oil shale formation evaluation by well logs and core measurements

17
AMSO: Alan Burnham, Roger Day TOTAL: Pierre Allix Schlumberger: Malka Machlus, Michael Herron, James Grau Nikita Seleznev, Gabriela Leu, Peter Hook Oil Shale Formation Evaluation by Well Logs and Core Measurements Robert Kleinberg SchlumbergerDoll Research Cambridge, Massachuse:s

Upload: others

Post on 12-Sep-2021

7 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Oil Shale Formation Evaluation by Well Logs and Core Measurements

AMSO: Alan Burnham, Roger Day TOTAL: Pierre Allix Schlumberger: Malka Machlus, Michael Herron, James Grau

Nikita Seleznev, Gabriela Leu, Peter Hook

Oil Shale Formation Evaluation  by Well Logs and Core Measurements  

 Robert  Kleinberg  Schlumberger-­‐Doll  Research  Cambridge,  Massachuse:s  

 

Page 2: Oil Shale Formation Evaluation by Well Logs and Core Measurements

Volumetrics – Density Porosity, Resistivity, Magnetic Resonance total mineral matter water kerogen

Composition – Capture Spectroscopy common inorganic minerals (quartz, calcite, illite . . .) unusual inorganic minerals (dawsonite, nahcolite . . .) total organic carbon

Geology - Microimager fractures vugs slumps

Objectives of Oil Shale Well Logging  

Page 3: Oil Shale Formation Evaluation by Well Logs and Core Measurements

50 ft

black=albite

Oil Shale Well Log Montage  

Page 4: Oil Shale Formation Evaluation by Well Logs and Core Measurements

Volumetrics – Density Porosity, Resistivity, Magnetic Resonance total mineral matter water (& salinity) kerogen

Composition – Capture Spectroscopy common inorganic minerals (quartz, calcite, illite . . .) unusual inorganic minerals (dawsonite, nahcolite . . .) total organic carbon

Geology - Microimager fractures vugs slumps

Objectives of Oil Shale Well Logging  

Page 5: Oil Shale Formation Evaluation by Well Logs and Core Measurements

ma bD w k

ma f

ρ −ρφ = = φ + φ

ρ −ρDensity Porosity

maρ = matrix (grain) density (~ 2.7 g/cc)

bρ = bulk (measured) density

fρ = “fluid” (water+kerogen) density (~1 g/cc)

= porosity measured by density tool

= volume fraction kerogen

= volume fraction water

Gamma-Gamma Density Log  Measures Sum of Water + Kerogen  

Page 6: Oil Shale Formation Evaluation by Well Logs and Core Measurements

Mag

netic

Res

onan

ce S

igna

l

Measurement Time

Measurement Dead Time

water kerogen

200 µs 2 s

Kerogen is Invisible to Magnetic Resonance  

Page 7: Oil Shale Formation Evaluation by Well Logs and Core Measurements

ma bD w k

ma f

ρ −ρφ = = φ + φ

ρ −ρDensity Porosity

maρ = matrix (grain) density (~ 2.7 g/cc)

bρ = bulk (measured) density

fρ = “fluid” (water+kerogen) density (~1 g/cc)

Magnetic Resonance Porosity MR wφ = φ

k D MRφ = φ −φ

= porosity measured by density tool

= volume fraction kerogen

= volume fraction water

Density Magnetic Resonance (DMR) Method Kerogen Volume from Density & Magnetic Resonance Logs  

Page 8: Oil Shale Formation Evaluation by Well Logs and Core Measurements

xx00 xx20 xx40 xx60 xx80 x100 0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

2020 2040 2060 2080 2100 2120

Density Porosity & Magnetic Resonance Porosity

Poro

sity

Depth (ft) 100108-03b

bad hole masked Density Porosity

NMR Porosity

Kerogen

Por

osity

0.6

0.5

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

0

100 feet

Page 9: Oil Shale Formation Evaluation by Well Logs and Core Measurements

0

20

40

60

80

1900 1950 2000 2050 2100

Well Log Kerogen VolumeCore Measured Fischer Assay

Wel

l Log

Ker

ogen

Vol

ume

(gal

/ton)

Depth (ft) 100829-11b

Cor

e Fi

sche

r Ass

ay (g

al/to

n)

xx00 xx50 x100 x150 x200

Depth (ft)

Wel

l Log

Ker

ogen

Vol

ume

(gal

/ton)

C

ore

Fisc

her A

ssay

(gal

/ton)

xx00 xx50 x100 x150 x200

80

60

40

20

0

Well Log Kerogen Volume vs Core Fischer Assay  

Page 10: Oil Shale Formation Evaluation by Well Logs and Core Measurements

[ ]FA TOM 0.019 199= −

kD MR

bTOM ( )ρ

= φ − φρ

Total  Organic  Ma:er  as  frac>on  of  ore  weight  

gallons  of  oil  per  ton  of  ore  

Synthe'c  Fuels  Data  Handbook  Cameron  Engineers,  1975  

Figure  29.  Organic  Ma:er  Content  of  Green  River  Oil  Shales-­‐  

Total  O

rganic  M

a:er  

 

 Modified  Fischer  Assay  (gal/ton)        

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

0 0 20 40 60

Page 11: Oil Shale Formation Evaluation by Well Logs and Core Measurements

0

20

40

60

80

1900 1950 2000 2050 2100

Well Log Fischer Assay EstimateCore Measured Fischer Assay

Cor

e Fi

sche

r Ass

ay (g

al/to

n)

Depth (ft) 100829-12b

Wel

l Log

Fis

cher

Ass

ay E

stim

ate

(gal

/ton)

xx00 xx50 x100 x150 x200 Depth (ft)

F

isch

er A

ssay

(gal

/ton)

80

60

40

20

0

Fischer Assay: Well Log vs Core  

Page 12: Oil Shale Formation Evaluation by Well Logs and Core Measurements

Schlumberger Log Interpretation Chart Gen-6 (2009)

m nw D w t

1R S Ra

= φ

( a ~ 1, m ~ n ~ 2 )

MRw

DS φ

MR2

w tR R= φ @ reservoir temperature T

( 1.1192)

wT 21.5 Csalinity(ppk) 7.976 R (T)

10 C 21.5 C

−+ °⎡ ⎤= ⋅ ⎢ ⎥° + °⎣ ⎦

[Rw] = ohm-meters

fraction of pore = space that is water filled

Archie’ Law =

Water Salinity from Resistivity & Magnetic Resonance  

Page 13: Oil Shale Formation Evaluation by Well Logs and Core Measurements

Assume all NaCl is in Pore Water

3 3

3 3 3g(NaCl) g(dry ore) cm (dry ore) cm (rock) g(NaCl)Salinityg(dry ore) g(water)cm (dry ore) cm (rock) cm (water)

= =

( ) 1FSAL DWNACL RHGA 1 PIGE WKERPIGE

= ⋅ − −

Water Salinity Estimate from Geochemical Logging  

Page 14: Oil Shale Formation Evaluation by Well Logs and Core Measurements

Low porosity – low resistivity spike

Mud filtrate salinity = 8 ppk

1400 feet

100108-01

Low porosity – low resistivity spike

80

60

40

20

0

100

Green River Formation  Salinity Log  

Page 15: Oil Shale Formation Evaluation by Well Logs and Core Measurements

Low porosity – low resistivity spike

1400 feet

100108-01

Green River Formation Salinity Log

80

60

40

20

0

100

Mud filtrate salinity = 8 ppk

No Communication Between Fresh & Saline Aquifers  

Page 16: Oil Shale Formation Evaluation by Well Logs and Core Measurements

Important information about oil shale deposits can be obtained from the same tools used in conventional oil and gas reservoirs. These include measurements of formation density, magnetic resonance response, electrical resistivity, and capture spectroscopy. Kerogen responds as part of the pore space to density porosity tools, but is invisible to borehole magnetic resonance. Simple processing gives kerogen volume and an accurate, depth-continuous estimate of Fischer Assay. A salinity log results from comparing magnetic resonance to formation resistivity. Agreement with a capture spectroscopy estimate is fair.

Summary  

Page 17: Oil Shale Formation Evaluation by Well Logs and Core Measurements

( 1.1192)

wT 21.5 Csalinity(ppk) 7.976 R (T)

10 C 21.5 C

−+ °⎡ ⎤= ⋅ ⎢ ⎥° + °⎣ ⎦

[Rw] = ohm-meters

Schlumberger Log Interpretation Chart Gen-6 (2009)