on the issue of inspecting challenging pipelines · on the issue of inspecting challenging...

27
Dr. Michael Beller, Tom Steinvoorte PPSA Seminar, Aberdeen, Nov. 18th 2015 ON THE ISSUE OF INSPECTING CHALLENGING PIPELINES

Upload: others

Post on 16-Apr-2020

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: ON THE ISSUE OF INSPECTING CHALLENGING PIPELINES · ON THE ISSUE OF INSPECTING CHALLENGING PIPELINES. Slide 2 1. Introduction 2. In-Line Inspection 3. „Piggable vs. „Unpiggable“

Dr. Michael Beller, Tom Steinvoorte

PPSA Seminar, Aberdeen, Nov. 18th 2015

ON THE ISSUE OF INSPECTING

CHALLENGING PIPELINES

Page 2: ON THE ISSUE OF INSPECTING CHALLENGING PIPELINES · ON THE ISSUE OF INSPECTING CHALLENGING PIPELINES. Slide 2 1. Introduction 2. In-Line Inspection 3. „Piggable vs. „Unpiggable“

Slide 2

1. Introduction

2. In-Line Inspection

3. „Piggable vs. „Unpiggable“

4. Tool Box Approach

5. Case Study 1: Jet Fuel Feeder Line

6. Case Study 2: Multi-Phase Oil Line with difficult access

7. Case Study 3: Inspection of a Loading Line

8. Conclusions

PPSA Aberdeen 2015

CONTENT

Page 3: ON THE ISSUE OF INSPECTING CHALLENGING PIPELINES · ON THE ISSUE OF INSPECTING CHALLENGING PIPELINES. Slide 2 1. Introduction 2. In-Line Inspection 3. „Piggable vs. „Unpiggable“

Slide 3

INTRODUCTION

• There are appr. 4 million kilometers of oil & gas transmission

pipelines globally.

• Roughly 40% of these lines are considered „non-piggable“

• In addition there is a large number of pipelines upstream that

require regular inspection.

What does „piggable“ mean?

Page 4: ON THE ISSUE OF INSPECTING CHALLENGING PIPELINES · ON THE ISSUE OF INSPECTING CHALLENGING PIPELINES. Slide 2 1. Introduction 2. In-Line Inspection 3. „Piggable vs. „Unpiggable“

Slide 4

„PIGGABLE“

• In-Line Inspection (ILI) of pipelines is

well-proven, widely used and in parts of

the world even prescriptive

• ILI is performed for metal loss, crack,

geometry and leak detection

• The mission is to provide accurate,

reliable and consistent data for integrity

assessment and fitness-for-purpose

investigations

A pipeline is considered „piggable“ if it can be inspected with

an ILI tool, without the need to modify the tool or the pipeline

Page 5: ON THE ISSUE OF INSPECTING CHALLENGING PIPELINES · ON THE ISSUE OF INSPECTING CHALLENGING PIPELINES. Slide 2 1. Introduction 2. In-Line Inspection 3. „Piggable vs. „Unpiggable“

Slide 5

„PIGGABLE“ VS. „UNPIGGABLE“

©B

elle

r/R

eb

er

Page 6: ON THE ISSUE OF INSPECTING CHALLENGING PIPELINES · ON THE ISSUE OF INSPECTING CHALLENGING PIPELINES. Slide 2 1. Introduction 2. In-Line Inspection 3. „Piggable vs. „Unpiggable“

Slide 6

„UNPIGGABLE“ ISSUES

• Accessability

• Negotiability

• Propulsion

These issues remain:

Flaw types: metal loss, cracks, geometric anomalies

POD, POI – issues of data quality, data management

Page 7: ON THE ISSUE OF INSPECTING CHALLENGING PIPELINES · ON THE ISSUE OF INSPECTING CHALLENGING PIPELINES. Slide 2 1. Introduction 2. In-Line Inspection 3. „Piggable vs. „Unpiggable“

Slide 7

THE TOOL BOX APPROACH

• Technology

• Tailor Made Processes and Procedures

• Expertise and Experience

Page 8: ON THE ISSUE OF INSPECTING CHALLENGING PIPELINES · ON THE ISSUE OF INSPECTING CHALLENGING PIPELINES. Slide 2 1. Introduction 2. In-Line Inspection 3. „Piggable vs. „Unpiggable“

Slide 8

ACCESSIBILITY

• Hot tapping

• Pig launch valves

• Temporary or permanent launcher

• Spool piece

• Bi-directional operation

PPSA Aberdeen 2015

Page 9: ON THE ISSUE OF INSPECTING CHALLENGING PIPELINES · ON THE ISSUE OF INSPECTING CHALLENGING PIPELINES. Slide 2 1. Introduction 2. In-Line Inspection 3. „Piggable vs. „Unpiggable“

Slide 9

• Uni-directional

• Bi-directional

• Low friction

• Ultra compact

• Multi – diameter

NEGOTIABILITY

PPSA Aberdeen 2015

Page 10: ON THE ISSUE OF INSPECTING CHALLENGING PIPELINES · ON THE ISSUE OF INSPECTING CHALLENGING PIPELINES. Slide 2 1. Introduction 2. In-Line Inspection 3. „Piggable vs. „Unpiggable“

Slide 10

• Medium propelled

• Nitrogen/ Air

• Batching

• Self-Propulsion

• Cable operated

PROPULSION

PPSA Aberdeen 2015

Page 11: ON THE ISSUE OF INSPECTING CHALLENGING PIPELINES · ON THE ISSUE OF INSPECTING CHALLENGING PIPELINES. Slide 2 1. Introduction 2. In-Line Inspection 3. „Piggable vs. „Unpiggable“

Slide 11

MEASUREMENT TECHNOLOGIES

• MFL – Magnetic Flux Leakage

• UT – Ultrasonic Technology

• EC – Eddy Current

• EMAT – Electro-Magnetic Acoustic Transducer

• …

External

Internal

Gas

LiquidDent

SCC

Corrosion

PPSA Aberdeen 2015

Page 12: ON THE ISSUE OF INSPECTING CHALLENGING PIPELINES · ON THE ISSUE OF INSPECTING CHALLENGING PIPELINES. Slide 2 1. Introduction 2. In-Line Inspection 3. „Piggable vs. „Unpiggable“

Slide 12

CASE STUDY: JET FUEL LINE FEEDER LINE

The Challenge:

• 6“ fuel line, length 1300 m

• Wall thickness: 4.5 to 5.6 mm

• No launching or receiving traps installed

• Access only possible from one end

• Tight miter bends in the line

• No digging possible

• Low operational pressure during inspection

• No interference of aircraft movement tolerable

Page 13: ON THE ISSUE OF INSPECTING CHALLENGING PIPELINES · ON THE ISSUE OF INSPECTING CHALLENGING PIPELINES. Slide 2 1. Introduction 2. In-Line Inspection 3. „Piggable vs. „Unpiggable“

Slide 13

CASE STUDY: JET FUEL LINE FEEDER LINE

The Solution:

• Small diameter UT

inspection tool

• BiDi capability

• Mechanical design of

tool allows negotiation of

mitre bends

• Tool capable of

negotiating 1D bends

• Tailor made and

specialized procedures

Page 14: ON THE ISSUE OF INSPECTING CHALLENGING PIPELINES · ON THE ISSUE OF INSPECTING CHALLENGING PIPELINES. Slide 2 1. Introduction 2. In-Line Inspection 3. „Piggable vs. „Unpiggable“

Slide 14

CASE STUDY: JET FUEL LINE FEEDER LINE

The Benefit:

• Reliable inspection of line providing high resolution UT data

• Zero disturbance to normal airport operations and aircraft movement

• Cost saving by avoiding any digging

• No line modifications required

• Inspection using medium transported in line – jet fuel

• Risk minimization due to Bi-Di design of tool

Page 15: ON THE ISSUE OF INSPECTING CHALLENGING PIPELINES · ON THE ISSUE OF INSPECTING CHALLENGING PIPELINES. Slide 2 1. Introduction 2. In-Line Inspection 3. „Piggable vs. „Unpiggable“

Slide 15

CASE STUDY – MULTI-PHASE OIL LINE

The Challenge:

• Inspection of 10“ multi-phase flow lines

• Multiple lines between 1 and 10 km long

• Hard to clean

• Medium at elevated temperature

• High water cut

• No possibility to install launchers & receivers

• Only access possible via 3-port valve

Page 16: ON THE ISSUE OF INSPECTING CHALLENGING PIPELINES · ON THE ISSUE OF INSPECTING CHALLENGING PIPELINES. Slide 2 1. Introduction 2. In-Line Inspection 3. „Piggable vs. „Unpiggable“

Slide 16

CASE STUDY – MULTI-PHASE OIL LINE

Valves are 3 port ball valves that are used in pipelines that require

frequent maintenance pigging. They can also be used to run short ILI

tools – if available!

PPSA Aberdeen 2015

Page 17: ON THE ISSUE OF INSPECTING CHALLENGING PIPELINES · ON THE ISSUE OF INSPECTING CHALLENGING PIPELINES. Slide 2 1. Introduction 2. In-Line Inspection 3. „Piggable vs. „Unpiggable“

Slide 17

CASE STUDY – MULTI-PHASE OIL LINE

The Solution:

• Specially designed BiDi MFL tool, that can be launched and

received via 3-port valve

• Tailor made procedures

• Tool can operate in LF/LP conditions

• Specialized tool tracking equipment

Page 18: ON THE ISSUE OF INSPECTING CHALLENGING PIPELINES · ON THE ISSUE OF INSPECTING CHALLENGING PIPELINES. Slide 2 1. Introduction 2. In-Line Inspection 3. „Piggable vs. „Unpiggable“

Slide 18

CASE STUDY – MULTI-PHASE OIL LINE

Wellhead

Launcher Receiver

Dunes

Detector chain Detector chain

Control

box

PPSA Aberdeen 2015

Page 19: ON THE ISSUE OF INSPECTING CHALLENGING PIPELINES · ON THE ISSUE OF INSPECTING CHALLENGING PIPELINES. Slide 2 1. Introduction 2. In-Line Inspection 3. „Piggable vs. „Unpiggable“

Slide 19

• Cost effective

No impact on operation, no pipeline modifications no need to liquid fill the line or

for pumps, hydro test can be avoided

• State-of-the-art inspection quality

Same performance as high resolution uni-directional MFL tools

• Light weight and easy to handle

No need for cranes, less manpower

• Flexible operation

Online inspection - less dependent on production planning

• Safe and reliable

Robust and proven MFL technology that only requires moderate cleaning

CASE STUDY – MULTI-PHASE OIL LINE

The Benefit

PPSA Aberdeen 2015

Page 20: ON THE ISSUE OF INSPECTING CHALLENGING PIPELINES · ON THE ISSUE OF INSPECTING CHALLENGING PIPELINES. Slide 2 1. Introduction 2. In-Line Inspection 3. „Piggable vs. „Unpiggable“

Slide 20

The Challenge:

Offloading pipeline at a MBM (Multi Buoy Mooring), from PLEM (Pipeline End

Manifold) to beach head area, no pig traps and previous UT inspection was

unsuccessful due to questionable data.

Size: 20”

Length: 1800 mtr

Product: Jet Fuel / Gasoline

CASE STUDY – LOADING LINE

PPSA Aberdeen 2015

Page 21: ON THE ISSUE OF INSPECTING CHALLENGING PIPELINES · ON THE ISSUE OF INSPECTING CHALLENGING PIPELINES. Slide 2 1. Introduction 2. In-Line Inspection 3. „Piggable vs. „Unpiggable“

Slide 21

The Challenge (continued):

The line cannot be inspected with conventional tools because of

• No traps

• Subsea entry

• Pressure limit of 6.5 kg/cm2 (6.4 bar) during inspection

Boundary conditions

• No interference with offloading operations

• Risk to be minimized

• Full inspection coverage

• Eliminate possibilities of contamination to the ocean during the submarine

activities of disconnecting hoses and installation of launching spool at PLEM

• Send only clean product to storage tank

CASE STUDY – LOADING LINE

PPSA Aberdeen 2015

Page 22: ON THE ISSUE OF INSPECTING CHALLENGING PIPELINES · ON THE ISSUE OF INSPECTING CHALLENGING PIPELINES. Slide 2 1. Introduction 2. In-Line Inspection 3. „Piggable vs. „Unpiggable“

Slide 22

The Solution:

For this inspection ROSEN engineers selected a medium propelled low friction

MFL inspection solution in combination with pre-inspection cleaning.

Pigging direction: from subsea PLEM to onshore beach head.

Propulsion: with jet fuel during normal offloading.

CASE STUDY – LOADING LINE

PPSA Aberdeen 2015

Page 23: ON THE ISSUE OF INSPECTING CHALLENGING PIPELINES · ON THE ISSUE OF INSPECTING CHALLENGING PIPELINES. Slide 2 1. Introduction 2. In-Line Inspection 3. „Piggable vs. „Unpiggable“

Slide 23

Launching trap design & construction

Design enables launching cleaning and MFL pig without intermediate spool

recovery.

CASE STUDY – LOADING LINE

PPSA Aberdeen 2015

Page 24: ON THE ISSUE OF INSPECTING CHALLENGING PIPELINES · ON THE ISSUE OF INSPECTING CHALLENGING PIPELINES. Slide 2 1. Introduction 2. In-Line Inspection 3. „Piggable vs. „Unpiggable“

Slide 24

Beach head with trap and filters installed

CASE STUDY – LOADING LINE

PPSA Aberdeen 2015

Page 25: ON THE ISSUE OF INSPECTING CHALLENGING PIPELINES · ON THE ISSUE OF INSPECTING CHALLENGING PIPELINES. Slide 2 1. Introduction 2. In-Line Inspection 3. „Piggable vs. „Unpiggable“

Slide 25

Pre-loading of cleaning and MFL tool into launching spool

CASE STUDY – LOADING LINE

PPSA Aberdeen 2015

Page 26: ON THE ISSUE OF INSPECTING CHALLENGING PIPELINES · ON THE ISSUE OF INSPECTING CHALLENGING PIPELINES. Slide 2 1. Introduction 2. In-Line Inspection 3. „Piggable vs. „Unpiggable“

Slide 26

The Benefit:

High resolution data collected for advanced Integrity Assessment

Successful procedures for complex operational conditions and a short time frame

Risk minimization and no impact on normal operations.

CASE STUDY – LOADING LINE

PPSA Aberdeen 2015

Page 27: ON THE ISSUE OF INSPECTING CHALLENGING PIPELINES · ON THE ISSUE OF INSPECTING CHALLENGING PIPELINES. Slide 2 1. Introduction 2. In-Line Inspection 3. „Piggable vs. „Unpiggable“

www.rosen-group.com

THANK YOU FOR JOINING

THIS PRESENTATION.