onetouch 4.0 sanned documents -...
TRANSCRIPT
Chapter 3
SOCIAL REALITY IN CORDIMER'S SOUTH AFRICA
The creation of Africa as the dark r~ncinent in t h e
colonial ideology had L d n the pious vocation of European
missionaries and the economic forces that promoted t h e
systematic suppression of a people f o r no less than t h r e e
centuries. From this distorted and diminutive s ta tus
given to the black races, a nation w a s being built.
Political independence was only an incidental aspiration
of a black slave -- he aspired f o r moral economic
rejuvenation -- and wanted above all nothing more to do
with t h e Whites. Most writers were aware of their
inability to reach to the masses, because a majority of
them were illiterate. Gordimer maintains that through
her writings, on the social injustice embedded in t h e . . - . -. -.
Mvth. Literature and the African World, 6 3 .
e-.-ery-day l i f e of South A f r i c a , she could educa t e the
English -speaking white section of the society:
With f o r t u n a t e i r o n y , however, it is a
responsibility which the white writer already
has taken on, f o r himself, if t he other
responsibility -- to his creat ive integrity -- keeps him scrupulous i n writing about what he
knows to be true whether whites like to hear it
or not: for the majority of h i s readers are
w h i t e . He brings some influence to bear on
whites . . . those individuals who are coming -- to bewilderedly out of the trip of power, and
those who gain courage from reading the open
expression of their own suppressed rebellion
(EG, 2 9 4 ) .
By t h e microscopic quality of her narrative and the
careful choice of politically saturated s i t u a t i o n s
Gordimer influences her contemporaries, mostly whites.
Gordimer's political ideology is reflected in her
writings through her historicising of t h e events
happening in the presentf and in the projected 'future'.
This shift in the 'time' often gives a sense of
timelessness to h e r narratives.
In creating a history of t h e society involved in
political struggle , Gordimer authenticates her political
ideology. Janmohammed in his comment emphasizes this
connection between the social reality and political
ideology in Gordimer:
She attempts in her fiction, to demythologize
the European of the liberal consciousness that
is trapped between its own humanistic values and
the highly antagonistic manicheanism of
apartheid (Manichean Aesuetics , 9).
Janmohammed had condensed the very essence of
Gardimer's writ ing career a s a political a c t i v i s t and has
focused on her \dualt commitment towards art and t ru th .
In the political programme of historicising the major
discordance in the South African society, which was in
the first place only a natural outcome of the white-
man's economic exploitation and the legalization of the
a c t , h o w could Gordimer -- a white woman -- be an
activist? South Africa is a place of irony and
disemblence -- a society totally shattered by the
onslaught of an aggressive alien culture for more than
three centuries. And t h e very fragmentary nature of the
society made it imperative that both the black and the
white intellectuals should jointly rebuild their n a t i o n
into an organic whole and reinstate i t s progress in the
natural path of history.
Gordimer can be seen as a human liberalist with a
clear idea about her vocation in l i f e :
There are two absolutes in my life. O n e is t h a t
racism is evil -- human damnation in the o l d
testament sense and no compromises, as well as,
sacrifices should be too great in the fight
against it. T h e other is that a writer is a
being in whose sensibility is fused what LukacFs
calls 'the duality of inwardness and outside
world' and he must never be asked to sunder this
union (s, 277).
Gordimer's e n t i r e writing career was her attempt a t
reconciling t h e s e t w o aspects of her being. This
manifested in her writings as her attempt at
historicising the social reality from t h e possibilities
of her own consciousness. Gordimer's stories are o f t e n
without much action -- nothing generally happens to t h e
subjects -- while the conditions, the moral choices, and
the environment are well brought out. ~ordimer never
wrote a historic novel, with real life subjects and
situations. But the historical consciousness in her
stories facilitates a study of her fiction as history. It
is t h e writer's familiarity with the cultural s t r u c t u r e
and beliefs of the South African society that stands out
in t h e narrative.
The presentation of this environment, promoted the
social awareness of the whites. Her accurate
observations, sometimes elucidated the truth to the
blacks as well. M o s t of a l l Gordimer analyzes the inter-
personal relations among the several sections of the
society. As the society was compartmentalized in
accordance with the color of t h e skin, each section was
given an unauthorized position in the social hierarchy.
The relationship between the native and t h e East European
Immigrant, and the relation between the East European
Immigrant and the English, can be discerned in the s t o r y
"The Defeated." The callous nature of Mr. John
Saiyetovitz in "The Defeated" towards the blacks was
cruder than the attitude of the English-men towards the
n a t i v e . In the \subjectt of Mr. Saiyetovitz, Gordimer
brought out the inferiority of the East European
immigrants, who were lower than the whites in the social
power structure. A small time shopkeeper, he, w a s anxious
to educate his daughter and raise their social as well as
economic standards. But he had no patience with t h e poor
Blacks who spent hours to choose a blanket from h i s shop:
Mr. Saiyetovitz treated t h e natives honestly,
but with bad grace. He forced them to feel their
ignorance, their inadequacy and their submission
to the white man's world of money. He
spiritually maltreated them and bitterly drove
h i s nail into the coffin of their confidence
(WHYW, 15).
Spoken from the consciousness of a little white
girl, t h e diction had the naive assurance of t h e
innocent. yet t h e tone implies the cruelty and the
finality of t h e seemingly simple acts of Mr* Saiyetovitz.
Words like *bad grace,' 'coffin,' and bitterly depict the
sordid pattern of inter-racial behaviors i n t h e society.
As the narrator moves on to the next level of interaction
namely herself and the concession store people the status
qua remains the same:
My mother did not want me to go near the
concession stores because they smelled and were
dirty, and the natives spat tuberculosis germs
i n t o the dust (m, 9 ) .
The derogatory attitude of the 'mother' which has been
influxed into the little girl would be the basis on which
she would receive all verbal and physical transactions
with t h e colored sections as she grows. Yet it is
interesting to note the relationship between the two
girls -- the narra tor and the daughter of t h e
Saiyetovitz. They seem to have an admiration f o r each
other. The black g i r l , Miriam, and the narrator had a
special relationship:
Our relationship had continued unchanged, just
as before; she had her friends and I had mine,
but outside of school there was the curious
plane of intimacy on which we had, as it were,
surprised one another wandering, and so which we
shared peculiarly by us (WHYW, 16).
Even though they shared this fqpeculiar intimacy," they
never dared to display it in public. Friendship between
t h e Blacks and the Whites, was something of a taboo, that
the children instinctively guessed the gulf that
separated their lives. The description of the narrator's
birthday party brings out the aloof character of
Miriam -- "all afternoon she looked out of the window
indifferentlyw (16). She must have been too awed or
shocked to see the ways of a white household; just as the
narrator was surprised by the wcoolnesstu inside the
store-keeper's home (JMYY, 14). Gordimer dramatically
highlights the intensity of the segregation in the
society, and how it creeps into a simple friendship
between two girls studying in the same class.
When the narrator visits the concession store after
the war, she comes across the Saiyetovitzs, in a totally
defeated state. Their daughter had left without any
remorse for a better world and she had expelled her
parents from her new life. "It doesn't come o u t as you
think, he said, it doesn't come out as you think, " was
a l l that Mr. Saiyetovitz could say at the end (WRYW, 221,
Y e t he seems to take out all h i s failure on the section
of society below him. As t h e story ends the girl "heard
his voice strike like a snake . . . . angry and
browbeating, sullen and final, lashing weakness at the
weak" ( 2 2 ) . She was referring to Mr. Saiyetovitz and the
native w h o had come to his shop. The terms of bitterness
presented by 'snake' and 'lash bring out the negative
tone of t h e situation. Although there is not much ac t ion
the tone and reaction of the 'subject,' in a segregated
society, is presented with microscopic detalls. Each
short story picks on a particular aspect of t h e society
that had a dig at the multifarious attitude of the
dominated/dominator relations.
These varying shades in South African kaleidoscope,
present interesting patterns of human behavior. And t h e
writers who shared the era f e l t the need to recapture
reality i n t o the 'unkillable wordt(%, 2 4 3 ) . Black
writers like Achebe, Ngugi, have used their fiction to
immortalize the truth of an event or a person for the
f u t u r e generation, as different from the authoritiesr
version of it. Some of the early writings were, a sort of
\catharsisr f o r the black writers to purge themselves of
the self-pity and humiliation of a shameful social setup.
It would be interesting to note that, i n i t i a l l y t h e
writers merely aimed at earning the empathy of the
readers, while later on the writings had a revolutionary
call for action in their words.
The evolution of t h i s nature could be discerned in
Gordimer also . The social reality in Gordimer, gradually
develops i n t o t h e mainstream of national and
revolutionary perspective. The girl in "Is There Nowhere
else We can Meet?" ( S , 17) matures into the girl in
"Smell Of Death and Flowers" ( S , 122). In Gordimer's
own comment a b o u t the issue in her introduction to
Selected Stories, she explains the inevitable evolution
in 'subjectsf and 'dictionr that has to follow the
changes in the soc ia l s e t u p . "The nativeff becomes first
'African* and then 'Blackt, because these usages have
been adopted over three decades, by South Africans" (S,
14). These changes in the society are simultaneously
emulated i n t o the narrative. Gordimer's t e x t is simmering
with the historical consciousness of an evolving nation.
In portraying t h e inter-racial dialogue, Gordimer has
made use of devices like irony, effective forceful
diction and carefully chosen 'subjects.' In her own
words" a catharsis of white guilt f o r the writer and t h e
reader'' was t h e anticipated result , 273). H e r
'subjects' were often riddled with irony. T h e 'good
mastersf and t h e 'good slavesf of t h e colonial ideology
were satirically presented by ~ordimer. The interesting
aspect is that, ~ordimer's \subjectsf provide varying
combinations and degrees of 'good' and 'bad, ' so
realistically that some critics like Dennis Brutus have
accused her of b e i n g journalistic and 'cold' i n her
writings (Bfrica md t h e Novel, 132). The variety in the
degree of 'evilt among the whites c a n be studied from two
separate stories. She 'coldlyf observes the lady in
"Good Climate Friendly Neighbors," which makes her
narrative more forceful and sublime , 21). When
compared with another white lady in "Happy Event, " ( S S ,
107) the subtle shades of criminality becomes evident.
B o t h the characters are white and both are corrupted
versions of racial prejudice. While the lady of the
petrol pump, was simply a v i c t i m of apartheid laws t h a t
lady in ''Happy Event," appears to be a mean and
disgustingly cruel woman. The point to be noted is t h a t
'here is life's plenty,' in all the vivid combinations of
good, bad and ugly; across the color borders. Gordimer
understands her characters without loving them (or h a t i n g
them), and labors to present them as realistically as
possible. To her depiction of social reaJity was the key
that would raise the consciousness, which in t u r n would
be the dynamism behind a revolutionary change in the
socie ty .
The fragmentary nature of the sho r t story format,
enabled Gordimer to present an assortment of images of
her society. Her collection of stories, can be sorted on
t h e basis of t h e c o n t e n t s : occupations, social cus toms,
and even a way of life. Thus s h e presents a cross-section
of the soc ie ty with all its ingredients such as Blacks,
Indians, East European Immigrants, Jews, Boers and the
English. Gordimer herself has commented that every writer
writes only one story: \*that story, in which everything,
novels, stories, the f a l s e starts, the half-completed,
t h e abandoned, has its meaningful place" ( S S , lo). I n
that sense, Gordimer has written t h e story of South
A f r i c a , w i t h a l l its weaknesses and s t rengths , during a
vital period of its history, to give a fragmentary view
of t h e corpus of its cultural influx, distorted and
disrupted by colonialism.
In the society of disrupted legal system where t h e
\justicer was phony and superficially manipulated by
minor i ty , non-hegernonic literature sometimes had to take
up the function of reportage. In such a compartmentalized
society 'cultureJ may be the only manifestation of t h e
social reality and the legitimacy of t h e historical
d i r e c t i o n . The writers* role in this context then becomes
primarily that of a disseminator of information and an
interpreter. Gordimer, in her interview with Riis
comments on t h e deep vision and perception of one of her
contemporary writers, Paul Theroux:
He is one of those writers who 'hear' [s ic] what
people are thinking about themselves and he
gives expression to what goes unrealized in
their society in a way they can't do
(-, 2 , 1, 2 6 ) .
This can be s a f e l y attributed to Gordimer herself. She
has captured the fears and prejudices in t h e society and
concretized the reality with her imagination. Gordimer
explores the dilemma of a liberal consciousness.
A detailed analysis of the Christian propaganda that
w a s prevalent in the colonial society should be the
framework on which the 'manicheanism' was to be studied,
in Gordimer's t e x t . The early European travellers,
explorers, and entrepreneurs had to face staunch
resistance from highly organized and civilized Muslim and
Hindu states in Africa. Their cultural practices, which
w e r e alien to the Christian doctrines were uniformly
abhorred as 'pagan.' And naturally, eradication of the
non-Christian f o r m of worship w a s the prime enthusiasm
of the missionaries. Missionaries had created several
myths towards the l e g i t i r n a t i z a t i o n of their actions. They
had taken upon themselves t h e 'task of civilizing' the
native. In this context it would be useful to gather a
more specific picture of their vision and thought on the
'native problem. ' The two aspects of t h e native
personality is summed up in the book Ern~ire S t r i k e s Back:
the image of the 'noble savage1 close to nature
and free of the cares and responsibilities
thrust upon one by \civilization. ' This image of
innocence coexisted with its opposite the
'violent savagef ungodly, deprived, subhuman,
almost like a wild animal -- a being who is t h e
antithesis of 'civilization.' Indeed within
Christian cosmology this being was transformed
i n t o a \devilr whose black skin on the outside
was merely a visible sign of a greater darkness
within" (61).
The myth of African primitivism was so wide-spread that
whole generations of young Africans were brought up in
the belief that Africa had no past, Generations of
slavery and illegal oppression had destroyed the most
valuable asset of a people . . . . their honor. Only when the slave internalizes his servitude, does the process of
colonization get completed:
The key term here is acculturation which refers
to the culture stripping or ' C u l t u r e castration'
which African s lave underwent during slavery
. . . . this process entailed the loss, by the
slaves of their languages, religions and family
kinship systems, leaving them with no
alternative but to learn his master's language
and to ape his values and institutions . . . . They had internalized a culture which is
fundamentally at odds with the Negro [sic]-
African elements in t h e i r backgrounds (-
Emaire Strfies Back, 100).
The depth of cruelty inflicted upon the black race
can be understood only when analyzed in this perspective.
And all the while, the whites believed they were 'saving'
the pagans. The deep incongruity between t h e false
consciousness of the whites and the reality, then becomes
a racial issue rather then a political one. Gordimer has
captured this 'righteous indignation' felt by the whites
at the "ungrateful behaviorsf' of the black slave, in
several of her stories. In the s t o r y " N o t For
Publicationr*, when the black boy Praise, bolts before
the matriculation, t h e priest and Ms Griggs, feel
cheated. They had given him everything possible, to
educate himself and refine himself, to develop i n t o the
leader they thought the blacks needed. But ' \ t h e woman's
kindness, t h e man's attention, got h i m in t h e eyes like
the sun striking off t h e pan, where the cattle had been
taken to drink" (s, 80).
Later, as t h e boy was f a l t e r i n g under the pressure
of the impending exams, Father Audry had a shocking
experience from him. When " the boy seemed sluggish,
almost deaf . . . . t h e Father p u t out his fine hand, in
question or compassion. But the boy leapt up, dodging a
blow1' (86). And the narrative voice explains the a c t
from a psychological perspective. "It was some
frightening retrogression, a reversion to the
subconscious, a place of symbols and collective memory"
(86). The unfathomable ridge between the collective
consciousness of the black/white races, was the most
evident fact of the society. Gordimer was aware of this
as a major stumbling block in the multifarious future of
South Africa. The story can be interpreted as the
rejection of overseas benevolence, by the African .
In y e t another story, "Another Part Of the Sky,"
Collins "the man who pulled down prison walls and grew
geraniums in their place, " was anguished when the ' \bay
with t h e neat, small head of the lizard8' escaped from
the prison (m, 78). Collins was unable to understand t h e occasional flight of one of his inmates. And each
time "with this same twinge of peculiar pain to the
principal f 8 ( W H Y W , 80). The narrative oscillates from t h e
perspective of Collinsls inner-dialogue to t h a t of an
omnipresent narrator. The shift is so deft that sometimes
the voice changes within the same sentence. The structure
of the sentence becomes loose and dis-oriented in the
fury of emotional outburst.
Saw desire melt into violence . . . wanting into having. Sat in the cave of hunched faces painted
with cozy fear by the light of a paraffin-tin
fire, flickered w i t h the torn filth newspapers
stuffed in corners (newspapers that said
stupidly, the crime wave . . . robbery . . . old man knifed in the street): and was free. That
was t h e boy's freedom, that was what he run away
to a week ago (79).
Collins could never understand t h e black boys desire
to be 'freef of t h e white man -- his charity included.
The colonial edifice was thriving on the attempt to
rehabilitate the Blacks in a Eurocentric pattern. But t h e
reality of the Black world was t h a t , they had their own
collective consciousness, as different from the white
man. In the subjects of 'Praise' and the 'runaway boy , '
Gordimer explores this false ideology of t h e colonizer.
South Africa, required the whites t o stop leading t he
na t ion . The whites should learn to listen, if they were
to fit in any where in the post independent South Africa.
In her essay "Where Do Whites Fit In?," Gordirner has
urged the white man '\to forget the old impulse to
leadership, and the temptation to g ive advice, backed by
experience and culture of the western civilization" (FJ,
3 5 ) .
The theory of separate development, was another of
the fictions created by the Afrikaner, which Gordimer
recomposes in the social realism of her stories. The
government brought the policy of determining the 'realt
South Africans according to their tribal origins. As a
consequence about eight million blacks were stripped of
their South African citizenship, to become in the South
African Legal System, foreigners in their own land. Even
though economic e~ploitation was the ulterior motive in
t h e whole exercise, the political authority was
accomplished at a deeper -- racial level -- of
unconscious. M.J Daymond in her essay on "Gender and
History, ' * positions Gordimer in the context of \enforced
division and modernity' as a historian of its processes1
(u, 2 7 , 1, 198). According to her , Gordimer's \ \grand
subject is the effect of racial domination on those who
i m p o s e and those who suffer it" ( 1 9 9 ) . Gordimer in her
writings presented both the destroyer and t h e destroyed
in political environment with stark naked realism. This
affinity towards 'everyday realityf and her scientific
presentation of it had earned her the criticism of being
cold. Gordimer criticizes the \ homelandsf in several of
her stories.
In "What Were You Dreaming?" (JAOS, 2121, and
"Which Era T h a t Would Be?" (s, 81), there are cutting
remarks on t h e cruelty of this brutalized segregation. In
t h e former s t o r y , the black man w h o gets a free ride with
t h e white couple, relates t h e p i t i a b l e conditions of h i s
home -- cape flats. He does n o t omit to indicate that h i s
family was repacked into this slum by t h e government.
Later as the black man sleeps in t h e back seat, h i s
'story' is verified by the white foreigner. In this
context the white female protagonist, who foreshadows,
Gordimer's own position as a white liberalist, lashes out
at the system of 'segregation':
We are not talking about slum clearance, my
dear; we're talking about destroying communities
because they are black, and white people want to
build houses or factories for t h e whites where
blacks live, I told you. We're talking amut
loading up trucks and cart ing people out of
sight of whites (JOAS, 221).
T h e s tark reality of t h e shame named apartheid,
valorizes in the voice of t h e white liberal. In another
story, "Which Era would That Be?", there is reference to
same 'cape Flats.' The white woman Jennifer, was working
at the slum as Assistant Director of a rehabilitation
program. And the segregated area is explained by t h e
third person narrative voice as \ \ a desolate colored slum
in t h e bush outside Cape Town" (z, 86). Further, the
cape Flats are referred to as '\ghastlyrt and the white
girl confesses to the black gathering that she couldn't
last f o r "more than . . . few month^,'^ if she did not
have t h e option to escape "to her flat in Cape Town on
Sundayst* (86). The inhuman conditions to which the
blacks were reduced, by t h e law of segregation, throws
light on the corrupt social system in South African
society.
In the s to ry "The Smell Of Death And Flo~ers'~ ( S ,
1221, there is a description of t h e 'location' as ' \ a
square mile of dreary little dwellings to which the
African population of t h e nearby t o m came home to sleep
at nightfJ(141). The disparity with the white township,
where the blacks spend their daytime engaged in di f ferent
forms of labor, denotes t h e economic dissimilitude, in
the society. The narrative becomes descriptive and
elaborate in its reference to the "ghastly sight," of
"the mean houses and squalid tin shelters. " Even in t h e
pitiable condition of the slum there was favoritism as
well as c o n t r o l .
The '\decent cottages which had been built by
the white housing authorities 'experimentally'
and never duplicated: they were occupied by t h e
favorite African clerks of the white location --
superintendent'' (141).
The locations were never allowed more than a few shops,
because they take away the business from the white
stores, The narrative tone is that of an enraged white
liberalist, appalled at t h e u n j u s t system of apartheid.
From her 'marginalr position of n o t really belonging
to both the worlds [colonizer or the colonized], Gordimer
had the distinct advantage of remaining "detached, to
view her characters and the situations in which they are
involved from more than one point of view" (v onwealth -at.ure, 8 , 1, 4 4 ) . Hence Gordimer's
analytical narrative, had the approximation to the way
things actuaSly were. Neither an advocate of t h e
colonizer's race [by way of her commitment towards the
cause of her n a t i o n ] , nor that of the colonized race
[being a white] Gordimer thus became an arbiter of human
liberalism and justice, in the issues of manichean
valencies, in the society. Gordimer promoted a theory of
national integration as opposed to assimilation, where,
equal opportunity was provided for the people of cultural
diversity in an atmosphere of mutual to lerance , The
inequalities in the society made communication difficult,
thus hindering the organic growth of the society. And in
this context it would be relevant to analyze meaning of
the 'common culture' that Gordimer arbitrates.
Raymond ~illiams has asserted that \\a common
culture can place no absolute restrictions on e n t r y to
a n y of its activities: this is in reality a claim to
equal opportunityf' (Culture And Society, 317 1. Gordimer
realized the vital role of the indigenous sections in the
growth of a nation, and depicts each of them in hex short
stories. The truth a b u t a l l sections had equal weightaqe
in her t ex t , and the consolidation of which gives a
comprehensive history of South Africa. Petrus in ' \ s i x
Feet Of the Country, '* and Thamasi, in \ 'A Happy E v e n t , "
are typical servants in the biblical sense. These 'ideal
slaves' accept their role as servants and internalize the
colonial ideology of white superiority. The systematic
conquest of t h e land and minds of African people, which
the white men, managed through the propaganda of their
religion, language and scientif i'c knowledge, created a
society of slaves and masters. Each depended on the other
for their identity. And it was the c u l t u r e of legalized
brutality, a ruling class culture of fear -- as Ngugi
explains, "the culture of an oppressing minority
desperately trying to impose total silence on a restive
oppressed majorityf' {Detained, 3 4 ) .
T h e whites had to rationalize their brutality, to
themselves and to the world. This required them to create
the myth af 'the uncivilized' dark man in the depth of a
dark continent. Janmohammed has maintained that the
"colonizerfs efforts towards absolute economic and
spiritual domination create in them a feudal s p i r i t f f
{ m c h e a n Aesthetics, 3 ) . And the Whites created several
trends or theories that gave an illegitimate authority to
maintain the ir feudal authority:
The colonizers ' efforts toward absolute
political, economic and spiritual domination
created i n them a feudal s p i r i t , supported by a
series of familiar rationalizations: the
superiority of White race, their mission to
civilize the rest of the world, the inability of
natives to govern themselves and to develop
their own resources, the blacks tendency towards
despotism, their ease in reverting to atavistic
barbarism, their lack of intelligence their
hyperemotional and uncontrollable personalities
and so f o r t h ( 3 ) .
But the truth was f a r from t h e false assumptions of
t h e conquerors. Gordimer has attempted to project the
reality of her society as opposed to the white lies.
Hence her narratives focused on t h e accultural aspect of
t h e black man and tried to understand the political
reasons that lead to the calcification of the cultural
progress in t h e society.
There is a tendency to think of colonialism as
though it w e r e a black experience. But, Gordimer
understood it as a 'reversible inter-reaction'.
Colonialism has been as much a white experience as a
black one, and only a few writers like Gordimer, were
able to convince the white world the "nature of that
enterprise" (Comp-terature, 91). Colonialism
had affected the white collective consciousness also in a
very negative manner. The white undergoes a kind of
regression in the cultural terms and acts in the most
inhuman manner in the colonial environment.
Within t h e s e contradictions of myth and reality in
the society, the gap between the masses and t h e
intellectuals, was too wide to be ignored. In t h e fight
for freedom, the intellectuals take advantage of the
backing of t h e masses in their negotiations with t h e
authority. Y e t , on actually attaining 'power,' they run
the machinery of government much the same way as their
predecessors. The neocolonialism deceives t h e general
public by continuing the government machinery without any
significant change in their social or economic situation.
But the intellectuals f e l t the need to illuminate the
deception practiced by the Blacks who came into power:
African writers and artists, however, are the
major exceptions to the callausness of t h e
elite; they provide one of the few links between
educated Africans and the rest of t h e people
(Manichean Aesthetics, 12).
Janmohammed, here refers to the crucial role played
by the writers like Gordimer, in the post independent
state. In her fictions the social reality was vehicled
through her selective \subjectsr and situations. The
characters in her s h o r t stories, range from native blacks
to burgeois whites, including in the course, a wide
cross-section of Indians ( A Chip Of Glass Ruby). Jews
(The Watcher Of The Dead), East European Emigrants {The
Defeated), and the coloreds. Gordimer's ideology of
social integration, in a healthy and just environment was
promoted in the narratives. The contributions of each
sector towards the organic growth of the society, made
Gordimer convinced of the impregnably tangled n a t u r e of
the South African Kaleidoscope; that was magnificent with
all its 'colors.' Unlike many of the black writers like
Chiweizi , who promoted a rad ica l rejection of all the
'Eurocentric literary academics, in and outside Africa
who have long been prejudiced against - - . . works in
African languaqes'(Voices from 9Nentiet .h Centu ry Africa
riots and Town-criers, xvii), or Nguqi, w h o tried to
'de-colonize the African mind' by rejecting the
colonizer's language, and authority, Gordimer takes a
practical path of peace and development as opposed to
violence and destruction. Gordirer's proposal of
decolonisation had its origin in reinstating honor to the
black consciousness, and raising the white awareness of
the unreality of the ' m y t h s of colonial ideology.'
Franz Fanon had referred to the native
intellectual's search far his identity in the customs
rituals and archetypes of the era before the white man's
advent. The native intellectuals' search their past f o r a
respite from the devastation that the White culture has
imposed on them:
Perhaps unconsciously, the native intellectuals,
since they could not stand wonder-struck before
the history of today's barbarity, decided to go
back further and to delve deeper dawn; and . . . it was w i t h greatest delight that they
discovered t h a t there was nothing to be ashamed
of in t h e past, but rather dignity, glory, and
solemnity. The c la im to a national culture in
t h e past does not only rehabilitate that nation
and serve as a justification for the hope of a
f u t u r e national c u l t u r e , in the sphere of
psycho-affective equilibrium it is responsible
f o r an important change in t h e native (m
Wretched nf tbe E m , 169).
In ~ardimer, t h e narrative tends to portray this
' d i q n i t y , glory, and solemnity' in the tribal chieftains,
Generals, and even beggars, of the black community, thus
developing a stable cultural backdrop far the African way
of life. Thus the work of devaluing the pre-colonial
history takes on a dialectical significance'(l69) in
Gordimer's 'subjectivity.'
And the responsibility of the native intellectual
was to reinstate once again, the cultural identity of the
nation on the path of progressive growth. The character
of 'the grandmother, ' in the story "Ultimate Safari," is
a moral boost fo r the African cultural reality. The
grandmother, takes crucial decisions right from the
moment she takes responsibility of the children. Her
s trength , both physical and mental, is accentuated in t h e
narrative. The old grandmother sells her churchgoing
dress, and even her only pair of shoes to provide food
and protection for the children. The strong family
bondage in African community is focused and t h e black
race is shown as inherent of several positive qualities.
Even when the tribe was forced to leave behind the sick
grandfather to die i n the grass, the tone of the
narrative is filled with pathos -- a kind of brave
pathos -- and not accusation. For the s a k e of t h e
children and the others in the tribe, they had to move
on. The sacrifice and suffering of t h e grandmother adds
depth and authenticity to the little girl's confidence
and love for t h i s old wornan. The significance, of t h e
journey attains its ideological inference through the
presentation of this subject -- grandmother. Shown from a little qirlFs view, her grandmother looms into a
larger-than-life figure. Rich in personality and human
values, the grandmother becomes t h e torch bearer of honor
of the black culture. She is a concentration of a l l that
is 'goodf and 'right' in the strong families of the black
community .
And the lack of progressive thought in the native is
then used to propagate the image of 'docile,' 'lazy,#
slave who indulged in petty stealing. This image of the
'samba slaver (-re Str-s Rack, 103), was only part
of the reality. The 'samba slavef had a psychological
explanation against the racist backdrop:
E l k i n s argued that there was a reality behind
the common sense racist image of the 'samba
slavef personality . . . . Where Elkins differed
from the racists was in arguing t h a t t h e s e were
not t h e innate characteristics of African people
but rather the inevitable consequences of t h e
institution of slavery (Slavery: A ~roblern
115-139).
Before the period of European domination, the
African societies had solid systems for distribution of
power within their groups, traces of which could be seen
in the leadership of one black slave in every plantation.
This \illegal1 leader is o f t e n said to have tremendous
authority in the slave quarters. The essential leadership
oriented nature of slave communities was conveniently
forgotten by the White community, because it contradicts
their 'mythf about the 'lazy, uncivilized black slave.'
Each community of slaves contained one or two members
whom t h e others looked up for leadership. The influence
of such a Negro, often, a preacher, on a quarter was
incalculable.
Gordimer's text deconstructs the myth of docile
attitudes in slaves. They do have leaders like any other
community, and t h e y are organized. Petrus, in "Six Feet
Of The Country, " seems to be the leader in that quarters
(m, 7). Jack, the sales h y in the petrol pump is
depicted as a much better specimen of good sense than t h e
white l a d y , in ''Good Climate, Friendly Inhabitants''
( 21). Gordimer captures the Social milieu through
three stages: the historical p a s t , the living present and
an ideal future. She tries to rebuild the A f r i c a n past
and reinstate honor into the Black heritage. She then
relocates the varied sections of society -- the Jews, the Indians, and others -- so as to illuminate their
political purpose and social status. F u r t h e r , she
visualizes the f u t u r e , in which the South Africans t r y
to undo the colonial edifice and move towards a state of
cultural plurality and national progress. Gordirnerts
historical consciousness, thus , authenticates the social
reality of South Africa.
The African tribes with its traditional value-system
is presented in Gordimer's *%Oral History" ( S E I ; , 90). The
t e x t in portraying the plight of an honest chief w h o was
manipulated i n t o betraying his awn people deserved
respect and admiration for the trusting simplicity of t h e
blacks. Gordimer here challenges the lie of 'samba
slave, ' who had no moral commitment to his society. In
the text, the narrator never enters the cansciousness of
the black chief but, rather suggests his thoughts from a
sympathetic view-point. Even though the omnipresent
nar ra tor does n o t identify hi s /her color, it is
pro- b l a c k s and vehemently against the white brutality.
The chief of Dilolo was a simple man who appears to have
betrayed h i s tribe to the white man and unleashed
genocide among his people. Yet as the narrator, p r e s e n t s
the thoughts and the fears of t h e chief, a totally
different story emerges in our understanding that
sympathizes with the straight forward African who was
snared by t h e guile of the w h i t e soldier. This
contradiction between the reality and the illusion, which
was an integral part of South A f r i c a , and t h e colonial
government machinery that made \foolsJ of honest men, is
the ambiance, in "Oral History."
The Chief in the beginning tries desperately not to
incur the wrath of the white man upon h i s people. But he
unwittingly betrays h i s villagers' political activities
to the White Police. T h e chief in all earnestness wants
to keep away the police raids from his village and tries
to s t o p the political activists from hiding in his
village. He was submissive and frightened into passivity
by the military might of the White man. But h i s villagers
were not willing to give up without a resistance. And the
poor chief could not understand his people and their
motives. Several young men in t h e tribe were taking part
in the political military training with t h e tacit
approval of the tribe. The chief's mother, a very old
woman tries to awaken h i m from h i s blind submission to
the supremacy of the colonizer. She suggests that the
chief continue his pretense that there was no politics in
his Dilolo. She was in fact, hinting at t h e public
opinion that demanded a political revolution: whether t h e
chief approved of it or not. She also reminds h i m of the
old tribal ways, when ''it used to be that all children
were our own children. All sons our sons'' (96). There
was a time when the chiefs ruled their tribes, respecting
the wishes and opinions of the entire tribe. Gordimer
hints that t h e African tribal system, was democratic in
character. She draws attention to the peaceful
settlements of villagers in the African past. Although
the narrative is quite ambiguous the chief's mother's
advice c a n be deciphered as a warning to t h e chief not to
believe t h e white man's word and cooperate in his program
of domination.
Y e t this pathetic 'chieff who '\wore shoes and socks
in s p i t e of the heat;" to imitate the white ruler even
though "those drinking nearest him could smell t h e
suffering of h i s feet" (s, 97), never heeded h i s wise
mother's advice. He was being defied by his tribe: or at
l e a s t that was the way he saw their open acceptance and
celebration of t h e rebels. An oxen was slaughtered fo r
t h e men who came from across the river, and they dared to
look h i m in the eye . Gordimer pretends to be sympathetic
to the inner rnonologue/thoughts of the chief, while all
the time she was characterizing t h e absurdities of the #
chief's misconceptions about his role in t h e white man's
pat tern of life, He was hoping to retain h i s importance
through allegiance with the white man. And he could no t
accept the bold diffidence of the rebels in appearing
before him even during daytime.
When the chief allowed himself, at least to meet
the eyes of a stranger, the whites that had been
showing in an oblique angle disappeared and he
took rather than saw t h e full gaze of t h e s e e i n g
eye ; the pupil w i t h their defiance their belief,
their claim, hold on him (z, 97).
This was more than he could take! The petty chief of
Dilolo never was a cruel traitor to h i s people, rather he
retains our sympathies for being a tool in t h e colonial
rnachiavellism. With his silly notions of imitating the
colonizer's culture, he is treated with mild irony a l l
through o u t . His house which was 'like a white man's
house,' (s, 90) his ability to read, h i s reverence for
the arrival of t h e Land -- Rover, h i s childish habi t of
wearing shoes and socks at the beer drinking, everything
suggests his attempt to follow the footsteps of t h e White
man, blindly. Y e t he never could have dreamt that t h e
whites would brutally destroy his village. And the final
realization of his error of judgment led to h i s suicide.
In the i n t e r n a l monologue of the chief, Gordimer
constantly shifts from authorial voice to 'ironic
impersonationr and t h e narration sometimes swiftly hides
t h e shift. This feature adds to the neutrality. In t h e
character of the chief Gordimer presents an accultured
black man. By allowing an insight i n t o the chief's way of
thinking, h i s reasoning and h i s justifications without
identifying with the authorial 'voice,' we are able to
get a dual graph of what the c h i e f saw in himself and
what he was shown as, by the author.
Apart from the main character of the story the
pattern in its entirety takes a shift after the chief
enters the army post where "he had to wait like a beggar
rather than a chief to be allowed to approach and be
searchedt\ , 98). The lack of respect in the alien
territory was unnerving to the chief. Latex, when the
white soldier was questioning him, "he had the feeling
it was not coming out as he had meant, n o t being
understocd as he had expectedJ0 (m, 99) . As in
gramophone gone haywire, the world of the poor chief was
crashing in. The next day when he enters h i s village, the
tension was mounting. \*Then he saw that the smoke, the
black particles spindling at h i s face, were not from
cooking fires" { 100). The ominous nature of the
narrative gathers momentum, and the scene of total
destruction of his clan unravels before him. Even though
he was instrumental i n t h e air-raid, he discerns our \I\ k\
empathy as he "bellowed and stumbled from but to but, " -,f
and "nothing answered frenzy n o t even a chicken answered
from under h i s feet" (101).
T h e a i r - r a i d which was a common e v e n t of s o u t h
A f r i c a suddenly acquires i n the t e x t a dialectical
significance that was totally different from the
'authorities' justification of such political acts. For
Gardimer, the fiction can present history as no historian
can. She declares:
If you want to read the facts of t h e retreat
from Moscow in 1812, you may read a history
book: if you want to know what w a r is really
like and how people of a certain time and back-
-ground dealt with it . . . . you must read 'War
and Peace' (The Black interpreters - N o t e s on
African writinq, 7 )
Thus in her writings the reality, with a l l its past
ambiance emerges. The power of t h i s awareness of the need
to remain within t h e Black cultural context-she hoped,
would be the momentum, behind the political struggle in
South Africa. This reinstating of honor and legitimacy
i n t o the Black man's philosophy and tr iba l way of life
that was prevalent, before the advent of the a l i e n race,
was Gordimerts method of reconstructing her nation from
the ashes of colonialism. clingman has described
Gordimerts symbolism as "invoking a concept of the
unconscious i n a classic psychoanalytical sense . . - I I
(History From the I n s i d e , 209) . The s t o r y "Oral History"
illustrates this phenomenon. The fears of t h e Blacks and
their f u t u r e , in the White man's p a t t e r n of life cauld be
visualized in t h e narrative. The disaster that happened
in the village of Dilolo can be traced to the attempt of
the chief to abide by an alien cultural corpus . By
concretizing the unconscious fears, Gordimer evokes a
sense of 'catharsist in t h e Black minds. H e r narrative
develops into a warning to those blacks who conveniently
forget their identity in exchange for petty carrots from
the colonial regime.
It would be important to note the mild colors t h a t
Gordimer uses to portray the chief's foolishness and the
aggressive diction to denote the army petrol's
activities. The author appeals to our logic and acquits
the chief on the basis that he was but a target of t h e
corrupt colonial system. A t t h e same time, Gordimer gives
a serene picture of the tribe with its wise judicial
system and mutual t r u s t and love. This was direct
detonation of t h e colonial 'lie' that the Blacks lived in
utter disharmony before the advent of the white man. The
missionaries and the authorities tried to highlight
polygamy and ritualism as the evidence of 'backwardness'
in the Blacks. They saw themselves as the torch bearers
of civilization in the 'dark continent.' In ''Empire
Writes Back, '' it has been explained, that, in
post-colonial writings [ a s a part of de-colonization],
there appeared a simultaneous need to reconstruct a
'pre-colonial' reality (195).
The process of literary de-colonization, has
involved a radical dismantling of the European
codes and a post colonial subversion and
appropriation of the dominant European
discourse. This dismantling has been frequently
accompanied by the demand f o r an entirely new or
wholly recovered pre-colonial reality (w W-, 195) -
Gordimer in her narrative has presented this aspect of
t h e ~ f r i c a n past in ''Oral History. '' The story gives an
interpretation of events from a black perspective.
The myth of a 'good Christian' was- impregnated into
the colonial ideology to subvert the rational tendencies
of the blacks. Africans who were estranged from their own
rituals and customs, remodeled their Christianity with an
African coloring. The popularity of Methodist churches
amonq the blacks were largely attributed to the local
autonomy granted to t h e slave congregation, They added
elements of \song and story-tellingf which had its o r i g i n
in the oral traditions of African cultural heritage. This
adaptation enabled the whites to impose themselves on the
blacks and render them more submissive. Obedience and
respect for authority w a s quoted from the Bible to ensure
an autocratic power-relation within the farmlands.
Christianity was built on faith and obedience rather than
logic, Hence in molding an African into a Christian, the
whites were creating a subservient working force, who
submitted to authority. Sarah in ''Ah Woe Is Me!" ( S S ,
27) is a Christian black subject. "Her own Mission
school education with its t a c t f u l emphasis on the next
world rather than this, had not made her dangerous
enough, or brave enough, or free enough or even educated
enough to think . . . '* ( 2 7 ) . Sarah worked a lifetime for
the white family. She never bore a grudge against the
white masters in spite of the low wages, poor health or,
their final dismissal. All she could say was "ah woe is
me. ''
Christianity, was a weapon to further the p o l i t i c a l
ambitions of the white masters. But when t h e black man
chose the white man's religion, he could no longer be
dismissed as a pagan. This created a problem in the
social hierarchy, and the white man solves it by his
condescending attitude to the blacks. The relation of the
white race and t h e blacks was something like the
relationship between a parent and child. B u t the image
was not that of a loving mother but t h a t of a s t e r n
mentor, who had to be on constant vigil to prevent the
perverted 'child' from returning to its bad ways.
Janmohammed, in his study on "The economy of Manichaen
Allegory," establishes that this image of African as a
child ''allows him to feel secure once again because it
restores the moral balance in favor of the (adult)
- Christian conqueror ' ' ((5, 21 ) . The
terms like 'boy,' 'baas,' emphasize this aspect of the
colonial myth. But the blacks were further judged by the
whites, for their tendency to steal from the white
masters. "Thou Shall Not Stealr1 says the Bible. The
theft committed by the blacks was not as simple as that.
They had their own interpretations for the religious
commands they adopted from their colonizers, Certain
peculiarities in the behavior of the blacks can be
explained on the basis of this newly derived 'slave-code'
as opposed to the 8master-code.' one very common element
was, "the constant 'acts of stealing' which many writers
on slavery have commented upon. Many writers tend to look
upon this \stealingf as childish, amoral acts which took
place with the amused acknowledgment of the 'mastert"
( w e S t r i k e s Rack, 105).
Gordimer in the story of 'Blinder,' referred to this
in an absolutely realistic manner. The maid of the house
Rosa, is representative of a typical house-maid. She
leads a miserable life in the backyard of a white family.
Taken to drinking, Rosa had the reputation of being a
'blinder. ' The narrative "Blindert' presents a slice-of
Rosa's life, when her lover dies in an accident (m,
82). With mild satire Gordimer portrays Rosa w i t h h e r
petty theft, hard labor and pathetic f a t e . Gordimer
retains a uniform level of pathos through out the s t o r y
in the \subject1 -- Rosa, even though some of her actions
are presented w i t h mild irony:
Rosa sits on an upturned bucket and the water
from her eyes and n o s e makes papier mache heads,
in her fists, out of the Floral Bouquet paper
handkerchiefs, she helps herself to (after such
a long service, one can't call it stealing) in
t h e lady of t h e housefs bathroom (SOT, 82).
In the context of 'slave-code,' it would be
interesting to note that whatever was taken from the
'master,' was only \takingr not 'stealing,' which t h e
slaves often did to supplement the meager allowance
allowed to them. B u t to them embezzling another blacks
possession was 'stealing0 which they usually never did.
Hence t h e colonial ideology that made all the blacks
'immune' to a 'civilized' way of communal living, was
only because they never evaluated t h e blacks' responses
within their own value -- systems and behavior codes.
Gordimer , in her narrative brought out t h i s
mis-appropriation of the colonialism that interpreted
everyone and everything from their \superiort position,
as the representatives of the great western civilization,
t h u s rendering anything that was new or different as
'wrong'. The revelation of the truth and reality, of the
black/white relationship, which was propagated f r o m the
thresho ld of manipulated colonial ideology, was
Gordirner's contribution to her society. A c c u l t u r a l i s r n in
the blacks , general distrust across the black/white
borders, guilt awareness in the whites, and the need for
an integration of cultural plurality by which all sectors
of t h e class-ridden society joined towards a common
future broadly condensed the social history appearing in
Gordirner's pages. As the writer, probes for the political
reasons that arbitrate ordinary people into dishonorable
behavioral pat terns , the sub-text valorizes into the
relationship between, t h e victims and the victimizers,
which in t u r n propagates her political ideology.
Gordimer saw her contemporaries all alike, no matter
whether they are White or Black as reported in her story
"The Soldier's Embracef': \ \ A n accolade, one side a white
cheek, the other a black. The white one she kissed on the
left cheek, the black one on t h e right cheek, as if these
were two sides of one face*' (a, lo). Here both t h e
soldiers had the same significance to the nar ra to r , a
liberal white woman. A l l the difference that made these
soldiers fight on opposite sides suddenly melts away, in
the eyes of the author.
In Gordimer's vision of an independent South Africa,
she knew that there would be a major displacement in t h e
positioning of Whites. In her essay "Where Do Whites F i t
in?," Gordimer discusses the 'new place' of Whites in
South Africa. The Blacks \'have had so much of us
[whites]-let's not go through t h e whole list again, from
tear-gas and taxes to brotherly advice-that a l l they
crave is to have no part of us '' , 32). Gordimer, y e t
wanted the whites '\to be ordinary members of a
multicoloured society, any colored society, freed both of
the privileges and t h e guilt of the white sins of our
fathersf'(=, 3 2 ) . This was her ideological picture of a
\new Africa.' All the same, she feared the worse. The
story 'A soldier's Embrace,' realized this deep anxiety
which was also incidentally, an integral part of South
A f r i c a n social reality. Even the white lawyer and his
wife who had actively taken part in the liberation
movement, who were proud of the Blacksf independence
struggle, had no \placef in the new set-up. Gordimer has
expressed her thoughts in London Magazine on t h e dual
meanings that emerge from her dialogues:
I was looking for what people meant but did not
say only about sex, but also about politics and
their relationship with the black people among
whom we lived as people lived in a forest among
trees("Leaving School--11" No. 2[1964], 5 9 - 6 4 ) .
The story is riddled w i t h ironic dialogue. Gordimer
attempts to reveal the hidden reality in the inter-
racial dichotomy. Even the lawyer's family friend
Chipande who had s p e n t so much of time with them and
shared their hospitality, couldn't find time to v i s i t
them. Finally when he did come, he was in a hurry to
leave:
Chipande couldn't stay, Chipande couldn't stay
for supper: his beautiful long velvety black
hands with their pale lining . - hung
impatiently between h i s knees while he sat
forward in his chair, explaining, adamant
against persuasion (m, 15).
This reversal of roles in the wake of independence
was the theme in several of Gordimer's tales. In South
Africa, distrust, was another major element which
Gordimer had studied at length, in i ts variant forms, By
searching for t h e root cause of distrust in society,
Gordimer attacks the corrupt social system that was to be
recomposed. In "A City of the Dead, A City of the
Living, 'I the gardener's wife Naneki , turned an inf oxmer
and betrayed t h e political refugee that her husband
sheltered in her house. In the narrative Naneki , even
though she betrayed the African cause, still retained our
sympathy, because of our awareness of the system that
persecuted the freedom fighters. Naneki, in betraying t h e
refugee was, simply safeguarding her husband and children
from getting caught in t h e heat of a political struggle.
The ambivalence i n the political commitment of female
subjects, had a deep relevance f o r t h e colonial world.
Naneki is oscillating in her stance a g a i n s t t h e rebel.
Alternating attraction and repulsion mark Naneki's
response to political revolution. The young man with a
gold ring in h i s ear has plenty of girl friends to get
babies with him", was quite disturbing to Naneki (m, 18). The close proximity of the tiny apartment made their
stay more intimate fo r Naneki who was the one to stay at
home all the time, To an average woman t h e entire process
of rebellion was a catastrophe The gardener's w i f e ,
unable to grasp the essence of t h e process t u r n s
desperate and attacks the political refugee, who happens
to be the manifestation of real change. Social
revolutions aimed at change in the existing environment
often cause a clash of interest in the public and
personal lives of the people. Haneki is representative of
the guilt and trauma of those who are unable to decide
what was really best far their safety. The f r e n z y of a
strugqlinq nation presents several difficult choices to
the society, and Gordimer has eternalized the pain of the
gardener, h i s w i f e and the political refugee, i n the
story "A C i t y Of The Dead, A City Of The Living."
Under the stern muscle power and the systematic
disintegration which was arbitrated into t h e tribal way
of l i f e , devoid of a common leader, economic resources or
even an understanding b e t w e e n the different tribes, how
could Africa rise from its fall from normality t h a t
lasted fo r a period of three hundred and odd years? The
answer to this problem of seehingly unanswerable
situation can be traced in Gordimer's own words:
We writers in South Africa are so close to the
hot breath of our problems w e seldom take t i m e
to stand back a little and note t h e movement of
ideas in the outside world - Psychoanalysts in France, structuralists in
United States and France, conservative, liberal
and left-wing thinkers in contemporary schools
of linguistics philosophy agree about one thing;
man became man not by the tool but by t h e word
(E1 2 4 9 )
Towards t h e super human task of rehabilitating a nation
Gordimer has done precisely this. She had taken upon
herself t h e problem of the b e w i l d e r e d nat ion and w i t h the
a i d of her powerful pen she had striven to make of South
Africans' \'menr' w i t h reason and justice.
A study of social reality in the text of Nadine
Gordimer would bring to the surface certain repeated
patterns of behavior in her 'subjects' that had their
origin in the racial awareness of either races. The
environment was deeply unhealthy in that it was infected
with several major v iruses ; dishonesty, distrust, illegal
authority, legalized terrorism, and injustice to the
weak. On a detailed analyses of the pathetic conditions
of the people in general it was felt t h a t , t h e 'real'
reasons that corrupted t h e people i n t o ugly
manifestations of 'everything repulsive in men,' was the
colonizers illegal rule of domination and cruel
suppression.
In 'Africa Emergent' and 'Open House,' the emotion
of distrust t h a t stripped people of humanity and
elementary goodness, are portrayed. T h e antagonists
are in both cases sympathetically treated, so as to
trace the deeper reasons that made monsters of men. In
the s t o r y 'Africa Emergent' the nar ra to r brought out the
unbearable cynicism in the society when he said: ". . . if you lived here . friends know that shows
of loyalty are all right for children hold ing hands in
t h e school playground" (s, 4 3 4 ) . Both t h e Blacks and
t h e whites had the need to pretend friendship,
and commitment. The entire narrative had the tone
of a solitary rambling in t h e inner monologue of a
white sympathizer who w a s justifying h i s guilt of having
suspected h i s friend of being a police s p y . The c o r r u p t
society cultivated several negative emotions and
behaviors that shamed the 'good1 and the consc.ientious.
So much was a mystery where trust becomes a
commodity on sale to the police . . . . There's only one way for a man like that to prove
himself, so far as we are concerned: he must be
in prison (s, 4 4 6 ) .
In the narrative there seems to be no fixed points;
rather it does not drive home a specific view-point.
~ordimer herself voices her disapproval of the structure
of t h e s t o r y "Africa Emergent," in her interview with
Johannes Riis in October 1979. Even though she was
skeptic about the construct of the narrative, she asserts
that the style was intensely emotional, and that conveys
a special meaning to the narrative. Gordimer confesses
that "it was intended as a story about one of the m o s t
terrible products of South African life, the distrust
that has arisen, and has had to rise, i n a state like
South Africa. It was written in a state of fiery emotion.
The writer and her situation did not meet, because she
wasn't equal to itf*(- 2,1,1980, 2 3 ) .
But the very structural incoherence, had a
signification i n presenting the fragmentary nature of
inter-racial dialogues in t h e society. T h e narrative has
t w o major stories in it that do n o t really merge, but
remain contiguous to t h e end. The faint analogy seems to
be the element of distrust that invaded a l l walks of life
in South Africa. Gordimer was obsessed, with the truth of
t h e society, and she makes an attempt to study the
reality beneath the distrust in t h e society. In her
interview she has explained a real life situation when
one of their 'blackf friends was taken into custody right
after a secret political meeting. When everyone was
"shocked, I f and "agitated c ' as to "who is the informer?
Who is the police spy?,'' t h e black members, reasoned
that "the informer is a victim of a system of
repression, just like his victimsr' ( 2 4 ) . This
rationalizing is well captured in the story "Africa
Emergent, '' even though the narrative defies the
conventional pattern of story-telling.
Gordimer is recomposing the narrative to develop a
sub-text of social reality, while on the surface it
continues on a different level. T h e narrat ive plunges
into t h e marginal area of the Black/White friendship, and
strays into the details of such peripheral interactions.
The narratorts confusion and extreme agitation gets
reflected in the laborious sentences . The words are
spoken at random, at times disjointed:
We hardly know by now what we can do, and what
we can't do; its difficult to say goaded in on
oneself by laws and doubts and rebellion and
caution and -- not least -- self-disgust, what
is or is not friendship (s, 4 3 4 ) .
The extreme sense of inadequacy, and the pain of havinq
to endure such a corrupt society, finds expression in the
narrative.
Gordimer in the course of her narrative, thus,
developed an authentic history of her people. The emotive
status of the society was also supplemented by the actual
ingredients that made up the canvas of South African
p o l i t i c s . The society of South Africa had two major
colors: Black and White. Y e t , it incorporated within its
wafts and wefts, several other threads too. Gordimer
analyzed the contribution of these sectors to the
political purpose of her land. Within the dichotomy of
the victim/victimizer, these people had a slight but
distinct role to play. In the narrative these \actorsf
brought out several crucial aspects of the 'great South
African L i e . ' In demythologizing the f a l s e consciousness
of the colonizer's ideology, Gordimer had made use of the
leverage of this segment in t h e society that were n e i t h e r
blacks nor whites.
The inter-racial dialogue thus became a major
political statement in Gordirnerfs t e x t . The simple
classification of these people on the basis of
occupation, religion and their 'power' in connection with
the black and white relationship, had created the avenue
fo r several photographic situations. Here often, the t e x t
simply made a presentation of itself without actually
concluding into a didactic summary. 'Inkalamuls Placef
(WHYW, 156). 'A Chip Or Glass Rubyf ( S S , 2 6 4 1 , 'A Watcher
of the Dead' OJHYW, 2 4 ) , 'The Defeated' (WIIYW, 9 ) and
such other stories were representative of t h e variant
colors of the social fabric.
Mrs. Bamjee, was no accident in the collection of
political *subjectsf i n Gordimerls parade. Mrs. Bamjee
was the courageous personality who brought o u t the
powerful role played by the Gandhian way of political
struggle, within the main fight f o r South African
independence. The Indians of South A f r i c a had the
experience of organizing a political upheaval among t h e
millions. Thus united against the common enemy -- the
white man -- Indians had been an accepted accomplice of
t h e black struggle. Even though the theme was political
and t h e characters were evidently pro-political, Gordimer
never failed to portray the human interest in the
situation. Mr. Bamjee an ordinary fruit-seller, could
never understand his wife's interest in politics. "When
the duplicating machine was brought into the house.
~ a m j e e s a i d , 'Isn't it enough t h a t you've got the
Indians' trouble on your back?" ( S S , 264). Obviously
Mrs. ~amjee thought differently. To her, 'all had the
same troublesF (264). Unlike most of the stories in
Gardimer, the narrative w a s from the perspective of an
omnipresent authorial voice, t h a t swiftly penetrated the
thoughts and minds of the participants. Hrs. Bamjee was
outwardly a typical Moslem woman who 'was up until long
after midnight, turning out leaflets . . . as if she
might have been pounding chillies'(SS, 2 6 5 ) . Political
struggle gathers momentum on ly when it penetrates the
primary unit of human existence; the family. Mrs.
Bamjee's involvement showed the power of the masses that
had the fury of a hurricane. Zanip Bamjee, a mother of
nine children, five by her first marriage and four by the
second, is one of the favored characters. Her care for
the community and her inclusion in its personnel of the
black women, marks her off as one 'who remembers
everything -- people without somewhere to live, hungry
kids boys who can't get educatedF (s, 273). The care an
her part for the 'wretched of the earthf gives her a
status in the narrative. Gordimer was educating her
fellow whites in the matter of social reality. No
government could withstand the power of the masses
awakening to freedom.
Gordirner had portrayed an assortment o f situations
and subjects t h a t when taken together had the
comprehensiveness of a historical chronicle. Towards this
end, the 'subjectsf were chosen, representative of their
occupation, their lifestyles and even their cultural
significance. To conclude, as Ngugi asserts in
e Mind:
Economic and political control can never be
complete or effective without mental control. To
control a people's culture is to control their
tools of self-definition in relationship to
others (16).
Gordimer in presenting the African canvas at its
most inconspicuous moments, conveys a clear and
purposeful picture of the inter-racial dialogue in the
society. Amidst t h e turbulent times of political
struggle, her cool observation and detached attitude
towards politics, gives her narrative a greater degree of
authenticity, than in the t e x t of one of her less
'marginal* contemporaries. And she has taken full
advantage of this marginal pos i t ion to focus on the
political issues from her *privilegedF angle. Clingman
rightly observes:
In her view the novel can present history as
historians cannot. Moreover, the presentation is
not fictional in the sense of being 'untrue.'
Rather, fiction deals with an area of activity
usually inaccessible to the sciences of greater
externally: the area in which historical process
is registered as the subjective experience of
individuals in society; fiction gives us
'history from the inside,[Historv From the
Inside, 1).
Gordimer's situations and the positioning of her
'subjects' in it, arbitrate the conclusions. Thus social
reality is the very tool that realizes her political
purpose. As Clingman puts it "Gordimer * s novels are
engaged in truth-telling; hers is a realism of naming and
showing of being witness to the times she has lived
through; and a corollary of her realism is that it has
undermined many of t h e 'lies' of apartheid" (221).
Works Cited
Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies, ed. me es --and BZicism in 70s Birtain.
London: Hutchinson, 1982.
Chinweizu. V Q ~ C ~ S from W & , y Af d c a : Griots
. London: Faber and Faber, 1988.
Elkins, S. M., Slavery. 8 a e m
titutimal and I n w e c t u . U of Chicago P,
1959.
Fanon, Franz. Wretaed of the. England: Penguin
Books, 1967.
Gordimer, Nadine. *\English Language Literature and
Politics in South Africa, '' Wnects of South African
t e r a t m . London: Heinemann, 1976.
- - - "Leaving Sch~ol*~' -on m, 2, 1964.
- - - \'The Black Interpreters Notes on African
Writing," SPRO-CAS/-. Johannesburg, 1973.
Interview w i t h Riis Johannes . "Nadine Gordimer, If
-, 2 , 1 (1980)+
. *
Jan Mohammed, AWul, R . Hanichean U t h e t i c s : The Pollt~cs
iterature ~n Col . Amherst: The U of
Hassachusetts P, 1983.
Laredo, Ursule. "African Mosaic: The Novels of Nadine
Gordimer , " Journal of Co-Literature, 8, 1
(June, 1973).
Ngugi w a Thcong ' 0 . . ,
t . . P L 2 s . m ~ he U n d : The Politics of
Janauaae in Af r i m t u r e . Zimbabwe: Zimbabwe
Publishing House ( P v t ) L t d . , 1987.
W * N g u g f w a Thiong'o. *on Prison- .
Britain: Cox and Wyman L t d . , 1981.
Soyinko, Woye. W h . Literature and T-.
Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1976.
Susan Basnett, ed. ative Literature. Oxford:
Blackwell, 1993.
Williams, Raymond. Gulture and Societv. UK: The Hogarth
P, 1993.