open 2013: creativity is not a purple dragon
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Open 2013: Creativity is Not a Purple Dragon](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062511/54b851c54a7959b46d8b459f/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Creativity is NOT a Purple Dragon
![Page 2: Open 2013: Creativity is Not a Purple Dragon](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062511/54b851c54a7959b46d8b459f/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Creativity is NOT a Purple Dragon
![Page 3: Open 2013: Creativity is Not a Purple Dragon](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062511/54b851c54a7959b46d8b459f/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Creativity is tucked away into various pockets of the engineering curriculum.
Engineering Design Courses
Entrepreneurship Programs
Images from http://www.engr.psu.edu/future/WhyPSUEngr/ and http://www.sedtapp.psu.edu/index.php.
![Page 4: Open 2013: Creativity is Not a Purple Dragon](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062511/54b851c54a7959b46d8b459f/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Students express frustration at the lack of opportunities to be creative in the curriculum.
“Most engineering classes are memorizing equations and solving problems in a specific way that has been taught to you.”
“I’ve only had a few classes where I felt I was able to be creative in my work.”
“Engineering classes are the place Creativity goes to die.”
![Page 5: Open 2013: Creativity is Not a Purple Dragon](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062511/54b851c54a7959b46d8b459f/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
The paper has three intended purposes:
1. Discuss the barriers to integrating the creative process into engineering courses
2. Understand how creativity has been conceptualized in engineering education
3. Generate ideas on how to implement the creative process throughout the curriculum
![Page 6: Open 2013: Creativity is Not a Purple Dragon](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062511/54b851c54a7959b46d8b459f/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
There are several potential reasons why creativity is not well integrated into engineering curricula.
1. Myths relating to creativity
2. Lack of ambiguity and opportunities for failure in most courses
3. Rewards structure in most courses
4. Difficulty assessing creative behaviors
5. Students’ perceptions regarding instructor’s value of creative behavior
![Page 7: Open 2013: Creativity is Not a Purple Dragon](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062511/54b851c54a7959b46d8b459f/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Kazerounian and Foley (2007) asked why creativity is not central to the engineering curriculum.
1. Engineering students do not feel that instructors value creativity.
2. Engineering instructors value creativity, but do not see it in their students.
“Creativity is not valued in contemporary engineering education.”
![Page 8: Open 2013: Creativity is Not a Purple Dragon](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062511/54b851c54a7959b46d8b459f/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Plucker, Beghetto, and Dow (2004) advocate for a comprehensive definition of creativity to guide research.
“Creativity is the interaction between aptitude, process, and environment by which an individual or group produces a perceptible product that is both novel and useful as defined within a social context.”
![Page 9: Open 2013: Creativity is Not a Purple Dragon](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062511/54b851c54a7959b46d8b459f/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Following the methodology of Plucker, Beghetto, and Dow (2004), we examined how creativity is conceptualized in engineering education research.
Content analysis of articles from 2006-2011 with “creativity” or “creative” in title
Major journals in engineering educationNo conference papersNo engineering design or entrepreneurship journals
![Page 10: Open 2013: Creativity is Not a Purple Dragon](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062511/54b851c54a7959b46d8b459f/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
The questions guiding the content analysis were:
1. Does the article explicitly define creativity? (i.e. “Creativity is…” or “Creative means…”)
2. How do the authors define/describe creativity?
![Page 11: Open 2013: Creativity is Not a Purple Dragon](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062511/54b851c54a7959b46d8b459f/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Few articles were found that used the word “creativity” or “creative” in the title.
Journal Number of Articles
Advances in Engineering Education 0
Australasian Journal of Engineering Education 0
European Journal of Engineering Education 4
International Journal of Engineering Education 10
Journal of Engineering Education 2
![Page 12: Open 2013: Creativity is Not a Purple Dragon](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062511/54b851c54a7959b46d8b459f/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Over half of the articles explicitly defined “creativity.”
No Explicit Definition
44%Explicit Def-inition56%
![Page 13: Open 2013: Creativity is Not a Purple Dragon](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062511/54b851c54a7959b46d8b459f/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
All articles related creativity to solving problems and finding solutions.
Spiritual
Interactionist
Divergent thinking
Useful
Product
Process
Unique
Problem solving
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
![Page 14: Open 2013: Creativity is Not a Purple Dragon](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062511/54b851c54a7959b46d8b459f/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Only three articles contained a complete definition similar to the interactionist model of creativity.
Spiritual
Interactionist
Divergent thinking
Useful
Product
Process
Unique
Problem solving
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
![Page 15: Open 2013: Creativity is Not a Purple Dragon](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062511/54b851c54a7959b46d8b459f/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Current efforts at PSU to integrate the creative process into courses include workshops and funded projects.
![Page 16: Open 2013: Creativity is Not a Purple Dragon](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062511/54b851c54a7959b46d8b459f/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Current efforts at PSU to integrate the creative process into courses include workshops and funded projects.
![Page 17: Open 2013: Creativity is Not a Purple Dragon](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062511/54b851c54a7959b46d8b459f/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Current efforts at PSU to integrate the creative process into courses include workshops and funded projects.
![Page 18: Open 2013: Creativity is Not a Purple Dragon](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062511/54b851c54a7959b46d8b459f/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
We also try to include discussions of creativity in other teaching-related workshops.
![Page 19: Open 2013: Creativity is Not a Purple Dragon](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062511/54b851c54a7959b46d8b459f/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Faculty are more accepting of the “creative process” rather than “creativity.”
“Creative process = Engineering”
“Creativity could be incorporated more broadly into engineering curricula beyond the design-oriented courses.”
![Page 20: Open 2013: Creativity is Not a Purple Dragon](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062511/54b851c54a7959b46d8b459f/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Acknowledgements:
Thank you to co-authors, Tom Litzinger and Irene Mena of the Leonhard Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Education at Penn State.
Thank you also to the Leonhard Center for providing funding for the creativity initiatives discussed in the paper.