oklahoma aeronautics commission - welcome to … updated approved cip...oklahoma aeronautics...

Oklahoma Aeronautics Commission Capital Improvement Program

Approved 1/9/2014, Modified 7/10/2014

Three Year Capital Improvement Program

FY 2014 - 2016

DAVE AMIS III, Chairman Oklahoma City

TOM STEPHENSON, Vice Chairman Oklahoma City

MICHAEL RAY, SecretaryGuymon

RICK ARMSTRONGTulsa

JOE HARRIS Blackwell

WES STUCKY Ardmore

Dr. DAVID CONWAYDurant

VICTOR N. BIRDDirector

Oklahoma Aeronautics Commission

Table of Contents

Executive Summary ……………………………………………………....…......….……….. 1 Preface ……………………………………………………………………….…………….…… 2 Capital Improvement Program .....................……………..............................………………….. 3 - 19

Oklahoma Aeronautic Commission Capital Improvement Program

FY 2014 - FY 2016

Oklahoma Aeronautics Commission 120 N Robinson, Ste. 1244W Oklahoma City, OK 73102

(405) 604-6900

www.aeronautics.ok.gov

The Oklahoma Aeronautics Commission (Commission) assists with the development of a statewide system of airports, encourages aeronautical safety and development, and coordinates activities with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to develop a national system of civil aviation. The Oklahoma Airport System Plan (OASP) was approved by the Commission in 1999 and is the long-term planning document used to identify the network of airports needed to serve the state. The OASP identifies airports by functional classification, service level, and design standard. The Commission’s Capital Improvement Program (CIP) programs federal and state funds regarding airport development that is consistent the goals of the OASP. The CIP allows the Commission, FAA, and airport sponsors to anticipate airport funding needs and accommodate changes in project scope, cost, and schedule based on multi-year planning. Inclusion of a project in the CIP is an indication to the sponsor that the project is under consideration for future funding; however, it is NOT a commitment for future funding. Justification is required for projects in the CIP and must be consistent with FAA and Commission Regulations, Policies and Procedures. Some projects listed in this document may not be implemented due to funding restrictions or lack of justification. The CIP is based on anticipated funding levels that were determined from historic state and federal allocations for airport development in the State of Oklahoma. Once the actual funding levels are established, project implementation and funding will be adjusted. The Commission welcomes your comments on this document and our CIP process. Please contact the Commission at the following address: Oklahoma Aeronautics Commission 120 N. Robinson Avenue, Suite 1244 W Oklahoma City, OK 73102 (405) 604-6900

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Preface

Annually, the Commission prepares and adopts a three-year Capital Improvement Program (CIP). The CIP programs federal and state funds for airport development consistent with the Oklahoma Airport System Plan (OASP). The challenge of strategic programming is the identification and sequencing of the big rock projects and the selection of smaller projects that can be funded in the same fiscal year. Big rock projects are typically very expensive and require federal state apportionment, federal discretionary, federal non-primary entitlement, and State funding. Oklahoma Airport System Plan The goal of the OASP is to identify a system of aviation facilities that will meet national and state needs (safety, capacity and geographic access). The OASP also identifies the basic amenities for each airport classification that will enable each airport in the system to perform its system role. The OASP includes 110 publicly owned airports with 100 of these airports included in the National Plan of Integrated Airport Systems (NPIAS). Definition of “Big Rock Projects” A big rock project is a project that results in a significant upgrade to the capability of a system airport, is a high cost project that is needed to sustain the capability of a regional business airport, or is a new airport. Examples of big rock projects are a runway extension, construction of parallel taxiway, runway reconstruction or overlay, acquisition of land for a runway extension or runway safety area, installation of approach lighting systems, installation of a localizer or a glide slope, or other project typically requiring multi-year and multi-source financing such as the Bartlesville Butler Creek relocation project, the R. L. Jones Jr. storm water project and the Stillwater runway extension project. Due to cost, only two or three big rock projects can be underway at any one time. Sequencing of Big Rock Projects The sequencing of the big rock projects is critical to the continued orderly development of the Oklahoma airport system. In the programming process, the big rock projects are selected first and other less costly projects are selected second. Obviously, some balance between big rock and less costly projects must be achieved. Project Selection Criteria Complete projects currently identified in Commission’s three-year CIP Pavement Management Program (visual inspection converted into a numerical pavement condition) Oklahoma Airport System Plan and Commission Strategic Plan and Goals Emphasis on regional business airport development Provide standard Airport Geometry and amenities as per functional classification Provide improved approaches to allow all-weather access Aesthetic, business friendly Airport Terminal buildings FAA National Priority System (numerical rating system) Biased towards based aircraft and operations Does not consider economic impact Does not consider geographical coverage Annual Airport Development Funding Planned State Apportionment from FAA = $3,400,000 Planned Discretionary funding from FAA = $3,000,000 Planned State Funding from State Dedicated Sources = $ 1,500,000 Note: This document is based on anticipated funding levels that were determined from historic state and federal allocations for airport development in the State of Oklahoma. Once the actual funding levels are established, project implementation and funding will be adjusted.

Agency Fiscal Year FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Total Commission $500,000 $500,000

FAA State Apportionment $0

FAA Discretionary $0

FAA Non-Primary Entitlement $0 Sponsor $500,000 $500,000

Total $1,000,000 $1,000,000

Ada Municipal Regional Business Airport

Project Description The Overall Development Objective of the proposed project is to construct a new terminal building. Funding: The Commission will participate in 50 percent of the eligible project cost. The Commission's funding share will not exceed the Commission's funding policy for terminal buildings. CY 2014: Construct new terminal building. Project Justification The existing terminal building is dated and showing signs of deterioration. The typical size for a new public terminal building is 3,750 square feet. A building of this size will accommodate a public reception area, a pilot flight planning and weather briefing area, an area for pilots to rest, men’s and women’s restrooms, an airport managers office, a training/conference room available for public use and a kitchen area for serving food, etc. Airport Information • Regional Business Airport • Based Aircraft: 43 (4 Jets) • Runway 17/35: 6,203' x 100' Selection Criteria • Pavement Management: NA • NPS: NA • OASP Goals: An appealing terminal building is a desired amenity at a regional business airport.

Federal grants require 10% matching funds while state grants require 5% matching funds. The Commission may provide half of the sponsor's federal match on the above project. Commission funding is dependent on availability of State funds.


FAA State Apportionment $775,000 $775,000

FAA Discretionary $650,000 $650,000

FAA Non-Primary Entitlement $150,000 $150,000 $300,000 Sponsor $16,667 $92,103 $108,769

Total $166,667 $1,575,000 $267,103 $2,008,769

Ada Municipal Regional Business Airport

Proposed Project The Overall Development Objective (ODO) of the proposed project is to rehabilitate the runway lighting system, improve the runway safety area, and rehabilitate runway 17/35. CY 2015: Construct overall development objective. Project Justification The existing runway lights are at the end of their service life and beginning to fail on a regular basis. This project will provide dependable runway lighting during fair weather and periods of inclement weather. New runway lights will improve the safety of the airport by being more visible and reliable. Grading the runway safety area to meet FAA standards will improve the safety of the flying public during take-off and landing. Runway 17/35 was overlaid during FY 2006 , therefore it is good pavement management to perform a crack seal / seal coat within 7 years of the overlay project. It has been well documented that it is more cost effective to rehabilitate a pavement when in a good condition than to let it continue to deteriorate into a condition that will require a more costly repair in the future. This project will preserve and extend the life of the pavement. Airport Information • Regional Business Airport • Based Aircraft: 43 (4 jets) •Runway 17/35: 6,200' x 100' Selection Criteria • Pavement Management: 83 • NPS: Rehabilitate runway - 68 • NPS: Rehabilitate RW lighting - 68 • OASP Goals: Safety and Standards


Grant approved July 10, 2014


FAA State Apportionment $0

FAA Discretionary $0

FAA Non-Primary Entitlement $0 Sponsor $13,517 $13,517

Total $270,342 $270,342

Anadarko Municipal District Airport

Project Description The Overall Development Objective of the proposed project is to rehabilitate runway17/35 and turnarounds. CY 2014: Design and construct ODO. Project Justification That project is consisted of rehabilitation of the runway pavement. Currently the pavements is exhibiting distresses due to seasonal environmental conditions and load bearing . The distresses observed include low and medium longitudinal cracking, transverse cracking. Repairing the pavement at this time will extend the life of the pavement by reducing water infiltration into the pavement base material causing additional failure of the pavement structure. Airport Information • District Airport • Based Aircraft: 12 • Runway 17/35: 3,100' x 50' Selection Criteria • Pavement Management: 29 • NPS: 63 • OASP Goals: Runway pavement PCI > 65


Selection Criteria• Pavement Management: N/A• NPS: NA• OASP Goals: Safety and Standards

Agency Fiscal Year FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Total Commission $500,000 $500,000 FAA State Apportionment FAA Discretionary FAA Non-Primary Entitlement $350,000 $350,000 Sponsor $38,889 $500,000 $538,889Total $388,889 $1,000,000 $1,388,889

Ardmore Municipal Regional Business Airport

Proposed Project The Overall Development Objective (ODO) of the proposed project is to construct a hard shell over the existing FAA equipment building, weather proof the control tower, and construct a customs terminal building. CY 2015: Construct new terminal building. Funding: The Commission will participate in 50 percent of eligible costs that are not funded with NPE funds. The Commission share will not exceed the Commission's funding policy for terminal buildings. Project Justification The existing equipment building was construct during the 1950(s), therefore the roof and walls have reached a dilapidated condition. The preferred repair is to construct a new equipment building. However, due to "FAA required" costs of removing and reinstalling the FAA owned equipment, the only economical option is to construct a hard shell over the existing structure. Currently, the exterior of the control tower allows rain water to enter and pond inside the tower. Also. the airport has obtained port of entry/custom status, which requires a secure area to conduct customs procedures. Constructing a hard shell over the existing equipment and enclosing the control tower with new siding will ensure the equipment and control tower are safe and operational during foul weather conditions. The construction of a customs terminal will increase the aviation demand for the airport. Airport Information • Regional Business Airport • Towered airport • Based Aircraft: 12


Grant Approved September 23, 2013

Federal Fiscal Year FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Total Commission $896,859 $896,859 FAA State Apportionment $0 FAA Discretionary $0 FAA Non-Primary Entitlement $0 Sponsor $47,203 $47,203Total $944,062 $944,062

Chandler Municipal District Airport

Project Description The Overall Development Objectives (ODO) of the proposed project is to rehabilitate the runway 17/35. CY 2013: Prepare preliminary engineering report. Then proceed to design and constructed during state FY 2014. Project Justification That project is consisted of rehabilitation of the runway pavement. Currently the pavements is exhibiting distresses due to seasonal environmental conditions and load bearing . The distresses observed include low, medium, and high longitudinal cracking, transverse cracking and alligator cracking. Repairing the pavement at this time will extend the life of the pavement reducing water infiltration into the pavement base material causing additional failure of the pavement structure. Airport Information • District Airport • Based Aircraft: 6 (2 Single, 2 Multi, 2 Jet) • Runway17/35: 4,000’ x 60’ Selection Criteria • Pavement Management: PCI = 55 • NPS: Repair runway pavement: = 68 • OASP Goals: Runway pavement PCI > 65

Federal grantsrequire 10% matching funds while state grants require 5% matching funds. The Commission may provide half of the sponsor's federal match on the above project. Commission funding is dependent on availability of State funds.

Agency Fiscal Year FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Total Commission $108,333 $108,333 FAA State Apportionment $525,000 $525,000 FAA Discretionary $300,000 $300,000 FAA Non-Primary Entitlement $150,000 $150,000 $300,000 Sponsor $16,667 $57,016 $73,683Total $166,667 $975,000 $1,141,667

Claremore Regional Regional Business Airport

Proposed Project The Overall Development Objective (ODO) of the proposed project is to install taxiway lights on the parallel taxiway system. CY 2014: NPE funded Design Only. CY 2015: Construct overall development objective. Project Justification Currently, the parallel taxiway system is not lighted, This project will improve airport safety by providing a dependable taxiway lighting system during all weather conditions. The lights will also promote better situational awareness of the pilot and reduce the potential for incursions. Airport Information • Regional Business Airport • Based Aircraft: 48 •Runway 17/35: 5,200' x 75' Selection Criteria • Pavement Management: N/A • NPS: 44 • OASP Goals: Safety and Standards


Agency Fiscal Year FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Total Commission $126,082 $126,082 FAA State Apportionment $0 FAA Discretionary $0 FAA Non-Primary Entitlement $0 Sponsor $6,636 $6,636Total $132,718 $132,718

Claremore Regional Regional Business Airport

Proposed Project The Overall Development Objective (ODO) of the proposed project is to extend the north taxilane. CY 2013: Construct overall development objective. Project Justification The project consists of extending the taxilane in the north hangar area approximately 285 ft. for new hangar construction. The project will support the airports goal to become self supporting. Airport Information • Regional Business Airport • Based Aircraft: 48 •Runway 17/35: 5,200' x 75' Selection Criteria • Pavement Management: N/A • NPS: 44 • OASP Goals: Safety and Standards Grant Approved July 19, 2013


Selection Criteria• Pavement Management: 38 Poor• NPS: 63• OASP Goals: Safety and Standards


Agency Fiscal Year FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Total Commission $375,080 $375,080 FAA State Apportionment FAA Discretionary FAA Non-Primary Entitlement $359,866 $359,866 Sponsor $38,682 $38,682

Total $359,866 $413,762 $773,628

Elk City Regional Regional Business Airport

Proposed Project The Overall Development Objective (ODO) of the proposed project is rehabilitate the south portion of the parallel taxiway system and rehab portions of the main apron. FC 2014: Construct the proposed ODO. Project Justification That project is consisted of rehabilitation of the runway pavement. Currently the pavements is exhibiting distresses due to seasonal environmental conditions and load bearing . The distresses observed include low, medium, and high longitudinal cracking, transverse cracking and alligator cracking. The pavement has reached the end of its useful life. Airport Information • Regional Business Airport • Based Aircraft: 30 • Runway 17/35: 5,399’ x 75'


Airport Information• Regional Business Airport • Based Aircraft: 30• Runway 17/35: 5,399’ x 75'

Selection Criteria• Pavement Management: 62 Fair• NPS: 63• OASP Goals: Safety and Standards

Agency Fiscal Year FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Total Commission $172,222 $172,222 FAA State Apportionment $800,000 $800,000 FAA Discretionary $600,000 $600,000 FAA Non-Primary Entitlement $150,000 $150,000 $300,000 Sponsor $16,667 $90,641 $107,307

Total $166,667 $1,812,863 $1,979,529

The current PCI of the runway pavement is 63 which is categorized as Fair and is below the threshold PCI rating (65) at which pavement deteriorates more rapidly. Currently the pavement is exhibiting distresses due to seasonal environmental conditions (i.e. aging, oxidation, and weathering). Distresses observed include low to medium longitudinal cracking, transverse cracking and patching. No major structural failures were observed, therefore the pavement section is concluded to be structurally adequate to support the traffic use the runway. Overlaying the pavement will protect the base structure and extend the life of the pavement.

Elk City Regional Regional Business Airport

Proposed Project The Overall Development Objective (ODO) of the proposed project is rehabilitate the north portion of the parallel taxiway system and portions of the main apron.. CY 2015: NPE Design Only CY 2016: Construct the proposed ODO. Project Justification

Federal grants require 10% matching funds. State grant funds require 5% matching funds. The Commission's policy is that it may provide half of the sponsor's federal match on the above project. Commission funding is dependent on availability of State funds.

Phase I Grant Approved July 10, 2014 ($643,314 Commission, $921,549 sponsor)

Federal Fiscal Year FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Total Commission $2,500,000 $2,500,000

ODOT - Dept. of Transportation $500,000 $500,000

$0

$0 Sponsor $2,850,000 $2,850,000

Total $5,850,000 $5,850,000

Woodring Regional Regional Business Airport

Proposed Project The Overall Development Objective (ODO) of the proposed project is to extend runway 17/35. The project will consist of land acquisition, relocation of the perimeter road, relocation of the MALS system and extending the runway and parallel taxiway system to 8,000 feet. CY 2014: Design and construct the proposed ODO. Funding: The Commission will participation is a 50/50 up to $2,500,00 and ODOT will fund up to $500,000 to relocate the perimeter road. Project Justification (next page). Airport Information • Regional Business Airport • Based Aircraft: 77 • Runway 17/35: 6,250’ x 100' • Contract Tower • MALS -R • Localizer and Glide Slope (Precision Approach on 35)


Funding FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 Total Commission ODOT - Dept. of Transportation

Sponsor Total

Woodring Regional Regional Business Airport

Project Justification



Agency Fiscal Year FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Total Commission $500,000 $500,000 FAA State Apportionment FAA Discretionary FAA Non-Primary Entitlement $574,481 $574,481 Sponsor $163,691 $163,691Total $1,238,172 $663,691 $1,901,863

Fairview Municipal Airport

Project Description The Overall Development Objective (ODO) of the proposed project is to extend the length of runway 17/35 from 3,620 ft. to 4,500 ft. The proposed project will consist of extending runway 17 end approximately 880 ft. and constructing a turnaround at runway 17 end. Scope revised to include widening runway to 75 ft. to meet FAA standards. CY 2013: Construct proposed ODO. Project Justification The City has request a runway extension in order to better serve the community and geographic area of the State. The City has been a good and willing sponsor of the airport for many years. The City owns adequate property around the airport which provides for future development. In the past few years the City has rebuilt the runway, reconstructed parking and hangar access aprons, and remodeled the terminal building. The airport is active and has 25 based aircraft. In order to justify the runway extension the City has provided letters from Dominion Farms, Ltd., Sand Ridge, Loves, Duckwall-ALCO Stores, Otex Pumping, Pexold Barker & Woltz, BVA Advanced Surgical Eye Care, AeroCare Medical Transport, Roberts Ranch of Oklahoma, Fairview Regional, Blake Production Co. Additionally, O-Tex, (a recent local business addition) with over thirty new jobs, is a significant economic impact on the community, and utilizes aviation extensively . And extending the runway will also allow fixed wing air ambulance to option during conditions are not favorable for rotorcraft. Airport Information • District Airport • Based Aircraft: 25 • Runway 17/35: 3,620' x 60' Selection Criteria • Pavement Management: N/A • FAA National Priority Rating: 47 - Extend Runway • OASP Goals: Improve aviation access to community



Agency Fiscal Year FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Total Commission $66,011 $66,011 FAA State Apportionment $1,038,203 $1,038,203 FAA Discretionary $0 $0 FAA Non-Primary Entitlement $150,000 $150,000 Sponsor $66,012 $66,012Total $1,320,226 $1,320,226

Goldsby - David J. Perry Airport

Project Description The Overall Development Objective (ODO) of the proposed project is to construct a parallel taxiway system for runway 13/31. In order for the new taxiway to meet FAA standards the main apron will need to be reconfigured, main hangar with a public terminal building in it relocated, and the fuel farm relocated. CY 2013: . Single phase construction of the ODO. FY 2014: Update Airport Layout Plan (NPE funded). Project Justification David J. Perry airport is a small but very active airport with 46 based aircraft. Currently, aircraft must use the runway for taxing, which results in aircraft having to wait on the main apron while aircraft are taking off or on approach to the airport. Therefore, construction of a parallel taxiway system will improve the safety for the flying public. Airport Information • District Airport • Based Aircraft: 46 • Runway 17/35: 3,006’ x 60’ Selection Criteria • Pavement Management: NA • NPS: Construct taxiway = 47 • OASP Goals: Standards


Agency Fiscal Year FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Total Commission $500,000 $500,000 FAA State Apportionment $0 FAA Discretionary $0 FAA Non-Primary Entitlement $0 Sponsor $500,000 $500,000Total $1,000,000 $1,000,000

Grove Municipal Regional Business Airport

Project Description The Overall Development Objective of the proposed project is to construct a new terminal building. CY 2014: Construct terminal building. Funding: The Commission will participate in 50 percent of the project cost. The Commission share will not exceed the Commission's funding policy for terminal buildings. Project Justification The existing terminal building is dated and showing signs of deterioration. The typical size for a new public terminal building is 3,750 square feet. A building of this size will accommodate a public reception area, a pilot flight planning and weather briefing area, an area for pilots to rest, men’s and women’s restrooms, an airport managers office, a training/conference room available for public use and a kitchen area for serving food, etc. Airport Information • Regional Business Airport • Based Aircraft: 70 • Runway 18/36: 5,200' x 75' Selection Criteria • Pavement Management: N/A • NPS: Standards = 32 • OASP Goals: An appealing terminal building is a basic amenity for a regional business airport.

Federal and State grants require 10% matching funds. The Commission's policy is that it may provide half of the sponsor's federal match on the above project. Commission funding is dependent on availability of State funds.

Agency Fiscal Year FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Total Commission $214,033 $214,033 FAA State Apportionment $916,300 $916,300 FAA Discretionary $860,000 $860,000 FAA Non-Primary Entitlement $150,000 $150,000 Sponsor $112,646 $112,646Total $1,926,300 $326,679 $2,252,979

Grove Municipal Regional Business Airport

Project Description The Overall Development Objective (ODO) of the proposed project is to construct a partial parallel taxiway system (green area) and aircraft parking apron (purple area) on the Westside of runway 18/36. CY 2014: Design only. CY 2015: Construct the overall development objective. Project Justification The objective of this project is to expand the airport development on the west side of the airport. Construction of 480 ft. of parallel taxiway and aircraft parking apron will allow new hangar development, pilots to access the runway, and supports the proposed new terminal building. The City will also construct a new access road (orange area) to the Westside development with City funds. Airport Information • Regional Business Airport • Based Aircraft: 87 • Runway 18/38: 5,200' x 75' Selection Criteria • Pavement Management: N/A • FAA National Priority Rating: 60- Construct Taxiway • FAA National Priority Rating: 53 - Construct Apron • OASP Goals: : An appealing terminal building is a desired amenity at regional business airport.


Agency Fiscal Year FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Total Commission $72,222 $72,222 FAA State Apportionment $500,000 $500,000 FAA Discretionary FAA Non-Primary Entitlement $150,000 $150,000 $300,000 Sponsor $16,667 $38,012 $54,678Total $166,667 $760,234 $926,901

Guymon Municipal Regional Business Airport

Project Description The Overall Development Objective (ODO) of the proposed project is to taxilanes for hangar development (reconfigure north apron area). CY 2015: Design only. CY 2016: Construct the overall development objective Project Justification The existing pavement is in poor condition. Constructing taxilanes for new hangar development will help the airport become self sustaining. Airport Information • Regional Business Airport • Based Aircraft: 39 • Runway 18/36: 5,904' x 100' Selection Criteria • Pavement Management: 16 Poor • FAA National Priority Rating: 47 • OASP Goals: :



Federal Fiscal Year FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Total Commission $159,630 $159,630 FAA State Apportionment $752,000 $752,000 FAA Discretionary $851,000 $851,000 FAA Non-Primary Entitlement $1,270,342 $1,270,342 Sponsor $159,630 $159,630Total $2,873,342 $319,260 $3,192,602

Idabel- McCurtain County Regional Business Airport

Project Description The Overall Development Objectives (ODO) of the proposed project is to construct the north portion of the parallel taxiway system for runway 02/20 and rehabilitation of the connecting taxiway. FY 2013: Construct ODO (Red Area). Project Justification Currently, aircraft must use the runway for back taxiing, which results in aircraft having to wait on the main apron while aircraft are taking off or on approach to the airport. Therefore, construction of a parallel taxiway system will improve the safety for the flying public. Airport Information • Regional Business Airport • Based Aircraft: 18 • Runway 02/20: 5,000’ x 75’ Selection Criteria • Pavement Management: N/A • NPS: Construct Taxiway = 47.1 • OASP Goals: Basic amenity for an RB airport



Agency Fiscal Year FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Total Commission $455,513 $455,513 FAA State Apportionment $0 FAA Discretionary $0 FAA Non-Primary Entitlement $225,000 $225,000 Sponsor $48,764 $48,764Total $273,764 $455,513 $729,277

Ketchum - South Grand Lake Regional District Airport

Project Description The Overall Development Objectives (ODO) of the proposed project is to improve airport drainage by constructing two drainage structures under/cross the runway pavement. CY 2014: Construct proposed ODO. Project Justification Due to water flowing over the runway during heavy rain conditions, areas of the runway pavement are exhibiting traffic induced failures which can lead to unsafe conditions i.e. damage to aircraft landing. Airport Information • District Airport • Based Aircraft: 14 • Runway18/36: 4,744’ x 60’ Selection Criteria • Pavement Management: PCI = 60 • NPS: Repair runway pavement: = 68 • OASP Goals: Runway pavement PCI > 65


Agency Fiscal Year FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Total Commission $300,000 $300,000 FAA State Apportionment FAA Discretionary FAA Non-Primary Entitlement $225,000 $225,000 Sponsor $27,632 $27,632Total $225,000 $327,632 $552,632

Ketchum - South Grand Lake Regional District Airport

Project Description The Overall Development Objectives (ODO) of the proposed project is to repair runway pavement. CY 2014: Complete preliminary engineering report and cost estimate. Construct recommended runway repair. Project Justification Areas of the runway pavement are exhibiting traffic induced failures which can lead to unsafe conditions i.e. damage to aircraft landing. These areas (approximately 1,400' 60' and various localized cracked areas) will require a total reconstruction of the pavement section to restore the runway's load bearing capacity. Airport Information • District Airport • Based Aircraft: 14 reported • Runway18/36: 4,744’ x 60’ Selection Criteria • Pavement Management: PCI = 85 (2010 inspection) • NPS: Repair runway pavement: = 68 • OASP Goals: Runway pavement PCI > 65




Max Westhiemer - Norman Regional Business Airport

Project Description The Overall Development Objective (ODO) of the proposed project consists of the rehabilitate runway 3/21 and connecting taxiways; Improve runway 3/21 RSA beyond runway ends. CY 2013: Design Only. CY 2014: Construct overall development objective. Project Justification The current PCI of the runway pavement is 63 which is categorized as Fair and is below the threshold PCI rating (65) at which pavement deteriorates more rapidly. Currently the pavement is exhibiting distresses due to seasonal environmental conditions (i.e. aging, oxidation, and weathering). Distresses observed include low to medium longitudinal cracking, transverse cracking and patching. No major structural failures were observed, therefore the pavement section is concluded to be structurally adequate to support the traffic use the runway. Overlaying the pavement will protect the base structure and extend the life of the pavement. Airport Information • Regional Business Airport • Based Aircraft: 98 • Runway 17/35: 5,200 x 100' • Runway 3/21: 4,747' x 100' • ILS 35 end (instrument landing system) 35 end • MALS 35 end (medium intensity approach lighting system) Selection Criteria • Pavement Management: PCI 63 • FAA National Priority Rating: 68 - Rehabilitate Runway • OASP Goals: Airfield pavements PCI > 65


Agency Fiscal Year FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Total Commission $172,222 $172,222 FAA State Apportionment $800,000 $800,000 FAA Discretionary $600,000 $600,000 FAA Non-Primary Entitlement $150,000 $150,000 Sponsor $90,641 $90,641Total $1,812,863 $1,812,863

McAlester Municipal Regional Business Airport

Project Description The Overall Development Objective (ODO) of the proposed is to rehabilitate runway 02/20. and the parallel taxiway system The project will consist of repair of the joints and broken panels, and diamond grind (runway only), and remark. CY 2016: Construct overall development objective. Project Justification The Commission’s pavement management system forecasts a PCI rating of 52 for runway 02/20 for year 2016 . Since the current PCI rating of the pavements is below65 (the threshold PCI value below which the pavement experiences rapid deterioration) it is more cost effective to rehabilitate the pavement in there current condition than to let them continue deteriorate to a condition that will require full depth reconstruction. Additionally, for safety and cost benefit the parallel taxiway system will be rehabilitated. Airport Information • Regional Business Airport • Based Aircraft: 41 • Runway 01/19: 5,602’ x 100’ Selection Criteria • Pavement Management: 52 • NPS: Rehabilitate Pavement 67 • OASP: Airfield Pavements > 65




Miami Municipal Regional Business Airport

Project Description The Overall Development Objective (ODO) of the proposed is to rehabilitate runway 17/35 and extend the parallel taxiway at runway 17 end. The project will consist of an asphalt overlay of runway 17/35 and extending the parallel taxiway system to runway 17 end. This project will require amending the Airport Layout Plan. CY 2013: Construct overall development objective. Project Justification The Commission’s pavement management system forecasts a PCI rating of 64 for runway 17/35 for year 2013 . Since the current PCI rating of all pavements is close to 65 (the threshold PCI value below which the pavement experiences rapid deterioration) it is more cost effective to rehabilitate the pavement in there current condition than to let them continue deteriorate to a condition that will require full depth reconstruction. Additionally, for safety and cost benefit the parallel taxiway system to runway 17/35 will be completed. Airport Information • Regional Business Airport • Based Aircraft: 29 • Runway 17/35: 5,020’ x 100' Selection Criteria • Pavement Management: PCI = 67 • NPS Runway: Rehabilitate Pavement = 69.9 • NPS Taxiway: Standards = 47.1 • OASP Goals: Airside pavement > 65 and parallel taxiway.


Agency Fiscal Year FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Total Commission $211,111 $211,111 FAA State Apportionment $800,000 $800,000 FAA Discretionary $800,000 $800,000 FAA Non-Primary Entitlement $150,000 $300,000 $450,000 Sponsor $16,667 $111,108 $127,774Total $166,667 $1,900,000 $322,219 $2,388,886

Mid-America Industrial Pryor

Regional Business Airport

Proposed Project The Overall Development Objective (ODO) of the proposed project is to rehabilitate runway 17/35 and approximately 1,200 ft. of taxiway. CY 2014: Preliminary Engineering Report by Commission (porject costs to be revised). CY 2014: NPE funded Design Only. CY 2015: Construct overall development objective. Project Justification The Commission’s pavement management system forecasts a PCI rating of 44 for runway 17/35 for year 2013. Since the current PCI rating of all pavements is below 65 (the threshold PCI value below which the pavement experiences rapid deterioration) it is more cost effective to rehabilitate the pavement in there current condition than to let them continue deteriorate to a condition that will require full depth reconstruction. Additionally, it is cost effective to rehabilitate a portion (1,200 ft.) of the parallel taxiway system while the men and equipment are on site. Airport Information • Regional Business Airport • Based Aircraft: 26 • Runway 18/36: 5,000' x 75' Selection Criteria • Pavement Management: PCI 44 • NPS: Rehabilitate runway - 67 • OASP Goals: Airside pavement > 65 and parallel taxiway.


Grant Approved September 23, 2013$14,000 State only grant to relocate fuel tanks


Pauls Valley Municipal Regional Business Airport

Proposed Project The Overall Development Objective (ODO)of the proposed project is to construct a parallel taxiway system to the primary runway and remove pavement that will no longer be used. CY 2013: Constructoverall development objective. Project Justification Currently, aircraft must use the secondary runway for back taxing and that results in a safety and capacity concern. Therefore, a standard parallel taxiway will improve the safety of the flying public. Airport Information • Regional Business Airport • Based Aircraft: 32 • Runway 12/30: 3,500' x 150’ 17/35: 5,000' x 100' Selection Criteria • Pavement Management: PCI = NA • NPS: Construct Parallel Taxiway = 57 • OASP Goals: Parallel Taxiway at all RB's


Project DescriptionThe Overall Development Objective (ODO) of the proposed project is to reconstruct the main apon and connecting taxiway.

CY 2013: Construct overall development objective.

Project JustificationThe current PCI of the main apron is 46 which is

categorized as Fair and is below the threshold PCI rating (65) at which pavement begins to deteriorate more rapidly. Currently the pavement is exhibiting distresses due to seasonal environmental conditions (i.e. aging, oxidation, and weathering). Distresses observed include low to medium block cracking, and patching.

Airport Information• Regional Business Airport• Based Aircraft: 31• Runway: 4,000 x 75ʹ

Selection Criteria• Pavement Management: Apron PCI 46• FAA National Priority Rating: 57• OASP Goals: Airfield pavements PCI > 65

Grant Approved July 19, 2013

Agency Fiscal Year FY 2014 FY 2015 Total Commission $400,000 $400,000 FAA State Apportionment $0 FAA Discretionary $0 FAA Non-Primary Entitlement $0 Sponsor $21,053 $21,053Total $421,053 $421,053

Robert S. Kerr (Poteau) Regional Business Airport




Seminole Municipal Regional Business Airport

Project Description The Overall Development Objective (ODO) of the proposed project is to rehabilitate runway 16/34, taxiway system, and main apron. Improve runway safety area beyond runway ends..revised March 26, 2013 CY 2014: Construction to complete project scope. Project Justification The current PCI of the runway pavement is 66 which is categorized as Fair and is at the threshold PCI rating (65) at which pavement begins to deteriorate more rapidly. Currently the pavement is exhibiting distresses due to seasonal environmental conditions (i.e. aging, oxidation, and weathering). Distresses observed include low to medium longitudinal cracking, transverse cracking and patching. No major structural failures were observed, therefore the pavement section is concluded to be structurally adequate to support the traffic use the runway. Overlaying the pavement will protect the base structure and extend the life of the pavement. Airport Information • Regional Business Airport • Based Aircraft: 34 • Runway: 5,000 x 75' Selection Criteria • Pavement Management: • FAA National Priority Rating: 68 - Rehabilitate Runway • OASP Goals: Airfield pavements PCI > 65


Airport Information• Regional Business Airport - Reliever• Based Aircraft: 520• Control Tower• ILS at runway 1L end• Runway 1L/R19: 5,102’ x 100’• Runway 1R/19L: 4,208' x 100'• Runway 13/31: 2,641' x 50'

Selection Criteria• Pavement Management: 65• NPS: Rehabilitate Primary Runway• OASP Goals: Safety and Standards

Agency Fiscal Year FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Total Commission $216,667 $216,667 FAA State Apportionment $600,000 $600,000 FAA Discretionary $1,200,000 $1,200,000 FAA Non-Primary Entitlement $150,000 $150,000 $300,000 Sponsor $16,667 $114,035 $130,702Total $166,667 $2,280,702 $2,447,368

Tulsa - Richard L. Jones Regional Business Airport

Project Description The Overall Development Objective (ODO) is rehabilitate the primary runway 1L/19R. CY 2014: Preliminary report on taxiway and runways. CY 2015: NPE Design Only. CY 2016: Construct overall development objective. Project Justification The current PCI of the runway pavement is 64 which is categorized as Fair and is at the threshold PCI rating (65) at which pavement begins to deteriorate more rapidly. Currently the pavement is exhibiting distresses due to seasonal environmental conditions (i.e. aging, oxidation, and weathering). Distresses observed include low to medium longitudinal cracking, transverse cracking and patching. No major structural failures were observed, therefore the pavement section is concluded to be structurally adequate to support the traffic use the runway. Overlaying the pavement will protect the base structure and extend the life of the pavement.



Agency Fiscal Year FY 2014 Total Commission $273,244 $273,244 FAA State Apportionment FAA Discretionary FAA Non-Primary Entitlement Sponsor $14,732 $14,732Total $287,976 $287,976


Project Description The Overall Development Objective (ODO) of the proposed project is to strengthen Taxiway “F”. CY 2013: Construct overall development objective. Project Justification Taxiway "F" existing pavement is not adequate to support increasing use by heavier business jets being serviced in this area. Strengthening the pavement will extend the life of the pavement structure. Airport Information • Regional Business Airport - Reliever • Based Aircraft: 520 • Control Tower • ILS at runway 1L end • Runway 1L/R19: 5,102’ x 100’ • Runway 1R/19L: 4,208' x 100' • Runway 13/31: 2,641' x 50' Selection Criteria • Pavement Management: • NPS: • OASP Goals: Standards



Agency Fiscal Year FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Total Commission $77,633 $77,633 FAA State Apportionment $0 FAA Discretionary $1,227,408 $1,227,408 FAA Non-Primary Entitlement $150,000 $150,000 Sponsor $78,146 $78,146Total $1,533,187 $155,779 $1,688,966


Project Description The Overall Development Objective (ODO) is to upgrade the airfield guidance signage to current FAA Standards (Advisory Circular 150/5340-18E. Electrical power lines from the electrical vault to the signs will be replaced and new regulators will be installed near the maintenance building to accommodate the current electrical demand. Relocate the electrical vault to a location . Install PAPI's on 1R/19L. Install REIL's on 1L/19R. Install "distance to go" markers on Install computer controls for airfield lighting similar to that at TUL and replace the old pilot controlled lighting system with a new one that allows independent control of the Runway 1L/19R & Taxiway "A" (using the main frequency for the control tower) and separate control (using the second frequency used for the east runway) for Runway 1R/19L & all the taxiway lights west of 1L/19R. Relocate the airport beacon to a new location immediately adjacent to the control tower. CY 2013: Construct overall development objective. Project Justification The existing airfield guidance signs do not comply with FAA Advisory Circular. Standardized signs will promote better situational awareness on the airfield as a means to reduce the potential for incursions.1L/19R and allows the control tower to use as a tool in order to expedite the flow of traffic and increase the capacity of that runway. A properly designed and standardized taxiway guidance sign system is essential for the safe and efficient operation of aircraft and ground vehicles on the airport movement area. Overall safety is enhanced by a standardized system of signs at all airports. Airport Information • Regional Business Airport - Reliever • Based Aircraft: 520 • Control Tower • ILS at runway 1L end • Runway 1L/R19: 5,102’ x 100’ • Runway 1R/19L: 4,208' x 100' • Runway 13/31: 2,641' x 50'



Agency Fiscal Year FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Total Commission $313,500 $313,500 FAA State Apportionment FAA Discretionary FAA Non-Primary Entitlement $2,520,000 $2,520,000 Sponsor $296,500 $296,500Total $2,520,000 $610,000 $3,130,000

Wiley Post - OKC Regional Business Airport

Proposed Project The Overall Development Objective (ODO) of the proposed project upgrade airfield electrical homerun from the vault to the primary runway and upgrade runway 17R/35L electrical; Crack seal seal coat and remark 17R/35L. CY 2014: Design and construct ODO. Project Justification The airport sponsor has funded and received the result of an airfield electrical study (Airfield Lighting and Electrical System Improvements, October 2013). The report stats that the megger tests are 0.030 for the homerun and 0.07 for runway 17R/25L. The megger test results indicate the circuits have passed the threshold of reliable operation (megger test below 1.0). Also, Based on the available as-built drawings, sections of the airfield lighting cable are assumed to be installed in 1989. theoretical calculations (50 MQ degrading at 15% per year) many of the airfield circuits are imminently close to reaching the end of their reliable operational life. This phase will construct a new homerun from the vault out to the primary runway lights and ensure the runway edge lights will remain operational when the FY 2015 projects closes the primary runway and runway 17R/35L is used as the primary runway. Rehabilitating runway 17R/35L will extend the life of the pavement and improve its serviceability during the period it is used as the primary runway. Airport Information • Regional Business Airport • Based Aircraft: • Runway 17L/35R: 7,198' x 150' • Runway 17R/35L: 5,000' x 75' • Runway 13/31: 4,,213' x 100' Selection Criteria • Pavement Management: NA


Agency Fiscal Year FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Total Commission $277,778 $277,778 FAA State Apportionment $1,100,000 $1,100,000 FAA Discretionary $1,250,000 $1,250,000 FAA Non-Primary Entitlement $150,000 $150,000 $300,000 Sponsor $16,667 $146,194 $162,861Total $166,667 $2,500,000 $423,972 $3,090,639


Proposed Project The Overall Development Objective (ODO) of the proposed projects consists of rehabilitation of the primary runway 17L/35R, diamond grind and groove the primary runway; rehabilitate concrete portions of the parallel taxiway system; replace in-pavement taxiway lights with taxiway edge lights on taxiway B; upgrade taxiway B electrical circuit; rehabilitate remark concrete portions of runway13/31. CY 2014: Design Only. CY 2015: Construct overall development objective. Project Justification Runway 17L/35R is exhibiting several corner and panel breaks and many joints are missing the sealant. Diamond grinding will smooth the pavement and grooving will meet FAA standards for this airport. The portions of the parallel taxiway system are in need of patching and sealing. A section of the taxiway system has in-pavement lights that routinely fail. Replacing the taxiway lights will improve pilots awareness. Airport Information • Regional Business Airport • Based Aircraft: • Runway 17L/35R: 7,198' x 150' • Runway 17R/35L: 5,000' x 75' • Runway 13/31: 4,,213' x 100' Selection Criteria • Pavement Management: • NPS: Rehabilitate Runway 72 • NPS: Rehabilitate taxiway 67 • OASP Goals: Safety and Standards


Selection Criteria• Pavement Management: • NPS: Rehabilitate Runway 72• NPS: Rehabilitate taxiway 67• OASP Goals: Safety & Standards

Agency Fiscal Year FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Total Commission $138,889 $138,889 FAA State Apportionment $500,000 $500,000 FAA Discretionary $600,000 $600,000 FAA Non-Primary Entitlement $150,000 $150,000 $300,000 Sponsor $16,667 $73,097 $89,764Total $166,667 $1,461,986 $1,628,653


Proposed Project The Overall Development Objective (ODO) of the proposed projects consists of; rehabilitate the connecting taxiways pavement, lights and signs; rehabilitate the parallel taxiway system(s) pavement, lights, and signs. CY 2014: Preliminary Engineering Report by Commission. CY 2015: Design Only. CY 2016: Construct overall development objective. Project Justification The airport sponsor has funded and received the result of an airfield electrical study (Airfield Lighting and Electrical System Improvements, October 2013). The report stats that the megger tests are 0.030 for the homerun and 0.07 for runway 17R/25L. The megger test results indicate the circuits have passed the threshold of reliable operation (megger test below 1.0). The parallel taxiway system is exhibiting distresses due to seasonal environmental conditions (i.e. aging, oxidation, and weathering). Distresses observed include low to medium longitudinal cracking, transverse cracking and patching. No major structural failures were observed, therefore the pavement section is concluded to be structurally adequate to support the traffic use the runway. Rehabilitation of the pavement will protect the base structure and extend the life of the pavement. Airport Information • Regional Business Airport • Based Aircraft: • Runway 17L/35R: 7,198' x 150' • Runway 17R/35L: 5,000' x 75' • Runway 13/31: 4,,213' x 100'




West Woodward Municipal Regional Business Airport

Project Description The Overall Development Objective (ODO) of the proposed project is to rehabilitate a portion of the main apron, taxilane to hangar area, and rehabilitate the runway lighting system. CY 2013: NPE funded Design Only. CY 2014: Construct overall development objective. Project Justification The current PCI of the main apron is 36 which is categorized as Poor and is below the threshold PCI rating (65) at which pavement begins to deteriorate more rapidly. Distresses observed include depressions, block cracking, raveling, low to medium longitudinal cracking, transverse cracking and patching. During 2002 structural failures were observed and two hard stands were constructed. Since that time the pavement has continued to deteriorate. Rehabilitating the pavement will protect the base structure and extend the life of the pavement. The existing runway lights are at the end of their service life and beginning to fail on a regular basis. This project will provide dependable runway lighting during periods of inclement weather. New runway lights will improve the safety of the airport by being more reliable, as well as visible to pilots. Airport Information • Regional Business Airport • Based Aircraft: 41 • Runway: 17 / 35 5502' x 100' • Runway: 05 /23 2500' x 60' Selection Criteria • Pavement Management: PCI 36 • FAA National Priority Rating: Apron 58 • FAA National Priority Rating: RW Lights 68 • OASP Goals: Airfield pavements PCI > 65

Federal grants require 10% matching funds while state grants require 5% matching funds. The Commission may provide half of

Agency Fiscal Year FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Total Commission $22,222 $22,222 $22,222 FAA State Apportionment $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $600,000 FAA Discretionary FAA Non-Primary Entitlement Sponsor Total $222,222 $222,222 $222,222 $666,666

State System Oklahoma Aeronautics Commission

Project Description The Overall Development Objective is to conduct a system planning study. The Commission’s system planning activities are categorized into 3 work elements as under: Work Element 1: Oklahoma Airport System Plan Review 1. Review functional classification of all system airports and compare available basic airport amenities at system airports with OASP Goals 2. Review the based aircraft inventory at system airports 3. Airport grant assurance compliance certification 4. Review airport design standard compliance Work Element 2: Airport Information Management Activities 1. NPIAS needs worksheet update 2. Pavement management 3. Airport safety inspections Work Element 3: Capital Planning Process 1. Airport five-year capital improvement program update 2. Obtain early project development packets for all AIP projects 3. Commission’s three-year capital improvement program 4. Collect sponsor self certifications


Agency Fiscal Year FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Total Commission $2,300,000 $2,300,000 FAA State Apportionment FAA Discretionary FAA Non-Primary Entitlement Deleted Sponsor $121,053 $121,053Total $2,421,053 $2,421,053

Statewide Navaid Regional Business Airport

Project Description The Overall Development Objective (ODO) of the proposed project is to install Omnidirectional Approach Lighting System's at active and geographically remote regional business airports. CY 2014: Design and construct overall development objective. Project Justification The installation of ODALs will improve the access to airports by increasing pilots awareness. Omni-Directional Approach Lights (ODALs) are used to identify the approach end and centerline of the runway. The ODALs is a configuration of seven omnidirectional sequenced flashing lights located in the runway approach area. The ODALS provides circling, offset, and straight-in visual guidance for nonprecision approach runways. The omnidirectional horizontal beam pattern, bright flashes and a sequential strobing flash pattern that rolls toward the runway threshold helps the pilot identify the runway. Three intensity settings allow the approach to be used under changing weather conditions. Proposed Airports • Claremore Municipal • Durant - Eaker Field • Guymon Municipal • Guthrie Municipal • Woodward - West Woodward Airport • Elk City Regional Selection Criteria • Pavement Management: NA • FAA National Priority Rating: 41.7 • OASP Goals: Improve Access


Agency Fiscal Year FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Total Commission $2,300,000 $2,300,000 FAA State Apportionment FAA Discretionary FAA Non-Primary Entitlement Sponsor $121,053 $121,053Total $2,421,053 $2,421,053

Statewide PCC RAMP

Project Description The Overall Development Objective (ODO) of the proposed project is to repair, seal, remark, and smooth the primary runway. Also, if funds are available, repair the more high level distressed areas on the taxiway and main apron. CY 2015: Design and construct overall development objective. Project Justification The runways, taxiways, and aprons are exhibiting corner breaks, broken and shattered panels, and poor joint seal. Diamond grinding will be considered to smooth the pavement . The Commission staff will move forward and obtain executed intergovernmental agreements for the Statewide PCC RAMP projects. The intergovernmental agreement will allow staff to act as agents for the airport sponsors and contract all Engineering and necessary services for the project through the State’s Office of Management and Enterprise Services, Division of Capital Assets Management, Construction and Properties Division and in accordance with the rules of that division. Proposed Airports • Pauls Valley Municipal • Duncan - Halliburton Field • Weatherford - Thomas P. Stafford • Guthrie-Edmond Regional • Elk City Regional Selection Criteria • Pavement Management: NA • FAA National Priority Rating: NA • OASP Goals: Improve Runway Pavement Condition


Agency Fiscal Year FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Total Commission Delete FAA State Apportionment FAA Discretionary FAA Non-Primary Entitlement $850,000 $850,000 Sponsor $44,737 $44,737Total $894,737 $894,737

Downtown Executive (Ardmore)

Proposed Project The Overall Development Objective (ODO) of the proposed project is to reconstruct the north portion of the main apron. CY 2015: Construct ODO. Project Justification The project consists of rehabilitation of a portion of the main apron pavement. Currently the pavements is exhibiting distresses due to seasonal environmental conditions and load bearing . The distresses observed include low, medium, and high longitudinal cracking, transverse cracking and alligator cracking. Repairing the pavement at this time will extend the life of the pavement reducing water infiltration into the pavement base material causing additional failure of the pavement structure. I Airport Information • Regional Business Airport • Based Aircraft: 58 • Runway 17/35: 5,000' x 75' Selection Criteria • Pavement Management: Poor • NPS: 57 • OASP Goals: Safety and Standards Project to be funded with transfered NPE funds. Project to be removed from CIP.


Project to be funded with transfered NPE funds. Project to be removed from CIP.

Agency Fiscal Year FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Total Commission Deleted FAA State Apportionment FAA Discretionary FAA Non-Primary Entitlement $764,528 $764,528 Sponsor $84,948 $84,948Total $849,476 $849,476

Stigler Regional District Airport

Project Description The Overall Development Objective (ODO) of the proposed project is to rehabilitate runway 17/35., connecting taxiway and apron. CY 2014: Construct overall development objective. Project Justification Currently the pavement is exhibiting distresses due to seasonal environmental conditions (i.e. aging, oxidation, and weathering). Distresses observed include low to medium longitudinal cracking, transverse cracking and patching. No major structural failures were observed, therefore the pavement section is concluded to be structurally adequate to support the traffic use the runway. Overlaying the pavement will protect the base structure and extend the life of the pavement. Airport Information • District Airport • Based Aircraft: 11 • Runway 17/35: 4,296 x 60' Selection Criteria • Pavement Management: 73 • FAA National Priority Rating: 67 • OASP Goals: Airfield pavements PCI > 65

Federal grants require10% matching funds while state grants require 5% matching funds The Commission may provide half of

Federal grants require10% matching funds while state grants require 5% matching funds. The Commission may provide half of the sponsor's federal match on the above project. Commission funding is dependent on availability of State funds.

Agency Fiscal Year FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Total Commission Deleted FAA State Apportionment FAA Discretionary FAA Non-Primary Entitlement $650,000 $650,000 Sponsor $72,222 $72,222Total $722,222 $722,222

Project to be funded with transfered NPE funds. Project to be removed from CIP.

Tahlequah Municipal Regional Business Airport

Project Description The Overall Development Objective (ODO) of the proposed project is to repair and rehabilitate runway 17/35 and the parallel taxiway system. CY 2014: Construct overall development objective. Project Justification Currently the pavement is exhibiting distresses due to seasonal environmental conditions (i.e. aging, oxidation, and weathering). Distresses observed include low to medium longitudinal cracking, transverse cracking and patching. No major structural failures were observed, therefore the pavement section is concluded to be structurally adequate to support the traffic use the runway. A dip has developed in the runway near 17 end, due to settlement that has occurred above the drainage structure. Airport Information • Regional Business Airport • Based Aircraft: 44 • Runway 17/35: 5,001 x 75' Selection Criteria • Pavement Management: • FAA National Priority Rating: • OASP Goals: Airfield pavements PCI > 65


End of Three Year CIP

oklahoma aeronautics commission - welcome to … updated approved cip...oklahoma aeronautics...

Documents