on the use of cellular technology for digital tv bi-directional return channel services guilherme d....
Post on 20-Dec-2015
213 views
TRANSCRIPT
2COPPE/UFRJCETUC/PUC-RIO
Summary
Motivation & GoalsCdma2000 1xEV-DO: OverviewTraffic Model EV-DO Model: Layers 1 e 2Experiments, Results and DiscussionConclusions
3COPPE/UFRJCETUC/PUC-RIO
Motivation & Goals
Evaluate EV-DO rev.0 as a alternative for the return channel of the Digital TV: Throughput Delay User population Fairness
Could we do better?
4COPPE/UFRJCETUC/PUC-RIO
Cdma2000 1xEV-DO: Overview
Reverse Link
Rates from 9.6 to 153.6Kbps per user
BPSK modulation 53.30ms packets
Besides the data channel Control Channel
Power controlled: - open loop - closed loop
CDMA
Phase reference for demod.; Channel timing
Forward link rate sent to the BS
Reverse RateIndicator
Pilot DRC RRI ACK
Forward channel data packets acknowledgment
6COPPE/UFRJCETUC/PUC-RIO
Cdma2000 1xEV-DO: Overview
Always at max. power
1.67ms TDM slots
Forward Link
Rates from 38.4kbps to 2.4Mbps through adaptive coding/modulationDepends on the state of the forward linkHigher bit rates: lower robustness to channel impairments
PFS recommended for slot allocation
Main goal: throughput
7COPPE/UFRJCETUC/PUC-RIO
Cdma2000 1xEV-DO: Overview
Forward Link (more...) Four Packet Interlacing
Avoids temporary monopolization of slots
Early Termination Gradual redundancy
Besides the data channel Control Channel
Pilot RPC RA Bit
open loop power control
closed-loop power control
congestion control
Always at max. power
1.67ms TDM slots
9COPPE/UFRJCETUC/PUC-RIO
Tangram-II Simulation Model Overview Simulation Tool:
Tangram-II (Federal University of Rio de Janeiro – Brazil)
Why Tangram-II instead of NS? Modeling is done through a high level interface: simplicity Includes additional high-level constructs to facilitate the modeling task
COPPE/UFRJCETUC/PUC-RIO
10COPPE/UFRJCETUC/PUC-RIO
Proposed model
Detailed (Physical and Link layers) EV-DO model Related work typically:
Physical layer modeling Lack of detailed traffic model
Few works modeling higher layers: No open-source model presenting system capacity results
as a function of user population No detailed fairness analysis
• Almost no clues on what could be done about fairness
11COPPE/UFRJCETUC/PUC-RIO
Traffic Model
Assumptions There is no users entering or leaving the
system
No mobility – predominant scenario in the BDTvS
13COPPE/UFRJCETUC/PUC-RIO
EV-DO Model
Assumptions:
A single EV-DO cell, no setorization: Thus, no soft-handoff
Early Termination not implemented Static users: low channel diversity
14COPPE/UFRJCETUC/PUC-RIO
EV-DO Model: Physical layer
Propagation Total power loss Ltotal[dB]
dBDdBLdBLdBL penetraçãopropagaçãototal propagation penetration
Propagation loss penetration loss (10dB)
shadowing fading (log-normal dist. de mean=0 and σ =8dB dense urban scenario)
15COPPE/UFRJCETUC/PUC-RIO
EV-DO Model: Physical layer
Propagation (more...) Okumura-Hata’s Propagation model for dense
urban scenario dhhahfdBL ERBTAERBcurbano loglog55.69.44log82.13log16.2655.69
97.475.11log2.3 2 TATA hdBhaCarrier frequency
(450MHz)
BS antenna height (40m)
AT height (1.5m)
dense urban correction factor :
16COPPE/UFRJCETUC/PUC-RIO
Power Control: Open Loop
Step 1: Pilot channel sensing
Step 2: Choose the lowest power such that:• After power losses it still reaches the receiver with
enough strength to achieve the desired PER (1%)
EV-DO Model: Physical layer
17COPPE/UFRJCETUC/PUC-RIO
Power Control (more…): Closed loop
Step 1: BS calculates for each user
Step 2: • Matches the received power with d
• Commands the AT to increase or decrease its power
EV-DO Model: Physical layer
pilot channel received energy
total perceived interfering power
thermal noise channel bandwidth (1.25MHz)
18COPPE/UFRJCETUC/PUC-RIO
DRC Estimation: Geometric Method
Step 1: Measure the received power from the BS: X Step 2: Calculate SINR: Relation between X and the
interference from rings 1 and 2
EV-DO Model: Physical layer
First interferingring
Second interferingring
19COPPE/UFRJCETUC/PUC-RIO
DRC Estimation : Step 3: Find the higher DRC that matches the
calculated SINR value, send it to the BS
EV-DO Model: Physical layer
PER = 1%
DRC
Rate(kbps)
SINR(dB)
20COPPE/UFRJCETUC/PUC-RIO
Scheduling Algorithm – PFS Choose user j
Updating average rate for user i
EV-DO Model: Link layer
)(
)(maxarg
tR
tDRC
ij
i
i
ji tCRTi
ji DRCitCRTitCRTitRitRi
se 0)(
se )()()()1()1(
Last DRC value Received from user i
User i average transmission rate
PFS “fairness” parameter
User i current transmission rate
21COPPE/UFRJCETUC/PUC-RIO
Congestion Control Noise rise – δR
δR =Nt/N0
δR = 5 as a threshold for the RA bit activation
• If the base station activates the RA Bit, ATs decreases its reverse date rate transmissions
EV-DO Model: Link layer
total interfering power
thermal noise power
22COPPE/UFRJCETUC/PUC-RIO
Experiments: Considerations Dense urban scenario
Web user population: from 10 to 80
Interest Metrics: Throughput; Delay;
Fairness Description0 Value Unit
AT Maximum Power 23 dBm
Antenna Maximum Power 55.8 dBm
Penetration Loss 10 dB
Thermal Noise -165 dB
PFS α 0.001
Cable loss 3 dB
Antenna Gain 17 dB
AT Sensibility -119 dB
23COPPE/UFRJCETUC/PUC-RIO
Results: User Throughput vs. Pop. and zone
Zone
Population
Th
rou
gh
pu
t (K
bp
s)
Decreasing Throughput with increasing population and distance
24COPPE/UFRJCETUC/PUC-RIO
Results: User Delay vs. Pop. and zone
Zone
Population
De
lay
(s
)
Increasing delay with increasing population and distance
25COPPE/UFRJCETUC/PUC-RIO
Results: User Throughput vs. PFS α
PFS α - Extreme values: no significant fairness variation α = 1 – Round Robin α = 0.001 – PFS: Strong Throughput priority
Zone
thro
ug
hp
ut
(K
bp
s)
alpha = 1.0 alpha = 0.001 Round Robin
PFS
26COPPE/UFRJCETUC/PUC-RIO
Discussion: Fairness issue
Throughput, delay quite worse for the most distant users
PFS α parameter adjustment
Same fairness issue
Worst overall throughput
27COPPE/UFRJCETUC/PUC-RIO
Proposed Solution: Directional Antenas
Experiment 1: Experiment 2: Experiment 3:
Distance Zone
1 2 3 … 8 9 10
… … … … … …
…
…
…
no-users (no directional antennas)2-zones
1-zone
1-user
Former experiments:
28COPPE/UFRJCETUC/PUC-RIO
Results: User Thoughput - fairness through directional antennas
Zone
t
hro
ug
hp
ut
(
Kb
ps
)
No user 1-user 1-zone
2-zones
From white to black bars: Increasing Fairness (thoughput)
Population of 60 users
29COPPE/UFRJCETUC/PUC-RIO
Results: User Delay - fairness through directional antennas
Zone
D
ela
y
(s
)
No user 1-user 1-zone
2-zones
From white to black bars: Increasing Fairness (delay)
Population of 60 users