on practices of an expert community organization for preparation of proposals in research priority...

14
On practices of an expert community organization for preparation of proposals in research priority areas http://www.extech.ru Scientific Research Institute - Federal Research Centre for Project Evaluation and Consulting Services (SRI FRCEC) Head of Information and Analytical Center of complex scientific research of technological and innovation sphere Nikolai A. Mironov

Upload: wesley-watts

Post on 26-Dec-2015

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

On practices of an expert community organization for preparation of proposals

in research priority areas

http://www.extech.ru

Scientific Research Institute - Federal Research Centre for Project Evaluation and

Consulting Services (SRI FRCEC)

Head of Information and Analytical Center of complex scientific research of technological and innovation sphereNikolai A. Mironov

2Role of the expert community in preparation of state and federal target programs topics

The best experts of many scientific, educational and industrial organizations of various forms of ownership are actively involved in building-up of research and

development priority areas.

The expert community is composed of the professionals in innovative scientific and technological spheres.

Preparation of priority areas and R&D topics for science and technology complex development is related with collection and processing of information from various

sources. It is also closely linked with a general conditions on research and development, knowledge of experts and analysts on scientific and technological

capacity in certain thematic areas.

An information-analytical support system for research management is created and yet developing in order to attract expert community members for preparation of

proposals on priority research areas.

The Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation supervises development of such system.

Information system for preparation of analytical documents

3

Information-analytical support of decision-making in R&D sphereInformation-analytical support of decision-making in R&D sphere

Expert Roster Database

Expert Roster Database ForumForumInformation on

Participation of Experts in the

Projects

Information on Participation of Experts in the

Projects

Experts Data feed Interface

Experts Data feed Interface

Authentication System (single sign-on)

Authentication System (single sign-on)

Interface providing relevant expert panels

Interface providing relevant expert panels

Information system of analytical documents preparation

Open Sources

Open Sources

Closed SourcesClosed

Sources

Subordinate Organizations

Database

Subordinate Organizations

Database

External Systems

Expert-Analyst Workstation

(personal space)

Expert-Analyst Workstation

(personal space)

Knowledge base (analytical documents,

models, methods, patterns, templates)

Knowledge base (analytical documents,

models, methods, patterns, templates)

Subsystem of work with

information resources

Subsystem of work with

information resources

Expert-Administrator Workstation

Expert-Administrator Workstation

Communication Subsystem

Communication Subsystem

Subsystem of work with information resources

Subsystem of work with information resources

Administration Subsystem

Administration Subsystem

Task Management Subsystem

Task Management Subsystem

4

Distribution of experts in federal districts of the Russian Federation

Federal DistrictExperts registered

(persons)Profile filled in

(persons)

Accredited Experts

(persons) %

Central 1138 962 798 70,12%

Including Moscow 819 693 579 70,7%

North-Eastern 308 272 220 71,43%

Southern 185 158 119 64,32%

Volga 459 403 319 69,5%

Urals 146 130 106 72,6%

Siberia 507 458 398 78,5%

Far Eastern 127 112 86 67,72%

North-Caucasian 55 43 30 54,55%

FD not mentioned 218 7 2 1%

Abroad 50 26 22 44%

Total 3193 2571 2100 65,77%

5

Distribution of experts on thematic areas of the state program

Main directionExperts registered

(persons)

Profile filled in

(persons)

Accredited Experts

persons %

Information-telecom systems 301 265 227 75.42%

Biotechnologies 201 167 167 83.08%

Medicine and Health Care 365 309 260 71.23%

New materials and nanotechnologies 522 468 414 79.31%

Transport and space systems 180 167 153 85%

Rational use of natural resources 565 517 487 86.19%

Energy efficiency and energy saving 287 260 195 67.94%

Interdisciplinary socio-economic and humanities research

499 418 197 39.48%

Main direction is not specified 273 0 0 0%

Total 3193 2571 2100 65.77%

6Distribution of experts according to scientific degrees

Experts registered(persons)

Experts accredited

persons %

1.Philosophy Doctors (Ph.D)

2258 1655 78.8%

2.Doctors (Candidates of sciences)

653 417 19.8%

3. Other Degree 4 1 0%

4. Without Degree 106 27 1.2%

5. Degree is not specified 172 0 0%

7Distribution of proposals for the formation of research themes

on thematic areas

Thematic AreaNumber of proposals

(pcs.)

1. Information-telecom systems 208

2. Biotechnologies 116

3. Medicine and Health Care 195

4. New materials and nanotechnologies 267

5. Transport and space systems 148

6. Rational use of natural resources 273

7. Energy efficiency and energy saving 207

8. Interdisciplinary socio-economic and humanities research 200

9. Main direction is not specified 203

Total 1817

Distribution of proposals for establishing of R&D topicsaccording to the Federal districts of the Russian Federation 8

Distribution of proposals for establishing of R&D topicsaccording to the Federal districts of the Russian Federation

Central

Siberia

Volga

North-West

Urals

Southern

Far-Eastern

North-Caucasian

Distribution of proposals for establishing of R&D topicsby types of organizations

9

Institutes of higher education

Russian Academy

of Sciences

Research institutes

Research centers

Distribution of proposals for establishing of R&D topicsby age of experts

10

><

Distribution of proposals for establishing of R&D topicsamong scientists of the highest qualification

11

Doctors

Philosophy Doctors (Ph.D)

Information and telecom systems - Eugeny A. MaryshevBiotechnology, medicine and health - Lydia L. MyakinkovaNew materials and nanotechnology - Igor M. KomarovTransport and Space Systems - Konstantin V. YepishinRational use of natural resources - Renald R. IlyushchenkoEnergy efficiency and energy saving - Nikolai I. AndrianovInterdisciplinary research - Sergei S. Shuvalov

Selection of Experts Analysts

Selection of Experts Analysts

Accreditation of Experts AnalystsAccreditation of Experts Analysts

Maintaining of interaction with experts

Maintaining of interaction with experts

Coordination of expert analysts activity

Coordination of expert analysts activity

Activities to attract the expert community

Examination of proposals and reports

for R & D

Examination of proposals and reports

for R & D

Defining of priorities in research and development

field

Defining of priorities in research and development

field

Defining of research proposals

Defining of research proposals

Analytical documents drafting

on validity of the research

Analytical documents drafting

on validity of the research

Activities for interaction with experts 12

13 QUESTIONNAIRE

for expert evaluation of proposals for a research topic (Total of 20 items)1. Conformity assessment of the proposed research goals and objectives to the State Program of the Russian Federation "Development of Science and Technology" for 2013-20201.1. Which priority areas of science, technology and engineering in the Russian Federation corresponds to the topic of research?       □ - as declared       □ - corresponds to the priority area (select from the list of ______________)       □ - did not match any of the priority areas2. Evaluation of Research (Science and Technology) level of R & D2.1. What research was conducted on this topic?      □ - fundamental (by whom, when)      □ - investigation by… (when)      □ - applied problem-oriented research (by whom, when)      □ - applied object-oriented research (by whom, when)      □ - not performed      □ - no information3. Risk assessment3.1. How do you assess the risk of negative results?      □ - extremely high risk (reported results will not be accepted)      □ - low risk (high probability of success)      □ - assessment hampered4. Evaluate the economics of the proposed researchDo you consider it appropriate inclusion of the topic of research in the sub-program 2 of the State Program of the Russian Federation "Development of Science and Technology" for 2013-2020:          □ - yes □ - noAdditional expert commentary:

Thank You for Listening!

Information and Analytical Center of Complex Scientific Research of Technological and Innovation Sphere

Head of the Center Nikolai A. Mironov

Теl./Fax 499-259-48-34 

[email protected]

http://www.extech.ru

Scientific Research Institute - Federal Research Center for Project Evaluation and

Consulting Services (SRI FRCEC)

14