on the cusp: stop cauti 1 national expansion: implementing cusp to eliminate catheter-associated...

On the CUSP: Stop CAUTI

1

National Expansion:Implementing CUSP to Eliminate Catheter-Associated

Urinary Tract Infections (CAUTI)

Project Initiation Call

Overview of Today’s Call

• Welcome and introductions

• Why this initiative is important: Overview of CAUTI

• Comprehensive Unit-Based Safety Program (CUSP)

• Project overview and data requirements

– Expected outcomes

– What it requires

• What are the next steps

2

Project Goals

• Reduce CAUTI rates in participating units by 25%– Appropriate placement– Appropriate continuance– Appropriate utilization

• Improve patient safety culture on participating units

3

Project Overview

Hospitals or Hospital Systems

State Hospital Associations

National Project Team

Project Management

Clinical Faculty & Data Management CUSP Faculty

4

National Project Team

5

Partner Team Members

Michigan Health & Hospital AssociationKeystone Center for Patient Safety & Quality

Sam Watson, MSA; Chris George, RN, MS

Health Research & Educational Trust Steve Hines, PhDDeborah Bohr, MPHMarchelle Djordjevic, MBA

Centers for Disease Control & Prevention Katherine Allen-Bridson, RN, BSN, CICCarolyn Gould, MD, MSCR

Johns Hopkins Quality Safety Research Group Sean Berenholtz, MDChris Goeschel, MPA, MPS, ScD, RN

Ann Arbor VA Medical CenterUniversity of Michigan Medical School

Sanjay Saint, MD, MPHSarah Krein, RN, PhD

St. John Hospital & Medical Center Mohamad Fakih, MD, MPH

Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAI’s)

• At least 20% of episodes are preventable; perhaps as much as 70%

(Harbath et al. J Hosp Infect 2003)

• Medicare no longer reimburses U.S. hospitals for the additional costs of certain infections

• Preventive practices are variably used

• The most common HAI is urinary tract infection

6

Urinary Catheter-Related Infection: Background

• Urinary tract infection (UTI) causes ~ 40% of hospital-acquired infections

• Most infections due to urinary catheters

• Up to 25% of inpatients are catheterized

• Leads to increased morbidity and costs

7

Clinical Manifestations of CAUTI

• Clinical manifestations vary greatly

• Asymptomatic bacteriuria overwhelming sepsis

• Symptomatic UTI:

– Lower abdominal, suprapubic, or flank pain

– Systemic symptoms: nausea, vomiting, fever

8

Burden-of-illness

• Of patients who receive urethral catheters:

– Bacteriuria rate is ~5% per day

• Among those with bacteriuria:

– ~10% will develop symptoms of UTI

– Up to 3% will develop bacteremia

• Direct medical costs:

– Symptomatic UTI: ~$600 per episode

– Bacteremia: ~$3000 per episode (Tambyah et al. ICHE 2002; Saint AJIC 1999)

9

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Rule Changes: 1 October 2008

• CMS now holds U.S. hospitals accountable for not preventing certain hospital-acquired complications

• CMS required to choose at least 2 conditions that:

– are high cost and/or high volume; and

– could reasonably have been prevented through the application of evidence-based guidelines

10

CMS Chose More Than 2 Conditions

• Catheter-associated UTI• Vascular catheter-associated infection• Retained object during surgery• Air embolism• Blood incompatibility• Pressure ulcers• Surgical Site Infections after certain surgical procedures• Falls and Trauma• Manifestations of poor glycemic control• DVT or PE following certain orthopedic surgeries

11

Cost Implications of CMS Rule Change

University of Michigan patient with pneumonia:

• Without complication or comorbidity (CC): $6899

• With CA-UTI (CC): $8495 (~$1600 more)

University of Colorado patient with acute MI:

• Without CC: $5436

• With CA-UTI (CC): $6721 (~$1300 more)(Wald and Kramer. JAMA 12/19/07)

12

Organisms enter the bladder by 3 ways:

1) At time of catheter insertion

2) Through the catheter lumen (from a colonized drainage bag)

3) Along external surface of the catheter (migrate along the catheter-mucosal interface)

Urinary Catheter-Related Infection: Pathophysiology

(Tambyah, Halvorson, Maki. Mayo Clin Proc 1999)

13

Intraluminal Extraluminal

Detrusor spasm Shedding of cells Bacteremia

Leakage Obstruction Fever (+) UA Hypotension

Bladder infection with inflammation

Urinary Catheter-Related Infection: Pathophysiology

14

The Indwelling Urinary Catheter:A “1-Point” Restraint?

Satisfaction survey of 100 catheterized VA patients:

• 42% found the indwelling catheter to be uncomfortable

• 48% stated that it was painful

• 61% noted that it restricted their ADLs

• 2 patients provided unsolicited comments that their catheter “hurt like hell”

(Saint et al. JAGS 1999)

15

• Background

• Prevention

Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection

16

Make sure the catheter is indicated

• Adhere to general infection control principles (eg, aseptic insertion, proper maintenance, hand hygiene, education, feedback)

• Remove the catheter as soon as possible

• Consider other methods of prevention

Prevention of Catheter- Associated UTI

17

UTI Prevention Rule #1: Make Sure the Patient Really Needs the Catheter

Appropriate indications

• Bladder outlet obstruction

• Incontinence and sacral wound

• Urine output monitored

• Patient’s request (end-of-life)

• During or just after surgery(Wong and Hooton - CDC 1983)

0

10

20

30

40

50

Initi

al

Pt D

ays

Percent unjustified

Unjustified

(Jain. Arch Int Med 95)

18

Why are Catheters Used Inappropriately?

• Perhaps physicians “forget” that their patient has a urinary catheter

• We determined the extent to which doctors are aware which of their inpatients have catheters

• Surveyed 56 medical teams at 4 sites

(Saint S, Wiese J, Amory J, et al. Am J Med 2000)

19

One Reason Catheters Are Used Inappropriately

Level Proportion Unaware of the Catheter

Medical students 18%

House officers 25%

Attending physicians

38%

(Saint S, Wiese J, Amory J, et al. Am J Med 2000)

20

Urinary Catheters Often Placed in the Emergency Department: A National U.S. Study

• Catheters often inserted without clear indications and may remain in place for convenience rather than medical necessity

• An Infection Control Nurse: “our other barrier is the Emergency Department and this is where most Foleys are placed. . . . Doctors forget to look under the sheets to say, ‘Oh yeah, there’s a Foley there’ and … the nurses aren’t going to take the initiative. . . ”

(Saint et al. Infect Cont Hosp Epid 2008)

21

• Make sure the catheter is indicated

Adhere to general infection control principles (e.g., aseptic insertion, proper maintenance, hand hygiene, education, feedback)



Prevention of Catheter- Associated UTI

22

• NEJM Videos in Clinical Medicine:

– Male Urethral CatheterizationT. W. Thomsen and G. S. Setnik - 25 May, 2006

– Female Urethral CatheterizationR. Ortega, L. Ng, P. Sekhar, and M. Song - 3 Apr, 2008

• Goal is to avoid contamination of the sterile catheter during the insertion process

• Should not assume that the healthcare workers inserting urinary catheters know how to do so

Use Proper Aseptic Technique for Catheter Insertion

23



Remove the catheter as soon as possible


Prevention of Catheter-Associated UTI

24

Early Removal of Indwelling Catheters: Summary of the Evidence

• 14 studies have evaluated urinary catheter reminders and stop-orders (written, computerized, nurse-initiated)

– Significant reduction in catheter use

– Significant reduction in infection

– No evidence of harm (ie, re-insertion)(Meddings J et al. Clin Infect Dis 2010)

25




Consider other methods of prevention

Prevention of Catheter-Associated UTI

26

• Alternatives to the indwelling catheter

–Bladder ultrasound

–Intermittent catheterization

–Condom catheter

Other Methods for Preventing CAUTI

27


28

Recent Guidelines on CAUTI Prevention

http://www.cdc.gov/hicpac/pdf/CAUTI/CAUTIguideline2009final.pdf


30

http://www.cdc.gov/hicpac/pdf/CAUTI/CAUTIguideline2009final.pdf

Modified HICPAC Categorization Scheme

All Category I recommendations carry same strength; levels A and B represent the quality of the evidence underlying the recommendation

31

Core Prevention Strategies: (All Category IB)

Catheter Use

InsertionMaintenance

• Insert catheters only for appropriate indications• Leave catheters in place only as long as needed

• Ensure that only properly trained persons insert and maintain catheters

• Insert catheters using aseptic technique and sterile equipment (acute care setting)

• Following aseptic insertion, maintain a closed drainage system

• Maintain unobstructed urine flow

Hand Hygiene

http://www.cdc.gov/hicpac/cauti/001_cauti.html

Quality Improvement Programs

32

Comprehensive Unit-based Safety Program (CUSP)


33

The Michigan Keystone ICU Project saved over 1,500 lives and $200 million by reducing health care

associated infections.

Office of Health Reform, Department of Health and Human Services

34

“Needs Improvement” Statewide Michigan CUSP ICU Results

• Less than 60% of respondents reporting good safety climate = “needs improvement”• Statewide in 2004 84%

needed improvement, in 2007 23%

• Non-teaching and Faith-based ICUs improved the most

• Safety Climate item that drives improvement: “I am encouraged by my colleagues to report any patient safety concerns I may have” 35

Pre CUSP Work

• Create an ICU team– Nurse, physician, administrator, infection control, others– Assign a team leader

• Measure Culture in your clinical unit(discuss with hospital association leader)

• Work with hospital quality leader to have a senior executive assigned to your unit based team

36

Comprehensive Unit-based Safety Program (CUSP) An Intervention to Learn from Mistakes and Improve Safety Culture

1. Educate staff on science of safety http://www.safercare.net

2. Identify defects

3. Assign executive to adopt unit

4. Learn from one defect per quarter

5. Implement teamwork tools

Timmel J, et al. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2010;36:252-260.

37

http://www.safercare.net/

http://www.safercare.net/

Teamwork Tools

• Call list

• Daily Goals

• AM briefing

• Shadowing

• Culture check up

• TEAMSTepps

38

39

CUSP Lessons Learned• Culture is local

– Implement in a few units, adapt and spread– Include frontline staff on improvement team

• Not linear process– Iterative cycles– Takes time to improve culture

• Couple with clinical focus– No success improving culture alone– CUSP alone viewed as ‘soft’ – Lubricant for clinical change

CUSP & CAUTI Interventions

1. Educate on the science of safety

2. Identify defects

3. Assign executive to adopt unit

4. Learn from Defects

5. Implement teamwork & communication tools

CUSP CAUTI

1. Care and Removal Intervention

Removal of unnecessary catheters

Proper care for appropriate catheters

2. Placement Intervention

Determination of appropriateness

Sterile placement of catheter

40

Expected Benefits

• Increased awareness of appropriate indications for indwelling urinary catheter use

• Reduced use of indwelling urinary catheters• Improved caregiver accountability to assess need and

trigger UC discontinuation when UC no longer necessary• Reduced risk of urethral trauma with reduction in

utilization• Reduced patient discomfort

41

Expected Benefits

• Reduction in bacteriuria• Reduction in symptomatic UTIs• Shortened Length of Stay• Decreased Cost per stay• Improved sensitivity to “patient dignity”

42

What Participation Requires Data Submission

Intervention Measure Frequency

CUSP

Technology and Exposure Assessment Baseline

HSOPS Baseline and post intervention

Team Check-up Tool Quarterly

Care and Removal

Process Prevalence & Appropriateness Weekly within Protocol

Outcome Monthly within Protocol - UTI Rate / Device Days

- UTI Rate / Patient Days Monthly within Protocol

Insertion TBD TBD43

Next Steps: Cohort 1

Timeline at a glance

Cohort 1 Fall 2010

October Unit attends first immersion call

October- January Unit attends Kick Off Meeting and begins participating in national content calls

November- January

- Participate in content and coaching calls - Collect and report quarterly data to monitor change

January Unit begins HSOPS

January Unit begins submitting CAUTI and TCT data

46

Next Steps: Cohort 2

Timeline at a glance

Cohort 2 Spring 2011

March Unit attends first immersion call

March- April Unit attends Kick Off Meeting and begins participating in national content calls

April- June - Participate in content and coaching calls - Collect and report quarterly data to monitor change

June Unit begins HSOPS

June Unit begins submitting CAUTI and TCT data

47

48

Questions

• Content – Sam Watson, MHA Keystone–[email protected]

• Participation–Marchelle Djordjevic, HRET–[email protected]

on the cusp: stop cauti 1 national expansion: implementing cusp to eliminate catheter-associated...

Documents