on the nature of capital adjustment costs - uc3mmkredler/readgr/perioncooperhaltiwanger06.pdf · on...
TRANSCRIPT
On the Nature of Capital Adjustment Costs
Russell W. COOPER, John C. HALTIWANGER
Presenter: Alessandro Peri
University of Carlos III, Madrid
Feb 3, 2014
1 / 13On the Nature of Capital Adjustment Costs
N
Introduction
The paper in a nutshell
1 What they do:
1 Investigation of the nature of Capital Adjustment Costs at the micro-level.
1 Estimate structural parameters of a rich capital adjustment cost specif.
2 How they do it: Simulated method of moments approach
3 Result:
Micro-level: convex non-convex adjustment costs fit the data best.
Aggregate-level: quadratic adjustment cost works fine.
2 / 13On the Nature of Capital Adjustment Costs
N
Introduction
Data
Panel Data:
Period: 1972-1988
Source: Longitudinal Research Database
It = EXPt −RETtKt+1 = (1− δt)Kt + It
it = It/Kt
3 / 13On the Nature of Capital Adjustment Costs
N
Facts
Facts: I/K
4 / 13On the Nature of Capital Adjustment Costs
N
Facts
Facts: I/K
4 / 13On the Nature of Capital Adjustment Costs
N
Facts
Facts: I/K
To recap:
1 Inaction
2 Large bursts of investments: Spikes
3 Negative Investment
4 Positive correlation It/Kt,profit shocks: ρ(it, At) > 0
5 Low positive serial correlation of: ρ(it, it−1) >≈ 0
4 / 13On the Nature of Capital Adjustment Costs
N
Model
Convex Adjustment Costs
V (A,K) = maxI
Π(A,K)− C(I, A,K)− p(I)I + βEA′|AV (A′,K ′)
Π(A,K) = maxL
R(A,K,L)− Lω(L) ≈ AKθ
0 No Adjustment Costs: C(I, A,K) ≡ 0, p(I) = p
1 Convex Adjustment Costs: C(I, A,K) = γ2 (I/K)2K, p(I) = p
5 / 13On the Nature of Capital Adjustment Costs
N
Model
Non Convexities
2 Non-Convex Adjustment Costs:
V (A,K) = max{V i(A,K), V a(A,K)}
V i(A,K) = Π(A,K) + βEA′|AV (A′,K(1− δ))V a(A,K) = max
IΠ(A,K)λ− FK − pI + βEA′|AV (A′,K ′) λ < 1
3 Transaction Costs:
V (A,K) = max{V i(A,K), V b(A,K), V s(A,K)}
V i(A,K) = Π(A,K) + βEA′|AV (A′,K(1− δ))
V b(A,K) = maxI
Π(A,K)− pbI + βEA′|AV (A′, (1− δ)K + I)
V s(A,K) = maxR
Π(A,K)− psR+ βEA′|AV (A′, (1− δ)K −R)
6 / 13On the Nature of Capital Adjustment Costs
N
7 / 13On the Nature of Capital Adjustment Costs
N
Quantitative Analysis
Estimation
V (A,K) = max{V i(A,K), V b(A,K), V s(A,K)}
V i(A,K) = Π(A,K) + βEA′|AV (A′,K(1− δ))
V b(A,K) = maxI
Π(A,K)λ− FK − I − γ
2(I/K)2K + βEA′|AV (A′, (1− δ)K + I))
V s(A,K) = maxR
Π(A,K)λ−FK−psR−γ
2(R/K)2K+βEA′|AV (A′, (1−δ)K−R))
Specifications:
Fixed Cost Case: F > 0, λ = 1
Opportunity Cost Case: F = 0, λ ∈ (0, 1)
8 / 13On the Nature of Capital Adjustment Costs
N
Quantitative Analysis
Estimation
Simulated method of moments
L (Θ) = minΘ
[Ψd −Ψs(Θ)]′W [Ψd −Ψs(Θ)]
Estimates of θ and profitability shocks
Π(Ait,Kit) = AitKθit (1)
ln(Ait) = ait = bt + εi,t−1 (2)
εit = ρεεi,t−1 + ηit (3)
πit = ρεπi,t−1 + θkit − ρeθki,t−1 + bt − ρεbt−1 + ηit (4)
8 / 13On the Nature of Capital Adjustment Costs
N
Quantitative Analysis
Fixed Cost Case: F > 0, λ = 1
9 / 13On the Nature of Capital Adjustment Costs
N
Quantitative Analysis
Opportunity Cost Case: F = 0, λ < 1
10 / 13On the Nature of Capital Adjustment Costs
N
Quantitative Analysis
Aggregate..another story
Meaning: Aggregation from LRD (not aggregate from NIPA)
Data:
ρ(iaggrt , aaggrt ) = 0.46 (vs 0.058 at plant level)
ρ(iaggrt , iaggrt−1 ) = 0.5 (vs 0.143 at plant level)
Model:
ρ(iaggrt , aaggrt ) = 0.63 ≈ 0.46
ρ(iaggrt , iaggrt−1 ) = 0.54 ≈ 0.5
γ∗ = arg maxγ R2(XBfit
t , X(γ)t) = 0.195 with R2 = 0.859
Conclusion: convex adjustment costs explains a lot of aggregate!
11 / 13On the Nature of Capital Adjustment Costs
N
Conclusions
Conclusions
Estimate the structural parameter of a rich adjustment cost functions
Simulated Method of Moments
Document significant convex and non-convex adjustment costs
at plant levelat sector level ( Link )
Corroborate convex-adjustment costs at macro-level
12 / 13On the Nature of Capital Adjustment Costs
N
Appendix
Sectoral parameter estimates Back
13 / 13On the Nature of Capital Adjustment Costs
N