oil sands the case for caution

Upload: anastasia-dwiayu

Post on 02-Mar-2018

224 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/26/2019 Oil Sands the Case for Caution

    1/16

    Saskatchewans portion of the Clearwater River and its adjacent lands are included in a 200,000 hectare wilderness

    park immediately to the south of the current oil sands disposition area.

  • 7/26/2019 Oil Sands the Case for Caution

    2/16

    06!!!6

    "he Clearwater River #alley and the near$y oil sands area have many valua$le archaeolo%ical sites.

    &n sections of the Clearwater River are ancient rock paintin%s that attest to this re%ion $ein% inha$ited for thousands

    of years.

  • 7/26/2019 Oil Sands the Case for Caution

    3/16

    'olitical Conte(t) "he $i% stakeholders in Canadas oil sands industry are privately owned national and international oil

    companies with a hu%e income and asset $ase.

    "hey include companies such as Suncor, Syncrude, *mperial &il and Shell. Re%ulatin% such companies re+uires

    political will, %ood federalprovincial cooperation and e(cellent enforcement.

  • 7/26/2019 Oil Sands the Case for Caution

    4/16

    Clearly, the -overnment of Canada cannot $e counted on to $e a firm re%ulator.

    nfortunately, the -overnment of Saskatchewan shows no si%n of readyin% itself to $e an effective re%ulator either.

    /oth the previous 1' %overnment and the current Saskatchewan 'arty %overnment %ranted e(ploration privile%es

    on lease land without an environmental impact assessment and prior to preparin% a re%ional land use plan.

  • 7/26/2019 Oil Sands the Case for Caution

    5/16

    *n situ e(traction re+uires si%nificant a$ove %round facilities. "his is the &'"*e(en site in on% ake, 3l$erta. *t

    includes a 44 hectare central facility, 25 e(ploration wells, 277 production wells and power lines to each well pad.

  • 7/26/2019 Oil Sands the Case for Caution

    6/16

    Saskatchewans portion of the Clearwater River and its adjacent lands are included in a 200,000 hectare wilderness

    park immediately to the south of the current oil sands disposition area.

  • 7/26/2019 Oil Sands the Case for Caution

    7/16

    *n situ e(traction re+uires si%nificant a$ove %round facilities. "his is the &'"*e(en site in on% ake, 3l$erta. *t

    includes a 44 hectare central facility, 25 e(ploration wells, 277 production wells and power lines to each well pad.

  • 7/26/2019 Oil Sands the Case for Caution

    8/16

    8ven some distance away from the central facility, fra%mentation of the $oreal forest is su$stantial. "he &'"*e(en

    land parcel is !0,600 hectares, $ut 709 of the land will $e less than 2:0 metres away from industrial infrastructure

    related to oil sands. *nevita$ly, this has ne%ative impacts on local wildlife populations. ;ra%mented physical ha$itat

    results in the natural ran%e of species $ein% diminished and split up.

  • 7/26/2019 Oil Sands the Case for Caution

    9/16

    3s the num$er of oil sands plants in northeast 3l$erta %row, there is a marked reduction in many species that rely on

    the $oreal forest for ha$itat.

    /ack%round ote

    "he $ird in the slide is the yellow$ellied sapsucker.

  • 7/26/2019 Oil Sands the Case for Caution

    10/16

  • 7/26/2019 Oil Sands the Case for Caution

    11/16

    *n situ plants also re+uire very e(tensive a$ove%round pipeline collection systems. "he pipeline collection system

    involves $oth a steam supply line and a line for produced $itumen.

  • 7/26/2019 Oil Sands the Case for Caution

    12/16

    06!! !6

    *f oil sands proceeds in northwest Saskatchewan the ha$itat of threatened species such as the common ni%hthawk will

    $e eroded.

    /ack%round ote)

    "he common ni%ht hawk is not a hawk. *t is a mem$er of the %oatsucker family.

  • 7/26/2019 Oil Sands the Case for Caution

    13/16

    &il sands operations are a si%nificant source of air pollution. "he lar%est source of air$orne pollution is the up%rader.

    8(amples of air$orne contaminants include nitrous o(ides and volatile or%anic compounds. =any volatile or%anic

    compounds are to(ic and they all com$ine with nitrous o(ides in the presence of sunli%ht to form %round level o>one.

    &ne of the volatile or%anic compounds produced $y the oil sands is $en>ene, a carcino%en and a to(ic su$stance to

    which there is no safe level of e(posure.

    &il sands operations also emit lar%e +uantities of particulate matter which can $e carried deep into the lun%s and

    contri$ute to health pro$lems such as $ronchitis and asthma.

    ;rom an environmental point of view, two of the most important pollutants released $y the oil sands are acid producin%

    sulphur dio(ide and nitrous o(ides. 3l$ertas oil sands %enerate more than !:0,000 tonnes per year of nitrous o(ide

    and sulphur dio(ide emissions. "hese are emitted in much hi%her +uantities than the conventional oil industry. *n the

    ne(t set of slides we shall turn to a more detailed e(amination of their impacts.

    References) ?!@ Simon 1yer, Aeremy =oorhouse, Batie aufen$er% and Ro$ 'owell. nderminin% "he 8nvironment)

    "he &il Sands Report Card ?Canada) 'em$ina *nstitute, 2007@, pa%es 2 and 50. ?2@ Christopher Datch and =att'rice. Canadas "o(ic "ar Sands) "he =ost 1estructive 'roject &n 8arth ?"oronto) 8nvironmental 1efence, 2007@, p.

    !!. "hese are references for the total annual release of nitrous o(ide and sulphur dio(ide emissions.

  • 7/26/2019 Oil Sands the Case for Caution

    14/16

    Central facilities often include an up%rader, which converts $itumen into synthetic crude oil with the use of pressure

    and steam. "he crude oil is then sent to a refinery for further processin%. "he up%rader is an ener%y intensive

    operation and can thus have si%nificant pollution impacts.

  • 7/26/2019 Oil Sands the Case for Caution

    15/16

    =ultiple oil sands projects could make Saskatchewans %reenhouse %as emissions even worse. "his is $ecause if a

    $arrel of oil is produced from in situ oil sands, the %reenhouse %as emissions are at least three times hi%her than if that

    same $arrel of oil is produced usin% conventional methods.

    Reference) /. =et>, &.R. 1avidson, '.R. /osch, R. 1ave, .3. =eyer ?editors@ *nter%overnmental 'anel on Climate

    Chan%e. Climate Chan%e 200) =iti%ation. Contri$ution of

  • 7/26/2019 Oil Sands the Case for Caution

    16/16

    &nce in the atmosphere, sulphur dio(ide and nitro%en o(ides $ecome mi(ed and can travel lon% distances. *n the case

    of 3l$erta and Saskatchewan, the prevailin% westerly winds carry 6:09 of the emissions from the ;ort =c=urray and

    Cold ake area into Saskatchewan. 1urin% their transport, sulphur dio(ide and nitrous o(ide are involved in chemical

    reactions with hydro%en chloride, o(y%en and water vapour. "hese reactions produce dilute solutions of nitric acid and

    sulphuric acid, which ultimately fall as rain or snow on Saskatchewan soils and water $odies. *t can take $etween 2

    and ! days $efore acid deposition on land or water occurs. 3s a result, acid deposition can take place as much as

    !,000 kilometres away from the ori%inal pollution source.