on how descartes changed the meaning of the pythagorean

32

Upload: others

Post on 31-Oct-2021

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: On how Descartes changed the meaning of the Pythagorean

On how Descartes changed the meaning of the

Pythagorean Theorem

Piotr BªaszczykInstitute of Mathematics

Pedagogical University, Kraków, Poland

Maynooth, 2nd August 2019

Page 2: On how Descartes changed the meaning of the Pythagorean

Problem

�,� = � Euclid, Elements, I.47

a2 + b2 = c2 a, b, c ∈ R

Page 3: On how Descartes changed the meaning of the Pythagorean

�,� = � Euclid's theory of equal �gures

a2 + b2 = c2 arithmetic of real numbers

Page 4: On how Descartes changed the meaning of the Pythagorean

The thesis

�,� = � Euclid's theory of equal �gures

a2 + b2 = c2 Descartes' arithmetic of line segments

a2 + b2 = c2 arithmetic of real numbers

Page 5: On how Descartes changed the meaning of the Pythagorean

Elements, I.47�In right-angled triangles the square on (�pì) the side subtendingthe right-angle is equal to the [sum of the] squares on (�pì) thesides surrounding the right-angle.

Let ABC be a right-angled triangle having the right-angle BAC. I saythat the square on (�pì) BC is equal to the [sum of the] squares on(�pì) BA, AC".

Page 6: On how Descartes changed the meaning of the Pythagorean

Elements, I.47"In right-angled triangles the square on (�pì) the side subtendingthe right-angle is equal to the squares on (�pì) the sides surroundingthe right-angle.

Let ABC be a right-angled triangle having the right-angle BAC. I saythat the square on (�pì) BC is equal to the squares on (�pì) BA,AC".

Page 7: On how Descartes changed the meaning of the Pythagorean

The proof of the proposition I.47

Page 8: On how Descartes changed the meaning of the Pythagorean

Euclid's theory of equal �gures

B C

D E

G

A F

B C

D E

G

A F

Page 9: On how Descartes changed the meaning of the Pythagorean

Euclid's theory of equal �gures

Page 10: On how Descartes changed the meaning of the Pythagorean

Euclid's theory of equal �gures

Page 11: On how Descartes changed the meaning of the Pythagorean

Euclid's theory of equal �gures

Page 12: On how Descartes changed the meaning of the Pythagorean

Elements, I.47

�,� = � Euclid's theory of equal �gures

Page 13: On how Descartes changed the meaning of the Pythagorean

Pythagorean theorem via propositions I.47 and VI.31

V.24: �I say that the �rst and the �fth, added together (suntejèn),AG, will also have the same ratio to ...".

a : c :: d : f , b : c :: e : f ⇒ (a + b) : c :: (d + e) : f

Page 14: On how Descartes changed the meaning of the Pythagorean

Problem

�,� = � Euclid's theory of equal �gure

�+� = � Euclid's theory of similar �gures

a2 + b2 = c2 arithmetic of real numbers

Page 15: On how Descartes changed the meaning of the Pythagorean

The thesis

�,� = � Euclid's theory of equal �gure

�+� = � Euclids theory of similar �gures

a2 + b2 = c2 Descartes' arithmetic of line segments

a2 + b2 = c2 arithmetic of real numbers

Page 16: On how Descartes changed the meaning of the Pythagorean

Descartes, Geometry, p. 298

Page 17: On how Descartes changed the meaning of the Pythagorean

Arithmetic of line segments: Product

x = a · b iff 1 : b :: a : x .

Page 18: On how Descartes changed the meaning of the Pythagorean

Arithmetic of line segments: Division

x =a

biff a : b :: x : 1.

Page 19: On how Descartes changed the meaning of the Pythagorean

Arithmetic of line segments: Square Root

x =√

a iff 1 : x :: x : a.

Page 20: On how Descartes changed the meaning of the Pythagorean

From Greek proportion to Descartes' arithmetic

and backwards

a : b :: c : d ⇔ a · d = c · ba : b :: c : d ⇔ a =

c

d· b

Page 21: On how Descartes changed the meaning of the Pythagorean

From Greek proportion to Descartes' arithmetic

a : b :: c : d ⇒ a · d = c · ba : b :: c : d ⇒ a =

c

d· b

Page 22: On how Descartes changed the meaning of the Pythagorean

�For, putting a for BD or CD, and c for EF, and x for DF, we haveCF = a − x , and since CF or a − x is to FE or c , as FD or x is toBF, which is consequently cx

a−x ".

CF : FE :: FD : BF

(a− x) : c :: x : BF ⇒ BF =cx

a− x

Page 23: On how Descartes changed the meaning of the Pythagorean

Ordered �eld of line segments

a : b :: c : d ⇒ a · d = c · ba : b :: c : d ⇒ a =

c

d· b

a · b = b · aa · (b · c) = (a · b) · c

a · (b + c) = a · b + a · ca < b ⇒ a · c < b · c

a · 1 = a/1 = a, a/a = 1, (1/a) · a = 1

a

b· c =

a · cb

,1

a· 1

b=

1

a · b√

a ·√

a = a,√

a2 = a,√

a · b =√

a ·√

b

Page 24: On how Descartes changed the meaning of the Pythagorean

Pythagorean theorem in Geometry, Book I, p.302Solving the equation z2 = az + bb

�I construct a right triangle NLM with one side LM equal to b, thesquare root of the known quantity bb, and the other side LN, equalto 1

2a, that is, the half of other know quantity, which was multiplied

by z , which I supposed to be the unknown line. Then prolonging MNthe base of this triangle to O, so that NO is equal to NL, the wholeline OM is the required line z . It is expressed in the following way:

z = 1

2a +

√1

4aa + bb �.

Page 25: On how Descartes changed the meaning of the Pythagorean

Pythagorean theorem in Geometry, Book II, p. 342Finding a tangent to an algebraic curve

�[...] making MA or CB = y , and CM or BA = x , I have an equationexpressing the relation between x and y . Then making PC = s, andPA = v , or PM = v − y , and due to the right triangle PMC, we seethat ss, the square of the base (qui est le carreé de la baze), is equalto xx + vv − 2vy + yy , the squares of two sides (qui sont les caréesdes deux côtés); that is to say

x =√

ss − vv + 2vy − yy”.

ss = x2 + (v − y)2

Page 26: On how Descartes changed the meaning of the Pythagorean

Pythagorean theorem in Geometry, Book III, p. 387Solving a fourth degree equation

�For, putting a for BD or CD, and c for EF, and x for DF, we haveCF = a − x , and since CF or a − x is to FE or c , as FD or x isto BF, which is consequently cx

a−x . Now, since in the right triangleBDF one side is x , and other is a, their squares, which are (leurscarrés, qui sont) xx + aa, are equal to the square of the base, whichis ccxx

xx−2ax+aa �.

x2 + a2 =(cx)2

(a− x)2

Page 27: On how Descartes changed the meaning of the Pythagorean

Book II: �[the sum of] the squares of two sides (qui sont les carées

des deux côtés); that is to say x2 + (v − y)2

Book III: �[the sum of] their squares, which are (leurs carrés, qui

sont) xx + aa

Page 28: On how Descartes changed the meaning of the Pythagorean

Linguistic layer of La Géométrie

square on the line versus square of the line

�we see that ss, the square of the base (qui est le carreé de la baze),is equal to xx + vv − 2vy + yy , the squares of two sides (qui sontles carées des deux côtés)", Book II

�since in the right triangle BDF one side is x and other is a, theirsquares, which are (leurs carrés, qui sont) xx + aa, are equal to thesquare of the base, which is ccxx

xx−2ax+aa �, Book III

Page 29: On how Descartes changed the meaning of the Pythagorean

Descartes' translation of Pappus. Geometry, p. 305

square on the line versus square of the line

Pappus: �if there be given a ratio (lìgoc) of the rectangle containedby the two lines so drawn to the square on the third�

Descartes: �let there be a proportion (proportio) of the rectanglecontained by the two lines so drawn to the square of the third (adquadratum reliquæ)�

Page 30: On how Descartes changed the meaning of the Pythagorean

Clavius, Euclidis Elementorum, p. 229

Page 31: On how Descartes changed the meaning of the Pythagorean

References I

Clavius, Ch., Euclidis Elementorum. Libri XV, Roma 1589.Descartes, R., La Géométrie, Lejda 1637.Heiberg, J., Euclidis Elementa, Lipsiae 1883�1888.Hultsch, F., Pappini Alexandrini Collecionis, Berolini 1877.

Page 32: On how Descartes changed the meaning of the Pythagorean

References II

Euclid's Elements of Geometry, tr. by R. Fiztpatrick, 2007.The Geometry of René Descartes, tr. by D.E. Smith and M.L. Lathan,New York 1954.P. Bªaszczyk, K. Mrówka, Euklides, Elementy, Ksi¦gi V-VI.

Tªumaczenie i komentarz, Kraków 2013.P. Bªaszczyk, K. Mrówka, Kartezjusz, Geometria. Tªumaczenie

i komentarz, Kraków 2015.P. Bªaszczyk, K. Mrówka, Kartezjusz, Dioptryka. Tªumaczenie

i komentarz, Kraków 2018.P. Bªaszczyk, From Euclid's Elements to the methodology of math-ematics. Two ways of viewing mathematical theory. Annales Univer-sitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis. Studia ad Didacticam Mathemat-

icae Pertinentia X, 2018, 5-15.