ogdcl strategy planning
TRANSCRIPT
Oil and Gas
Development Co. LtdTerm PresentationManagerial Policy
Presented ByAbdulBaseer
TokhiGR # 112003
Agenda Introduction Current Strategic Direction
External Assessment Internal Assessment Financial Performance Long Term Objectives SWOT Analysis BCG Matrix I-E Matrix QSP Matrix Strategy Implementation
Intro
duct
io n National Oil & Gas Co. of Pakistan. Flagship of the country’s E&P sector. Market leader in terms of reserves,
production and acreage. Listed on four stock exchanges:
Karachi Stock Exchange (KSE) Lahore Stock Exchange (LSE) Islamabad Stock Exchange (ISE) London Stock Exchange (LSE)
Registered OfficeOGDCL House, Plot No.3, F-6 / G-6,Jinnah Avenue, Blue Area, Islamabad.
Head
Offi
ce
Build
ing
Membership PIP (Petroleum Institute of Pakistan) PPEPCA (Pakistan Petroleum Exploration and Production Companies
Association) MAP (Management Association of Pakistan) SPE (Society of Petroleum Engineers) PAPG (Pakistan Association of Petroleum Geoscientist) WWF (World Wild Fund) WEC (World Energy Council)
Awards 30th Corporate Excellence Award 2014. 29th Corporate Excellence Certificate (Map) 2013. CSR Business Excellence Award 2013. Environment Excellence Award 2008-2013. Best Corporate Reports Award 2007-2012.
www.ogdcl.com/UploadFolder/financial/32.DirectorsReport.pdf
Curre
nt S
trate
gic D
irect
ion Vision
To be a leading multinational exploration and production company. MissionTo become the leading provider of oil and gas to the country by increasing exploration and production both domestically and internationally, utilizing all options including strategic alliances. To continuously realign ourselves to meet the expectations of our stakeholders through best management practices, the use of latest technology, and innovation for sustainable growth, while being socially responsible.http://
www.ogdcl.com/ContentPage?id=9Dpk%2bgUmFnmrPxq7ZKqqJA%3d%3d
Net gas production from 1,173 MMscfd in FY 2014 to 1,311 MMscfd in FY 2015.
Net oil production from 41,330 bpd in FY 2014 to 44,732 bpd in FY 2015.
Increase the number of rigs that we contract from third parties.
Expect to achieve total average production of 283,096 boepd in FY 2015.
Added 29 new licenses to our exploration portfolio.
For FY 2015 19 exploration and appraisal wells, and 16 development wells are targeted.
Plan to increase our 2D and 3D onshore seismic surveys in FY 2015 to 2,745 L. km and 2,075 sq. km.Cu
rrent
Stra
tegi
c Dire
ctio
n
http://www.ogdcl.com/ContentPage?id=9Dpk%2bgUmFnmrPxq7ZKqqJA%3d%3d
Key
Com
petit
ors OGDCL's key competitors in
the exploration business include:BP Plc (BP.L)Pakistan Petroleum Ltd.
(PPL.KA)Pakistan Oilfields
(PKOL.KA) Italy's ENI (ENI.MI).
http://www.ogdcl.com/ContentPage?id=9Dpk%2bgUmFnmrPxq7ZKqqJA%3d%3d
Sour
ces &
Util
izatio
n Of
Inco
me
www.ogdcl.com/UploadFolder/financial/32.DirectorsReport.pdf
Expl
orat
ion
Perc
enta
ge
www.ogdcl.com/UploadFolder/financial/32.DirectorsReport.pdf
Com
pone
nts o
f Miss
ion
Stat
emen
tComponent Yes/No
Customer NoProduct YesMarket YesTechnology YesSurvival Growth YesPhilosophy YesSelf-Concept YesPublic Image YesEmployees Yes
9 Co
mpo
nent
s of M
issio
n St
atem
ent Products/services: oil and gas Markets: to the country Technology: the use of latest technology Survival Growth: To continuously realign
ourselves to meet the expectations of our stakeholders
Philosophy: use of latest technology, and innovation
Self-Concept: To become the leading provider of oil and gas to the country
Public image: while being socially responsible.
Employees: best management practices
Modi
fied
Miss
ion
Stat
emen
tTo become the leading provider of oil and gas to the firms and individuals of the country by increasing exploration and production both domestically and internationally, utilizing all options including strategic alliances. To continuously realign ourselves to meet the expectations of our stakeholders through best management practices, the use of latest technology, and innovation for sustainable growth, while being socially responsible.
Exte
rnal
Th
reat
s Economic ForcesCrude Oil Prices, Exchange rate Social, Cultural, Demographic and NE
Forces Political, Governmental, and Legal
ForcesLegislation, Law and Order Technological Forces Competitive ForcesBP.L Pakistan Petroleum Ltd Pakistan OilfieldsItaly's ENI
External Assessment
Competitive Profile Matrix
Critical Success Factor
Weight Rating Score
Quality 0.15 3 0.45
Financial Position 0.25 4 1
Market Share 0.30 3 0.9
Management 0.20 3 0.6
Global Expansion 0.10 2 0.2
Total 1.00 3.15
Weight
Rating
Score
0.12 3 0.36
0.22 2 0.44
0.29 2 0.58
0.27 4 1.08
0.11 1 0.11
1.00 2.57
OGDCL NR
External Factor Evaluation Matrix
Opportunities Weight Rating ScoreMergers or strategic alliances 0.10 2 0.20Market vacated by an ineffective competitor
0.13 3 0.39
Workshops for training and development
0.16 2 0.32
Support of the Ministry of Petroleum & NR.
0.12 3 0.36
Threats Weight Rating ScorePrice wars with competitors 0.09 3 0.27Tuff Competition 0.12 2 0.24Globalization that bring strong companies in PK
0.20 3 0.60
Competitors have superior access to channels of distribution
.08 2 0.16
Total 1.00 2.54
Inte
rnal
Stre
ngth
s &
Wea
knes
ses
STRENGTHS ARE: Largest Oil and gas company in the
Pakistan. Monopoly of the company and having
confidence due to government support. Dynamic & Strong Financial Position due to
the 45 years’ experience. A new, Exploration and innovative of Wells. Best location of business which is choosing
after long process. Quality processes and procedures. Large number of field of oil and gas. Experienced and Technical Staff involving
no. of expert Geologist. Confidence of the Customers.
Internal Assessment
WEAKNESSESS ARE: Lack of marketing expertise. Undifferentiated products (i.e. in
relation to the competitors) Lack of coordination of operations. Government Influence. Untrained Staff. Slow promotion process which
reduces the performance. Lack of Check and balance. Weak quality products (can be
only one of more than one).
Inte
rnal
Stre
ngth
s &
Wea
knes
ses
Internal Assessment
Internal Factor Evaluation Matrix
Strengths Weight Rating Score
Monopoly of the company 0.18 4 0.72Dynamic & Strong Financial Position 0.16 3 0.48
Quality processes and procedures 0.13 3 0.39
Confidence of the Customers 0.12 2 0.24
Weaknesses Weight Rating Score
Undifferentiated products 0.10 3 0.30Slow promotion process 0.12 3 0.36Government Influence 0.10 2 0.20Lack of coordination of operations. 0.09 2 0.18
Total 1.00 2.87
Financial Performance
Crude Oil Thousand barrels
13,20013,40013,60013,80014,00014,20014,40014,60014,800
13,713
14,183
14,734
2011-122012-132013-14
Sale
s of C
rude
Oi
l
www.ogdcl.com/UploadFolder/financial/32.DirectorsReport.pdf
Sale
s of G
as
Gas MMcf365,000370,000375,000380,000385,000390,000395,000400,000405,000410,000415,000
381,863
392,513
414,786
2011-122012-132013-14
Financial Performance
www.ogdcl.com/UploadFolder/financial/32.DirectorsReport.pdf
Sale
s of
LPG
LPG MMcf0
10,00020,00030,00040,00050,00060,00070,00080,000 75,005
41,003
64,088
2011-122012-132013-14
Financial Performance
www.ogdcl.com/UploadFolder/financial/32.DirectorsReport.pdf
Sale
s of
Sulp
hur
Sulphur Tons0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
21,400
14,493
27,707
2011-122012-132013-14
Financial Performance
www.ogdcl.com/UploadFolder/financial/32.DirectorsReport.pdf
Financial Performance www.ogdcl.com/UploadFolder/financial/32.DirectorsReport.pdf
Financial Performance www.ogdcl.com/UploadFolder/financial/32.DirectorsReport.pdf
Profitability Ratios
Gross Profit Margin
67%68%69%70%71% 70%
71%
69%2011-122012-132013-14
Net Profit Margin
36%40%44%48%
49%
41%
48%
2011-122012-132013-14
DuPont Analysis0%
10%20%30%40%50% 42%
32%35%2011-122012-132013-14
Financial Performance
www.ogdcl.com/UploadFolder/financial/32.DirectorsReport.pdf
Liquidity Ratios
Current Ratio01234567 6.67
2.34.04
2011-122012-132013-14
Acid Test Ratio0
2
4
66.26
2.013.65 2011-12
2012-132013-14
CFO to Sales0%
20%40%60%80%
100%120%140%
59%
125%
63% 2011-122012-132013-14
Financial Performance
www.ogdcl.com/UploadFolder/financial/32.DirectorsReport.pdf
Activity/Turnover Ratios
Debtor Turnover in Days
0
40
80
120
160
200200
158
1112011-122012-132013-14
Total Assets Turnover Ra-
tio
50%
54%
58%
62%
66%66%
59%
56% 2011-122012-132013-14
Financial Performance
www.ogdcl.com/UploadFolder/financial/32.DirectorsReport.pdf
Investment/Market Ratios
Price Earning Ratio
0
4
8
127.12
10.789.07
2011-122012-132013-14
Dividend Yield Ratio
0%1%2%3%4%5%
5%4% 4%
2011-122012-132013-14
Dividend Coverage Ratio
0123
3.112.57
3.11
2011-122012-132013-14
Financial Performance
www.ogdcl.com/UploadFolder/financial/32.DirectorsReport.pdf
Long
Term
Ob
ject
ives
To enhance its reserves and production profile and ultimately maximize value for shareholders up to 2018.
To improve reliability and efficiency of supply to the customer.
Maintain Low Cost Operations by 2020. To excel in exploration, development
and commercialization. Pursue Selective International
Expansion. To improve internal business decision
making and strategic planning through state of art MIS by 2017.
To build strategic reserves for future growth / expansion by 2019.
Accelerate Production Growth.
www.ogdcl.com/about-us/Strategy.htmwww.ogdcl.com/UploadFolder/financial/MDRevwt2011.pdfwww.ogdcl.com/UploadFolder/financial/32.DirectorsReport.pdf
SWOT Analysis is conducted to identify the organizational strengths (S), organizational weaknesses (W), environmental opportunities (O), and environmental threats (T). Each analysis helps to know that how these elements influence organizational performance.
SWO
T An
alys
is
SWOT Analysis with Actions
Strengths
• Highly Skilled Professionals
• Vast Experience
• Joint Ventures with Foreign Oil Companies Working in Pakistan
• High market cap and revenue
Weaknesses
• Political Influences
• Limited Customer
• Limited Marketing Opportunity
• Inadequate Financing for off-shore drilling
Opportunities
• Expansion towards a multinational Company
• Expansion towards Exploration & drilling Activities
• Marketing Opportunity for LPG & Sulphur
• Off-shore drilling
Maximize strengths to take advantage of opportunities
• Strong Marketing campaign through distributors to make people aware of LPG
• It should go for countries such as Mexico, Saudi Arabia, and Russia where there is a room for O&G Co.
• Bring new finance through bonds for expansion of drilling activities
Resolve weakness, take advantage of opportunities
• Find new markets such as Mexico, Saudi Arabia, and Russia. There are too many customers
• Marketing of the products should be done appropriately
• New stocks should be brought in to finance the off-shore drilling
Threats
• Latest Technology
• Unproductive wells
• World Market
• Safety Issues / Tribal Issues
Maximize the strengths to mitigate threats
• Have proper safety system for the workers on site
• Joint venture with foreign companies to make wells productive
• Improve the public image to have more options for financing new technology
Minimize weaknesses to reduce threats
• Reduce the political influences on the mgt
• Acquire new technology for drilling purpose.
• Remove political influences to concentrate on world market
Bost
on C
onsu
lting
Gr
oup
Matri
xIt aims to identify high-growth prospects by categorizing the company's products according to growth rate and market share. By optimizing positive cash flows in high-potential products, a company can capitalize on market-share growth opportunities.
Crude Oil
LPG
Gas
SulphurBo
ston
Con
sulti
ng
Grou
p Ma
trix
(BCG
)
Inte
rnal-
Exte
rnal
(IE)
Ma
trix
The Internal-External (IE) matrix is another strategic management tool used to analyze working conditions and strategic position of a business. The Internal External Matrix or short IE matrix is based on an analysis of internal and external business factors which are combined into one suggestive model.
I-E M
atrix
EFE = 2.54IFE = 2.87
Quan
titat
ive S
trate
gic
Plan
ning
Mat
rixIt is a high-level strategic management approach for evaluating possible strategies. Quantitative Strategic Planning Matrix (QSPM) provides an analytical method for comparing feasible alternative actions. The QSPM method falls within so-called stage 3 of the strategy formulation analytical framework.
Strategy Selection
QSP Matrix Weight
Attractiveness Score
Total Attractivene
ss Score
Attractiveness Score
Total Attractivene
ss Score
Strengths• Monopoly of the company • Dynamic & Strong Financial Position • Quality processes and procedures• Confidence of the Customers
0.180.160.130.12
3423
0.540.640.260.36
2343
0.360.480.520.36
Weaknesses• Undifferentiated products• Slow promotion process• Government Influence• Lack of coordination of operations.
0.100.120.100.09
2341
0.200.360.400.09
3321
0.300.360.200.09
Opportunities• Mergers or strategic alliances• Market vacated by an ineffective
competitor• Workshops for training and development• Support of the Ministry of Petroleum &
NR.
0.100.130.160.12
3422
0.300.520.320.24
2223
0.200.260.320.36
Threats• Price wars with competitors• Tuff Competition• Globalization that bring strong companies • Competitors have superior access to
channels of distribution
0.090.120.200.08
3224
0.270.240.400.32
3243
0.270.240.800.24
Sum Of Total Attractiveness Score 2.00 5.46 5.36
Market Development
Market Penetration
Requ
ired
For M
arke
t De
velo
pmen
t Strategic Alliance agreement can be
made with:Pemex in MexicoAldress in Saudi ArabiaNorthgas in Russia Global Business Management System
(expansion in ERP) Capital Expansion through Retained
Earnings and Issuance of Corporate Bonds
Strong infrastructure for communication purpose
Expatriate Management (hiring for this purpose)
Strategy Implementation
Thank You