Maki Naro, Oct 6, 2016 in The Nib Used with Permission URL=https://thenib.com/repeat-after-me

© C

OP

YRIG

HT

FIR

ST L

OO

K M

ED

IA 2

01

6

Page 11: Open, transparent and reproducible science is stronger science · 2016. 11. 9. · Open sharing Universalism Evaluate research on own merit Disinterestedness Motivated by knowledge

9/11/2016

11

Software Preservation Necessary for Reproducibility

Page 12: Open, transparent and reproducible science is stronger science · 2016. 11. 9. · Open sharing Universalism Evaluate research on own merit Disinterestedness Motivated by knowledge

9/11/2016

12

daspos.org

https://osf.io/y9mpx/

Page 13: Open, transparent and reproducible science is stronger science · 2016. 11. 9. · Open sharing Universalism Evaluate research on own merit Disinterestedness Motivated by knowledge

9/11/2016

13

Infrastructure

WriteReport

AnalyzeData

Search/Discovery

DevelopIdea

DesignStudy

CollectData

Store Data

Analyze Data

OSF

Page 14: Open, transparent and reproducible science is stronger science · 2016. 11. 9. · Open sharing Universalism Evaluate research on own merit Disinterestedness Motivated by knowledge

9/11/2016

14

Technology to enable change

Open Science Framework

http://osf.io

free, open source

Page 15: Open, transparent and reproducible science is stronger science · 2016. 11. 9. · Open sharing Universalism Evaluate research on own merit Disinterestedness Motivated by knowledge

9/11/2016

15

Put data, materials, and code on the OSF

Persistent

Citable

Identifiers

Page 16: Open, transparent and reproducible science is stronger science · 2016. 11. 9. · Open sharing Universalism Evaluate research on own merit Disinterestedness Motivated by knowledge

9/11/2016

16

Connecting the workflow

is critical to enabling change

Page 17: Open, transparent and reproducible science is stronger science · 2016. 11. 9. · Open sharing Universalism Evaluate research on own merit Disinterestedness Motivated by knowledge

9/11/2016

17

OpenSesame

OpenSesame

Page 18: Open, transparent and reproducible science is stronger science · 2016. 11. 9. · Open sharing Universalism Evaluate research on own merit Disinterestedness Motivated by knowledge

9/11/2016

18

API Docs

https://api.osf.io/v2/docs/

Page 19: Open, transparent and reproducible science is stronger science · 2016. 11. 9. · Open sharing Universalism Evaluate research on own merit Disinterestedness Motivated by knowledge

9/11/2016

19

Community

Page 20: Open, transparent and reproducible science is stronger science · 2016. 11. 9. · Open sharing Universalism Evaluate research on own merit Disinterestedness Motivated by knowledge

9/11/2016

20

Problem

The gap between

scholarly values and

practices.

Promotes incentives that help

realign values and practices

Page 21: Open, transparent and reproducible science is stronger science · 2016. 11. 9. · Open sharing Universalism Evaluate research on own merit Disinterestedness Motivated by knowledge

9/11/2016

21

Norms

CommunalityOpen sharing

UniversalismEvaluate research on own merit

DisinterestednessMotivated by knowledge and discovery

Organized skepticismConsider all new evidence, even against one’s prior work

Quality

Counternorms

SecrecyClosed

ParticularlismEvaluate research by reputation

Self-interestednessTreat science as a competition

Organized dogmatismInvest career promoting one’s own theories, findings

Quantity

Anderson, Martinson, & DeVries, 2007

Page 22: Open, transparent and reproducible science is stronger science · 2016. 11. 9. · Open sharing Universalism Evaluate research on own merit Disinterestedness Motivated by knowledge

9/11/2016

22

Anderson, Martinson, & DeVries, 2007

Anderson, Martinson, & DeVries, 2007

Page 23: Open, transparent and reproducible science is stronger science · 2016. 11. 9. · Open sharing Universalism Evaluate research on own merit Disinterestedness Motivated by knowledge

9/11/2016

23

Problems

• Flexibility in analysis

• Selective reporting

• Ignoring nulls

• Lack of replication

Sterling, 1959; Cohen, 1962; Lykken, 1968; Tukey, 1969;

Greenwald, 1975; Meehl, 1978; Rosenthal, 1979

A reader quick, keen, and leery

Did wonder, ponder, and query

When results clean and tight

Fit predictions just right

If the data preceded the theory

Anonymous, quoted from Kerr (1998)

Page 24: Open, transparent and reproducible science is stronger science · 2016. 11. 9. · Open sharing Universalism Evaluate research on own merit Disinterestedness Motivated by knowledge

9/11/2016

24

A Garden of Forking Paths

Jorge Luis Borges; Gelman and Loken

Exclude outliers?

Control for year?

Median or mean?

“Does X affect Y?”

Read more: osf.io/8mpji

Page 25: Open, transparent and reproducible science is stronger science · 2016. 11. 9. · Open sharing Universalism Evaluate research on own merit Disinterestedness Motivated by knowledge

9/11/2016

25

Registered Reports

DesignCollect &

AnalyzeReport Publish

PEER

REVIEW

Registered Reports

DesignCollect &

AnalyzeReport Publish

PEER

REVIEW

Page 26: Open, transparent and reproducible science is stronger science · 2016. 11. 9. · Open sharing Universalism Evaluate research on own merit Disinterestedness Motivated by knowledge

9/11/2016

26

Registered Reports

• AIMS Neuroscience

• Attention, Perception, &

Psychophysics

• Cognition and Emotion

• Comprehensive Results in

Social Psychology

• Cortex

• Drug and Alcohol Dependence

• eLife

• Euro Journal of Neuroscience

• Experimental Psychology

• Journal of Accounting Research

• Journal of Business and

Psychology

• Journal of Personnel

Psychology

• Journal of Media Psychology

• Nutrition and Food Science

Journal

• Perspectives on Psych. Science

• Royal Society Open Science

• Social Psychology

• Stress and Health

• Work, Aging, and Retirement

http://osf.io/8mpji

Page 27: Open, transparent and reproducible science is stronger science · 2016. 11. 9. · Open sharing Universalism Evaluate research on own merit Disinterestedness Motivated by knowledge

9/11/2016

27

Who Publishes Registered

Reports?

(just to name a few)

See the full list of journals at osf.io/8mpji

Incentives to embrace change

Page 28: Open, transparent and reproducible science is stronger science · 2016. 11. 9. · Open sharing Universalism Evaluate research on own merit Disinterestedness Motivated by knowledge

9/11/2016

28

The $1,000,000

Preregistration Challenge

Endorse TOP Guidelines

Badges for Open Practices

Registered Reports

https://cos.io/prereg

Page 29: Open, transparent and reproducible science is stronger science · 2016. 11. 9. · Open sharing Universalism Evaluate research on own merit Disinterestedness Motivated by knowledge

9/11/2016

29

http://cos.io/top

752 Journals

63 Organizations

TOP Guidelines

1. Data citation

2. Design transparency

3. Research materials transparency

4. Data transparency

5. Analytic methods (code) transparency

6. Preregistration of studies

7. Preregistration of analysis plans

8. Replication

http://cos.io/top

Page 30: Open, transparent and reproducible science is stronger science · 2016. 11. 9. · Open sharing Universalism Evaluate research on own merit Disinterestedness Motivated by knowledge

9/11/2016

30

Transparency & Openness Promotion Guidelines

Eight Standards

1. Data citation

2. Design transparency

3. Research materials transparency

4. Data transparency

5. Analytic methods (code) transparency

6. Preregistration of studies

7. Preregistration of analysis plans

8. Replication

Three Tiers

1. Disclose

2. Require

3. Verify

Signatories

752 Journals63 Organization

Learn more at http://cos.io/top

Signals: Making Behaviors Visible

Promotes Adoption

Page 31: Open, transparent and reproducible science is stronger science · 2016. 11. 9. · Open sharing Universalism Evaluate research on own merit Disinterestedness Motivated by knowledge

9/11/2016

31

Case Study: Psychological Science

Page 32: Open, transparent and reproducible science is stronger science · 2016. 11. 9. · Open sharing Universalism Evaluate research on own merit Disinterestedness Motivated by knowledge

9/11/2016

32

% A

rtic

les

rep

ort

ing

that

dat

a w

as a

vaila

ble

40%

30%

20%

10%

0%

% o

f A

rtic

les

rep

ort

ing

that

dat

a w

as a

vaila

ble

100%

75%

50%

25%

0%Reportedly available Available Correct Data Usable Data Complete Data

Page 33: Open, transparent and reproducible science is stronger science · 2016. 11. 9. · Open sharing Universalism Evaluate research on own merit Disinterestedness Motivated by knowledge

9/11/2016

33

Training to enact change

Meet researchers where they

are and help them find

immediate benefit in training

Page 34: Open, transparent and reproducible science is stronger science · 2016. 11. 9. · Open sharing Universalism Evaluate research on own merit Disinterestedness Motivated by knowledge

9/11/2016

34

Free training on how to make

research more reproducible

http://cos.io/stats_consulting

Page 35: Open, transparent and reproducible science is stronger science · 2016. 11. 9. · Open sharing Universalism Evaluate research on own merit Disinterestedness Motivated by knowledge

9/11/2016

35

Find this presentation at

https://osf.io/hgjyz/

Questions: [email protected]