online defamation copyright defense
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Online Defamation Copyright Defense](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022021214/577d2a761a28ab4e1ea93d25/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
8/6/2019 Online Defamation Copyright Defense
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/online-defamation-copyright-defense 1/38
Presented by:Presented by: Kevin M. Goldberg, Esq.
Fletcher, Heald & Hildreth, P.L.C. Phone: 703-812-0462
E-mail: [email protected]: http://www.fhhlaw.com
Blog: http://www.commlawblog.com
![Page 2: Online Defamation Copyright Defense](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022021214/577d2a761a28ab4e1ea93d25/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
8/6/2019 Online Defamation Copyright Defense
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/online-defamation-copyright-defense 2/38
1. Information You Produce
2. Information Added by Others
![Page 3: Online Defamation Copyright Defense](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022021214/577d2a761a28ab4e1ea93d25/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
8/6/2019 Online Defamation Copyright Defense
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/online-defamation-copyright-defense 3/38
� The laws generally don·t change
� But the lack of usual and important controls can affectexisting laws in important ways:
� Rush to publication/lack of editing process (see:Washington Post videos
)
� Ability to use multiple and new/unfamiliar media
![Page 4: Online Defamation Copyright Defense](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022021214/577d2a761a28ab4e1ea93d25/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
8/6/2019 Online Defamation Copyright Defense
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/online-defamation-copyright-defense 4/38
� Defamation/False Light
� Copyright
![Page 5: Online Defamation Copyright Defense](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022021214/577d2a761a28ab4e1ea93d25/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
8/6/2019 Online Defamation Copyright Defense
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/online-defamation-copyright-defense 5/38
8 Elements to be Proven by a Plaintiff as a Result of
New York Times v. Sullivan
�Defamatory�False� Assertion of Fact� About the Plaintiff
�Published�With Fault�CausingDamage�Without a Privilege for the Defendant
![Page 6: Online Defamation Copyright Defense](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022021214/577d2a761a28ab4e1ea93d25/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
8/6/2019 Online Defamation Copyright Defense
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/online-defamation-copyright-defense 6/38
Statements of Fact vs. Statements of Opinion
Is it capable of being answered ́ Yesµ or ´Noµ?
Look at:
Verifiability of the alleged libelCommon usage or meaning of the specific language
Full context of statement
Broader context of statement (what sort of publication)
![Page 7: Online Defamation Copyright Defense](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022021214/577d2a761a28ab4e1ea93d25/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
8/6/2019 Online Defamation Copyright Defense
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/online-defamation-copyright-defense 7/38
Public Official or Public Figure = Actual Malice
These people have assumed special roles in society and special
prominence in resolution of public questions
These people have greater access to the media to defendthemselves
In many cases, they have voluntarily exposed themselves torisk of injury from defamatory falsehood
Private Figure = Negligence
![Page 8: Online Defamation Copyright Defense](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022021214/577d2a761a28ab4e1ea93d25/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8/6/2019 Online Defamation Copyright Defense
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/online-defamation-copyright-defense 8/38
� A statement is made with actual malice if the writer or speaker has
knowledge that it was false or made it with reckless disregard to its
truth or falsity
�This must be proven by clear and convincing evidence
�Examples applicable to blogging:
Purposeful failure to interview a person with opposing viewpointUsing headline despite knowledge that readers might misinterpret it
![Page 9: Online Defamation Copyright Defense](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022021214/577d2a761a28ab4e1ea93d25/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
8/6/2019 Online Defamation Copyright Defense
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/online-defamation-copyright-defense 9/38
![Page 10: Online Defamation Copyright Defense](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022021214/577d2a761a28ab4e1ea93d25/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
8/6/2019 Online Defamation Copyright Defense
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/online-defamation-copyright-defense 10/38
![Page 11: Online Defamation Copyright Defense](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022021214/577d2a761a28ab4e1ea93d25/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
8/6/2019 Online Defamation Copyright Defense
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/online-defamation-copyright-defense 11/38
�Determine Ownership
�Is the material eligible for copyright protection?
� (Is it an original work fixed in a tangible medium)?
�Who owns the Material?
�How long do they own it?
�What rights do they own?
� Avoid Substantial Similarity
�Can you Purchase or License the Content?
�Key Terms to Remember
�Statutory Licenses
� Are you Engaged in a Fair Use?
�Do other defenses or safe harbors exist?
![Page 12: Online Defamation Copyright Defense](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022021214/577d2a761a28ab4e1ea93d25/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
8/6/2019 Online Defamation Copyright Defense
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/online-defamation-copyright-defense 12/38
�Original
�Independently created by the author
�Has some minimum degree of creativity
�Work of Authorship (Defined in Copyright Act)
�Fixed (more than just transitory duration)
�Tangible Medium of Expression
![Page 13: Online Defamation Copyright Defense](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022021214/577d2a761a28ab4e1ea93d25/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
8/6/2019 Online Defamation Copyright Defense
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/online-defamation-copyright-defense 13/38
�Does Not Mean it is already being used
somewhere, somehow -- the fact that something is
on the Internet does not mean it is ´publicµ
�It simply means that the Copyright Term has
expired.
�This is why you need to identify the owner and
when the work was created.
![Page 14: Online Defamation Copyright Defense](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022021214/577d2a761a28ab4e1ea93d25/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
8/6/2019 Online Defamation Copyright Defense
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/online-defamation-copyright-defense 14/38
![Page 15: Online Defamation Copyright Defense](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022021214/577d2a761a28ab4e1ea93d25/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
8/6/2019 Online Defamation Copyright Defense
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/online-defamation-copyright-defense 15/38
�Reproduce the copyrighted work
�PrepareDerivative works
�Distribute by sale, transfer, rental, lease, or lending
�Perform the work in public
�Display the work
![Page 16: Online Defamation Copyright Defense](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022021214/577d2a761a28ab4e1ea93d25/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
8/6/2019 Online Defamation Copyright Defense
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/online-defamation-copyright-defense 16/38
![Page 17: Online Defamation Copyright Defense](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022021214/577d2a761a28ab4e1ea93d25/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
8/6/2019 Online Defamation Copyright Defense
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/online-defamation-copyright-defense 17/38
Display
![Page 18: Online Defamation Copyright Defense](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022021214/577d2a761a28ab4e1ea93d25/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
8/6/2019 Online Defamation Copyright Defense
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/online-defamation-copyright-defense 18/38
Display
(Resolution)
![Page 19: Online Defamation Copyright Defense](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022021214/577d2a761a28ab4e1ea93d25/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
8/6/2019 Online Defamation Copyright Defense
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/online-defamation-copyright-defense 19/38
Extent of Ownership Rights
� A copyright owner has a limited monopoly to engage in these five
activities.
� Unless you are the copyright owner, you cannot use a currentlycopyrighted work or anything substantially similar to the workunless:
± You get permission right to use the work via purchase or license
± You are engaged in a ³fair use´
± Another defense exists
![Page 20: Online Defamation Copyright Defense](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022021214/577d2a761a28ab4e1ea93d25/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
8/6/2019 Online Defamation Copyright Defense
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/online-defamation-copyright-defense 20/38
Permission/Licensing
Because a copyright is a piece of property (³Intellectual Property´) it
can be bought, sold, or leased/rented/licensed, with the followingcharacteristics:
± Exclusive or non-exclusive
± Limited in duration or perpetual
± Types of media covered**
± Other conditions, such as attribution
± Statutory and Compulsory Licenses
![Page 21: Online Defamation Copyright Defense](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022021214/577d2a761a28ab4e1ea93d25/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
8/6/2019 Online Defamation Copyright Defense
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/online-defamation-copyright-defense 21/38
Licensing of Clip Art
![Page 22: Online Defamation Copyright Defense](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022021214/577d2a761a28ab4e1ea93d25/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
8/6/2019 Online Defamation Copyright Defense
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/online-defamation-copyright-defense 22/38
Better Clip Art Options
Derived from Yahoo! Derived from Wikimedia free content projects
http://www.flickr.com http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Main_Page
![Page 23: Online Defamation Copyright Defense](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022021214/577d2a761a28ab4e1ea93d25/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
8/6/2019 Online Defamation Copyright Defense
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/online-defamation-copyright-defense 23/38
![Page 24: Online Defamation Copyright Defense](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022021214/577d2a761a28ab4e1ea93d25/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
8/6/2019 Online Defamation Copyright Defense
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/online-defamation-copyright-defense 24/38
The Special Problems of Linking and Embedding Advances in technology and social media provide the ability tolink with text, pictures, and even audio or video, raisingquestions applicable to all 5 rights exclusive to a copyright owner
Easiest Solution:
Use the embedding function available through YouTube andother Social Networks to use the official version
![Page 25: Online Defamation Copyright Defense](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022021214/577d2a761a28ab4e1ea93d25/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
8/6/2019 Online Defamation Copyright Defense
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/online-defamation-copyright-defense 25/38
The Fair Use Defense Defense
![Page 26: Online Defamation Copyright Defense](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022021214/577d2a761a28ab4e1ea93d25/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
8/6/2019 Online Defamation Copyright Defense
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/online-defamation-copyright-defense 26/38
Fair Use Situation # 1 ² Text
Tip: Beware the Copyright Troll!!!
![Page 27: Online Defamation Copyright Defense](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022021214/577d2a761a28ab4e1ea93d25/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
8/6/2019 Online Defamation Copyright Defense
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/online-defamation-copyright-defense 27/38
![Page 28: Online Defamation Copyright Defense](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022021214/577d2a761a28ab4e1ea93d25/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
8/6/2019 Online Defamation Copyright Defense
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/online-defamation-copyright-defense 28/38
Remedies
� Actual damages
± Profit lost by copyright holder ± Profit gained by infringer
� Statutory damages
± $750 - $30,000 per work, based upon the judge·s discretion
± Can be increased to $150,000 if proven to be willful or reduced to$ 250 if proven to be innocent or willful
� Injunction
� Criminal prosecution (punishment may include fines/jail)
![Page 29: Online Defamation Copyright Defense](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022021214/577d2a761a28ab4e1ea93d25/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
8/6/2019 Online Defamation Copyright Defense
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/online-defamation-copyright-defense 29/38
Steps to Avoiding Copyright Infringement
![Page 30: Online Defamation Copyright Defense](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022021214/577d2a761a28ab4e1ea93d25/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
8/6/2019 Online Defamation Copyright Defense
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/online-defamation-copyright-defense 30/38
� Section 230 of the Communications
Decency Act (Defamation/False Light)
� Section 512 of the Digital Millennium
Copyright Act (Copyright)
![Page 31: Online Defamation Copyright Defense](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022021214/577d2a761a28ab4e1ea93d25/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
8/6/2019 Online Defamation Copyright Defense
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/online-defamation-copyright-defense 31/38
No provider or user of an interactive
computer service shall be treated as
the publisher or speaker of any
information provided by another
information content provider
![Page 32: Online Defamation Copyright Defense](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022021214/577d2a761a28ab4e1ea93d25/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
8/6/2019 Online Defamation Copyright Defense
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/online-defamation-copyright-defense 32/38
Has protected defendants in the following actions:
Defamation
Invasion of Privacy
Publication of Trade Secrets
But not these:
Federal Criminal Laws
Obscenity
Child Abuse
Intellectual Property (Copyright/Trademark)
![Page 33: Online Defamation Copyright Defense](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022021214/577d2a761a28ab4e1ea93d25/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
8/6/2019 Online Defamation Copyright Defense
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/online-defamation-copyright-defense 33/38
W hen there is evidence that the company or an employee posted the content
Personal or Company Blogs
RSS Feeds
Prompting the Poster
MCW v.Badbusinessbureau.com
Operator of a website entitled was not entitled to this defense because it had "created and developed"
information on its site that was critical of local businesses.
Worth noting that www.badbusinessbureau.com specifically directed certain actions, including actively
encouraging and instructing posters what to include in their defamatory posts on the site
Roommates.com/Craigslist
Roommates.com· s creation of standard questions with drop down menus that offer mandatory responses from
users (such as male or female, or sexual orientation of the user) are content created by site, even if the user must
choose the actual answer to each question.
Compare with Craigslist, where posters often included that information, but Courts have twice said that
Craigslist has no liability
![Page 34: Online Defamation Copyright Defense](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022021214/577d2a761a28ab4e1ea93d25/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
8/6/2019 Online Defamation Copyright Defense
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/online-defamation-copyright-defense 34/38
If the identity of that original speaker is unknown, the victim will often subpoena the website to get that
information, which also takes time in litigation.
Caught between the ´rockµ of litigation and the ´hard placeµ of censorship, many newspapers have
turned to the reporter·s privilege as a means of protecting both their legal interests and their reputation
Courts in Oregon, Montana and Maryland have held that the state shield law allows a newspaper to
protect the identity of an anonymous poster as though that person was a source; a similar case is
pending in Illinois
Will depend on how a journalist is defined in the state shield law
![Page 35: Online Defamation Copyright Defense](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022021214/577d2a761a28ab4e1ea93d25/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
8/6/2019 Online Defamation Copyright Defense
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/online-defamation-copyright-defense 35/38
�General Provision stating ownership and that these terms must be accepted to access and use the blog and allowing
discontinuing of access for any violations.
�No reprinting or other unauthorized use.
�Representation and warranty that user will not use the blog for any purpose that is unlawful or prohibited by the Terms and
Conditions
� All statements and materials, whether original posts or comments to those posts, reflect the views of such individual
contributors and do not reflect the views of ________.
�We reserve the right to monitor the material placed on this site and to remove any posting that we deem inappropriate.
� You represent that your contribution is in the public domain or original to you; does not infringe the intellectualproperty, contractual or proprietary rights of any third parties; and is not otherwise defamatory or violative of the law.
�Limitation of Liability
�No liability for links to other sites
�Indemnification by user for liability stemming from its posts
![Page 36: Online Defamation Copyright Defense](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022021214/577d2a761a28ab4e1ea93d25/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
8/6/2019 Online Defamation Copyright Defense
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/online-defamation-copyright-defense 36/38
____ reserves the right at any time and for any reason to deny you access to the blog or any
portion thereof, and to terminate this Agreement. Termination will be effective without notice.Please note that ____ reserves the right to change the Terms and Conditions under which this
blog is made available to you, upon notice, which may be given by ____ posting such
modifications on the blog, by e-mail, or any other reasonable way. Your continued use of this
blog following notice of such modifications will be conclusively deemed acceptance of any
changes to these Terms and Conditions. You agree that notice of changes to this Agreement on
the blog, delivered by email, or provided in any other reasonable way, constitute reasonable
and sufficient notice.
![Page 37: Online Defamation Copyright Defense](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022021214/577d2a761a28ab4e1ea93d25/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
8/6/2019 Online Defamation Copyright Defense
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/online-defamation-copyright-defense 37/38
Information Produced by Others:
Section 512
� Provide notification regarding policies pertaining to repeat
copyright infringement offenses
� Designate an agent for service of proper DMCA Notice and
Takedown requests and Counter-Notifications on the website
and with the UnitedS
tates Copyright Office
� Act largely as a passive conduit and follow required
procedures when provided with proper notification of a
possible copyright infringement
![Page 38: Online Defamation Copyright Defense](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022021214/577d2a761a28ab4e1ea93d25/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
8/6/2019 Online Defamation Copyright Defense
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/online-defamation-copyright-defense 38/38
Presented by:Presented by: Kevin M. Goldberg, Esq.
Fletcher, Heald & Hildreth, P.L.C. Phone: 703-812-0462
E-mail: [email protected]: http://www.fhhlaw.com Blog: http://www.commlawblog.com